The treatment of posterolateral knee instability with combined arthroscopic popliteus bypass and PCL reconstruction provides good-to-excellent clinical results in the mid-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who were treated with an arthroscopic popliteus bypass (PB) technique, in cases of a posterolateral rotational instability (PLRI) and a concomitant posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury of the knee. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series in which 23 patients were clinically evaluated after a minimum of 2 years following arthroscopic PB and combined PCL reconstruction. Lysholm, Tegner and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome scores as well as visual analog scales (VAS) for joint function and pain were evaluated. Posterior laxity was objectified with stress radiography and a Rolimeter examination. Rotational instability was graded with the dial test. RESULTS: 23 patients were available for follow-up, 46.0 ± 13.6 months after surgery. The median time interval from the initial injury to the surgery was 6.0 (3.5;10.5) months. The postoperative Lysholm Score was 95.0 (49-100); the Tegner Score changed from 6.0 (3-10) before the injury to 5.0 (0-10) at the follow-up examination (p = 0.013). The side-to-side difference on stress radiography (SSD) of posterior translation changed from 10.4 (6.6-14.8) mm before the injury to 4.0 (0.2-5.7) mm postoperatively (p < 0.01). Rotational instability was reduced to grade A (82.6%) or B (17.4%) (IKDC). The Rolimeter SSD was 2.0 (0-3) mm at the follow-up examination. VAS Function 0 (0-5), VAS pain 0 (0-6). CONCLUSIONS: The arthroscopic PB graft technique provided good-to-excellent clinical results in the mid-term follow-up in patients with type A PLRI and concomitant PCL injury. However, an exact differentiation of lateral, rotational and dorsal instabilities of posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries is crucial, for the correct choice of therapy, as cases with lateral instabilities require more complex reconstruction techniques. Arthroscopic posterolateral corner reconstruction is a safe procedure with a high success rate in the mid-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

[Current treatment standard for patella fractures in Germany]. / Aktueller Versorgungsstandard von Patellafrakturen in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patella fractures is technically demanding. Although the radiological results are mostly satisfactory, this often does not correspond to the subjective assessment of the patients. The classical treatment with tension band wiring with K­wires has several complications. Fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis seems to be biomechanically advantageous. OBJECTIVE: Who is treating patella fractures in Germany? What is the current standard of treatment? Have modern forms of osteosynthesis become established? What are the most important complications? MATERIAL AND METHODS: The members of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery and the German Knee Society were asked to participate in an online survey. RESULTS: A total of 511 completed questionnaires were evaluated. Most of the respondents are specialized in trauma surgery (51.5%), have many years of professional experience and work in trauma centers. Of the surgeons 50% treat ≤5 patella fractures annually. In almost 40% of the cases preoperative imaging is supplemented by computed tomography. The classical tension band wiring with K­wires is still the preferred form of osteosynthesis for all types of fractures (transverse fractures 52%, comminuted fractures 40%). In the case of comminuted fractures 30% of the surgeons choose fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis. If the inferior pole is involved a McLaughlin cerclage is used for additional protection in 60% of the cases. DISCUSSION: The standard of care for patella fractures in Germany largely corresponds to the updated S2e guidelines. Tension band wiring is still the treatment of choice. Further (long-term) clinical studies are needed to verify the advantages of fixed-angle plates.

Preoperative medial knee instability is an underestimated risk factor for failure of revision ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to carefully analyse the reasons for revision ACLR failure to optimize the surgical revision technique and minimize the risk of recurrent re-rupture. Large studies with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up that clinically examine patients with revision ACLR are rare. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2016, 111 patients who underwent revision ACLR were included in the retrospective study. All patients were examined for a minimum of 2 years after revision surgery (35 ± 3.4 months, mean ± STD) and identified as "failed revision ACLR" (side-to-side difference ≥ 5 mm and pivot-shift grade 2/3) or "stable revision ACLR". RESULTS: Failure after revision ACLR occurred in 14.5% (n = 16) of the cases. Preoperative medial knee instability (n = 36) was associated with failure; thus, patients had a 17 times greater risk of failure when medial knee instability was diagnosed (p = 0.015). The risk of failure was reduced when patients had medial stabilization (n = 24, p = 0.034) and extra-articular lateral tenodesis during revision surgery (n = 51, p = 0.028). Increased posterior tibial slope (n = 11 ≥ 12°, p = 0.046) and high-grade anterior knee laxity (side-to-side difference > 6 mm and pivot-shift grade 3, n = 41, p = 0.034) were associated with increased failure of revision ACLR. Obese patients had a 9 times greater risk of failure (p = 0.008, n = 30). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the largest revision ACLR patient group with pre- and postoperative clinical examination data and a follow-up of 2 years published to date. Preoperative medial knee instability is an underestimated risk factor for revision ACLR failure. Additionally, high-grade anterior knee laxity, increased PTS and high BMI are risk factors for failure of revision ACLR, while additional medial stabilization and lateral extra-articular tenodesis reduce the risk of failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Lower Failure Rates and Improved Patient Outcome Due to Reconstruction of the MCL and Revision ACL Reconstruction in Chronic Medial Knee Instability.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant lesion of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is associated with a greater risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare two medial stabilization techniques in patients with revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and concomitant chronic medial knee instability. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: In a retrospective study, we included 53 patients with revision ACLR and chronic grade 2 medial knee instability to compare medial surgical techniques (MCL reconstruction [n = 17] vs repair [n = 36]). Postoperative failure of the revision ACLR (primary aim) was defined as side-to-side difference in Rolimeter testing ≥5 mm or pivot-shift grade ≥2. Clinical parameters and postoperative functional scores (secondary aim) were evaluated with a mean ± SD follow-up of 28.8 ± 9 months (range, 24-69 months). RESULTS: Revision ACLR was performed in 53 patients with additional grade 2 medial instability (men, n = 33; women, n = 20; mean age, 31.3 ± 12 years). Failure occurred in 5.9% (n = 1) in the MCL reconstruction group, whereas 36.1% (n = 13) of patients with MCL repair showed a failed revision ACLR (P = .02). In the postoperative assessment, the anterior side-to-side difference in Rolimeter testing was significantly reduced (1.5 ± 1.9 mm vs 2.9 ± 2.3 mm; P = .037), and medial knee instability occurred significantly less (18% vs 50%; P = .025) in the MCL reconstruction group than in the MCL repair group. In the logistic regression, patients showed a 9-times elevated risk of failure when an MCL repair was performed (P = .043). Patient-reported outcomes were increased in the MCL reconstruction group as compared with MCL repair, but only the Lysholm score showed a significant difference (Tegner, 5.6 ± 1.9 vs 5.3 ± 1.6; International Knee Documentation Committee, 80.3 ± 16.6 vs 73.6 ± 16.4; Lysholm, 82.9 ± 13.6 vs 75.1 ± 21.1 [P = .047]). CONCLUSION: MCL reconstruction led to lower failure rates in patients with combined revision ACLR and chronic medial instability as compared with MCL repair. MCL reconstruction was superior to MCL repair, as lower postoperative anterior instability, an increased Lysholm score, and less medial instability were present after revision ACLR. MCL repair was associated with a 9-times greater risk of failure.

Intraarticular osteotomy of malunited tibial plateau fractures: an analysis of clinical results with a mean follow-up after 4 years.

PURPOSE: Malunions are a common complication after tibial plateau fractures (TPF), leading to stiffness, pseudo-instability and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to analyse the clinical outcome after intraarticular osteotomy of malunited TPF and to perform a failure analysis. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2018, 23 patients (11 males, 12 females; 43.8 ± 12.8 years) with intraarticular osteotomy after malunited TPF were included in the retrospective study. Clinical examination and postoperative scores were collected with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Malunion was measured on pre- and postoperative CT scans and localized according to the 10-segment classification while the leg axis in the frontal plane was measured pre- and postoperatively on long leg standing radiographs. RESULTS: Excellent and good clinical outcome was achieved in 73.9% (n = 17) of the cases and patient related outcome improved significantly (Tegner 3.3 ± 1.6-5 ± 1.8, p < 0.001; clinical Rasmussen 14.6 ± 3.8-24.9 ± 4.4, p < 0.001). Radiological parameters also improved as an intraarticular step-off was reduced from 9 ± 3.8 to 0.6 ± 0.8 mm (p < 0.001) and a lower limb malalignment from 7.2 ± 4.8° to 1.5 ± 1.9° (p = 0.003). Failure analysis showed that an impaired clinical result correlated with a postoperative extension (n = 3, p < 0.001) and flexion deficit (n = 4, p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Intraarticular osteotomy of malunited TPF lead to good clinical results with significant clinical and radiological improvement in most cases while an impaired patient outcome correlated with a limited range of motion. This study is the first failure analysis of intraarticular osteotomy after malunited TPF published up to now.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis in patients with revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and high-grade anterior knee instability.

BACKGROUND: Additional lateral extra-articular procedures can reduce the risk of failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). There is limited evidence on the effect of lateral extra-articular procedures in revision ACL surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in combination with revision ACLR for combined ACL graft failure and high-grade anterior knee instability. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2018, 75 patients with graft failure after primary ACLR and high-grade anterior knee instability who received revision ACLR were included in the retrospective study. High-grade anterior knee instability was defined as high-grade pivot-shift or side-to-side difference of more than six millimeters in Rolimeter®-testing. An additional modified Lemaire tenodesis was performed in 59 patients during revision ACLR. Seventy-three patients were clinically examined with a minimum of two years after revision surgery. RESULTS: Failure of the revision ACLR occurred in 8.2% (n = 6) of the cases. LET lead to significant decreased failure rates (five percent vs. 21%, p = .045) and decreased incidence of a positive pivot-shift in patients with revision ACLR and high-grade anterior knee instability in comparison to patients without LET. Also, postoperative functional scores were significantly increased in the group of additional LET. CONCLUSIONS: Additional LET in patients with revision ACLR and high-grade anterior instability significantly reduces the risk of failure of revision ACLR, the incidence of pivot-shift and increases postoperative functional outcome.

Slope-Correction Osteotomy with Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Highly Effective in Treating High-Grade Anterior Knee Laxity.

BACKGROUND: Both an elevated posterior tibial slope (PTS) and high-grade anterior knee laxity are often present in patients who undergo revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, and these conditions are independent risk factors for ACL graft failure. Clinical data on slope-correction osteotomy combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) do not yet exist. PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and slope-correction osteotomy combined with LET. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2018, we performed a 2-stage procedure: slope-correction osteotomy was performed first, and then revision ACLR in combination with LET was performed in 22 patients with ACLR failure and high-grade anterior knee laxity. Twenty patients (6 women and 14 men; mean age, 27.8 ± 8.6 years; range, 18-49 years) were evaluated, with a mean follow-up of 30.5 ± 9.3 months (range, 24-56 months), in this retrospective case series. Postoperative failure was defined as a side-to-side difference of ≥5 mm in the Rolimeter test and a pivot-shift grade of 2 or 3. RESULTS: The PTS decreased from 15.3° to 8.9°, the side-to-side difference decreased from 7.2 to 1.1 mm, and the pivot shift was no longer evident in any of the patients. No patients exhibited revision ACLR failure and all patients showed good to excellent postoperative functional scores (mean ± SD: visual analog scale, 0.5 ± 0.6; Tegner, 6.1 ± 0.9; Lysholm, 90.9 ± 6.4; Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] Symptoms, 95.2 ± 8.4; KOOS Pain, 94.7 ± 5.2; KOOS Activities of Daily Living, 98.5 ± 3.2; KOOS Function in Sport and Recreation, 86.8 ± 12.4; and KOOS Quality of Life, 65.4 ± 14.9). CONCLUSION: Slope-correction osteotomy in combination with LET is a safe and reliable procedure in patients with high-grade anterior knee laxity and a PTS of ≥12°. Normal knee joint stability was restored and good to excellent functional scores were achieved after a follow-up of at least 2 years.

Hepatocyte growth factor and matrix metalloprotease 2 levels in synovial fluid of the knee joint are correlated with clinical outcome of meniscal repair.

BACKGROUND: The reoperation rate after primary meniscal repair is about 20%. Thus far, it has remained unclear whether there are distinct individual preconditions that may be associated with a better or worse outcome of this procedure. We therefore analysed typical biochemical mediators in the synovial fluid (SF) of patients with meniscus tear before arthroscopic meniscal refixation and correlated their concentrations to the occurrence of re-rupture after meniscus repair. METHODS: In this study, 48 patients with meniscus ruptures were included. SF samples were taken intraoperatively prior to arthroscopy. Multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based methods were used to measure hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), interleukin-18 (IL-18), matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-9 and MMP-13 in the SF. At follow-up, the patients were classified into two groups: surgical success and surgical failure. RESULTS: Ten out of 48 patients (20.8%) had to undergo revision surgery after meniscal repair (surgical failure). The median HGF in the surgical failure group was 2.4-times higher than in the surgical success group (P = .006), and the median MMP-2 was 1.8 times higher (P = .017). Concentration levels of the other tested proteins were not correlated with the success or failure of the meniscus surgery. There was weak evidence that both markers are indicators of an unsatisfactory healing process for meniscal refixation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that HGF and MMP-2 could serve as molecular markers to estimate the chances of healing success of meniscus repair and possibly to individualise therapy in meniscal surgery.

Bone metabolism is a key factor for clinical outcome of tibial plateau fractures.

PURPOSE: Given that tibial plateau fractures (TPF) are rare, they may pose a challenge to the treating surgeon due to their variety of complex fracture patterns. Numerous studies have identified potential fracture-specific, surgery-related, and patient-related risk factors for impaired patient outcomes. However, reports on the influence of bone metabolism on functional outcomes are missing. METHODS: In a retrospective multicenter cohort study, 122 TPF of 121 patients were analyzed with respect to radiological and clinical outcomes (Rasmussen) with a mean follow-up of 35.7 ± 24.9 months. The risk factor assessment included bone metabolism-affecting comorbidities and medication. RESULTS: The findings showed that 95.9% of the patients reported a good-to-excellent clinical outcome, and 97.4% reported a good-to-excellent radiological outcome. Logistic regression revealed that potentially impaired bone metabolism (IBM) was an independent risk factor for the clinical (p = 0.016) but not the radiological outcome (Table 4). Patients with 41-type B fractures and a potential IBM had a seven times higher risk to present a fair-to-poor clinical outcome [OR 7.45, 95 CI (4.30, 12.92)]. The most common objective impairment was a limited range of motion in 16.4% of the patients, especially in 41-type C fractures (p = 0.06). The individual failure analysis additionally identified surgery-related options for improvement. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that potential IBM was an independent risk factor for a poor-to-fair clinical outcome.

Effect of fracturoscopy on the incidence of surgical site infections post tibial plateau fracture surgery.

PURPOSE: Surgical treatment of tibial plateau fracture (TPF) is common. Surgical site infections (SSI) are among the most serious complications of TPF. This multicentre study aimed to evaluate the effect of fracturoscopy on the incidence of surgical site infections in patients with TPF. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicentre study. All patients with an AO/OTA 41 B and C TPF from January 2005 to December 2014 were included. Patients were divided into three groups: those who underwent arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF), and those who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with fracturoscopy, and those treated with ORIF without fracturoscopy. The groups were compared to assess the effect of fracturoscopy. We characterised our cohort and the subgroups using descriptive statistics. Furthermore, we fitted a logistic regression model which was reduced and simplified by a selection procedure (both directions) using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). From the final model, odds ratios and inclusive 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 52 patients who underwent fracturoscopy, 48 patients who underwent ARIF, and 2000 patients treated with ORIF were identified. The rate of SSI was 0% (0/48) in the ARIF group and 1.9% (1/52) in the fracturoscopy group compared to 4.7% (93/2000) in the ORIF group (OR = 0.40, p = 0.37). Regression analyses indicated a potential positive effect of fracturoscopy (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.07-5.68; p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that fracturoscopy is associated with reduced rates of SSI. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to investigate this. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Arthroscopic Controlled Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Fixation of Posterolateral Tibia Plateau Impression Fractures.

Posterolateral impression fractures of the tibial plateau are common, and open reduction and fixation can be demanding, including exposure of the peroneal nerve. Based on a patient example, the surgical technique of an arthroscopic controlled closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation of a posterolateral tibia plateau impressed fracture is described. A patient sustained a posterolateral impression currently described as an "apple bite" fracture of the tibial plateau. The surgical technique includes standard arthroscopic portals and posteromedial and (transseptal) posterolateral portals. The posterolateral tibial plateau is visualized by incision of popliteomeniscal fibers, retraction of the popliteus tendon, and exposure of the posterolateral plateau. The impression area is marked with a K-wire using an anterior cruciate ligament target device. A cannulated ram is placed over the K-wire. The fracture is lifted under arthroscopic guidance and can be supported with allograft bone chips. To stabilize the reduction, 3 K-wires are positioned from anterior to posterior, and 3 cannulated screws are inserted directly under the joint surface to support the fractured area. In comparison with open surgical techniques, this procedure is exclusively performed under arthroscopic control and enables an anatomic reduction and fixation of the posterolateral tibial plateau.

Anatomic Reconstruction of the Posterolateral Corner: An All-Arthroscopic Technique.

Injuries of the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee lead to chronic lateral and external rotational instability. Successful treatment of PLC injuries requires an understanding of the complex anatomy and biomechanics of the PLC. Several open PLC reconstruction techniques have been published. It is understood that anatomic reconstruction is superior to extra-anatomic techniques, leading to better clinical results. An open, anatomic, fibula-based technique for reconstruction to address lateral and rotational instability has been described. However, when an open technique is used, surgeon and patient are faced with disadvantages, such as soft tissue damage or exposure of vulnerable structures. Few arthroscopic techniques for tibia- or fibula-based reconstruction of rotational posterolateral instability have been described. A complete arthroscopic stabilization of the combined lateral and posterolateral rotational instability of the knee has not yet been described. We therefore present the first all-arthroscopic technique for complete PLC reconstruction, based on an open technique described previously. All relevant landmarks of the PLC can be arthroscopically visualized in detail, allowing safe and effective treatment of PLC injuries.

Modified adductor sling technique: A surgical therapy for patellar instability in skeletally immature patients.

BACKGROUND: Due to open femoral physis the therapy of patellar instability in skeletally immature patients is challenging. We developed a modified surgical technique of the 'Adductor-Sling-Approach' by Sillanpää. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of the operative technique and to analyse the reasons for failure. METHODS: Thirty 'modified adductor sling' reconstructions in 28 patients were included in the study. From 2010 to 2016 modified adductor sling reconstruction was performed by looping the gracilis or semitendinosus tendon around the adductor magnus tendon and attaching it at the medial facet of the patella. Clinical outcome was retrospectively evaluated at a mean follow up of 25.6months (range 12-43). The evaluation also included subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm Score, Kujala Score and Tegner Activity Score. RESULTS: The average age at the time of operation was 15.10years (range 11-17). Eighty-seven percent of the patients, who underwent the modified adductor sling technique, gained a stable patella and excellent results in postoperative scores. Recurrent dislocation occurred in four of 30 cases (13%). Analysis showed that possible reasons for failure of the tendon graft could be maltracking of the patella due to patella alta, trochlear dysplasia or an elevated tibial tuberosity to trochlear groove distance. CONCLUSION: The modified adductor sling technique for MPFL reconstruction in children and adolescents showed elevated redislocation rates. Only in absence of additional patellofemoral maltracking, caused by elevated tibial tubercle to trochlear groove distance (>15mm), patella alta or especially severe trochlear dysplasia, the modified adductor sling technique could be recommended.