RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the variability in the measurements of stress sonography of the ankle and determine the effects of examiner experience on the measurements. METHODS: Twenty examiners (10 experienced and 10 beginners) were included in the study. Each examiner performed stress ultrasonography on a patient with a chronic anterior talofibular ligament injury and a patient with an intact ligament using the reverse anterior drawer method. Changes in ligament length before versus after stress were determined. The same 20 examiners performed ultrasonography on two other patients with an injured or intact ATFL using the anterior drawer method. The length change values and variance were compared between the groups using t-tests and F-tests. RESULTS: Using the reverse anterior drawer method, the change in the anterior talofibular ligament length was 3.3 mm (range, 2.2-4.8 mm) in the experienced group and 2.7 mm (0.0-4.1 mm) in the beginner group for the ligament injured patient. The length changes for the patient with intact anterior talofibular ligament were 0.5 mm (0.1-0.9 mm) and 0.4 mm (-0.1-1.5 mm) in the experienced and beginner groups, respectively. There were no significant intergroup differences in measurement amount (P = 0.37) or variance (P = 0.72). Similarly, using the anterior drawer method, no significant differences between the groups were found in measurement amount or variance. CONCLUSION: The quantitative evaluation of stress sonography of the ankle was variable regardless of examiner experience or stress method, particularly in patients with an anterior talofibular ligament injury. The amount of variability appeared to be unacceptably large for clinical application. Our study results highlight the need for technical standardization.
Assuntos
Traumatismos do Tornozelo , Instabilidade Articular , Ligamentos Laterais do Tornozelo , Humanos , Tornozelo , Traumatismos do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Ligamentos Laterais do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Ligamentos Laterais do Tornozelo/lesões , Ultrassonografia/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In quantitative ankle stress sonography, different examiners use different techniques, which may cause measurement variability. This study aimed to clarify whether standardizing stress sonography techniques reduces variability in the quantitative measurement of anterior talofibular ligament length change. METHODS: Fourteen examiners with a mean ultrasound experience of 8.7 years participated in this study. Each examiner performed stress ultrasonography of the ankle using their preferred method on one patient with an intact anterior talofibular ligament (Patient 1) and on two patients with chronic ankle instability (Patient 2 and 3). Changes in the ligament length between the resting and stressed positions were determined. A consensus meeting was then conducted to standardize the sonographic technique, which was used by the examiners during a repeat stress sonography on the same patients. The variance and measured values were compared between the preferred and standardized techniques using F-tests and paired t-tests, respectively. RESULTS: At a consensus meeting, a sonographic technique in which the examiner pushed the lower leg posteriorly against the fixed foot was adopted as the standardized technique. In Patient 1, the change in the anterior talofibular ligament length was 0.4 (range, -2.3-1.3) mm and 0.6 (-0.6-1.7) mm using the preferred and standardized techniques, respectively, with no significant difference in the variance (P = 0.51) or the measured value (P = 0.52). The length changes in Patient 2 were 2.0 (0.3-4.4) mm and 1.7 (-0.9-3.8) mm using the preferred and standardized techniques, respectively. In Patient 3, the length changes were 1.4 (-2.7-7.1) mm and 0.7 (-2.0-2.3) mm. There were no significant differences between the techniques in either patient group. CONCLUSION: Variability in the quantitative measurement of ankle stress sonography was not reduced despite the standardization of the technique among examiners. Hence, comparing the measured values between different examiners should be avoided.