Association between Statin Use and Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: Chemotherapy-induced cardiac dysfunction (CIC) is a significant and concerning complication observed among cancer patients. Despite the demonstrated cardioprotective benefits of statins in various cardiovascular diseases, their effectiveness in mitigating CIC remains uncertain. Objective: This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively evaluate the potential cardioprotective role of statins in patients with CIC. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases to identify relevant articles published from inception until 10th May 2023. The outcomes were assessed using pooled odds ratio (OR) for categorical data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: This meta-analysis comprised nine studies involving a total of 5532 patients, with 1904 in the statin group and 3628 in the non-statin group. The pooled analysis of primary outcome shows that patients who did not receive statin suffer a greater decline in the LVEF after chemotherapy compared to those who receive statin (MD, 3.55 (95% CI: 1.04-6.05), p = 0.01). Likewise, we observed a significantly higher final mean LVEF among chemotherapy patients with statin compared to the non-statin group of patients (MD, 2.08 (95% CI: 0.86-3.30), p > 0.001). Additionally, there was a lower risk of incident heart failure in the statin group compared to the non-statin group of patients (OR, 0.41 (95% CI: 0.27-0.62), p < 0.001). Lastly, the change in the mean difference for LVEDV was not statistically significant between the statin and non-statin groups (MD, 1.55 (95% CI: -5.22-8.33), p = 0.65). Conclusion: Among patients of CIC, statin use has shown cardioprotective benefits by improving left ventricular function and reducing the risk of heart failure.

Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: Inflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of both acute and chronic heart failure. Recent studies showed that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could be related to adverse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases. We sought to evaluate whether NLR could predict mortality in patients with acute heart failure by means of a meta-analysis. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases through January 2023 for studies evaluating the association of NLR with mortality in patients with acute heart failure. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and long-term all-cause mortality. Endpoints were pooled using a random-effects DerSimonian-and-Laird model and were expressed as a hazard ratio (HR) or mean difference (MD) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Results: A total of 15 studies with 15,995 patients with acute heart failure were included in the final study. Stratifying patients based on a cut-off NLR, we found that high NLR was associated with a significantly higher in-hospital mortality [HR 1.54, 95% CI (1.18-2.00), p < 0.001] and long-term all-cause mortality [HR 1.61, 95% CI (1.40-1.86), p < 0.001] compared to the low-NLR group. Comparing the highest against the lowest NLR quartile, it was shown that patients in the highest NLR quartile has a significantly heightened risk of long-term all-cause mortality [HR 1.77, 95% CI (1.38-2.26), p < 0.001] compared to that of lowest NLR quartile. However, the risks of in-hospital mortality were compared between both quartiles of patients [HR 1.78, 95% CI (0.91-3.47), p = 0.09]. Lastly, NLR values were significantly elevated among non-survivors compared to survivors during index hospitalization [MD 5.07, 95% CI (3.34-6.80), p < 0.001] and during the follow-up period [MD 1.06, 95% CI (0.54-1.57), p < 0.001]. Conclusions: Elevated NLR was associated with an increased risk of short- and long-term mortality and could be a useful tool or incorporated in the risk stratification in patients with acute heart failure.

Clinical Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock due to Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection versus Cardiogenic Shock due to Coronary Artery Disease.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) can be treated conservatively. However, some SCAD patients can develop cardiogenic shock (CS). We evaluated the outcomes of SCAD-related CS using data from a national population-based cohort study from January 1, 2016, to December 30, 2019. In our study of 32,640 patients with SCAD, about 10.6% of patients presented with cardiogenic shock. We found that SCAD patients with cardiogenic shock had higher mortality as well as greater complications including use of mechanical circulatory devices, arrythmias, respiratory support, and acute heart failure compared to those without cardiogenic shock. When comparing cardiogenic shock due to SCAD with that due to coronary artery disease (CAD), we found that while mortality rates were similar, those with cardiogenic shock due to SCAD were associated with higher risk of use of mechanical circulatory support, major bleeding, blood transfusion and respiratory failure.

Meta-Analysis of Racial Disparity in Clinical Outcome Among Congenital Heart Disease Patients Postsurgery.

Congenital heart disease (CHD), the most prevalent congenital disorder in newborns, is a leading cause of infant mortality. Mortality rates have declined over time with advancements in knowledge and management approaches. Despite these advancements, studies on racial disparities in CHD surgical mortality have yielded inconclusive results. We aim to evaluate the disparity among the clinical outcomes post-CHD surgery. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus utilizing predefined MeSH terms coupled with Boolean operators "AND" and "OR." The search strategy included the terms "congenital heart disease" AND "racial disparity" OR "minorities" OR "Black" OR "White" AND "mortality." Our meta-analysis sought observational studies published from inception until 10th March 2023 reporting post-surgical incidence of mortality in Black and White patients with CHD. We identified 5 studies, including 79616 patients with CHD. Of these, 15,124 Black patients and 64,492 White patients who underwent for CHD surgery. All included patients were less than 18 years of age with a definitive diagnosis of CHD. The mean length of the hospital stay was (11.5 vs 10.10) days, respectively. The pooled analysis showed that Black patients with CHD have significantly higher odds of postoperative mortality (OR, 1.46 (95%CI: 1.31-1.62), P < 0.001) with low heterogeneity across the studies. This very first meta-analysis shows that Black patients are at increased risk of mortality post-CHD surgery compared to White patients. These disparities need to be addressed, and proper guidelines need to be made with better medical infrastructure and treatment options for racial minority groups.

Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases and Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases (AIRDs) are associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. However, the post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes in this population present a research gap, given the limited and discordant findings in existing studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the relationship between AIRDs and clinical outcomes after PCI; 9 studies with 7,027,270 patients (126,914 with AIRD, 6,900,356 without AIRD) were included. The AIRD cohort was characterized by an older age, a predominantly female demographic, and a greater prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Over a mean follow-up period of 4.6 ± 3.5 years, AIRD patients demonstrated significantly higher odds of all-cause mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.45, 95% CI: 1.25-1.78, P < .001) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 1.63, 95% CI: 1.01-2.62, P = .04) compared with non-AIRD patients. Sensitivity analysis using adjusted estimates, confirmed the higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.32, 95% CI: 1.05-1.64, P = .01). Patients with rheumatoid arthritis had a significantly elevated odds of all-cause mortality (OR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.27-1.77) and MACE (OR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.14-1.21). Our study demonstrated an association between AIRDs and suboptimal long-term outcomes post-PCI. Prospective studies are warranted to explore the risk factors of unfavorable prognoses in patients with AIRDs.

Short-Term Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: Markers of Thrombo-Inflammation Are Independent Risk Factors and Only Weakly Associated with Renal Insufficiency and Co-Morbidity Burden.

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There has been renewed interest in using thrombo-inflammatory markers as prognostic tools in patients with CHF. To determine if thrombo-inflammatory markers are independent risk factors for 28-day mortality in hospitalized CHF patients, we retrospectively analyzed admission data extracted from 2008 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of CHF to Zigong Fourth People's Hospital. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that the thrombo-inflammatory markers thrombin time, platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and D-dimer level were independent predictors of mortality. In addition, variables reflecting the severity of CHF (New York Heart Association class > 2), impaired renal function (elevated serum creatinine [SCr]), impaired organ perfusion (elevated BUN), and chronic liver disease were also independent predictors of mortality. Thrombo-inflammatory biomarkers were only weakly associated with SCr and the burden of co-morbidity, suggesting that thrombo-inflammation may in large part be attributable to CHF itself and that, moreover, its presence may confer an increased risk of mortality. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to determine the existence and the consequences of a thrombo-inflammatory phenotype among patients with CHF.

National Trends, Mortality and Outcomes in Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States.

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) have become increasingly utilized in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite these purported advantages, prior reports regarding the use of IVUS and OCT have indicated that contemporary use of intravascular imaging remains low with significant regional variation. Here, we present the findings of an updated contemporary analysis regarding the use of IVUS/OCT guided PCI vs. angiography-guided PCI in the United States. We also evaluated in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes between IVUS/OCT-guided PCI versus angiography-guided PCI-only over million patients in the United States. There has been a significant decrease in the number of PCIs performed, while there has been increasing in trend of IVUS/OCT-guided PCI over this period. Most importantly, we found that IVUS/OCT guided PCI were associated with better clinical outcomes in terms of in-hospital mortality, compare with angiography guided PCI.

Gender Differences in the Short and Long-Term Outcomes Following Rotational Atherectomy: A Meta-Analysis.

Rotational atherectomy (RA) is used to address complex calcified coronary lesions but data regarding the association between gender and outcomes of patients who underwent RA remain uncertain. We aimed to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent RA based on gender. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from its inception until August 2023 for relevant studies. Endpoints were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model as odd ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 7 studies with 8,490 patients (2,565 women and 5,925 men) who underwent RA were included in the study. In terms of periprocedural outcomes, women had a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.68, p = 0.03), coronary dissection (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.10, p = 0.03), coronary perforation (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.23, p = 0.01), and stroke (OR 4.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 16.82, p = 0.04) than men. There were no significant differences between women and men in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.94, p = 0.33), myocardial infarction (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.08, p = 0.18), bleeding (OR 1.71, 95% CI 0.88 to 3.30, p = 0.11), and cardiac tamponade (OR 2.30, 95% CI 0.45 to 11.68, p = 0.32). Over a follow-up period of 3 years, the results of meta-analysis showed that women had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.77, p <0.001), long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.74, p = 0.01), and long-term stroke (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.63 to 7.17, p <0.001). The risk of long-term myocardial infarction was found to be similar between both genders (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.22, p = 0.09). In conclusion, female gender is associated with adverse periprocedural and long-term outcome after RA. Women consistently demonstrated higher risk of in-hospital mortality, coronary dissection, coronary perforation, and stroke in the periprocedural period. Long-term follow-up further highlighted a heightened risk for women in terms of all-cause mortality and stroke.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) are one of the leading causes of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Evidence supporting Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) for the prevention of SCD and mortality has shown conflicting results to date. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the impact of ICD therapy with conventional care for the primary prevention of death of various causes in adults with ICM and NICM. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search on the electronic database for relevant articles from inception until 30th May 2023. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using a random effect model, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 13 randomized controlled trials involving 7857 patients were included in the study. Pooled analysis showed that ICD therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of all-cause mortality (OR, 0.69 (95%CI:0.55-0.87), P = 0.001), with a similar trend among ICM and NICM compared with the control group. ICD therapy also reduces the incidence of SCD (OR, 0.32(95%CI: 0.24-0.43), P<0.00001) with a similar trend in ICM and NICM, as well as death due to arrhythmia (OR, 0.35(95%CI: 0.19-0.64), P<0.001). However, the incidence of cardiovascular mortality in the ICD group (OR, 0.77(95%CI: 0.58-1.02), P=0.07) was comparable to the control group. CONCLUSION: ICD therapy was associated with a reduction in the incidence of all-cause mortality, sudden cardiac death, and death due to arrhythmia among ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients.

Association between baseline high-sensitive C-reactive protein, homocysteine levels, and post-stroke depression among stroke patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

BACKGROUND: Post-stroke depression (PSD) is a prevalent neuropsychiatric sequelae following stroke, often associated with diminished functional recovery and heightened mortality risk. Emerging evidence suggests neuroinflammation, triggered in response to stroke events, may be instrumental in precipitating PSD. AIM: This study aims to assess the significance of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP) and homocysteine (Hcy) in post-stroke individuals with PSD. METHODS: We systematically searched all electronic databases from inception until May 30, 2023. Outcomes were reported as standard mean difference (SMD), and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: A total of 12 studies with 3,230 patients were included in this study. The mean age of the overall cohort was 65.7 years, and patients with PSD were observed to be older than patients without PSD (68.3 years versus 63.1 years). We observed a higher female prevalence in the PSD group (44.4% versus 40.7%). PSD patients were more likely to be widowed (19.4% versus 8.4%) and more likely to have a family history of psychiatric disorder (11.3% versus 4.9%) compared to non-PSD patients. We also observed that patients with PSD had higher levels of baseline Hs-CRP [SMD 0.16, (95% CI 0.08 to 0.25), p<0.001], and Hcy [SMD 0.14, (95% CI 0.05 to 0.22), p<0.001] than patients without PSD. Meta-regression analysis did not reveal any effect modifier for higher Hs-CRP in the study group, however, history of widowhood was a significant effect modifier when assessing Hcy levels between the two groups (coefficient 1.998, p=0.038). CONCLUSION: Baseline levels of Hs-CRP and Hcy were significantly higher in patients with PSD, highlighting the role of recognizing demographic and biochemical markers in understanding the complexities of post-stroke depression.

Association between rheumatoid arthritis and atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disorder with a varying range of organs involved leading to adverse outcomes. However, very little is known, with conflicting results about the association between RA and atrial fibrillation (AF). We aim to evaluate the association between RA and AF, and other clinical outcomes. We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for relevant articles from inception until September 10, 2023. Primary clinical outcomes were AF. Secondary outcomes were acute coronary syndrome (ACS), stroke, and all-cause mortality (ACM). A total of 4 679 930 patients were included in the analysis, with 81 677 patients in the RA group and 4 493 993 patients in the nonrheumatoid arthritis (NRA) group. The mean age of the patients was 57.2 years. Pooled analysis of primary outcomes shows that RA groups of patients had a significantly higher risk of AF (odds ratios [OR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.16-2.03], p < .001) compared with NRA groups. Secondary Outcomes show that the RA group of patients had significantly higher odds of ACS (OR, 1.39; 95% CI: [1.26-1.52], p < .001), and ACM (OR, 1.19; 95% CI: [1.03-1.37], p = .02) compared with the NRA groups. However, the likelihood of stroke (OR, 1.02; 95% CI: [0.94-1.11], p = .61) was comparable between both groups of patients. Our study shows that RA groups of patients are at increased risk of having AF, ACS, and ACM.

Association Between Catheter Ablation and Dementia Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of Dementia. However, the association between catheter ablation (CA) in patients with atrial fibrillation and the risk of dementia is not well established, with conflicting results to date. We aimed to evaluate the association between CA patients and the risk of Dementia. We performed a systematic literature search using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane libraries for relevant articles from inception until 10th May 2023. Hazard ratios (HR) were pooled using a random-effect model, and a P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 5 studies with 125,649 patients (30,192 in the CA group and 95,457 in the non-CA group) were included. The mean age of patients among CA and non-CA groups was comparable (58.7 vs 58.18). The most common comorbidity among CA and non-CA groups was hypertension (18.49% vs 81.51%), respectively. Pooled analysis of primary outcome showed that CA was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of Dementia (HR, 0.63 [95% CI: 0.52-0.77], P < 0.001). Similarly, pooled analysis of secondary outcomes showed that the patients with CA had a lower risk of Alzheimer's disease (HR, 0.78 [95% CI: 0.66-0.92], P < 0.001) compared with the non-CA group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of vascular dementia (HR, 0.63 [95% CI: 0.38-1.06], P = 0.08) between both groups of patients. Our study suggested that catheter ablation reduced the risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease compared to the nonablation group of patients.

Vascular complications and outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients on chronic steroid therapy: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic steroid (CS) therapy was reportedly linked to increased vascular complications following percutaneous coronary intervention. However, its association with vascular complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remained uncertain, with conflicting results being reported. OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to compare the rate of vascular complications and outcomes between patients with and without CS use after TAVR. METHODS: The authors conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from their inception until 18th April 2022 for relevant studies. Endpoints were described according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions. Effect sizes were pooled using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model as risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. RESULTS: Five studies with 6136 patients undergoing TAVR were included in the analysis. The included studies were published between 2015 and 2022. The mean ages of patients in both study groups were similar, with the CS group averaging 80 years and the nonsteroid group averaging 82 years. Notably, a higher proportion of patients in the CS group were female (56%) compared to the nonsteroid group (54%). CS use was associated with a significantly higher risk of major vascular complications (12.5 vs. 6.7%, RR 2.32, 95% CI: 1.73-3.11, P <0.001), major bleeding (16.8 vs. 13.1%, RR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.27-2.05, P <0.001), and aortic annulus rupture (2.3 vs. 0.6%, RR 4.66, 95% CI: 1.67-13.01, P <0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of minor vascular complications (RR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.00-2.04, P =0.05), in-hospital mortality (2.3 vs. 1.4%, RR 1.86, 95% CI: 0.74-4.70, P =0.19), and 30-day mortality (2.9 vs. 3.1%, RR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.53-2.46, P =0.74) between both groups. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that CS therapy is associated with increased major vascular complications, major bleeding, and annulus rupture following TAVR. Further large multicenter studies or randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings.

Racial Disparity Between the Post-Procedural Outcomes Among Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The Racial disparity between the clinical outcomes post interventions among Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) have not been well studied, with limited literature available. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the post-procedure outcomes among PAD patients between Black and White race. We systematically searched all electronic databases from inception until first November 2022. The primary endpoint was major amputation within 30 days. Secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days, mortality within 30 days, and all-cause mortality (ACM). A total of 136,395 patients were included in the analysis, with 117,177 patients of the White race and 19,218 patients of the Black race. The mean age of the patients in each group was (66.41 vs 62.75). Most common comorbidity among White and Black patients was diabetes mellitus (42.15% vs 55.90%), and hypertension (HTN) (39.53% vs 90.07%). The odds of major amputation within 30 days was significantly higher in Black patients compared to white patients (OR, 0.40 (95% CI: 0.19-0.84, P = 0.02), while the odds of MI was higher in White patients compared to Black race PAD patients (OR, 1.29, (95%CI:1.05-1.58), P < 0.02). There was no significant difference in ACM (OR, 0.97(95%CI: 0.64-1.47, P = 0.88), and mortality within 30 days (OR, 1.09(95%CI:0.77-1.53, P = 0.64) between both groups. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis with the largest sample size thus far, highlighting that Black patients are at a higher risk for major amputation within 30 days compared to white patients although mortality remains comparable between the 2 races.

Comparison of outcome among type 2 vs type 1 myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To date, there were limited studies available on myocardial infarction (MI), and consequently, the outcomes of patients with type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI) compared to type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) remained inconclusive. We aimed to compare the outcomes of T1MI and T2MI patients in terms of mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. We performed a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for relevant articles from inception until March 20, 2022. 341,049 patients had T1MI, while the remaining 67,537 patients had T2MI. Mean age was similar between both groups (T1MI: 67.3 years, T2MI: 71.03 years), while the proportion of females was lower in T1MI (37.81% vs 47.15%). Our analysis revealed that patients with T1MI had significantly lower odds of all-cause mortality (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.36-0.56, p < 0.001), in-hospital mortality (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46-0.86, p < 0.001), 1-year mortality (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.25-0.47, p < 0.001), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.91, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in terms of 30-day mortality (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.25-1.36, p = 0.21), cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.68-1.32, p = 0.74), all-cause readmission (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62-1.14, p = 0.26), and readmission due to MI (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.66-2.27, p = 0.53) between both groups. Patients with T1MI had favorable outcomes in terms of mortality and MACE compared to that of T2MI patients. Further studies should aim at determining the optimal management strategy for these high-risk patients for better patient outcomes.

Post-diagnostic statin use and its association with cancer recurrence and mortality in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Statins are widely acknowledged for their application in patients with hypercholesterolemia to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. More recently, their potential to exert pleiotropic effects, particularly in impeding the proliferation of neoplastic cells, has attracted considerable attention. Prior studies have demonstrated that statins may mitigate cancer progression and micrometastasis. However, the benefits of statins in breast cancer have been inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of statin use following a breast cancer diagnosis on breast cancer recurrence and mortality. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for relevant articles from inception until 30th May 2023. Hazard ratios (HR) were pooled using a random-effect model. The primary outcome of interest was the risk of breast cancer recurrence. The secondary outcomes included breast cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies with 156 448 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age of patients between statin users and non-users was 64.59 and 59.15 years, respectively. Statin use was associated with a reduction in the recurrence of breast cancer [HR 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-0.87] compared with non-statin users. This trend was similar among lipophilic statin users (HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.63-0.85) but not for hydrophilic statin users (HR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.82-1.68). Furthermore, statin users exhibited a lower risk of breast cancer mortality (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66-0.96) but all-cause mortality (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-1.02) was comparable among both groups of patients. Conversely, lipophilic statins demonstrated a reduction in both all-cause mortality (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75-0.93) and breast cancer mortality (HR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.99) compared to non-statin users. CONCLUSION: Among patients with breast cancer, statin use post-diagnosis decreases the risk of breast cancer recurrence and breast cancer mortality. Furthermore, lipophilic statins exhibit an additional advantage of reduction in all-cause mortality.PROSPERO registration: CRD42022362011.

Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes Among Solid Organ Transplant Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The safety and clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) among patients with solid organ transplants is not well understood. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of TAVR and SAVR among patients with a history of solid organ transplantation. We performed a systematic literature search of databases for relevant articles from inception until May 1st, 2022. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were pooled using a random-effect model, and a P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 3240 studies were identified of which 3 studies with a total of 2960 patients were included in the final analysis. For solid organ transplants patients, the odds of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.20-0.71, P < 0.001), 30-day mortality (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.74, P < 0.001), acute kidney injury (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.35-0.59, P < 0.001), and bleeding (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.27-0.46, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in patients undergoing TAVR compared to SAVR. In contrast, the odds of pacemaker implantation (OR 2.60, 95% CI 0.36-18.90, P = 0.34), postprocedural stroke (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.13-1.03, P = 0.06) were similar between both groups of patients. Length of hospital stay was significantly lower in TAVR compared to SAVR patients (SMD -0.82, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.70, P < 0.001). In solid organ transplant patients, TAVR appeared to be a safe procedure with fewer postprocedure complications, shorter length of hospital stay, and lower in hospital mortality compared with SAVR.

Acute Kidney Injury Associated with Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Risk Factors for Morbidity and Mortality and a Potential Benefit of Combined Therapy with Tocilizumab and Corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in patients with severe COVID-19. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 249 patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) during the first wave of the pandemic to determine risk factors for AKI. Demographics, comorbidities, and clinical and outcome variables were obtained from electronic medical records. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed older age, higher admission serum creatinine, elevated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, elevated admission D-Dimer, elevated CRP on day 2, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor requirement, and azithromycin usage as significant risk factors for AKI. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher admission creatinine (p = 0.0001, OR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.56-3.70), vasopressor requirement (p = 0.0001, OR = 3.20, 95% CI = 1.69-5.98), elevated admission D-Dimer (p = 0.008, OR = 1.0001, 95% CI = 1.000-1.001), and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) on day 2 (p = 0.033, OR = 1.0001, 95% CI = 1.004-1.009) were independent risk factors. Conversely, the combined use of Tocilizumab and corticosteroids was independently associated with reduced AKI risk (p = 0.0009, OR = 0.437, 95% CI = 0.23-0.81). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the high rate of AKI and associated mortality among COVID-19 patients admitted to ICUs and suggests a role for inflammation and/or coagulopathy in AKI development. One should consider the possibility that early administration of anti-inflammatory agents, as is now routinely conducted in the management of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome, may improve clinical outcomes in patients with AKI.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

There is a paucity of data and minimal literature on outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among liver cirrhosis patients. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical outcomes among liver cirrhosis patients post-PCI. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus databases for relevant studies. Effect sizes were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 3 studies met the inclusion criteria, providing data from 10,705,976 patients. A total of 28,100 patients were in the PCI + Cirrhosis group and 10,677,876 patients were in the PCI-only group. The mean age of patients with PCI + Cirrhosis and PCI alone was 63.45 and 64.35 years. The most common comorbidity was hypertension among the PCI + Cirrhosis group compared with PCI alone (68.15% vs. 73.6%). Cirrhosis patients post-PCI were had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (OR, 4.78 (95%CI: 3.39-6.75), p < 0.001), GI bleeding (OR, 1.91 (95%CI:1.83-1.99), p < 0.001, I2 = 0%), stroke (OR, 2.48 (95%CI:1.68-3.66), p < 0.001), AKI (OR, 3.66 (95%CI: 2.33-6.02), p < 0.001), and vascular complications (OR, 1.50 (95%CI: 1.13-1.98), p < 0.001) compared with the PCI group without cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis are at a high risk for mortality and adverse outcomes post-PCI procedure compared to the PCI-only group of patients.

Amplatzer amulet versus watchman device for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Amplatzer Amulet (AA) and Watchman devices (WD) are the 2 most frequently used devices for percutaneous LAA closure globally. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes associated with these 2 devices in patients undergoing percutaneous LAA closure. METHOD: We systematically searched all electronic databases from inception until February 21, 2023. The primary endpoint was procedure related complications. Secondary endpoints were device related thrombus, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, peri device leak, systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 3 randomized clinical trials with 2150 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The mean age was 75 and 76 years in the Amplatzer group and in the Watchman group, respectively. The odds of procedure-related complications (OR, 1.80 [95% CI: 1.21-2.67], P < .001) were significantly higher among patients with AA compared to the WD. However, the odds of all-cause mortality (OR, 0.75 (95% CI: 0.49-1.16), P = .20), stroke (OR, 0.79 [95% CI: 0.47-1.34], P = .39), systemic/pulmonary embolism (OR, 1.34 [95% CI: 0.30-6.04], P = .70), and major bleeding (OR, 1.10 [95% CI: 0.83-1.48], P = .50) were comparable between the two devices. The odds of device related thrombus (OR, 0.72 [95% CI: 0.46-1.14], P = .17) was comparable between both the group of patients, however the incidence of peri device leak was significantly lower in AA group (OR, 0.41 [95% CI: 0.26-0.66], P < .001) compared with WD group of patients. CONCLUSION: The AA was not superior to the Watchman device in terms of safety and efficacy. However, the Amulet occluder was associated with a higher incidence of procedure-related complications, and lower peri device leak.