Changes in Transient Elastography with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Real-World Retrospective Analysis.

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), especially in patients with comorbid diabetes and obesity. This study investigated the effects of GLP-1RAs on hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in patients with MASLD, as measured by changes in vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and other clinical parameters in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of 96 patients with MASLD from a multidisciplinary care clinic who completed VCTE at baseline and follow-up within 6-24 months to compare changes in controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM), as well as other metabolic markers, between GLP-1RA users and nonusers using two-sample t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. We also assessed whether improvements in hepatic steatosis, defined as a change in CAP >38 dB/m as previously described in the literature, were associated with improvement in fibrosis. Results: GLP-1RA use resulted in significant improvements in weight (-8.1 kg vs. -3.5 kg, P = 0.009), body mass index (BMI) (-2.9 kg/m2 vs. -1.3 kg/m2, P = 0.012), alanine aminotransferase (-15.0 IU/L vs. -4.0 IU/L, P = 0.017), aspartate aminotransferase (-5.0 IU/L vs. -1.0 IU/L, P = 0.021), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (-0.7% vs. 0.1%, P = 0.019), and CAP (-59.9 dB/m vs. -29.1 dB/m, P = 0.016). Responders also had significant improvements in weight (-9.2 kg vs. -1.9 kg, P < 0.001), BMI (-3.3 kg/m2 vs. -0.7 kg/m2, P < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (-6.1 mmHg vs. -0.7 mmHg, P = 0.028), HbA1c (-0.8% vs. 0.3%, P < 0.001), and LSM (-1.5 kPa vs. 0.1 kPa, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with MASLD treated with GLP-1RAs showed significant improvements in hepatic steatosis and multiple other metabolic parameters, with weight loss as the proposed mechanism for this liver improvement. In addition, change in CAP >38 dB/m was associated with improvements in LSM and other metabolic parameters, suggesting the clinical utility of VCTE in the surveillance of MASLD.

Cardiovascular risk of celecoxib in 6 randomized placebo-controlled trials: the cross trial safety analysis.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies and randomized trials have reported increased cardiovascular risk associated with cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Prior placebo-controlled randomized studies had limited ability to assess the relationship of either celecoxib dose or pretreatment cardiovascular status to risk associated with celecoxib. Our aim was to assess the cardiovascular risk associated with celecoxib in 3 dose regimens and to assess the relationship between baseline cardiovascular risk and effect of celecoxib on cardiovascular events. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a patient-level pooled analysis of adjudicated data from 7950 patients in 6 placebo-controlled trials comparing celecoxib with placebo for conditions other than arthritis with a planned follow-up of at least 3 years. Patients were administered celecoxib in 3 dose regimens: 400 mg QD, 200 mg BID, or 400 mg BID. From the pooled data, we calculated a hazard ratio for all dose regimens combined and individual hazard ratios for each dose regimen and examined whether celecoxib-related risk was associated with baseline cardiovascular risk. The primary end point was the combination of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or thromboembolic event. With 16,070 patient-years of follow-up, the hazard ratio for the composite end point combining the tested doses was 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1 to 2.3). The risk, which increased with dose regimen (P=0.0005), was lowest for the 400-mg-QD dose (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.6 to 2.0), intermediate for the 200-mg-BID dose (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.1), and highest for the 400-mg-BID dose (hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.5 to 6.1). Patients at highest baseline risk demonstrated disproportionately greater risk of celecoxib-related adverse events (P for interaction=0.034). CONCLUSIONS: We observed evidence of differential cardiovascular risk as a function of celecoxib dose regimen and baseline cardiovascular risk. By further clarifying the extent of celecoxib-related cardiovascular risk, these findings may help guide treatment decisions for patients who derive clinical benefit from selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition.