The EUROMED CANCER network: state-of-art of cancer screening programmes in non-EU Mediterranean countries.

BACKGROUND: The EUROMED CANCER Network project aims to support non-EU Mediterranean countries in the development of cancer early detection and screening policies. METHODS: Through a structured questionnaire information from 15 countries (Albania, Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), Croatia, Egypt, Jordan, UN Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, Lebanon, Montenegro, Morocco, Palestinian National Authority, Serbia, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey) were collected on cancer epidemiology and control. RESULTS: Large differences between countries are evident. Breast cancer (BC) is the commonest cancer among women, though the incidence rate is much lower in non-EU than in EU Mediterranean countries. Conversely, cervical cancer (CC) is much more common in the former than in the latter countries. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is more frequent in Northern than in Eastern and Southern Mediterranean shores. Population-based cancer registries are available in few countries but most of them lack information on disease staging. Opportunistic screening for CC and BC is unevenly spread across and within countries; organised screening programmes are rare and do not meet international recommendations. BC and CC early detection is extensively considered a priority, while a few countries included CRC into their agenda. CONCLUSIONS: Collected data witnesses inadequacy of health information system and, in general, of the strategies for cancer control in the involved countries. A uniform approach for strengthening cancer control is not realistic neither feasible. Tailored preventive actions for cancer early detection have to be started concurrently with the development of a reliable health information system and, specifically, with cancer registration.

French colorectal cancer screening pilot programme: results of the first round.

OBJECTIVES: In France, a national pilot population-based screening programme on colorectal cancer was set up in 2002. In 2006, 23 French districts were included, targeting a population of more than five million people. This programme offers biennial screening using the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) to average risk subjects aged between 50 and 74 years. People receive a letter inviting them to consult their GPs, who in turn provide the FOBT. People with a positive test result are proposed a full colonoscopy. The results of the programme's first-round performance indicators are presented. METHODS: The monitoring centre collected data from GPs and gastroenterologists on follow-up and colonoscopy results for people who were screened positive. Data were transferred to the French Institute for Public Health Surveillance (InVS) for the analysis. RESULTS: The overall participation rate for the 19 districts having completed a first screening round reached 42%. The overall positive test rate was 2.7%. In the eight districts with comprehensive follow-up data for the first round, 86% of colonoscopies were completed after a positive test. A total of 1615 people were diagnosed with cancer, and 4612 people with adenoma. The cancer detection rate reached 2.3/1000 [corrected] it was higher in men than in women (3.4/1000 [corrected] versus 1.4/1000) [corrected] and increased with age. Forty-three percent of invasive detected cancers were stage I, 24% stage II, 23% had lymph node involvement and 10% presented with distant metastasis. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that indicators are consistent with international references. During 2007-2008, the programme coverage will be progressively extended, and all 99 French districts should be actively involved in its implementation.

Evaluation of a combined screening programme for breast, cervical and colorectal cancers in France.

A combined breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening programme was set up in 1990 in Isère, for women aged 50-69 years (target population 100,000) comprising an initial medical visit. The programme was evaluated in 1997. The evaluation covered uptake results, sensitivity, specificity, two opinion surveys among 1025 physicians and 400 women to measure the impact, and three surveys regarding radiologists', gastroenterologists' and pathologists' attitudes. Sensitivity and specificity rates were 74 and 87% for breast, 83 and 99% for cervical and 43 and 97% for colorectal screening. The number of cervical smears completed by women aged 60-69 years doubled with the programme. Acceptability of the faecal occult blood test was 88%. Eighty percent of physicians were in favour of the programme but 67% said that they often prescribed outside the programme. Overall, 71% of the interviewed women said they had had a breast screen, 69% a Pap smear and 53% a faecal occult blood test when only 25-35% of the target population was actually recorded in the programme. This programme increased the uptake of women not previously screened both within and outside the programme. It showed discrepancies between beliefs and practices of physicians. Protocol changes were implemented after this evaluation.

Do socio-demographic factors influence mammography use of French women? Analysis of a French cross-sectional survey.

The aim of this study was to analyse the independent role of socio-demographic factors on the use of mammography according to whether or not an organized breast cancer screening programme exists. The study sample of 2825 women aged 40-74 years was drawn from a cross-sectional population-based survey of French households. Among these women 46% lived in districts that offered a screening programme and 63% reported undergoing mammography in the previous 2 years. Living in a district that offered a screening programme was associated with increased use of mammography. According to both univariate and multivariate analysis, several socio-demographic characteristics, such as high monthly household income or high education level, increased the probability of using mammography. However, three factors had a major positive impact on its use: (1) having had a gynaecological examination in the previous 2 years, (2) living in a district where a screening programme was available, and (3) age. There was a significant interaction between the factors 2 and 3. Between 40 and 60 years, age had the same impact on the use of mammography whether or not women lived in a district with a screening programme. After the age of 60 years, the use of mammography collapsed among women living in a district without a screening programme and remained frequent among women living in the district that offered such a programme. Even if the overall level of mammography screening was high and the existence of a screening programme maintained a high level of mammography use among older women, the programme should target better the women of underprivileged spheres and reinforce the role of the general practitioner; in particular for women not followed by a gynaecologist.

[Mammography use among women aged 35 to 75 years]. / Pratiques de la mammographie chez les femmes de 35 à 75 ans: étude descriptive dans la population consultant les centres d'examens de santé.

The aim of the study was to evaluate mammography use and indications (diagnosis or screening) among 19,253 women aged 35 to 75 attending a health screening centre. The data were collected by a self-administered questionnaire completed after by an interview with a nurse. Mammography use is frequent in women attending a health screening centre, even before the age of 50: 79.1% had undergone at least one mammography during their life and for 47.3% a screen had been performed within the last three years. Nevertheless mammography was only used by 65.2% of the women aged 50-69 years, target age group of the screening programme. A logistic regression model adjusting for multiple variables was used to examine factors associated with women who underwent a screen within the last three years. Women more likely to be screened were aged 50-69 (vs age 35-49: OR=3.1), used regular gynaecological care (OR=4.5), had a family history of breast cancer (OR=1.45), had in their district a breast cancer screening campaign (OR=1.93). The study indicated that women under 50 years of age with a family history of breast cancer and women aged 70 and over were under-screened. When a campaign for breast cancer screening was organised in the district the screening rates were higher in the target population (71,4% vs 60,1%) although only 64% of the women reported having attended. Current recommendations for breast cancer screening should be reviewed in the light of these results.

Are breast cancer screening practices associated with sociodemographic status and healthcare access? Analysis of a French cross-sectional study.

The aim of this study was to analyse the role of women's sociodemographic and healthcare access characteristics according to breast cancer screening practices (organized, individual or no screening). A cross-sectional study was set up in seven French districts using a self-administered postal questionnaire. Randomization was stratified proportionally on age and urban/rural status in each district separately among attendees and nonattendees to the organized breast cancer screening programme (OS). A total of 5638 women aged 50-74 years returned their questionnaires: 1480 in the attendee OS group and 4158 in the nonattendee group. Among them, 3537 declared having undergone a recent mammography outside the organized programme (individual, IS group) and 621 declared never having undergone a mammography or having done so more than 2 years ago (NS group). Analyses showed a gradient between the three groups (IS, OS and NS, respectively) in their association with breast cancer screening practices considering three factors: an increasing gradient was observed for renunciation of basic healthcare for financial reasons, a decreasing gradient in the regular visit to a medical gynaecologist and having had a Pap smear in the last 3 years. Three other variables that showed a decreasing gradient are: living with a partner, current use of hormone replacement therapy and having had a check-up in the last 5 years. In conclusion, the main differences between breast cancer screening practices were largely associated with difficulties in healthcare access, considering regular gynaecological visits in particular.