Conservative treatment of retinoblastoma: a prospective phase II randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by local treatments and chemothermotherapy.

PurposeIntraocular retinoblastoma treatments often combine chemotherapy and focal treatments. A first prospective protocol of conservative treatments in our institution showed the efficacy of the use of two courses of chemoreduction with etoposide and carboplatin, followed by chemothermotherapy using carboplatin as a single agent and diode laser. In order to decrease the possible long-term toxicity of chemotherapy due to etoposide, a randomized neoadjuvant phase II protocol was conducted using vincristine-carboplatin vs etoposide-carboplatin.Patients and methodsThe study was proposed when initial tumor characteristics did not allow front-line local treatments. Patients included in this phase II noncomparative randomized study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy received vincristin-carboplatin (new arm) vs etoposide-carboplatin (our reference arm). They were subsequently treated by local treatments and chemothermotherapy. Primary end point was the need for secondary enucleation or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) not exceeding 40% at 2 years.ResultsA total of 65 eyes in 55 children were included in the study (May 2004 to August 2009). Of these, 32 eyes (27 children) were treated in the arm etoposide-carboplatin and 33 eyes (28 children) in the arm vincristin-carboplatin. At 2 years after treatment, 23/33 (69.7%) eyes were treated and salvaged without EBRT or enucleation in the arm vincristin-carboplatin and 26/32 (81.2%) in the arm etoposide-carboplatin.ConclusionEven if the two treatment arms could be considered as sufficiently active according to the study decision rules, neoadjuvant chemotherapy by two cycles of vincristine-carboplatin followed by chemothermotherapy appear to offer less optimal local control than the etoposide-carboplatin combination.

Does aggressive local treatment have an impact on survival in children with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma?

PURPOSE: Due to the extensive initial distant tumour spread in metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma, the importance of local treatment is sometimes underestimated. A retrospective study was conducted to identify the prognostic value of aggressive local treatment in paediatric metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. PATIENTS: Patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma aged 1-21 years treated in France from 1998 to 2011 according to European protocols MMT-4-89, 4-91, 98 and recent national guidelines were selected. Survival comparison were performed between patients with 'aggressive local treatment' (surgery and radiotherapy) and exclusive surgery or radiotherapy, after exclusion of patients with early progression. End-points were event-free and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 101 children, median age 9 years, with majority of primaries in unfavourable sites (73 patients, pts), T2 tumours (66 pts), alveolar subtypes (65 pts) and large tumours (>5 cm, 83 pts) received various chemotherapy regimens. On univariate and multivariate analyses, OS was better after 'aggressive local treatment' (49 pts; 44.3 ± 8%), than after exclusive surgery (10 pts; 18.8% ± 15.5%) or exclusive radiotherapy (29 pts; 16.1 ± 7.2%, P < 0.006). Moreover, OS was better in the case of surgery with complete resection (41.1 ± 10.2%) or microscopic residue (56.4 ± 14.9%) than macroscopic residue (20.0 ± 12.6%; P < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective analysis, OS appeared to be better for patients receiving 'aggressive local treatment' even after adjustment for the initial patient and tumour characteristics. Isolated debulking surgery is associated with a very poor outcome and should be avoided. Aggressive local treatment in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma, even with metastasis, should be seriously considered.