Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Chemioterapia ; 3(5): 281-5, 1984 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6398125

RESUMO

Seventy-three hospitalized patients with urinary tract infections (UTI) were included in a double-blind study and received at random either fosfomycin or fosfomycin plus amoxicillin (CFL) in a pre-fixed combination, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the CFL. CFL was administered orally to 39 patients at the daily dosage of 1 g every 8 h for 6 days (666 mg of fosfomycin and 334 mg of amoxicillin) while fosfomycin was given orally to 34 patients at the daily dosage of 666 mg every 8 h for 6 days. A bacteriological cure was observed in 97.4% of the patients treated with CFL, while in the fosfomycin group the bacterial eradication was obtained only in 82.3% (P less than 0.05). CFL showed a more rapid bactericidal activity than fosfomycin. In addition, CFL was more effective than fosfomycin against "difficult" Gram-negative bacteria such as Proteus spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Both antibiotics were well tolerated. Our limited experience revealed that CFL induces a negligible degree of resistant strains, and fewer than fosfomycin. Thus we conclude that CFL seems to be a useful antibiotic combination in the treatment of UTI.


Assuntos
Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Fosfomicina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA