Treatment approaches and costs associated with diabetes clinical metrics as measured by Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS).

BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes of diabetes can be influenced by primary care providers' (PCP) treatment approaches. This study explores the association between PCP approaches to management and performance measured by established diabetes metrics and related costs. METHODS: In phase one, Electronic Medical Records were used to extract diabetes related metrics using Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), for patients with diabetes who had office visits to 44 PCP practices from April 2019 to March 2020. Using those metrics and scoring system, PCP practices were ranked and then categorized into high- and low-performing groups (top and bottom 25%, n = 11 each), with a total of 19,059 clinic visits by patients with a diagnosis of diabetes. Then extensive analysis was performed to evaluate a correlation between treatment approaches and diabetes outcomes across the top and bottom performing practices. In phase 2, patients with diabetes who were attributed to the aforementioned PCP practices were identified in a local health plan claims data base (a total of 3,221 patients), and the allowed amounts from their claims were used to evaluate differences in total and diabetes-related healthcare costs by providers' performance. RESULTS: Comparing 10,834 visits in high-performing practices to 8,235 visits in low-performing practices, referrals to certified diabetes care and education specialists and provider-to-provider electronic consults (e-consults) were higher in high-performing practices (Z = 6.06, p < .0001), while traditional referrals were higher in low-performing practices (Z = -6.94, p < .0001). The patient-to-provider ratio was higher in the low-performing group (M = 235.23) than in the high-performing group (M = 153.26) (Z = -2.82, p = .0048). Claims data analysis included 1,825 and 1,396 patients from high- and low-performing providers, respectively. The patient-to-provider ratio was again higher in the low-performing group (p = .009, V = 0.62). Patients receiving care from lower-performing practices were more likely to have had a diabetes-related hospital observation (5.7% vs. 3.9%, p = .02; V = 0.04) and higher diabetes-related care costs (p = .002; d = - 0.07); these differences by performance status persisted when controlling for differences in patient and physician characteristics. Patients seeing low-performing providers had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (Mdn = 3) than those seeing high-performing providers (Mdn = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Referrals to the CDCES and e-Consult were associated with better measured diabetes outcomes, as were certain aspects of cost and types of hospital utilization. Higher patients to providers ratio and patients with more comorbidities were observed in low performing group.

Hospital-Care Utilization and Medical Cost Patterns Among Patients With Insulin-Dependent Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Using claims data from an integrated payer-provider, we compared costs incurred by patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) who received Hospital Inpatient/Observation/EmeRgency Department care (HIghER care) for diabetes-related events with those who did not receive such care to identify a target population for interventions in future studies. METHODS: A retrospective study pooled real-world claims data for IDDM (type 1 or type 2) between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019. Medical claims were used to calculate the total and diabetes-related allowed medical costs to the enterprise and per member per month costs. RESULTS: Medical and prescription drug coverage from 19 378 members was analyzed. Only 8.4% of the IDDM population received HIghER care but incurred 20% of medical expenses and nearly 40% of diabetes-related medical costs. For HIghER care patients, medical spending was higher in every inpatient and outpatient category (Wilcoxon 2-sample tests, all P < .0001). Non-diabetes-related prescription drug costs were greater in this group (Wilcoxon test, Z = 2.2879, P = .0221), whereas diabetes-related prescription drug costs were higher for non-HIghER care (Wilcoxon test, Z = -9.5918, P < .0001). In a longitudinal study of 29 602 patients over 24 months, previous-year receipt of HIghER care was a significant predictor of HIghER care the subsequent year (odds ratio, 3.28). CONCLUSION: Medical spending for patients receiving HIghER care was disproportionately high and greater in every inpatient and outpatient category. HIghER care receipt the previous year was highly predictive of HIghER care episodes the following year.

Glycemic Control in Hospitalized Patients with Diabetes Receiving Corticosteroids Using a Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin Protocol: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Hospitalized patients with diabetes receiving corticosteroids are at risk of developing hyperglycemia and related complications. This study evaluated a neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin-based protocol in improving glycemic control in hospitalized patients receiving corticosteroids. METHODS: This was a randomized, prospective, non-blinded study in an inpatient setting involving patients with diabetes who were hospitalized and receiving prednisone ≥ 10 mg per day or equivalent. High dose corticosteroids group (prednisone > 40 mg/day or equivalent) received NPH insulin 0.3 U/kg between 0600 and 2000 hours if eating or 0.2 U/kg between 2000 and 0600 hours if not eating. Low dose corticosteroids group (prednisone 10-40 mg/day or equivalent) received 0.15 U/kg between 0600 and 2000 hours if eating or 0.1 U/kg between 2000 and 0600 hours if not eating. Primary outcome measure was mean blood glucose level measured pre-meal and at bedtime for days 1-5. RESULTS: Mean blood glucose level was lower in the intervention (n = 29) than in the usual care (n = 31) group [226.12 vs. 268.57 mg/dL, respectively, (95% CI for difference - 63.195 to - 21.695), p < 0.0001]. Significant differences in mean glucose level were noted at fasting [170.96 vs. 221.13 mg/dL, respectively, (95% CI for difference - 72.70 to - 27.63), p < 0.0001] and pre-lunch [208 vs. 266.48 mg/dL, respectively, (95% CI for difference - 86.61 to - 30.36), p < 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: In hospitalized patients with diabetes receiving corticosteroids, an NPH insulin-based protocol improves glycemic control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01970241. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.