Safety and efficacy of exercise training in children and adolescents with congenital heart disease: A systematic review and descriptive analysis.

BACKGROUND: While exercise training is beneficial in the prevention and management of many chronic diseases, the role of exercise training in children and adolescents with congenital heart disease is less understood. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of exercise training in children and adolescents with congenital heart disease. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science and SportDiscus. We included randomised controlled trials that incorporated an exercise intervention compared with a non-exercising comparator group and examined safety and efficacy in children and adolescents with congenital heart disease. A descriptive analysis of the included trials was then conducted. RESULTS: A total of 9 articles from 6 trials (642 participants with varying conditions and disease severity) were included. Significant variability of study participants and outcomes were observed across the trials. No adverse events linked to the exercise interventions were stated. The articles reported numerous positive changes to clinically relevant fitness measures. Exercise capacity improved with exercise training in 3 of 4 trials in which it was measured. Cardiorespiratory fitness showed improvements in 3 of 4 trials. Neuromuscular fitness increased in 1 of 2 trials. Physiological and metabolic parameters were improved, and negative changes were not observed to several clinically important measures (e.g. muscular oxygenation, cardiac measures) in 2 of 2 trials. Physical activity increased in 1 of 3 trials. No articles reported on changes in measures of body composition. Outcomes are varied with little consensus on measurements or assessment methods. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise training appears to be safe and efficacious for improving physical fitness in children and adolescents with congenital heart disease who have been appropriately screened by their medical team. However, the certainty of the evidence for these findings is low to moderate.

Sex-based differences in body core temperature response across repeat work bouts in the heat.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of repeated work bouts in the heat on peak body core temperature and to explore sex-based differences in body core temperature responses. METHODS: Fourteen males and fifteen females performed four work bouts (two heavy and two moderate, alternating) in 32.5 °C Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT), each separated by 30-min seated rest in 28.0 °C WBGT. Participants wore a military combat uniform with body armour and helmet (10 kg load) during the work bouts, removing the vest and helmet during recovery periods. RESULTS: Body core temperature elevation over time was faster in the first compared with subsequent work bouts of each intensity. Body core temperature elevation was similar between males and females during the first heavy work bout, then remained significantly lower in females for the reminder of the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the assumed progressive elevation in strain, but in agreement with recent literature, a gradual reduction in heat storage in subsequent exercise bouts prevented a cumulative increase in heat strain in the conditions tested.