Initial Study of the Extended STABILISE Technique for Complete Remodeling in Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the standard treatment for acute complicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD). However, long-term results reveal that TEVAR does not achieve a complete aortic remodeling and poses a risk of aneurysmal aortic degeneration. Distal re-entry treatment at the abdominal level seems to be necessary to obtain a complete remodeling in TBAD. Moreover, it is necessary to treat the aortoiliac bifurcation in patients with persistent true lumen collapse or limb ischemia. METHODS: Between January 2018 and October 2019, 11 patients with acute or sub-acute complicated TBAD or non-A non-B aortic dissection were treated in our institution in an endovascular fashion. We performed the stent-assisted, balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination in aortic dissection repair (STABILISE) technique in all cases, but 2 cases required complementary treatment of the aortoiliac bifurcation with a bifurcated AFX endograft system for limb ischemia due to true lumen collapse. RESULTS: Technical success was obtained in all patients. No procedural complications occurred. No postoperative deaths, stroke, paraplegia, mesenteric, or renal ischemia were observed, and no secondary intervention was necessary. Satisfactory aortic re-modeling was obtained after the follow-up periods with a 57.5% mean true lumen expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience using the extended STABILISE (e-STABILISE) technique using a bifurcated AFX endograft did not result in any postoperative mortality or complications. Without additional data, this technique should be reserved for specific patients who require revascularization of the aortoiliac bifurcation.

Incidence, predictors, impact, and treatment of vascular complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a modern prospective cohort under real conditions.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular complications (VCs) occurring in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures have frequently been reported in the past. Considering significant technical improvements in delivery systems and vascular closure devices, the goal of this study was to determine the incidence, impact, and prognostic factors of VCs in a recent real-world cohort. METHODS: We report a bicentric prospective analysis of 479 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI between January 2017 and December 2017. VCs were defined according to criteria set out by the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2. RESULTS: The incidence of VCs was 26.1% (n = 125 patients), of which 2.9% were major (n = 14) and 23.2% were minor (n = 111). VCs were related to the primary puncture point in 69% of cases compared with 31% at the secondary puncture site. Treatments implemented were medical in 76% of cases and surgical in 24% of cases. The risk factors for VCs were as follows: iliac morphology score, sheath to iliofemoral artery ratio (SIFAR), and moderate-severe iliofemoral calcifications or tortuosity. In the case of major VCs, only sheath to iliofemoral artery ratio was a risk factor. Major VCs significantly increased intrahospital mortality (30.7% vs 1.1% for minor VCs and 1.3% for no VCs; log-rank, P < .0001) and 1-year mortality (40.6% vs 5.6% for minor VCs and 5.6% for no VCs; log-rank, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Using strictly VARC-2 end point definitions, more than one-quarter of TAVI procedures were associated with VCs, primarily minor ones. Secondary puncture points were responsible for one-third of VCs and should therefore also be actively monitored. Major VCs have a significant impact on short-term and midterm survival.

Standardized Definition of Structural Valve Degeneration for Surgical and Transcatheter Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves.

Bioprostheses are prone to structural valve degeneration, resulting in limited long-term durability. A significant challenge when comparing the durability of different types of bioprostheses is the lack of a standardized terminology for the definition of a degenerated valve. This issue becomes especially important when we try to compare the degeneration rate of surgically inserted and transcatheter bioprosthetic valves. This document, by the VIVID (Valve-in-Valve International Data), proposes practical and standardized definitions of valve degeneration and provides recommendations for the timing of clinical and imaging follow-up assessments accordingly. Its goal is to improve the quality of research and clinical care for patients with deteriorated bioprostheses by providing objective and strict criteria that can be utilized in future clinical trials. We hope that the adoption of these criteria by both the cardiological and surgical communities will lead to improved comparability and interpretation of durability analyses.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in heart transplant patients: diagnostic value of quantitative tissue markers: T2 mapping and extracellular volume fraction, for acute rejection diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of acute rejection in cardiac transplant recipients requires invasive technique with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) which has risks and limitations. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with T2 and T1 mapping is a promising technique for characterizing myocardial tissue. The purpose of the study was to evaluate T2, T1 and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) quantification as novel tissue markers to diagnose acute rejection. METHODS: CMR was prospectively performed in 20 heart transplant patients providing 31 comparisons EMB-CMR. CMR was performed close to EMB. Images were acquired on a 1.5 Tesla scanner including T2 mapping (T2 prepared balanced steady state free precession) and T1 mapping (modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequences: MOLLI) at basal, mid and apical level in short axis view. Global and segmental T2 and T1 values were measured before and 15 min (for T1 mapping) after contrast administration. RESULTS: Acute rejection was diagnosed in seven patients: six cellular rejections (4 grade IR, 2 grade 2R) and one antibody mediated rejection. Patients with acute rejection had significantly higher global T2 values at 3 levels: 58.5 ms [55.0-60.3] vs 51.3 ms [49.5-55.2] (p = 0.007) at basal; 55.7 ms [54.0-59.7] vs 51.8 ms [50.1-53.6] (p = 0.002) at median and 58.2 ms [54.0-63.7] vs 53.6 ms [50.8-57.4] (p = 0.026) at apical level. The area under the curve (AUC) for each level was 0.83, 0.79 and 0.78 respectively. Patients with acute rejection had significantly higher ECV at basal level: 34.2% [32.8-37.4] vs 27.4% [24.6-30.6] (p = 0.006). The AUC for basal level was 0.84. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnosis accuracy for basal T2 (cut off: 57.7 ms) were 71, 96 and 90% respectively; and for basal ECV: (cut off 32%) were 86, 85 and 85% respectively. Combining basal T2 and basal ECV allowed diagnosing all acute rejection and avoiding 63% of EMB. CONCLUSIONS: In heart transplant patients, a combined CMR approach using T2 mapping and ECV quantification provides a high diagnostic accuracy for acute rejection diagnosis and could potentially decrease the number of routine EMB.

Tolerance of rapid right ventricular pacing during thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the tolerance of rapid right ventricular pacing (RRVP) compared with that of the traditional methods of hypotension used during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: From January 2002 to December 2012, we retrospectively included all the patients treated with TEVAR by comparing the 2 groups: patients operated with RRVP (RRVP+) and those operated without RRVP (RRVP-). The characteristics of the population and the procedures were recorded. The rates of complications were compared up to 1 year. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were operated. Treated pathologies were multiple with 19 aneurysms, 14 false aneurysms, 12 isthmic ruptures, 11 dissections, 3 coarctations, and 2 endoleaks. Twenty-four patients were RRVP+ and 37 patients were RRVP-. Mortality rates at 1 month in groups RRVP+ and RRVP- were of 0% and 2.7%, respectively (P = 1), and reintervention rates were 0% and 13.5%, respectively (P = 0.15). Three peroperative rhythm disorders (12.5%) were observed in the RRVP+ group including 2 ventricular fibrillations and 1 atrial fibrillation, both reduced without complications. One pacemaker was implanted for atrioventricular block in the RRVP- group. In the RRVP+ group, 83.3% of the patients presented a rise in troponin Ic (TnI) >0.04 ng/mL in 72 hours compared with 40.5% of the patients in the RRVP- group (P = 0.0013), with a spontaneously favorable evolution. No coronary syndrome was observed at 1 year with a mortality rate of 10.8% in the RRVP- group vs. 0% in the RRVP+ (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: In spite of a frequent moderate rise of TnI at the time of RRVP, this technique does not present more complications at 1 year than the use of a chemical hypotension. It thus seems an interesting alternative for selected patients, in trained teams.

Polymorphisms of protein tyrosine phosphatase CD148 influence FcγRIIA-dependent platelet activation and the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is due primarily to IgG antibodies specific to platelet factor 4/heparin complexes (PF4/Hs) that activate platelets via FcγRIIA. CD148 is a protein tyrosine phosphatase that regulates Src kinases and collagen-induced platelet activation. Three polymorphisms affecting CD148 (Q276P, R326Q, and D872E) were studied in HIT patients and 2 control groups, with or without antibodies to PF4/Hs. Heterozygote status for CD148 276P or 326Q alleles was less frequent in HIT patients, suggesting a protective effect of these polymorphisms. Aggregation tests performed with collagen, HIT plasma, and monoclonal antibodies cross-linking FcγRIIA showed consistent hyporesponsiveness of platelets expressing the 276P/326Q alleles. In addition, platelets expressing the 276P/326Q alleles exhibited a greater sensitivity to the Src family kinases inhibitor dasatinib in response to collagen or ALB6 cross-linking FcγRIIA receptors. Moreover, the activatory phosphorylation of Src family kinases was considerably delayed as well as the phosphorylation of Linker for activation of T cells and phospholipase Cγ2, 2 major signaling proteins downstream from FcγRIIA. In conclusion, this study shows that CD148 polymorphisms affect platelet activation and probably exert a protective effect on the risk of HIT in patients with antibodies to PF4/Hs.

Durability of bovine pericardial mitral bioprosthesis based on Heart Valve Collaboratory echocardiographic criteria.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the very long-term results of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the mitral position, with particular attention to structural valve deterioration based on echocardiographic criteria. METHODS: From 1984 to 2016, 648 patients (mean age 68.8 years; 53.9% female) underwent mitral valve replacement using the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis. Multiple valve replacements were excluded. Clinical, operative, and follow-up data were prospectively recorded. The mean follow-up was 7.8 ± 5.4 years, for a total of 5043 valve-years. The follow-up data were 98.3% complete (11 patients lost). Structural valve deterioration was determined by strict echocardiographic assessment based on Heart Valve Collaboratory criteria. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 4%. A total of 322 late deaths occurred, for a linearized rate of 6.4%/valve-year. The actuarial survival rate at 15 years was 31.4 ± 2.6%. Age at implantation, male sex, and preoperative New York Heart Association class III or IV were significant risk factors affecting late survival. Actuarial freedoms from complications at 15 years were thromboembolism, 92.5 ± 1.9%; major bleeding, 93.8 ± 1.7%; endocarditis, 93.2 ± 1.3%; and explantation due to structural valve deterioration, 69.3 ± 3.5%. The median survival time for explantation due to structural valve deterioration was 21.7 years for the entire cohort (16.1 years for patients <65 years old). Based on echocardiographic data, actuarial freedom from severe and moderate/severe structural valve deterioration at 15 years were 64.0 ± 3.6% and 52.1 ± 3.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With low 15-year rates of valve-related events and structural valve deterioration based on Heart Valve Collaboratory echocardiographic criteria, the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis remains a reliable choice for a mitral tissue valve.

Durability of a bovine pericardial aortic bioprosthesis based on Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 echocardiographic criteria.

Objectives: The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease (Edwards Lifesciences) pericardial bioprosthesis has demonstrated satisfying hemodynamics at midterm follow-up, but its durability remains unclear. We report our 10-year experience with this third-generation valve implanted in the aortic position, with particular attention to structural valve deterioration. Methods: From 2007 to 2016 at our center, 338 patients underwent aortic valve replacement using the Perimount Magna Ease pericardial bioprosthesis. Patients were prospectively followed (mean 6.6 ± 2.6 years) with clinical evaluation and yearly echocardiography. Follow-up was 98% complete (7 patients lost) for a total of 2238 valve-years. Bioprosthesis structural valve deterioration was determined by strict echocardiographic assessment based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria. Results: Overall operative mortality was 1.2%. Actuarial survival including early deaths averaged 80.9% ± 2.2% and 66.7% ± 4.4% after 5 and 10 years of follow-up, respectively. Actuarial freedom from explantation due to structural valve deterioration at 5 and 10 years was 99.6% ± 0.4% and 88.8% ± 5.0%, respectively, and actuarial freedom of structural valve deterioration at 5 and 10 years was 98.5% ± 0.7% and 44.0% ± 6.4%, respectively. More precisely, actuarial freedom of structural valve deterioration stage 3 was 99.6% ± 0.4% at 5 years and 88.3% ± 5.0% at 10 years, whereas freedom of structural valve deterioration stage 2/3 was 98.5% ± 0.7% and 60.9% ± 7.0%, respectively. Conclusions: With a low rate of explantation due to structural valve deterioration events at 10 years, and particularly a low rate of moderate or severe structural valve deterioration based on echocardiographic Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria, the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease pericardial bioprosthesis remains a reliable choice for a tissue valve in the aortic position.

Risk factors for valve-related complications after mechanical heart valve replacement in 505 patients with long-term follow up.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Currently, valve thrombosis, thromboembolic events and bleeding events account for 75% of all complications that occur after mechanical heart valve replacement. The study aim was to determine the main risk factors for valve-related complications in patients undergoing mechanical heart valve replacement. METHODS: Data were available from the systematic follow up of patients who had received a CarboMedics bileaflet mechanical heart valve replacement at the authors' institution. Follow up examinations were conducted prospectively at two-year intervals, via questionnaires sent to the patients' general practitioners, or by telephone calls. RESULTS: Between January 1988 and December 2005, a total of 505 consecutive patients (300 males, 205 females; mean age 52 years; range: 5 to 77 years) underwent heart valve replacement using a CarboMedics mechanical prosthesis. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed in 308 patients, mitral valve replacement (MVR) in 134 patients, and double-valve replacement (DVR) in 62 patients. The follow up was 95.4% complete; the mean follow up was 7.5 years, and the total follow up 3,718 patient-years. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications represented the leading cause of valve-related events (104/195), of valve-related mortality (15/25), and of the need for repeat surgery (9/16). Valve thrombosis occurred in 12 patients. Implantation in the mitral position was identified as a risk factor (HR = 15.07; CI: 8.41-23.07; p 0.0001). Thromboembolism occurred in 32 patients; the use of antiplatelet agents was found to be a protective factor (HR = 0.23; CI: 0.08-0.70; p = 0.01). Bleeding events occurred in 52 patients; risk factors for bleeding events included a history of thromboembolic or bleeding complications (HR = 2.70; CI: 1.33-5.26; p = 0.006) and an unstable International Normalized Ratio (INR) (HR = 2.86; CI: 1.01-8.08; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: After mechanical heart valve replacement, the only risk factors for bleeding complications were an unstable INR and a history of thromboembolic or bleeding events. The use of antiplatelet agents proved to be a protective factor against thromboembolic events.

Aortic treatment of native infection by reconstruction with the Omniflow II biologic prosthesis.

Aortic infection is a challenging condition. Fortunately, surgical revision of infected aorta with in situ reconstruction can provide long-term cure. The material for aortic repair remains an area of debate. The Omniflow II (LeMaitre Vascular, Burlington, Mass) prosthesis is a biosynthetic graft made to resist long-term degeneration and allows growth of host tissue with reduction of the risk of arterial infection. It has already been used for peripheral bypass with very low infection rates. Herein, we describe an original case of first-line native aorta replacement by a straight Omniflow II biologic prosthesis for infected aortic aneurysm.

Bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients aged 65 years or younger: long-term outcomes with the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial valve.

OBJECTIVES: Mitral valve replacement using a bioprosthesis remains controversial in young patients because data on long-term outcomes are missing. This study evaluated the long-term results of the PERIMOUNT pericardial mitral bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or younger. METHODS: From 1984 to 2010, 148 Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT mitral bioprostheses were implanted in 148 patients aged 65 years or younger. Baseline clinical, perioperative and follow-up data were recorded prospectively. Structural valve deterioration (SVD) was defined by strict echocardiographic assessment. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 8.6 ± 5.5 years, for a total of 1269 valve-years. Operative mortality rate was 2.0%. Fifty-one late deaths occurred (linearized rate 4.0% per valve-year). Actuarial survival rates averaged 70 ± 4%, 53 ± 6% and 31 ± 7% after 10, 15 and 20 years of follow-up, respectively. Actuarial freedom from SVD at 10, 15 and 20 years was 78 ± 5%, 47 ± 7% and 19 ± 7%, respectively. Reoperation was associated with no operative mortality. Actuarial freedom from reoperation due to SVD at 10, 15 and 20 years was 82 ± 4%, 50 ± 6% and 25 ± 8%, respectively. Competing risk analysis demonstrated an actual risk of explantation secondary to SVD at 20 years of 44 ± 5%. Expected valve durability was 14.2 years for this age group. CONCLUSIONS: In the selected patients aged 65 years or younger undergoing mitral valve replacement with a pericardial bioprosthesis, the expected valve durability was 14.2 years. Reoperation for SVD was associated with a low risk of mortality.

Heart transplantation in selected patients aged 60 years and older: a two-decade retrospective and multicentre analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study analysed survival and long-term outcomes of heart transplantation in patients aged 60 years and older. We also analysed the impact of a national graft allocation priority [Super Emergency (SE)] and compared survival with younger patients in our centres and in France. METHODS: We performed a multicentre (University Hospitals in Nantes, Rennes and Tours), 2-decade retrospective study between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 2013. Elderly recipients were placed on the same list as younger patients; the use of marginal donors remained occasional. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients aged between 60 and 68 years were included. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 83.2%, 77.4% and 63.8%, respectively, which were significantly worse than those of recipients aged <60 years (1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of 87.3%, 80.4% and 68.0%, respectively). The postoperative course was acceptable. The main cause of death was malignancy (29.8% in our cohort). Survival was similar between the first and second decades and among the SE group. Our population exhibited better survival than patients <60 years transplanted in France during the same period with 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of 76.8%, 68.0% and 56.3%, respectively. Predictors of survival in the multivariate analysis included ischaemic cardiomyopathy [hazard ratio (HR) 4.1] and postoperative complications, such as dialysis (HR 9.5) and mechanical circulatory support (HR 4.2). CONCLUSIONS: We report positive postoperative course and long-term outcomes after heart transplantation in older recipients using conventional donors. Our satisfactory outcomes may be explained by the stringent selection of recipients combined with regular follow-up.

Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis for aortic calcified stenosis: 18-year experience with 1133 patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most important cause of aortic valve disease, its prevalence increasing with patient age. The present study formed part of a long-term evaluation on use of the Perimount pericardial valve for aortic calcified stenosis. METHODS: A total of 1133 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis for degenerative AS between July 1984 and December 2003 at the authors' institution, was followed up in 2004. Among the patients (716 males, 417 females; mean age 72.6 years), 997 were in sinus rhythm, and the mean NYHA functional class was 2.3. Preoperative echocardiography indicated a mean gradient of 56 mmHg, a peak gradient of 89 mmHg, and an effective orifice area of 0.6 cm2. Associated procedures were required in 336 patients. RESULTS: All patients but 18 (1.5%) were followed up for an average of 5.5 years postoperatively; thus, the total follow up was 6,180 patient-years. Operative mortality was 2.8% (n=32), and there were 330 late deaths. At 18 years the actuarial survival rate was 22 +/- 4%. Among the 725 patients followed, 80% were in sinus rhythm and 98% in NYHA classes I or II. Valve-related complications included 39 thromboembolic episodes, 24 endocarditis, 22 anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, 28 reoperations, and 19 structural valve failures. A total of 54 patients died from valve-related causes (13 embolic events, two endocarditis, two hemorrhage, one structural failure, 36 unknown causes), and 57 died from cardiac failure. Neither thrombosis nor hemolysis was observed. At 18 years, freedom from embolism was 92 +/- 2%, from endocarditis 93 +/- 4%, from hemorrhage 95 +/- 2%, from reoperation 62 +/- 11%, from valve failure 68 +/- 12%, and from all complications 47 +/- 8%. Among patients aged >60 years, the 18-year actuarial freedom from reoperation was 76 +/- 14%, and from valve failure 85 +/- 8%. CONCLUSION: With a low rate of valve-related events at 18 years, and an especially low rate of structural failure, the Perimount pericardial prosthesis is a reliable choice for patients with aortic calcified stenosis.

Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve in patients aged 50-65 years.

OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) using a bioprosthesis remains controversial for patients aged 50-65 years. This cohort study reports the very long-term outcomes of AVR using Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis in this age group. METHODS: From 1984 to 2008, 522 Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial aortic bioprostheses were implanted in 516 patients aged 50-65 years (mean age, 60 ± 4 years; 19% female). Multiple valve replacements were excluded fro m our cohort. Baseline demographic, perioperative and follow-up data were recorded prospectively. Mean follow-up was 9 ± 6 years, for a total of 4428 valve-years. Follow-up was complete for 97% of patients included. RESULTS: Operative mortality rate was 2%. One hundred and forty-six late deaths occurred for a linearized rate of 3%/valve-year. Actuarial survival rates averaged 73 ± 2, 59 ± 3 and 35 ± 5% after 10, 15 and 20 years of follow-up, respectively. Mortality rate associated with reoperation was 2%. Actuarial freedom from reoperation rates due to structural valve deterioration (SVD) at 10, 15 and 20 years was respectively of 91 ± 2, 76 ± 3 and 50 ± 6%. Competing risk analysis demonstrated an actual risk of explantation secondary to SVD at 20 years of 30 ± 3%. Expected valve durability was 19 years for this age group. Age was not a significant risk factor for SVD in this middle-aged population. CONCLUSIONS: In patients aged 50-65 years undergoing AVR with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis, the expected valve durability was 19 years. Age was not a significant risk factor for SVD within this age group. Patient selection and attention to timing of reintervention may be determinants of long-term outcomes.

Very Long-Term Outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Aortic Valve in Patients Aged 60 or Younger.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement using a bioprosthesis remains controversial for patients younger than 60 years because of missing data on long-term outcomes in this age group. METHODS: From 1984 to 2008, 383 Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial aortic bioprostheses were implanted in 373 patients 60 years or younger (mean age, 51.0 ± 9.2 years; 19% female). Multiple valve replacements were excluded from our cohort. Baseline clinical, perioperative, and follow-up data were recorded prospectively. The mean follow-up was 8.6 ± 5.9 years, for a total of 3,299 valve-years. Follow-up was complete for 95.3% of patients included. RESULTS: Operative mortality rate was 1.3%. Eighty-five late deaths occurred, for a linearized rate of 2.6%/valve-year. Actuarial survival rates averaged 78.1% ± 2.6%, 65.6% ± 3.5%, and 46.8% ± 6.0% after 10, 15, and 20 years of follow-up, respectively. Mortality rate associated with reoperation was 2.3%. Actuarial freedom from reoperation rates attributable to structural valve deterioration at 10, 15, and 20 years were, respectively, 88.3% ± 2.4%, 70.8% ± 4.1%, and 38.1% ± 5.6%. Competing risk analysis demonstrated an actual risk of explantation secondary to structural valve deterioration at 20 years of 41.6% ± 4.1%. Expected valve durability was 17.6 years for this age group. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients 60 years or younger undergoing aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis, the expected valve durability was 17.6 years. Reoperation for structural valve deterioration was associated with a low risk of mortality.

Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve in aortic position.

BACKGROUND: The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) has demonstrated good long-term outcomes, but its durability remains unclear depending on age at implantation. We report our 20-year experience with the Perimount valve implanted in the aortic position, with particular attention to the probability and time to reoperation required due to bioprosthesis deterioration. METHODS: From 1984 to 2008 at our center, 2,659 patients (mean age, 70.7 ± 10.4 years) underwent aortic valve replacement using the Perimount pericardial bioprostheses. Patients were prospectively followed on an annual basis (mean 6.7 ± 4.8 years, range 0 to 24.6 years) with an echocardiogram at the time of follow-up. Cumulative follow-up was 18,404 valve-years. Bioprosthesis structural valve deterioration was determined by strict echocardiographic assessment. RESULTS: Overall operative mortality was 2.8%. Actuarial survival rates including early deaths averaged 52.4% ± 1.2%, 31.1% ± 1.4%, and 14.4% ± 1.7% after 10, 15, and 20 years of follow-up, respectively. Age-stratified freedom from reoperation due to structural valve deterioration at 15 and 20 years was 70.8% ± 4.1% and 38.1% ± 5.6%, respectively, for the group aged 60 years or less, 82.7% ± 2.9% and 59.6% ± 7.6% for those 60 to 70 years, and 98.1% ± 0.8% at 15 years and above for the oldest group. Expected valve durability is 19.7 years for the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: With a low rate of valve-related events at 20 years, and particularly a low rate of structural valve deterioration, the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis remains a reliable choice for a tissue valve in the aortic position, especially in patients over 60 years of age.

Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the very-long-term results of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the mitral position. METHODS: From 1984 to 2011, 450 Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial mitral bioprostheses were implanted in 404 consecutive patients (mean age, 68 years; 53% female). Patients undergoing multiple valve replacements were excluded. The clinical, operative, and follow-up data were prospectively recorded. The mean follow-up was 7.2±5.1 years, for a total of 3258 valve-years. The follow-up data were 97.8% complete. RESULTS: The operative mortality rate was 3.3%. A total of 188 late deaths occurred, for a linearized rate of 5.8%/valve-year. At 20 years, the overall actuarial survival rate was 16.9%±3.9%. Age at implantation, preoperative New York Heart Association class III or IV, and redo procedure were significant risk factors affecting late survival. The actuarial freedom from complications at 20 years was thromboembolism, 83.9%±7.6%; hemorrhage, 80.2%±10.8%; endocarditis, 94.8%±1.4%; structural valve deterioration, 23.7%±6.9%; and explantation owing to structural valve deterioration, 40.5%±8.0%. The competing risk analysis demonstrated an actual risk of explantation owing to structural valve deterioration at 20 years of 25.5%±2.9%. The expected valve durability was 16.6 years for the entire cohort (11.4, 16.6, and 19.4 years for patients aged <60, 60 to 70, and >70 years, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: With a low rate of valve-related events at 20 years and, in particular, a low rate of structural valve deterioration, the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis remains a reliable choice for a mitral tissue valve, especially in patients >60 years old.

A 25-year experience with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount in the mitral position.

Data of 401 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis between 1984 and 2009 were evaluated. Their mean age was 68.1 ± 10.4 years (range, 22-90 years) and 54.9% were female. The most common etiology was degenerative disease (33.2%) and 62.1% of patients had mitral insufficiency. Follow-up was 3,178 patient-years, and 96.8% complete; the mean follow-up was 8.9 ± 3.1 years. Overall survival at 25 years was 10.2% ± 3%. Late mortality was 2.48% per patient-year, and valve-related deaths occurred at 1.62% per patient-year. The actuarial freedom from reoperation due to structural valve deterioration at 20 years was 24.3% ± 2% for degenerative disease and 15% ± 1.4% for non-degenerative disease. For degenerative valve disease, the freedom from structural valve deterioration at 18-years was 39% ± 1% for recipients <60-years old and 66% ± 2% for those ≥60-years old. Our data confirm the excellent durability and low mortality associated with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount for mitral valve replacement. The rate of calcification of the valve was unrelated to degenerative valve disease, but our findings suggest that this prosthesis gives better results in recipients ≥60-years old than in younger patients.

15-year comparison of supra-annular porcine and PERIMOUNT aortic bioprostheses.

The second-generation Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses, the supra-annular porcine valve and the PERIMOUNT pericardial valve, have been evaluated longitudinally for several years. This study compared clinical performance over 15 years. Aortic valve replacement was performed with a supra-annular porcine valve in 1,823 patients (group 1) aged 19-89 years (mean, 68.9 +/- 10.9 years) and with a PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis in 1,430 patients (group 2) aged 16-90 years (mean, 69.5 +/- 10.4 years). The groups were similar except for concomitant coronary artery bypass in 43% of group 1 and 18% of group 2 ( p < 0.001). Overall survival at 15 years was 29.3% +/- 1.5% for group 1 and 35.2% +/- 3.1% for group 2 ( p = 0.0009). The actual freedom from valve-related mortality was 88.5% +/- 0.9% for group 1 and 84.9% +/- 1.7% for group 2. The actual freedom from structural valve deterioration at 15 years was similar overall, and for patients aged > 60 years, between the groups, but was dissimilar (group 2 > group 1) for age group 2), sex (male > female), age, and concomitant coronary artery bypass. Both bioprostheses provided satisfactory clinical performance at 15 years after aortic valve replacement.