RESUMO
The dataset presents a compilation of stomach contents from six demersal fish species from two functional groups inhabiting the Baltic Sea. It includes detailed information on prey identities, body masses, and biomasses recovered from both the fish's digestive systems and their surrounding environment. Environmental parameters, such as salinity and temperature levels, have been integrated to enrich this dataset. The juxtaposition of information on prey found in stomachs and in the environment provides an opportunity to quantify trophic interactions across different environmental contexts and investigate how fish foraging behaviour adapts to changes in their environment, such as an increase in temperature. The compilation of body mass and taxonomic information for all species allows approaching these new questions using either a taxonomic (based on species identity) or functional trait (based on body mass) approach.
Assuntos
Peixes , Conteúdo Gastrointestinal , Animais , Países Bálticos , Oceanos e MaresRESUMO
At macroecological scales, the provision of Nature's contributions to people (NCP) is mostly estimated with biophysical information, ignoring the ecological processes underlying them. This hinders our ability to properly quantify the impact of declining biodiversity and the provision of NCP. Here, we propose a framework that combines local-scale food web energy flux approaches and large-scale biodiversity models to evaluate ecosystem functions and flux-related NCP at extensive spatiotemporal scales. Importantly, this approach has the potential to upscale ecosystem functions, assess the vulnerability of flux-related NCP to the climate crisis, and support the development of multiscale mitigation policies.
Assuntos
Biodiversidade , Ecossistema , Humanos , Mudança Climática , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Cadeia Alimentar , Modelos BiológicosRESUMO
Objetivos: Comparar a expressão imuno-histoquímica da E-caderina e da Beta-catenina de lesões escamosaspré-neoplásicas e neoplásicas de mucosa oral de amostras emblocadas em parafina. Materiais e métodos:Foram selecionadas 15 amostras de mucosa oral de pacientes apresentando hiperplasia com ou sem displasialeve (grupo 1); 5 amostras apresentando displasia moderada, acentuada ou carcinoma in situ (grupo 2); e12 amostras apresentando carcinoma de células escamosas invasor (grupo 3). Essas amostras foram submetidasà técnica de imuno-histoquímica com anticorpos primários monoclonais anti-E-caderina e anti-Betacatenina.A leitura em microscopia óptica compreendeu a expressão tecidual desses marcadores no epitélioescamoso das amostras de mucosa oral lesadas ou não. A expressão imuno-histoquímica dessas moléculasde adesão foi classificada, segundo a sua intensidade de marcação tecidual, em negativa, positiva fraca epositiva forte. Resultados: A expressão de E-caderina foi forte em 93,3% dos casos do grupo 1 (hiperplasia/displasia leve), e 100% dos casos demonstraram forte expressão para a Beta-catenina nesse mesmo grupo. Contudo, no grupo 3 (carcinoma de célula escamosa), somente 42% dos casos foram fortemente positivospara E-caderina e 25% deles para Beta-catenina. Conclusões: A E-caderina e a Beta-catenina diminuíram asua expressão segundo a progressão tumoral do carcinoma de mucosa oral, reforçando um dos mecanismosrelacionados com a sua carcinogênese.
Objectives: To compare the immunohistochemical expression of E-cadherin and Beta-catenin in squamous pre-malignant and malignant lesions of formalin fixed paraffin embedded buccal mucosa samples. Materials e methods: Selected 15 samples of buccal mucosa of patients with hyperplasia with or without mild dysplasia (group 1), 5 samples showing moderate dysplasia, severe or carcinoma in situ (group 2) and 12 samples presenting invasive squamous cell carcinoma (group 3). These samples were subjected to immunohistochemistry with anti-E-cadherin and anti-Beta-catenin monoclonal antibodies. The expression of these markers in tissue samples injured or not were analyzed in accordance of positivity that was observed in epithelium stratum. The immunohistochemical expression of these adhesion molecules was classified according to their intensity in negative, weak positive and strong positive. Results: The expression of E-cadherin was strong at 93.3% of patients in group 1, and 100% of the cases showed strong expression of Beta-catenin in the same group. However, in group 3, only 42% of cases were strongly positive for E-cadherin and 25% of them to Beta-catenin. Conclusions: The E-cadherin and Beta-catenin decreased their expression according to tumor progression, from hiperplasia/mild dysplasia lesion to buccal invasive carcinoma and this fact may be related of the carcinogenesis mechanisms.