Enhancing multi-site autism research through the development of a collaborative data platform.

Data repositories, particularly those storing data on vulnerable populations, increasingly need to carefully consider not only what data is being collected, but how it will be used. As such, the Autism Intervention Research Network on Physical Health (AIR-P) has created the Infrastructure for Collaborative Research (ICR) to establish standards on data collection practices in Autism repositories. The ICR will strive to encourage inter-site collaboration, amplify autistic voices, and widen accessibility to data. The ICR is staged as a three-tiered framework consisting of (1) a request for proposals system, (2) a REDCap-based data repository, and (3) public data dashboards to display aggregate de-identified data. Coupled with a review process including autistic and non-autistic researchers, this framework aims to propel the implementation of equitable autism research, enhance standardization within and between studies, and boost transparency and dissemination of findings. In addition, the inclusion of a contact registry that study participants can opt into creates the base for a robust participant pool. As such, researchers can leverage the platform to identify, reach, and distribute electronic materials to a greater proportion of potential participants who likely fall within their eligibility criteria. By incorporating practices that promote effective communication between researchers and participants, the ICR can facilitate research that is both considerate of and a benefit to autistic people.

A novel dance intervention program for children and adolescents with developmental disabilities: a pilot randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Organized physical activity programs have been shown to provide wide benefits to participants, though there are relatively few studies examining the impact of these programs for individuals with developmental disabilities. This pilot study was conducted to determine the feasibility and impact of an undergraduate-led dance intervention program for children and adolescents with developmental disabilities. We evaluated the impact of the dance program on motor ability and social skills. METHODS: The study design was a waitlist control clinical trial in which participants were randomized to active and control groups. Eligible participants included male and female children and adolescents between the ages of 4 and 17 years with neurodevelopmental disabilities. The Motor Assessment Battery for Children Checklist and the Social Responsiveness Scale were used to assess change in motor and social skills, respectively. After gathering baseline data, the active group completed 1 h of online dance classes per week for 10 weeks, while the control group entered a 10-week waiting period. All participants then returned for a follow-up visit. Pre- and post-intervention data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects modeling adjusting for age and class attendance with subject random intercept. RESULTS: We recruited and randomized 43 participants with neurodevelopmental disabilities (mean age = 8.63, SD = 2.98), of which 30 participated in dance classes. The attendance rate was 82.6% for the active group and 61.7% for the control group. The active group demonstrated a significant improvement in motor skills in an unpredictable environment, as indicated on the Motor Assessment Battery for Children Checklist (n = 21, p = 0.05). We also observed positive trends in social skills that did not reach significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that it is feasible to develop and implement a fully digital dance intervention program for individuals with developmental disabilities. Further, we find that change in motor skills can be detected after just 10 h of low-intensity participation. However, a lack of significant change in social skills coupled with limitations in study implementation suggests further research is needed to determine the full impact of this dance program. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System: Protocol ID 20-001680-AM-00005, registered 17/2/2021 - Retrospectively Registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04762290 .

Examining the neurodevelopmental and motor phenotypes of Bohring-Opitz syndrome (ASXL1) and Bainbridge-Ropers syndrome (ASXL3).

Background: Chromatin Modifying Disorders (CMD) have emerged as one of the most rapidly expanding genetic disorders associated with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Motor impairments are also prevalent in CMD and may play a role in the neurodevelopmental phenotype. Evidence indicates that neurodevelopmental outcomes in CMD may be treatable postnatally; thus deep phenotyping of these conditions can improve clinical screening while improving the development of treatment targets for pharmacology and for clinical trials. Here, we present developmental phenotyping data on individuals with Bohring-Optiz Syndrome (BOS - ASXL1) and Bainbridge-Ropers Syndrome (BRS - ASXL3) related disorders, two CMDs highly penetrant for motor and developmental delays. Objectives: To phenotype the motor and neurodevelopmental profile of individuals with ASXL1 and ASXL3 related disorders (BOS and BRS). To provide a preliminary report on the association of motor impairments and ASD. Methods: Neurodevelopmental and motor phenotyping was conducted on eight individuals with pathogenic ASXL1 variants and seven individuals with pathogenic ASXL3 variants, including medical and developmental background intake, movement and development questionnaires, neurological examination, and quantitative gait analysis. Results: Average age of first developmental concerns was 4 months for individuals with BOS and 9 months in BRS. 100% of individuals who underwent the development questionnaire met a diagnosis of developmental coordination disorder. 71% of children with BOS and 0% of children with BRS noted movement difficulty greatly affected classroom learning. Participants with BRS and presumed diagnoses of ASD were reported to have more severe motor impairments in recreational activities compared to those without ASD. This was not the case for the individuals with BOS. Conclusion: Motor impairments are prevalent and pervasive across the ASXL disorders with and without ASD, and these impairments negatively impact engagement in school-based activities. Unique neurodevelopmental and motor findings in our data include a mixed presentation of hypo and hypertonia in individuals with BOS across a lifespan. Individuals with BRS exhibited hypotonia and greater variability in motor skills. This deep phenotyping can aid in appropriate clinical diagnosis, referral to interventions, and serve as meaningful treatment targets in clinical trials.