The post-operative tonsillectomy (POPT) study: A multi-centre prospective paediatric cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Tonsillectomy is the most common operation performed by otolaryngologists in the UK, despite this we have a poor understanding of the post-operative recovery. We aimed to investigate post-operative bleeding and pain following paediatric tonsillectomy using a patient diary. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Multi-centre study involving 12 secondary and tertiary otolaryngology units across the North of England. Patients were recruited from 1st March 2020 to 30th June 2022. Multilevel ordered logistic regression model statistics were performed. PARTICIPANTS: Children (≥4 years, ≤16 years) undergoing tonsillectomy (with or without adenoidectomy) for benign pathology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency and severity of post-operative bleeding. Intensity and pattern of post-operative pain. RESULTS: In total 297 children were recruited, with 91 (30.6%) diaries eligible for analysis. Post-operative bleeding occurred in 44% of children. Most frequently blood in the saliva was reported (82.9%). Increasing age significantly increased bleeding odds by 17% per year (p = .001). Bleeding frequency decreased with higher surgeon grade (p = .003) and when performing intracapsular coblation tonsillectomy (p = .02) compared with other techniques. Lower age and intracapsular coblation tonsillectomy, against other techniques, significantly reduced rates of pain post-operatively (p < .0001 and p = .0008). CONCLUSION: A high level of low-level post-operative bleeding was observed. Pain scores remained high for 5 days post-operatively then gradually reduce to normal by day 13. Intracapsular coblation tonsillectomy appears to be superior to all other techniques in terms of reducing post-operative bleeding and pain. These findings should be used to guide patients in the consent process to inform them of the expected nature of post-surgical recovery.

Higher Speciality Training Boot Camp in Otolaryngology: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of the Northern National Formative Specialty Training 3 Induction Course.

Background Opportunities for new otolaryngology trainees to develop their skills as they embark on specialty training can be limited. Our facility hosted a national simulation-based boot camp for new otolaryngology trainees in the UK. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the boot camp in improving trainee confidence as they transitioned from core surgical training (CST) to higher specialty training (HST) in otolaryngology. Methodology We conducted a prospective study on the effectiveness of the boot camp on trainee induction. The boot camp included hands-on simulation, small group teaching and didactic lectures addressing technical skills in the fields of otology, laryngology, rhinology, facial plastics, and paediatrics, as well as non-technical skills involving human factors, simulated ward round, and cognitive simulation. The boot camp curriculum reflected the competencies expected by the Joint Committee of Surgical Training (JCST) at this level of training. Participants completed a pre- and post-course questionnaire addressing their self-confidence for the technical and non-technical skills they developed during the boot camp. All participants were invited to participate in an interview 12 months after the boot camp. Results A total of 27 new otolaryngology trainees (approximately half of all new otolaryngology trainees in the UK) participated in the boot camp. A significant increase in median confidence was observed for all technical and non-technical stations (p < 0.0001). The increase in confidence observed was similar for participants regardless of prior experience in otolaryngology. Five candidates were interviewed a year after the boot camp. Analysis of the transcripts generated distinct comments that were grouped into five key themes. Conclusions A simulation-based boot camp mapped to the JCST curriculum can increase the confidence of new otolaryngology Specialty Training 3 trainees during their transition from CST to HST. It can provide valuable and durable technical and non-technical skills to aid trainees in the clinic, theatre environment, and when on-call during their inaugural year of training.

Acute otitis externa: Consensus definition, diagnostic criteria and core outcome set development.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence for the management of acute otitis externa (AOE) is limited, with unclear diagnostic criteria and variably reported outcome measures that may not reflect key stakeholder priorities. We aimed to develop 1) a definition, 2) diagnostic criteria and 3) a core outcome set (COS) for AOE. STUDY DESIGN: COS development according to Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) methodology and parallel consensus selection of diagnostic criteria/definition. SETTING: Stakeholders from the United Kingdom. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Comprehensive literature review identified candidate items for the COS, definition and diagnostic criteria. Nine individuals with past AOE generated further patient-centred candidate items. Candidate items were rated for importance by patient and professional (ENT doctors, general practitioners, microbiologists, nurses, audiologists) stakeholders in a three-round online Delphi exercise. Consensus items were grouped to form the COS, diagnostic criteria, and definition. RESULTS: Candidate COS items from patients (n = 28) and literature (n = 25) were deduplicated and amalgamated to a final candidate list (n = 46). Patients emphasised quality-of-life and the impact on daily activities/work. Via the Delphi process, stakeholders agreed on 31 candidate items. The final COS covered six outcomes: pain; disease severity; impact on quality-of-life and daily activities; patient satisfaction; treatment-related outcome; and microbiology. 14 candidate diagnostic criteria were identified, 8 reaching inclusion consensus. The final definition for AOE was 'diffuse inflammation of the ear canal skin of less than 6 weeks duration'. CONCLUSION: The development and adoption of a consensus definition, diagnostic criteria and a COS will help to standardise future research in AOE, facilitating meta-analysis. Consulting former patients throughout development highlighted deficiencies in the outcomes adopted previously, in particular concerning the impact of AOE on daily life.

ENT Quality Improvement Program as a tool to improve the collection of morbidity and mortality data: a multisite audit carried out over 6 months.

OBJECTIVE: This project aims to assess the role of a standardised process of data collection to improve morbidity and mortality data across the region. DESIGN: Six hospitals within the North West (UK) were recruited and adopted the ENT Quality Improvement Program (QIP) into their daily practice. Monthly anonymous data were sent back to the reviewer for trend analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Four outcome measures were defined: (1) number of cases recorded within the region each month; (2) assessment of the severity of cases and trends; (3) assessment of action plans reviewing any changes in practice made as a result of using this tool; (4) long-term use of the tool and qualitative feedback from units. RESULTS: 162 patients over the 6 months were included with 180 case discussions. 170 of these were morbidities and 10 were mortalities. Mortality was more frequent in patients with a diagnosis of head and neck cancer. Of the 162 patients, 133 encountered postoperative complications. Post-tonsillectomy (62/133 47%) and post-thyroid surgery (19/133 14%) complications were the most frequently encountered. 66% of the complications were low grade with 18% requiring management under general anaesthetic. Actions plans included four policy reviews with the introduction of three new policies. All sites found the tool user-friendly and are continuing to use it beyond the data collection period. CONCLUSIONS: The ENT QIP has been found to be a simple, user-friendly tool which has improved the quality of data over the six sites and resulted in improvements in practice. Implementation of the tool allows clinicians to critically appraise their practice and to reflect as well as to demonstrate how complications have resulted in change.