Impact of pediatric epilepsy on sleep patterns and behaviors in children and parents.

PURPOSE: Disrupted sleep patterns in children with epilepsy and their parents are commonly described clinically. A number of studies have shown increased frequency of sleep disorders among pediatric epilepsy patients; however, few have characterized the association between epilepsy and parental sleep quality and household sleeping arrangements. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of pediatric epilepsy on child sleep, parental sleep and fatigue, and parent-child sleeping arrangements, including room sharing and cosleeping. METHODS: Parents of children 2 to 10 years of age with and without epilepsy completed written questionnaires assessing seizure history, child and parent sleep, and household sleeping arrangements. Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) scores were used to evaluate sleep disturbances for the child. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Iowa Fatigue Scale (IFS) were used to evaluate parental sleep and fatigue, respectively. The Early Childhood Epilepsy Severity Scale (E-Chess) was used to assess epilepsy severity. KEY FINDINGS: One hundred five households with a child with epilepsy and 79 controls participated in this study. Households with a child with epilepsy reported increased rates of both parent-child room sharing (p < 0.001) and cosleeping (p = 0.005) compared to controls. Children with epilepsy were found to have greater sleep disturbance by total CSHQ score (p < 0.001) and the following subscores: parasomnias (p < 0.001), night wakings (p < 0.001), sleep duration (p < 0.001), daytime sleepiness (<0.001), sleep onset delay (p = 0.009), and bedtime resistance (p = 0.023). Parents of children with epilepsy had increased sleep dysfunction (p = 0.005) and were more fatigued (p < 0.001). Severity of epilepsy correlated positively with degree of child sleep dysfunction (0.192, p = 0.049), parental sleep dysfunction (0.273, p = 0.005), and parental fatigue (0.324, p = 0.001). Antiepileptic drug polytherapy was predictive of greater childhood sleep disturbances. Nocturnal seizures were associated with parental sleep problems, whereas room sharing and cosleeping behavior were associated with child sleep problems. Within the epilepsy cohort, 69% of parents felt concerned about night seizures and 44% reported feeling rested rarely or never. Finally, 62% of parents described decreased sleep quality and/or quantity with cosleeping. SIGNIFICANCE: Pediatric epilepsy can significantly affect sleep patterns for both the affected child and his or her parents. Parents frequently room share or cosleep with their child, adaptations which may have detrimental effects for many households. Clinicians must not only be attentive to the sleep issues occurring in pediatric patients with epilepsy, but also for the household as a whole. These data provide evidence of a profound clinical need for improved epilepsy therapeutics and the development of nocturnal seizure monitoring technologies.

Efficacy of cannabidiol in subjects with refractory epilepsy relative to concomitant use of clobazam.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of open-label, highly purified cannabidiol (CBD, Epidiolex®) in treating refractory epilepsy relative to the concomitant use of clobazam (CLB) as well as the clinical implications of changes in CLB and norclobazam (nCLB) levels. METHODS: Data were examined retrospectively, in patients who either used CBD with concomitant CLB or without concomitant CLB after two months of treatment with CBD and at the point of best seizure control within the first year of treatment with CBD. Responder rates (percentage of subjects with a 50 % or greater reduction in weekly seizures from their baseline) and mean reduction in weekly seizure frequency were calculated and compared between those who concomitantly used CLB and those who did not. The relationship between the change in CLB and nCLB levels and change in mean weekly seizure frequency was also investigated within the group of subjects using concomitant CLB and CBD. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 47 subjects between the ages of 2.5-51 years. There was no significant difference between the concomitant CLB (n = 32) and no concomitant CLB (n = 15) groups in terms of demographics (age (p = 0.4344), race (p = 1.0000), sex (p = 0.7507)) or most epilepsy characteristics (underlying condition (all p > 0.05), mean baseline seizure frequency (p = 0.6483)). There was only one significant difference between groups regarding seizure types (more subjects with epileptic spasms in concomitant CLB group (p = 0.0413)). Concomitant AED usage was not significantly different in the two groups (all p > 0.05). Mean reduction in weekly seizure frequency was greater at the best point of seizure control within the first year than at two months of treatment with CBD, regardless of concomitant CLB usage (all p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in reduction of mean weekly seizure frequency between those who took concomitant CLB and those who did not at either time point (all p > 0.05). There was a significantly greater responder rate for subjects taking CBD and CLB than those taking CBD without CLB only at the point of best seizure control within the first year of CBD treatment (p = 0.0240). There was no strong, significant correlation between change in nCLB or CLB levels and change in seizure frequency at either time point (all |p|<0.22). SIGNIFICANCE: With or without concomitant CLB, CBD can be effective in reducing seizure frequency. Changes in nCLB and CLB levels do not have a clinically significant correlation with changes in weekly seizure frequency for those taking CBD with CLB.