Impact of Ramadan-focused diabetes education on hypoglycemia risk and metabolic control for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Ramadan fasting is regarded as a form of worship amongst Muslims. However, patients with a high risk of diabetic complications are advised to avoid fasting, as the practice is associated with significant impacts on several health factors for type 2 diabetic patients, including glycaemic control. Thus, a lack of focused education before Ramadan may result in negative health outcomes. AIM: To evaluate the impact of a Ramadan-focused diabetes education programme on hypoglycaemic risk and other clinical and metabolic parameters. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies meeting the inclusion criteria from inception. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and guidelines were followed when performing the search and identification of appropriate studies. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in this systemic review; five of them met the criteria to compile for a meta-analysis. The included studies were with various study designs, including randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental and non-randomised studies. Overall, the results revealed a significant reduction of hypoglycemia risk (81% reduction) for fasting patients in intervention groups who received Ramadan-focused education compared with patients receiving conventional care (OR 0.19, 95% CI: 0.08-0.46). Moreover, HbA1c significantly improved amongst patients who received a Ramadan-focused diabetes education intervention, compared with those receiving conventional care. CONCLUSION: Ramadan-focused diabetes education had a significant impact on hypoglycemia and glycaemic control, with no significant effect on body weight, blood lipids or blood pressure.

Improving type 2 diabetes mellitus management in Ministry of Defense Hospitals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 2018-2021.

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disease characterised by elevated levels of blood glucose and is a leading cause of disability and mortality. Uncontrolled type 2 diabetes leads to complications such as retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy. Improved treatment of hyperglycaemia is likely to delay the onset and progression of microvascular and neuropathic complications.This article describes the efforts of 18 governmental hospitals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia that enrolled in a collaborative improvement project to improve the poor glycaemic control (HbA1c >9% to be less than 15%) of patients with diabetes by the end of 2021 among all the chronic illness clinics in the enrolled military hospitals. Enrolled hospitals were required to implement an evidence-based change package that included the implementation of diabetes clinical practice guidelines with standardised assessment and care planning tools. Furthermore, care delivery was standardised using a standard clinic scope of service that focused on multidisciplinary care teams. Finally, hospitals were required to implement diabetes registries that were used by case managers for poorly controlled patients.The project timetable was from October 2018 to December 2021. Diabetes poor control (HbA1c >9%) showed improved mean difference of 12.7% (34.9% baseline, 22.2% after) with a p value of 0.01. Diabetes optimal testing significantly improved from 41% at the start of the project in the fourth quarter of 2018, reaching 78% by the end of the fourth quarter of 2021. Variation between hospitals showed a significant reduction in the first quarter of 2021.The collaborative multilevel approach of standardising the care based on the best available evidence through policies, guidelines and protocols, patient-focused care and integrated care plan by a multidisciplinary team was associated with noticeable improvement in all key performance indicators of the project.

Implementation of medication reconciliation at admission and discharge in Ministry of Defense Health Services hospitals: a multicentre study.

There is potential for many medication errors to occur due to the complex medication use process. The medication reconciliation process can significantly lower the incidence of medication errors that may arise from an incomplete or inaccurate medication history as well as reductions in length of hospital stay, patients' readmissions and lower healthcare costs.The quality improvement collaborative project was conducted as a pilot study in two hospitals, then implemented on a broader scale in 18 hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The goal of the project was to reduce the percentage of patients with at least one outstanding unintentional discrepancy at admission by 50%, over 16-month period (July 2020-November 2021). Our interventions were based on the High 5's project medication reconciliation WHO, and Medications at Transitions and Clinical Handoffs toolkit for medication reconciliation by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Improvement teams used the Institute of Healthcare Improvement's (IHI's) Model for improvement as a tool for testing and implementing changes. Collaboration and learning between hospitals were facilitated by conducting learning sessions using the IHI's Collaborative Model for Achieving Breakthrough Improvement. The improvement teams underwent three cycles.By the end of the project significant improvements were observed. The percentage of patients with at least one outstanding unintentional discrepancy at admission showed a 20% reduction (27% before, 7% after; p value <0.05) (Relative Risk (RR) 0.74) with a mean reduction in the number of discrepancies per patient by 0.74. The percentage of patients with at least one outstanding unintentional discrepancy at discharge showed 12% reduction (17% before, 5% after; p value <0.05) (RR 0.71) with a mean reduction in the number of discrepancies per patient by 0.34.Compliance to medication reconciliation documentation within 24 hours of admission and discharge showed significant improvement by an average of 17% and 24%, respectively. Additionally, the implementation of medication reconciliation had a negative correlation with the percentage of patients with at least one outstanding unintentional discrepancy at admission and discharge.

Collaborative improvement project to decrease maternal mortality rate across five hospitals in Saudi Arabia.

Maternal morbidities and mortalities remain high globally, yet are preventable events. Maternal haemorrhage is a primary cause of both maternal morbidity and mortality. In this collaborative project, multipronged evidence-based interventions, inclusive of embedded morbidity surveillance trigger tools were implemented to increase maternal morbidity reporting and improve the safety culture, while structured morbidity and mortality reviews aided in the reduction maternal mortality.

Utilizing diabetes registry for exploring sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of type II diabetic patients in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as the process and outcomes of diabetic individuals. METHODS: Hospital Saudi Registry at Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Chronic Illness Clinics (Family and Community Medicine), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia database was started in February 2019 and data were collected until February 2020. The data were collected by trained diabetes nurse specialists. The registry includes all patients with type II diabetes mellitus (DM) and excluded patients with type I DM. Results: A total of 8,209 patients were enrolled in the registry with a higher proportion of females than males. The mean age was 59.3 years, BMI 32.5kg/m2, and HBA1c levels was 8.2%. Significant gender differences for BMI, duration of diabetes, blood pressure, LDL, smoking status, and medication intake. From the first to the third visit, BMI was raised; however, LDL, diastolic blood pressure, and albumin creatinine ratio were reduced. The mean HBA1c values plummeted for all patients and 33% of the patients had a reduction in the HbA1c levels. However, HbA1c levels increased for 24.7% of the patients' from baseline to the last visit. CONCLUSION: This registry provides great insights into the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of diabetic patients in Saudi Arabia. This registry data can be used to investigate the associations between sociodemographic or clinical characteristics and glycemic control among T2DM patients in Saudi Arabia.

Sociodemographic and clinical predictors of refractory type 2 diabetes patients: Findings from a case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the sociodemographic and clinical predictors of uncontrolled diabetic patients, to identify high-risk and people with impaired glycemic control, to establish more effective strategies for reducing morbidity and mortality. METHODS: This case-control study of 8209 enrolled patients were included from the diabetes registry by Chronic Illness Center (CIC), Family and Community Medicin, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh Saudi Arabia between February 2019 and February 2020. Cases are defined as patients with type II refractory diabetes having persistent HbA1c >9, not reach adequate glycemic control despite intensified therapy under specialist care (CIC) for at least 6 months. Controls were defined as patients with Hba1c ≤9. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify predictors for patients with the persistent outcome of HbA1c >9%. RESULTS: Overall, a total of 1152 cases and 4555 controls were included. Patients with refractory diabetes were younger (mean: 58.5, standard deviation [SD]: 11.7) and females (63.4%). Duration of diabetes (13.3, SD: 7.4, p<0.001) and the mean value of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (2.7, SD: 0.91, p<0.001) were significantly higher in the refractory group. The findings from the final model revealed that with every unit increase in age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.97, [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-0.98]) and body mass index the odds of having refractory diabetes significantly reduced by 0.97 times (OR: 0.97, [95% CI: 0.95-0.99]). While with every unit increase in the duration of diabetes (OR: 1.03, [95% CI: 1.01-1.05]), systolic blood pressure (OR: 1.01, [95% CI: 1.00-1.02]) and LDL (OR: 1.42, [95% CI: 1.23-.62]) the odds of having refractory diabetes significantly increased by 1.03 and 1.42 times respectively compared to controls when adjusted for gender, albumin creatinine, diastolic blood pressure. CONCLUSION: The findings from this study helped classify the predictors of refractory patients with diabetes. Understanding refractory patients' predictors may help to develop new therapeutic strategies to boost their glycemic status safely.

The impact of health information technology on patient safety.

Since the original Institute of Medicine (IOM) report was published there has been an accelerated development and adoption of health information technology with varying degrees of evidence about the impact of health information technology on patient safety.  This article is intended to review the current available scientific evidence on the impact of different health information technologies on improving patient safety outcomes. We conclude that health information technology improves patient's safety by reducing medication errors, reducing adverse drug reactions, and improving compliance to practice guidelines. There should be no doubt that health information technology is an important tool for improving healthcare quality and safety. Healthcare organizations need to be selective in which technology to invest in, as literature shows that some technologies have limited evidence in improving patient safety outcomes.