Self-Made Bovine Pericardial Tube Grafts for the Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Infections.

BACKGROUND: Aortic infections are uncommon but life-threatening diseases. The material of choice for aortic reconstruction is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study is to examine the short- and mid-term outcomes in the treatment of abdominal aortic infections using self-made bovine pericardium tube grafts. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study collected all patients who underwent in situ abdominal aortic reconstruction using self-made bovine pericardial tube grafts between February 2020 and December 2021 in a tertiary care center. Patient comorbidities, symptoms, radiological, bacteriological, and perioperative findings, as well as postoperative outcomes, were analyzed. RESULTS: Bovine pericardial aortic tube grafts were used in 11 patients (10 males, median age 68.7 years). Two patients presented with a native aortic infection, and 9 had graft infections (4 bypass grafts, 4 endografts, and a plurioperated patient who had undergone both endovascular and open procedures). There were 2 emergent surgeries due to infectious aneurysm ruptures. All patients were symptomatic, and the most frequent clinical finding was lumbar or abdominal pain (36%), followed by wound infection (27%), and fever (18%). Seven bifurcated and 4 straight pericardial tube grafts were needed. Purulent drainage was obtained around the previous graft or in the aneurysmal sac in 7 cases; intraoperative cultures were positive in 6 cases (gram + bacteria). Two patients died in the immediate postoperative period (perioperative mortality 18%; urgent procedures 50%; scheduled procedures 11%). One patient had a major complication due to bilateral severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pneumonia. There was 1 single reintervention to control hemostasis due to bleeding nongraft-related. The median follow-up was 14.1 months (3-24 months). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience in the treatment of abdominal aortic infections by in situ reconstruction with self-made bovine pericardial tube grafts shows promising results. These should be confirmed in the long term.

An early single-center experience with the Relay double inner-branch arch endograft.

Background: Open surgery remains the gold standard technique for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies, although endovascular techniques offer a new opportunity for patients deemed unfit for open repair. This paper assesses the early outcomes of patients treated with a double inner-branched arch endograft in a single, tertiary-care institution. Methods: All consecutive cases of elective endovascular arch repair from 2016 to 2022 were included in a prospective database. All procedures were performed using the custom-made Relay® (Terumo Aortic-Bolton Medical Inc., Sunrise, FL, USA) double inner-branched endograft; an extra-anatomical bypass was associated in all cases to preserve the patency of supra-aortic trunks. Comorbidities, periprocedural data, immediate results and follow-up complications were analyzed. Results: Twelve patients were treated during the study period [mean age 74±7 years, 100% male, 58% American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk ≥3]. Treated conditions included aneurysms (n=9), one pseudoaneurysm, one aortic ulcer and a type IA endoleak. The technical success rate was 100%. Early complications included respiratory insufficiency (n=3; 25%), stroke (n=1; 8.3%), acute coronary syndrome needing coronary stenting (n=1; 8.3%), and one perioperative death (n=1; 8.3%) secondary to an intracranial bleeding after coronary stenting. One patient required early reintervention due to retroperitoneal iliac access bleeding (n=1; 8.3%). During a median follow-up of 15.5 (range, 0-44) months, four patients suffered neurological events (two of them of cardioembolic origin), one reintervention was needed (subclavian anastomosis pseudoaneurysm), and a type IB endoleak was diagnosed. Overall mortality was of 17% (n=2), with an 83% overall survival at 2 years. The aortic-related death-free survival was 100%. Conclusions: Endovascular treatment of aortic arch pathology is feasible and shows promising early mortality and stroke rates in high-risk candidates. The main short and midterm goal should be minimizing neurological complications. A longer follow-up is mandatory to determine the effectiveness of the technique and to detect device related complications.