Dactylospongia elegans-A Promising Drug Source: Metabolites, Bioactivities, Biosynthesis, Synthesis, and Structural-Activity Relationship.

Marine environment has been identified as a huge reservoir of novel biometabolites that are beneficial for medical treatments, as well as improving human health and well-being. Sponges have been highlighted as one of the most interesting phyla as new metabolites producers. Dactylospongia elegans Thiele (Thorectidae) is a wealth pool of various classes of sesquiterpenes, including hydroquinones, quinones, and tetronic acid derivatives. These metabolites possessed a wide array of potent bioactivities such as antitumor, cytotoxicity, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory. In the current work, the reported metabolites from D. elegans have been reviewed, including their bioactivities, biosynthesis, and synthesis, as well as the structural-activity relationship studies. Reviewing the reported studies revealed that these metabolites could contribute to new drug discovery, however, further mechanistic and in vivo studies of these metabolites are needed.

Impacts of deficiency in vitamin D derivatives on disease severity in adult bronchial asthma patients.

Vitamin D affects innate and adaptive immunity processes that impact treatment, severity, and morbidity of acute asthma episodes. Several vitamin D forms may help modulate immunity, including vitamin D2 (D2), vitamin D3 (D3), 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3), and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-(OH)2D3). This study assessed serum levels of vitamin D derivatives in bronchial asthma patients and their correlation with disease markers. One hundred thirteen subjects, divided into two groups, were enrolled. The first group included 73 asthmatic patients (57 males and 16 females), and the second included 40 healthy adults (31 males and 9 females) as a control group. All subjects were evaluated with a careful history and clinical examination, a chest X-ray with a posteroanterior view, routine laboratory examination, spirometry, and asthma control tests (ACT). Vitamin D serum levels were assessed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) with tandem mass spectrometry. Disease markers were assessed and correlated with serum levels of vitamin D forms. Markers included forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC%, peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory flow25-75% (FEF25-75%), eosinophilic blood count, and total immunoglobulin E (IgE). Asthmatic patients had significantly lower serum levels of vitamin D than healthy controls (p ≤ 0.001). Further, serum vitamin D levels decreased significantly in uncontrolled asthmatic patients than partially controlled and controlled patients. Correlations for 25(OH)D3 and 1,25-(OH) 2D3 were stronger than for D2 and D3. There were negative correlations for eosinophilic blood count, total IgE, and ACT. Serum levels of all vitamin D forms were reduced in asthmatic patients with moderate to strong correlations with disease severity. Vitamin D deficiency or even insufficiency may thus play a role in disease severity.

Reporting Quality of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Conducted in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacoeconomics and health economics in general is a new field that is still developing and emerging, not only in Saudi Arabia but all over the world. The objective of this study is to collect all published cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) studies conducted based on Saudi settings and to evaluate their reporting quality. METHODS: We used PRISMA guidelines to search for all English-language CEAs conducted in Saudi Arabia in 3 databases: Medline, Embase, and Scopus. Keywords used in the search were: cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, cost-utility, economic evaluation, Saudi Arabia. The data extracted were analyzed to assess reporting quality based on Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Guidelines (CHEERS) and the second panel recommendations. RESULTS: The 3 databases yielded 859 articles after removing duplicates. Only 7 articles included as final results following PRISMA guidelines. These 7 studies were published between 2015 and 2020. The CEA studies varied in their reporting quality; however, there were common missing required items among all of them, such as justifying choosing of a specific model and time horizon and reporting the ethical implications of the studied interventions. CONCLUSION: Seven published CEA studies were conducted based on Saudi settings as revealed by this review. The included studies reported the more important aspects of CEA studies. However, there were missed reporting items based on the checklists we used to assess CEAs in this review. Although perfect and complete adherence to CHEERS or the second panel guidelines is a high standard, future CEAs should adhere to such standards. Transparency and good reporting are cornerstones in CEAs, and future CEAs should report their methods, findings, and results in a more transparent and efficient way.