Potential biomarkers and metabolomics of acetaminophen-induced liver injury during alcohol consumption: A preclinical investigation on C57/BL6 mice.

The toxic effects of alcohol consumption on population health are significant worldwide and the synergistic toxic effects of concurrent intake of Acetaminophen and alcohol is of clinical concern. The understanding of molecular mechanisms beneath such synergism and acute toxicity may be enhanced through assessing underlying metabolomics changes. The molecular toxic activities of the model hereby, is assessed though metabolomics profile with a view to identifying metabolomics targets which could aid in the management of drug-alcohol interactions. In vivo exposure of C57/BL6 mice to APAP (70 mg/kg), single dose of ethanol (6 g/kg of 40%) and APAP after alcohol consumption was employed. Plasma samples were prepared and subjected to biphasic extraction for complete LC-MS profiling, and tandem mass MS2 analysis. Among the detected ions, 174 ions had significant (VIP scores >1 and FDR <0.05) changes between groups and were selected as potential biomarkers and significant variables. The presented metabolomics approach highlighted several affected metabolic pathways, including nucleotide and amino acid metabolism; aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis as well as bioenergetics of TCA and Krebs cycle. The impact of APAP on the concurrent administration of alcohol showed great biological interactions in the vital ATP and amino acid producing processes. The metabolomics changes show distinct metabolites which are altered to alcohol-APAP consumption while presenting several unneglectable risks on the vitality of metabolites and cellular molecules which shall be concerned.

Mellitin peptide quantification in seasonally collected crude bee venom and its anticancer effects on myelogenous K562 human leukaemia cell line.

BACKGROUND: Apitherapy is an emerging field in cancer research, particularly in developing communities. The potency of Melittin (MEL), a major constituent in bee venom is accounted for the cytotoxic capacity against cancer cells. It is postulated that the genotype of bees and the time of venom collection influences its specific activity against certain types of cancer. METHOD: Hereby, Jordanian crude bee venom (JCBV) was collected during different seasons of the year, specifically spring, summer and autumn and investigated for in vitro antitumour effects. Venom collected during springtime comprised the highest quantity of MEL in comparison to venom collected some other time. Springtime-collected JCBV extract and MEL were tested on an immortal myelogenous leukaemia cell line, namely K562 leukemic cells. Treated cells were examined for cell modality via flow cytometry analysis and cell death mediating gene expressions. RESULTS: Springtime-collected JCBV extract and MEL showed an IC50 of 3.7 ± 0.37 µg/ml and 1.84 ± 0.75 µg/ml, respectively. In comparison to JCBV and positive control, MEL-treated cells exhibited late apoptotic death with a moderate cellular arrest at G0/G1 and an increase of cell number at G2/M phase. Expression of NF-κB/MAPK14 axis was inhibited in MEL and JCBV-treated cells, as well as expression of c-MYC and CDK4. Moreover, marked upregulation in ABL1, JUN and TNF was observed. In conclusion, springtime-collected JCBV showed the highest content of MEL while both JCBV and pure MEL showed apoptotic, necrotic, and cell cycle arrest efficiency against K562 leukemic cells. CONCLUSION: Integration of bee venom in chemotherapy needs more investigation and should be carefully translated into clinical use. During such translation, the correlation of bee genotype, collection time and concentration of MEL in CBV should be profiled.