Plasma cell biology: Foundations for targeted therapeutic development in transplantation.

Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage organ disease. Over the past 70 years, tremendous progress has been made in solid organ transplantation, particularly in T-cell-targeted immunosuppression and organ allocation systems. However, humoral alloimmune responses remain a major challenge to progress. Patients with preexisting antibodies to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) are at significant disadvantages in regard to receiving a well-matched organ, moreover, those who develop anti-HLA antibodies after transplantation face a significant foreshortening of renal allograft survival. Historical therapies to desensitize patients prior to transplantation or to treat posttransplant AMR have had limited effectiveness, likely because they do not significantly reduce antibody levels, as plasma cells, the source of antibody production, remain largely unaffected. Herein, we will discuss the significance of plasma cells in transplantation, aspects of their biology as potential therapeutic targets, clinical challenges in developing strategies to target plasma cells in transplantation, and lastly, novel approaches that have potential to advance the field.

Effects of invivo CXCR4 blockade and proteasome inhibition on bone marrow plasma cells in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates.

To date, plasma cell (PC)-targeted therapies have been limited by suboptimal PC depletion and antibody rebound. We hypothesized this is partly because of PC residence in protective bone marrow (BM) microenvironments. The purpose of this proof-of-concept study was to examine the effects of the CXCR4 antagonist, plerixafor, on PC BM residence; its safety profile (alone and in combination with a proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib); and the transcriptional effect on BMPCs in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Participants were enrolled into 3 groups: group A (n = 4), plerixafor monotherapy; and groups B (n = 4) and C (n = 4), plerixafor and bortezomib combinations. CD34+ stem cell and PC levels increased in the blood after plerixafor treatment. PC recovery from BM aspirates varied depending on the dose of plerixafor and bortezomib. Single-cell RNA sequencing on BMPCs from 3 group C participants pretreatment and posttreatment revealed multiple populations of PCs, with a posttreatment enrichment of oxidative phosphorylation, proteasome assembly, cytoplasmic translation, and autophagy-related genes. Murine studies demonstrated dually inhibiting the proteasome and autophagy resulted in greater BMPC death than did monotherapies. In conclusion, this pilot study revealed anticipated effects of combined plerixafor and bortezomib on BMPCs, an acceptable safety profile, and suggests the potential for autophagy inhibitors in desensitization regimens.

The expanded role of the transplant pharmacist: A 10-year follow-up.

The role of the transplant pharmacist is recognized by transplant programs, governmental groups, and professional organizations as an essential part of the transplant multidisciplinary team. This role has evolved drastically over the last decade with the advent of major advances in the science of transplantation and the growth of the field, which necessitate expanded pharmacy services to meet the needs of patients. Data now exist within all realms of the phases of care for a transplant recipient regarding the utility and benefit of a solid organ transplant (SOT) pharmacist. Furthermore, governing bodies now have the opportunity to use Board Certification in Solid Organ Transplant Pharmacotherapy as a mechanism to identify and recognize specialty knowledge and expertise within the field of SOT pharmacotherapy. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overarching review of the current and future state of SOT pharmacy while also identifying major changes to the profession, forthcoming challenges, and expected areas of growth.

Early initiation of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir after transplantation of HCV-viremic kidneys into HCV-negative recipients is associated with normalization in the altered inflammatory milieu.

Our previous Multicenter Trial to Transplant HCV-infected Kidneys (MYTHIC) observed that 100% of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-uninfected patients who received a kidney from an HCV-infected deceased donor were cured of HCV with an 8-week regimen of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (G/P) initiated 2-5 days after transplantation. Following acute and chronic infection with HCV, immune system perturbations have been reported to persist even after viral clearance. The aim of this study was to determine whether HCV viremic kidney recipients in the MYTHIC study experience sustained changes in the soluble inflammatory milieu associated with HCV infection. Among nine patients with HCV viremia at day 3 post-kidney transplant (post-KT D3), IP-10, IL-10, MIP-1ß, and IL-8 were significantly elevated from baseline. However, over the subsequent visits, there was a rapid, dramatic reduction back to baseline levels. Among seven patients who were not HCV viremic at post-KT D3, the cytokine levels did not significantly change. HCV-uninfected patients who received a kidney from an HCV-viremic deceased donor and were treated with early G/P experienced only transient alterations in the soluble inflammatory milieu. These data provide reassuring evidence that there appear to be no persistent cytokine disturbances with transient HCV viremia accompanying HCV donor positive/recipient negative kidney transplant.

A call for transplant stewardship: The need for expanded evidence-based evaluation of induction and biologic-based cost-saving strategies in kidney transplantation and beyond.

Rising expenditures threaten healthcare sustainability. While transplant programs are typically considered profitable, transplant medications are expensive and frequently targeted for cost savings. This review aims to summarize available literature supporting cost-containment strategies used in solid organ transplant. Despite widespread use of these tactics, we found the available evidence to be fairly low quality. Strategies mainly focus on induction, particularly rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG), given its significant cost and the lack of consensus surrounding dosing. While there is higher-quality evidence for high single-dose rATG, and dose-rounding protocols to reduce waste are likely low risk, more aggressive strategies, such as dosing rATG by CD3+ target-attainment or on ideal-body-weight, have less robust support and did not always attain similar efficacy outcomes. Extrapolation of induction dosing strategies to rejection treatment is not supported by any currently available literature. Cost-saving strategies for supportive therapies, such as IVIG and rituximab also have minimal literature support. Deferral of high-cost agents to the outpatient arena is associated with minimal risk and increases reimbursement, although may increase complexity and cost-burden for patients and infusion centers. The available evidence highlights the need for evaluation of unique patient-specific clinical scenarios and optimization of therapies, rather than simple blanket application of cost-saving initiatives in the transplant population.

Multicenter Study to Transplant Hepatitis C-Infected Kidneys (MYTHIC): An Open-Label Study of Combined Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir to Treat Recipients of Transplanted Kidneys from Deceased Donors with Hepatitis C Virus Infection.

BACKGROUND: Single-center trials and retrospective case series have reported promising outcomes using kidneys from donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, multicenter trials are needed to determine if those findings are generalizable. METHODS: We conducted a prospective trial at seven centers to transplant 30 kidneys from deceased donors with HCV viremia into HCV-uninfected recipients, followed by 8 weeks of once-daily coformulated glecaprevir and pibrentasvir, targeted to start 3 days posttransplant. Key outcomes included sustained virologic response (undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after completing treatment with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir), adverse events, and allograft function. RESULTS: We screened 76 patients and enrolled 63 patients, of whom 30 underwent kidney transplantation from an HCV-viremic deceased donor (median kidney donor profile index, 53%) in May 2019 through October 2019. The median time between consent and transplantation of a kidney from an HCV-viremic donor was 6.3 weeks. All 30 recipients achieved a sustained virologic response. One recipient died of complications of sepsis 4 months after achieving a sustained virologic response. No severe adverse events in any patient were deemed likely related to HCV infection or treatment with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir. Three recipients developed acute cellular rejection, which was borderline in one case. Three recipients developed polyomavirus (BK) viremia near or >10,000 copies/ml that resolved after reduction of immunosuppression. All recipients had good allograft function, with a median creatinine of 1.2 mg/dl and median eGFR of 57 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our multicenter trial demonstrated safety and efficacy of transplantation of 30 HCV-viremic kidneys into HCV-negative recipients, followed by early initiation of an 8-week regimen of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir.

A prospective, iterative, adaptive trial of carfilzomib-based desensitization.

Proteasome inhibitor-based strategies hold promise in transplant but have yielded varying results. Carfilzomib, a second-generation proteasome inhibitor, may possess advantages over bortezomib, the first-generation proteasome inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, toxicity, and preliminary efficacy of carfilzomib in highly HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Renal transplant candidates received escalating doses of carfilzomib followed by plasmapheresis (group A) or an identical regimen with additional plasmapheresis once weekly before carfilzomib dosing. Thirteen participants received carfilzomib, which was well tolerated with most adverse events classified as low grade. The safety profile was similar to bortezomib desensitization; however, neurotoxicity was not observed with carfilzomib. Toxicity resulted in permanent dose reduction in 1 participant but caused no withdrawals or deaths. HLA antibodies were substantially reduced with carfilzomib alone, and median maximal immunodominant antibody reduction was 72.8% (69.8% for group A, P = .031, 80.1% for group B, P = .938). After depletion, rebound occurred rapidly and antibody levels returned to baseline between days 81 and 141. Bone marrow studies revealed that approximately 69.2% of plasma cells were depleted after carfilzomib monotherapy. Carfilzomib monotherapy-based desensitization provides an acceptable safety and toxicity profile while leading to significant bone marrow plasma cell depletion and anti-HLA antibody reduction.

Proteasomal adaptations underlying carfilzomib-resistance in human bone marrow plasma cells.

Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) have a deleterious effect on allografts and remain a major immunologic barrier in transplantation. Current therapies to eliminate DSAs are ineffective in highly HLA-sensitized patients. Proteasome inhibitors have been employed as a strategy to target bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs), the source of long-term antibody production; however, their efficacy has been limited by poorly defined drug-resistance mechanisms. Here, we performed transcriptomic profiling of CD138+ BMPCs that survived in vivo desensitization therapy with the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib to identify mechanisms of drug resistance. The results revealed a genomic signature that included increased expression of the immunoproteasome, a highly specialized proteasomal variant. Western blotting and functional studies demonstrated that catalytically active immunoproteasomes and the immunoproteasome activator PA28 were upregulated in carfilzomib-resistant BMPCs. Carfilzomib-resistant BMPCs displayed reduced sensitivity to the proteasome inhibitors carfilzomib, bortezomib, and ixazomib, but enhanced sensitivity to an immunoproteasome-specific inhibitor ONX-0914. Finally, in vitro carfilzomib treatment of BMPCs from HLA-sensitized patients increased levels of the immunoproteasome ß5i (PSMB8) catalytic subunit suggesting that carfilzomib therapy directly induces an adaptive immunoproteasome response. Taken together, our results indicate that carfilzomib induces structural changes in proteasomes and immunoproteasome formation.

Belatacept-based immunosuppression with simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance and early corticosteroid withdrawal: A prospective, randomized multicenter trial.

Simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance (CNIA) and early corticosteroid withdrawal (ESW) have not been achieved primarily due to excessive acute rejection. This trial compared 2 belatacept-based CNIA/ESW regimens with a tacrolimus-based ESW regimen. Kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive alemtuzumab/belatacept, rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG)/belatacept, or rATG/tacrolimus. The combinatorial primary endpoint consisted of patient death, renal allograft loss, or a Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-calculated eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 12 months. Results are reported by treatment group (alemtuzumab/belatacept, rATG/belatacept, and rATG/tacrolimus). Superiority was not observed at 1 year for the primary endpoint (9/107 [8.4%], 15/104 [14.4%], and 14/105 [13.3%], respectively; P = NS) for either belatacept-based regimen. Differences were not observed for secondary endpoints (death, death-censored graft loss, or estimated glomerular filtration rates < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). Differences were observed in biopsy-proved acute cellular rejection (10.3%, 18.3%, and 1.9%, respectively) (P < .001), but not in antibody-mediated rejection, mixed acute rejection, or de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies. Neurologic and electrolyte abnormality adverse events were less frequent under belatacept. Belatacept-based CNIA/ESW regimens did not prove to be superior for the primary or secondary endpoints. Belatacept-treated patients demonstrated an increase in biopsy-proved acute cellular rejection and reduced neurologic and metabolic adverse events. These results demonstrate that simultaneous CNIA/ESW is feasible without excessive acute rejection.

Cost-effectiveness of Using Kidneys From HCV-Viremic Donors for Transplantation Into HCV-Uninfected Recipients.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Less than 4% of patients with kidney failure receive kidney transplants. Although discard rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-viremic kidneys are declining, ~39% of HCV-viremic kidneys donated between 2018 and 2019 were discarded. Highly effective antiviral agents are now available to treat chronic HCV infection. Thus, our objective was to examine the cost-effectiveness of transplanting kidneys from HCV-viremic donors into HCV-uninfected recipients. STUDY DESIGN: Markov state transition decision model. Data sources include Medline search results, bibliographies from relevant English language articles, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, and the US Renal Data System. SETTING & POPULATION: US patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who are on kidney transplant waiting lists. INTERVENTION(S): Transplantation with an HCV-unexposed kidney versus transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney and HCV treatment. OUTCOMES: Effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life-years and costs measured in 2018 US dollars. MODEL, PERSPECTIVE, AND TIMEFRAME: We used a health care system perspective with a lifelong time horizon. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney was more effective and less costly than transplantation with an HCV-unexposed kidney because of the longer waiting times for HCV-unexposed kidneys, the substantial excess mortality risk while receiving dialysis, and the high efficacy of direct-acting antiviral agents for HCV infection. Transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney was also preferred in sensitivity analyses of multiple model parameters. The strategy remained cost-effective unless waiting list time for an HCV-viremic kidney exceeded 3.1 years compared with the base-case value of 1.56 year. LIMITATIONS: Estimates of waiting times for patients willing to accept an HCV-viremic kidney were based on data for patients who received HCV-viremic kidney transplants. CONCLUSIONS: Transplanting kidneys from HCV-viremic donors into HCV-uninfected recipients increased quality-adjusted life expectancy and reduced costs compared with a strategy of transplanting kidneys from HCV-unexposed donors.

Chronopharmacokinetics and Food Effects of Single-Dose LCP-Tacrolimus in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: A modified-release version of tacrolimus, LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT; Envarsus XR, Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Cary, NC), has been licensed in the United States for prophylaxis of organ rejection in de novo kidney transplant patients. As tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, the impact of circadian patterns on LCPT drug exposure, including food and chronopharmacokinetic effects, needs to be elucidated to optimize dosing. METHODS: Two randomized, crossover, phase 1 studies were conducted in healthy volunteers. The first assessed the effect of morning versus evening dosing on the pharmacokinetic profile of LCPT 2 mg; the second assessed the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic profile of LCPT 5 mg. In both, blood samples were drawn from participants for up to 144 hours after administration of a single LCPT dose. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between evening and morning dosing in peak blood concentration (4.4 versus 4.0 ng/mL; P = 0.27), area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) from time 0 to time of the last concentration (89.1 versus 102.6 ng/mL; P = 0.20), AUC from time 0 to infinity (99.7 versus 114.3 ng·h/mL; P = 0.18), AUC from 0 to 24 hours post-dose (AUC0-24; 49.4 versus 51.6 ng·h/mL; P = 0.56), time to reach maximum blood concentration (median, 6.0 versus 6.0 hours; P = 0.91), total clearance (arithmetic mean = 21.5 versus 19.5 L/h; P = 0.50), or terminal half-life (arithmetic mean = 26.8 versus 28.1 hours; P = 0.26). After a high-calorie meal in the morning, the AUC0-24 reduced by 54% (ratio of geometric means = 45.6%; P < 0.0001) and peak blood concentration reduced by 22% (ratio of geometric means = 78.4%; P = 0.0006). However, the terminal half-life did not differ between fasted and fed states (33.3 versus 34.8 hours; P = 0.16), implying that these differences occurred because of altered bioavailability rather than modified clearance. CONCLUSIONS: For LCPT, no chronopharmacokinetic effects were observed, whereas food significantly reduced the 24-h exposure and the peak blood concentration.

Evidence of a clinically significant drug-drug interaction between cannabidiol and tacrolimus.

Cannabidiol (CBD), a major purified nonpsychoactive component of cannabis with anticonvulsant properties, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in June 2018 as an adjuvant treatment for refractory epilepsy (Epidiolex; GW Pharmaceuticals). CBD is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 and CYP2C19 with a growing body of evidence suggesting it is also a potent inhibitor of these pathways. We report for the first time a significant drug-drug interaction between the purified CBD product and tacrolimus. A participant in a CBD clinical trial for epilepsy who was also receiving tacrolimus showed an approximately 3-fold increase in dose-normalized tacrolimus concentrations while receiving 2000-2900 mg/day of CBD. Our report delineates an important concern for the transplant community with the increasing legalization of cannabis and advent of an FDA-approved CBD product. Larger studies are needed to better understand the impact of this drug-drug interaction in solid organ transplant recipients.

Assessment of tacrolimus intrapatient variability in stable adherent transplant recipients: Establishing baseline values.

The purpose of this study was to determine the intrapatient (within the same patient) variability of tacrolimus in adherent patients. Daily tacrolimus trough levels were obtained at home using dried blood spot technology in kidney and liver transplant recipients. Patients were randomized to receive 3 formulations of tacrolimus, each for two 1-week periods. Adherence was monitored by patient diary, pill counts, and use of the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS). Variability was quantified as the coefficient of variation (CV). Comparison of CV between groups was by independent t test or one-way ANOVA as appropriate. The population was found to be adherent with a rate of 99.9% with a mean interval between the evening and morning dose of tacrolimus of 11.86 hours. The median CV for the entire population was 15.2% (range 4.8%-110%). There were no differences in CV by allograft type or tacrolimus formulation. The multivariate analysis did not identify any demographic characteristics associated with a CV > 30%. In a highly adherent population, tacrolimus did not display high intrapatient variability. Given the association between IPV and poor allograft outcomes, future studies are needed to quantitate the influence of adherence and establish target IPV goals.

Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin for the prevention of acute rejection in kidney transplantation.

This report describes the results of 2 international randomized trials (total of 508 kidney transplant recipients). The primary objective was to assess the noninferiority of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG, Thymoglobulin® ) versus interleukin-2 receptor antagonists (IL2RAs) for the quadruple endpoint (treatment failure defined as biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, or loss to follow-up) to serve as the pivotal data for United States (US) regulatory approval of rATG. The pooled analysis provided an incidence of treatment failure of 25.1% in the rATG and 36.0% in the IL2RA treatment groups, an absolute difference of -10.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] -18.8% to -2.9%) supporting noninferiority (noninferiority margin was 10%) and superiority of rATG to IL2RA. In a meta-analysis of 7 trials comparing rATG with an IL2RA, the difference in the proportion of patients with BPAR at 12 months was -4.8% (95% CI -8.6% to -0.9%) in favor of rATG. In conclusion, a rigorous reanalysis of patient-level data from 2 prior randomized, controlled trials comparing rATG versus IL-2R monoclonal antibodies provided support for regulatory approval for rATG for induction therapy in renal transplant, making it the first T cell-depleting therapy approved for the prophylaxis of acute rejection in patients receiving a kidney transplant in the United States.

Use of HCV Ab+/NAT- donors in HCV naïve renal transplant recipients to expand the kidney donor pool.

Hepatitis C (HCV) disease transmission from the use of HCV antibody-positive and HCV nucleic acid test-negative (HCV Ab+/NAT-) kidneys have been anecdotally reported to be absent. We prospectively analyzed kidney transplant (KT) outcomes from HCV Ab+/NAT- donors to HCV naïve recipients under T-cell depleting early steroid withdrawal immunosuppression. Allografts from 40 HCV Ab+/NAT- donors were transplanted to 52 HCV Ab- recipients between July 2016 and February 2018. Thirty-three (82.5%) of donors met Public Health Service (PHS) increased risk criteria. De novo HCV infection was detected at 3 months post-KT in one recipient (1.9%). This was a case of transmission from a HCV Ab+ NAT+ donor with an initial false-negative NAT completed using sample collected on donor hospital admission (day 2). At the time of HCV diagnosis, a stored donor sample collected during procurement (day 4) was tested and resulted NAT-positive. Subsequently, sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved with 12 weeks of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. One death with functioning graft at 261 days post-KT was determined not related to HCV or donor factors. This experience provides evidence of a low transmission rate of HCV from HCV Ab+/ NAT- kidney donors, thereby arguing for increasing utilization.

A phase Ib, open-label, single arm study to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and impact on humoral sensitization of SANGUINATE infusion in patients with end-stage renal disease.

The endeavor to study desensitization in kidney transplantation has not been matched by an effort to investigate strategies to prevent sensitization. In this study (NCT02437422), we investigated the safety, impact on sensitization, and pharmacokinetics of SANGUINATE (SG), a hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier, as a potential alternative to packed red blood cells (PRBC) in transplant candidates with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Ten ESRD subjects meeting inclusion/exclusion (I/E) criteria were planned to receive three weekly infusions of SG (320 mg/kg). The study was stopped after five subjects were enrolled, and their data were analyzed after completing a follow-up period of 90 days. Two subjects had elevated troponin I levels in setting of SG infusion, one of which was interpreted as a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. All other adverse events were transient. SG pharmacokinetic analysis showed mean (SD) Cmax , Tmax , AUC, and half-life of 4.39 (0.69) mg/mL, 2.42 (0.91) hours, 171.86 (52.35) mg h/mL, and 40.60 (11.96) hours, respectively. None of the subjects developed new anti-HLA antibodies following SG infusion and throughout the study period. In conclusion, SG is a potential alternative to PRBCs in ESRD patients considered for kidney transplantation as it was not associated with humoral sensitization. Larger studies in highly sensitized patients are required to further evaluate for potential safety signals.

Bioequivalence between innovator and generic tacrolimus in liver and kidney transplant recipients: A randomized, crossover clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Although the generic drug approval process has a long-term successful track record, concerns remain for approval of narrow therapeutic index generic immunosuppressants, such as tacrolimus, in transplant recipients. Several professional transplant societies and publications have generated skepticism of the generic approval process. Three major areas of concern are that the pharmacokinetic properties of generic products and the innovator (that is, "brand") product in healthy volunteers may not reflect those in transplant recipients, bioequivalence between generic and innovator may not ensure bioequivalence between generics, and high-risk patients may have specific bioequivalence concerns. Such concerns have been fueled by anecdotal observations and retrospective and uncontrolled published studies, while well-designed, controlled prospective studies testing the validity of the regulatory bioequivalence testing approach for narrow therapeutic index immunosuppressants in transplant recipients have been lacking. Thus, the present study prospectively assesses bioequivalence between innovator tacrolimus and 2 generics in individuals with a kidney or liver transplant. METHODS AND FINDINGS: From December 2013 through October 2014, a prospective, replicate dosing, partially blinded, randomized, 3-treatment, 6-period crossover bioequivalence study was conducted at the University of Cincinnati in individuals with a kidney (n = 35) or liver transplant (n = 36). Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDA) data that included manufacturing and healthy individual pharmacokinetic data for all generics were evaluated to select the 2 most disparate generics from innovator, and these were named Generic Hi and Generic Lo. During the 8-week study period, pharmacokinetic studies assessed the bioequivalence of Generic Hi and Generic Lo with the Innovator tacrolimus and with each other. Bioequivalence of the major tacrolimus metabolite was also assessed. All products fell within the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) average bioequivalence (ABE) acceptance criteria of a 90% confidence interval contained within the confidence limits of 80.00% and 125.00%. Within-subject variability was similar for the area under the curve (AUC) (range 12.11-15.81) and the concentration maximum (Cmax) (range 17.96-24.72) for all products. The within-subject variability was utilized to calculate the scaled average bioequivalence (SCABE) 90% confidence interval. The calculated SCABE 90% confidence interval was 84.65%-118.13% and 80.00%-125.00% for AUC and Cmax, respectively. The more stringent SCABE acceptance criteria were met for all product comparisons for AUC and Cmax in both individuals with a kidney transplant and those with a liver transplant. European Medicines Agency (EMA) acceptance criteria for narrow therapeutic index drugs were also met, with the only exception being in the case of Brand versus Generic Lo, in which the upper limits of the 90% confidence intervals were 111.30% (kidney) and 112.12% (liver). These were only slightly above the upper EMA acceptance criteria limit for an AUC of 111.11%. SCABE criteria were also met for the major tacrolimus metabolite 13-O-desmethyl tacrolimus for AUC, but it failed the EMA criterion. No acute rejections, no differences in renal function in all individuals, and no differences in liver function were observed in individuals with a liver transplant using the Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) test for multiple comparisons. Fifty-two percent and 65% of all individuals with a kidney or liver transplant, respectively, reported an adverse event. The Exact McNemar test for paired categorical data with adjustments for multiple comparisons was used to compare adverse event rates among the products. No statistically significant differences among any pairs of products were found for any adverse event code or for adverse events overall. Limitations of this study include that the observations were made under strictly controlled conditions that did not allow for the impact of nonadherence or feeding on the possible pharmacokinetic differences. Generic Hi and Lo were selected based upon bioequivalence data in healthy volunteers because no pharmacokinetic data in recipients were available for all products. The safety data should be interpreted in light of the small number of participants and the short observation periods. Lastly, only the 1 mg tacrolimus strength was utilized in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Using an innovative, controlled bioequivalence study design, we observed equivalence between tacrolimus innovator and 2 generic products as well as between 2 generic products in individuals after kidney or liver transplantation following current FDA bioequivalence metrics. These results support the position that bioequivalence for the narrow therapeutic index drug tacrolimus translates from healthy volunteers to individuals receiving a kidney or liver transplant and provides evidence that generic products that are bioequivalent with the innovator product are also bioequivalent to each other. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01889758.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic analysis of immunosuppressive agents after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Severe obesity has been shown to limit access to renal transplantation in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been performed in the ESRD population to assist in achieving waitlist and transplant eligibility. Little is known about how LSG impacts the bioequivalence of tacrolimus products and immunosuppression pharmacokinetics. METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, single-dose, crossover, two-period pharmacokinetic (PK) study. The purpose of this study was to assess single-dose PK of immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC), extended-release tacrolimus (ER-TAC), and mycophenolic acid (MPA) in adult ESRD patients post-LSG. RESULTS: Twenty-three subjects were included in the 24-hour PK assessments. The ratio of geometric means between ER-TAC and IR-TAC was 103.5% (90% CI; 89.6%-119.6%) for AUC0-24 and 92.5% (90% CI; 80.4%-106.4%) for Cmax . PK parameters were similar between ER-TAC and IR-TAC, except for Cmin (P=.004) and Cmax (P=.04). MPA AUC0-24 was similar when given with either ER-TAC or IR-TAC (P=.32). Patients expressing CYP3A5*1 genotypes had lower tacrolimus AUC0-24 values vs those with CYP3A5*3/*3 (IR-TACP<.001; ER-TACP=.008). Genotype did not impact MPA PK. CONCLUSION: Dose modification of immunosuppressants post-LSG may not be necessary aside from standard therapeutic drug monitoring.

LCPT once-daily extended-release tacrolimus tablets versus twice-daily capsules: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 trials in important de novo and stable kidney transplant recipient subgroups.

African-American and elderly kidney transplant recipients (KTR) have increased risk for poor clinical outcomes post-transplant. Management of immunosuppression may be challenging in these patients and contribute to worse outcomes. A novel once-daily formulation of tacrolimus (LCPT) has demonstrated noninferiority, similar safety, improved bioavailability, a consistent concentration time profile, and less peak and peak-trough fluctuations vs. tacrolimus twice-daily (Tac BID). This pooled analysis of two phase 3 randomized, controlled trials, including 861 (LCPT N = 428; Tac BID N = 433; 38% of patients were stable KTR, and 62% were de novo KTR) patients, examined the efficacy of LCPT in KTR subgroups (blacks, females, and age ≥65). Overall, treatment failure [death, graft failure, centrally read biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), or lost to follow-up] at 12 months was as follows: LCPT: 11.9%, BID Tac: 13.4% [-1.48% (-5.95%, 2.99%)]. BPAR rates were as follows: LCPT: 8.2%, Tac BID: 9.5% [-1.29% (-5.14%, 2.55%)]. Numerically, fewer treatment failure events with LCPT were found in the majority of subgroups, with significantly less treatment failure associated with LCPT among black KTR [-13.82% (-27.22%, -0.31%)] and KTR ≥65 [-13.46% (-25.27%, -0.78%)]. This pooled analysis suggests numerically lower efficacy failure rates associated with LCPT among high-risk subgroups, in particular black KTR and KTR ≥65 years old.

Absence of the Effect of Pretransplant Body Mass Index on Post Kidney Transplant Outcomes.

CONTEXT: Obesity has been reported as risk factor for reduced posttransplant graft and patient survival and increased delayed graft function (DGF). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work is to analyze the effect of body mass index (BMI) on defined transplant outcomes in patients transplanted under defined guidelines in a kidney transplant program. DESIGN: Review of a prospectively collected database in renal transplant recipients receiving rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and early corticosteroid withdrawal between 2001 and 2011. SETTING: This review was conducted in a single abdominal transplant program in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was death-censored graft survival categorized by posttransplant body mass groups. Secondary outcomes included DGF as well as patient survival. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty seven patients were identified. No difference was observed in graft survival or DGF between BMI groups. One-year, death-censored graft survival and patient survival rates ranged from 97.5% to 100% and 96.6% to 100%, respectively. Delayed graft function was uncommon across all BMI groups, ranging from 5.3% to 9.1%, with the lowest incidence in patients with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2). Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates at 1 year were similar across all groups (10.1%-14%) as were estimated glomerular filtration rates were at 1, 3, and 5 years. CONCLUSION: Our results do not show an effect of BMI on posttransplant outcomes, suggesting that relaxation of BMI criteria may be warranted for recipient selection.