RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Traumatic lower limb injuries can result in chronic pain. Orthotic interventions are a leading conservative approach to reduce pain, manage loading, and protect the foot. Robust carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) designed for military service members have been shown to reduce foot loading. However, the effect of carbon fiber orthosis design, including designs widely used in the civilian sector, on foot loading is unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: Determine if carbon fiber orthoses alter foot loading during gait. METHODS: Loadsol insoles were used to measure peak forces and force impulse acting on the forefoot, midfoot, hindfoot, and total foot. Nine healthy, able-bodied individuals participated. Force impulse was quantified as cumulative loading throughout stance phase. Participants walked without an orthosis and with three carbon fiber orthoses of differing designs: a Firm stiffness CDO, a Moderate stiffness CDO, and a medial and lateral strut orthosis (MLSO). RESULTS: There were significant main effects of orthosis condition on peak forefoot forces as well as forefoot and hindfoot force impulse. Peak forefoot forces were significantly lower in the Moderate and Firm CDOs compared to no orthosis and MLSO. Compared to walking without an orthosis, forefoot force impulse was significantly lower and hindfoot force impulse was significantly greater in all carbon fiber orthoses. Additionally, hindfoot force impulse in the Firm CDO was significantly higher than in the MLSO and Moderate CDO. SIGNIFICANCE: The three carbon fiber orthosis designs differed regarding foot loading, with more robust orthoses providing greater forefoot offloading. Orthosis-related changes in forefoot loading suggest that carbon fiber orthoses could reduce loading-associated pain during gait. However, increased hindfoot force impulse suggests caution should be used when considering carbon fiber orthoses for individuals at risk of skin breakdown with repetitive loading.
Assuntos
Fibra de Carbono , Desenho de Equipamento , Órtoses do Pé , Suporte de Carga , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Suporte de Carga/fisiologia , Marcha/fisiologia , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Pé/fisiologia , Adulto Jovem , CarbonoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Carbon-fiber custom dynamic orthoses are used to improve gait and limb function following lower limb trauma in specialty centers. However, the effects of commercially available orthoses on center of pressure progression and patient perception of orthosis smoothness during walking are poorly understood. METHODS: In total, 16 participants with a unilateral lower extremity traumatic injury underwent gait analysis when walking without an orthosis, and while wearing monolithic and modular devices, in a randomized order. Device alignment, stiffness, participant rating of perceived device smoothness, center of pressure velocity, and ankle zero moment crossing were assessed. FINDINGS: The modular device was approximately twice as stiff as the monolithic device. Alignment, smoothness ratings, peak magnitude of center of pressure velocity, and zero moment crossing were not different between study devices. The time to peak center of pressure velocity occurred significantly later for the modular device compared to the monolithic and no orthosis conditions, with large effect sizes observed. INTERPRETATION: Commercially available orthoses commonly used to treat limb trauma affect the timing of center of pressure progression relative to walking without an orthosis. Despite multiple design differences, monolithic and modular orthoses included in this study did not differ with respect to other measures of center of pressure progression. Perceived smoothness ratings were approximately 40% greater with the study orthoses as compared to previous studies in specialty centers, which may be due to a more gradual center of pressure progression, as indicted by lower peak magnitude of center of pressure velocity with both study orthoses.