RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Self-harm and depression are strong risk factors for repeat self-harm and suicide. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of remotely delivered problem-solving cognitive behaviour therapy (PSCBT) plus treatment as usual (TAU) versus TAU in young people with repeat self-harm and depression. METHODS: Single-blind multi-centre RCT with an internal pilot, pre-set stop-go criteria and qualitative semi-structured interviews. Eligible participants (aged 16-30 years) were recruited from 9 adult or child and adolescent self-harm and crisis services; had ≥ 2 lifetime self-harm episodes, one in the preceding 96 h; and Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) score ≥ 17. Participants were randomised (1:1) to either TAU or TAU and 10-12 sessions of PSCBT delivered by mobile phone or video-calling. RESULTS: Twenty-two participants were recruited (11 in each arm), 10 (46%) completed follow-up at 6 months, 9 (82%) started the PSCBT and 4 (36%) completed it. The study did not meet three of its four stop-go criteria, reflecting considerable barriers to recruitment and retention. Participants had severe depression symptoms: with mean BDI-II 38.9 in the PSCBT and 37.2 in TAU groups, respectively. Three (14%) unblindings occurred for immediate safety concerns. Barriers to recruitment and retention included lack of agency for participants, severity of depression, recency of crisis with burden for participants and clinicians who diagnosed depression according to pervasiveness. CONCLUSIONS: RCTs of PSCBT for young people with depression and self-harm are not feasible using recruitment through mental health services that conduct assessments following self-harm presentations. Clinician assessment following self-harm presentation mainly identifies those with severe rather than mild-moderate depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02377011 ); Date of registration: March 3rd 2015. Retrospectively registered: within 21 days of recruitment of the first participant.
Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Depressão/terapia , Resolução de Problemas , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/terapia , Telemedicina/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/psicologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/epidemiologia , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/psicologia , Método Simples-Cego , Suicídio/psicologia , Adulto Jovem , Prevenção do SuicídioRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Most frequent attendance in primary care is temporary, but persistent frequent attendance is expensive and may be suitable for psychological intervention. To plan appropriate intervention and service delivery, there is a need for research involving standardized psychiatric interviews with assessment of physical health and health status. OBJECTIVE: To compare the mental and physical health characteristics and health status of persistent frequent attenders (FAs) in primary care, currently and over the preceding 2 years, with normal attenders (NAs) matched by age, gender and general practice. METHODS: Case-control study of 71 FAs (30 or more GP or practice nurse consultations in 2 years) and 71 NAs, drawn from five primary care practices, employing standardized psychiatric interview, quality of life, health anxiety and primary care electronic record review over the preceding 2 years. RESULTS: Compared to NAs, FAs were more likely to report a lower quality of life (P < 0.001), be unmarried (P = 0.03) and have no educational qualifications (P = 0.009) but did not differ in employment status. FAs experienced greater health anxiety (P < 0.001), morbid obesity (P = 0.02), pain (P < 0.001) and long-term pathological and ill-defined physical conditions (P < 0.001). FAs had more depression including dysthymia, anxiety and somatoform disorders (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent frequent attendance in primary care was associated with poor quality of life and high clinical complexity characterized by diverse and often persistent physical and mental multimorbidity. A brokerage model with GPs working in close liaison with skilled psychological therapists is required to manage such persistent complexity.
Assuntos
Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde , Transtornos Mentais , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The top 3% of frequent attendance in primary care is associated with 15% of all appointments in primary care, a fivefold increase in hospital expenditure, and more mental disorder and functional somatic symptoms compared to normal attendance. Although often temporary if these rates of attendance last more than two years, they may become persistent (persistent frequent or regular attendance). However, there is no long-term study of the economic impact or clinical characteristics of regular attendance in primary care. Cognitive behaviour formulation and treatment (CBT) for regular attendance as a motivated behaviour may offer an understanding of the development, maintenance and treatment of regular attendance in the context of their health problems, cognitive processes and social context. METHODS/DESIGN: A case control design will compare the clinical characteristics, patterns of health care use and economic costs over the last 10 years of 100 regular attenders (≥30 appointments with general practitioner [GP] over 2 years) with 100 normal attenders (6-22 appointments with GP over 2 years), from purposefully selected primary care practices with differing organisation of care and patient demographics. Qualitative interviews with regular attending patients and practice staff will explore patient barriers, drivers and experiences of consultation, and organisation of care by practices with its challenges. Cognitive behaviour formulation analysed thematically will explore the development, maintenance and therapeutic opportunities for management in regular attenders. The feasibility, acceptability and utility of CBT for regular attendance will be examined. DISCUSSION: The health care costs, clinical needs, patient motivation for consultation and organisation of care for persistent frequent or regular attendance in primary care will be explored to develop training and policies for service providers. CBT for regular attendance will be piloted with a view to developing this approach as part of a multifaceted intervention.
Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Inglaterra , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Política Organizacional , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Projetos Piloto , Padrões de Prática Médica , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Psicometria , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Somatoformes/diagnóstico , Transtornos Somatoformes/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Most frequent attendance in primary care is temporary. Long-term frequent attendance may be suitable for psychological intervention to address health management and service use. AIM: To explore the feasibility and acceptability of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for long-term frequent attendance in primary care and obtain preliminary evidence regarding clinical and cost effectiveness. DESIGN AND SETTING: A CBT case series was carried out in five GP practices in the East Midlands. METHOD: Frequent attenders (FAs) were identified from case notes and invited by their practice for assessment, then offered CBT. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed by CBT session attendance and thematic analysis of semi-structured questionnaires. Clinical and cost effectiveness was assessed by primary care use and clinically important change on a range of health and quality of life instruments. RESULTS: Of 462 FAs invited to interview, 87 (19%) consented to assessment. Thirty-two (7%) undertook CBT over a median of 3 months. Twenty-four (75%) attended at least six sessions. Eighteen FAs (86%, n = 21) reported overall satisfaction with treatment. Patients reported valuing listening without judgement alongside support to develop coping strategies. Thirteen (54%, n = 24), achieved clinically important improvement on the SF-36 Mental-Component Scale at 6-month follow-up and improved quality of life, but no improvement on other outcomes. Primary care use reduced from a median of eight contacts in 3 months at baseline (n = 32) to three contacts in 3 months at 1 year (n = 18). CONCLUSION: CBT appears feasible and acceptable to a subset of long-term FAs in primary care who halved their primary care use. With improved recruitment strategies, this approach could contribute to decreasing GP workload and merits larger-scale evaluation.