Efficacy and safety of ligelizumab in adults and adolescents with chronic spontaneous urticaria: results of two phase 3 randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) do not achieve complete control of their symptoms with current available treatments. In a dose-finding phase 2b study, ligelizumab improved urticaria symptoms in patients with H1-antihistamine (H1-AH) refractory CSU. Here, we report the efficacy and safety outcomes from two ligelizumab phase 3 studies. METHODS: PEARL-1 and PEARL-2 were identically designed randomised, double-blind, active-controlled and placebo-controlled parallel-group studies. Patients aged 12 years or older with moderate-to-severe H1-AH refractory CSU were recruited from 347 sites in 46 countries and randomly allocated in a 3:3:3:1 ratio via Interactive Response Technology to 72 mg ligelizumab, 120 mg ligelizumab, 300 mg omalizumab, or placebo, dosed every 4 weeks, for 52 weeks. Patients allocated to placebo received 120 mg ligelizumab from week 24. The primary endpoint was change-from-baseline (CFB) in weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) at week 12, and was analysed in all eligible adult patients according to the treatment assigned at random allocation. Safety was assessed throughout the study in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. The studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03580369 (PEARL-1) and NCT03580356 (PEARL-2). Both trials are now complete. FINDINGS: Between Oct 17, 2018, and Oct 26, 2021, 2057 adult patients were randomly allocated across both studies (72 mg ligelizumab n=614; 120 mg ligelizumab n=616; 300 mg omalizumab n=618, and placebo n=209). A total of 1480 (72%) of 2057 were female, and 577 (28%) of 2057 were male. Mean UAS7 at baseline across study groups ranged from 29·37 to 31·10. At week 12, estimated treatment differences in mean CFB-UAS7 were as follows: for 72 mg ligelizumab versus placebo, -8·0 (95% CI -10·6 to -5·4; PEARL-1), -10·0 (-12·6 to -7·4; PEARL-2); 72 mg ligelizumab versus omalizumab 0·7 (-1·2 to 2·5; PEARL-1), 0·4 (-1·4 to 2·2; PEARL-2); 120 mg ligelizumab versus placebo -8·0 (-10·5 to -5·4; PEARL-1), -11·1 (-13·7 to -8·5; PEARL-2); 120 mg ligelizumab versus omalizumab 0·7 (-1·1 to 2·5; PEARL-1), -0·7 (-2·5 to 1·1; PEARL-2). Both doses of ligelizumab were superior to placebo (p<0·0001), but not to omalizumab, in both studies. No new safety signals were identified for ligelizumab or omalizumab. INTERPRETATION: In the phase 3 PEARL studies, ligelizumab demonstrated superior efficacy versus placebo but not versus omalizumab. The safety profile of ligelizumab was consistent with previous studies. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma.

Omalizumab in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid resistant to first-line therapy: a French national multicentre retrospective study of 100 patients.

BACKGROUND: Interest in the use of omalizumab to treat bullous pemphigoid (BP) in the event of resistance or contraindication to conventional therapies is currently based on limited evidence. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in BP and to identify predictive factors in response to treatment. METHODS: We conducted a French national multicentre retrospective study including patients with a confirmed diagnosis of BP treated with omalizumab after failure of one or several treatment lines. We excluded patients with clinically atypical BP, as per Vaillant's criteria. The criteria for clinical response to omalizumab were defined according to the 2012 international consensus conference. Anti-BP180-NC16A IgE enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed on sera collected before initiating omalizumab, when available. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2021, 100 patients treated in 18 expert departments were included. Median age at diagnosis was 77 years (range 20-98). Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 77% of patients, and partial remission in an additional 9%. CR was maintained 'off therapy' in 11.7%, 'on minimal therapy' in 57.1%, and 'on non-minimal therapy' in 31.2%. Median time to CR was 3 months (range 2.2-24.5). Relapse rate was 14%, with a median follow-up time of 12 months (range 6-73). Adverse events occurred in four patients. CR was more frequently observed in patients with an increased serum baseline level of anti-BP180-NC16A IgE (75% vs. 41%; P = 0.011). Conversely, urticarial lesions, blood total IgE concentration or eosinophil count were not predictive of CR. Patients with an omalizumab dosage > 300 mg every 4 weeks showed a similar final outcome to those with a dosage ≤ 300 mg every 4 weeks, but control of disease activity [median 10 days (range 5-30) vs. 15 days (range 10-60); P < 0.001] and CR [median 2.4 months (range 2.2-8.2) vs. 3.9 months (range 2.3-24.5); P < 0.001] were achieved significantly faster. CONCLUSIONS: We report the largest series to date of BP treated by omalizumab and confirm its effectiveness and safety in this indication. Serum baseline level of anti-BP180-NC16A IgE may predict response to treatment.

Comprehensive Ophthalmological Evaluation in Atopic Dermatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic type 2 inflammatory skin disease, is frequently associated with ocular surface diseases (OSD) which may appear or worsen under anti-type 2-targeted treatments. However, the exact prevalence of OSD and the ophthalmology referral criteria remain ill-defined in AD patients before initiating such biotherapies. We aimed to characterize the prevalence, the nature and the factors related to OSD development in AD that may justify an ophthalmological management. METHODS: A total of 98 consecutive AD inpatients without biological treatment were retrospectively included. These were systematically evaluated by an ophthalmologist during their dermatological care. Clinical and laboratory data were analysed to characterize OSD and their risk factors. RESULTS: OSD were found in 83/98 AD patients (85%); mainly dry eye syndrome (64%, 63/98), allergic conjunctivitis (42%, 41/98), posterior (33%, 32/98), and anterior blepharitis (27%, 26/98). In AD patients without ocular symptoms, OSDs were also frequently found (63%, 12/19) and were mostly mild. Risk factors for OSD were history of allergic rhinitis, allergic sensitization, head and neck AD, ocular symptoms (foreign body sensation in the eye, burning, itching, photophobia), and total IgE level >3,000 kU/L. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of OSD was high, even in asymptomatic patients. The risk factors identified may indicate the need for ophthalmological examination for therapeutic management, especially when biological agents targeting type 2 inflammation are considered.

Hypersensitivity infusion-associated reactions induced by enzyme replacement therapy in a cohort of patients with late-onset Pompe disease: An experience from the French Pompe Registry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pompe disease is a rare hereditary glycogen storage disorder due to lysosomal acid alpha-glucosidase deficiency. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is the only available treatment. Infusion-associated reactions (IAR) are challenging since there are no guidelines for ERT rechallenge after a drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR) in Pompe disease. The objective of the present study was to describe IAR and their management in late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) patients in France, and to discuss the various possibilities of ERT rechallenge. METHODS: An exhaustive screening of LOPD patients receiving ERT between 2006 and 2020 from the 31-participating hospital-based or reference centers was performed. The patients who had presented at least one hypersensitivity IAR (=DHR) episode were included. Demographic characteristics of the patients, IAR onset and timing, were retrospectively collected from the French Pompe Registry. RESULTS: Fifteen patients among 115 treated LOPD patients in France presented at least 1 IAR; 80.0% were women. Twenty-nine IAR were reported; 18 (62.1%) IAR were Grade I reactions, 10 (34.5%) IAR were Grade II, and 1 (3.4%) IAR was Grade III. IgE-mediated hypersensitivity was found in 2/15 patients (13.3%). The median [IQR] time from ERT introduction to the first IAR was 15.0 months [11.0-24.0]. ERT was safely and effectively re-introduced either with premedication alone, or in combination with either modified regimen or desensitization protocol, in all 9 rechallenged patients; including in patients with IgE-mediated hypersensitivity, in the patient with the Grade III reaction, as well as in patients with very high anti-GAA titer. DISCUSSION: Based on the results herein and previous reports, we discuss premedication and modified regimen for Grade I reactions, and desensitization in Grade II and III reactions. In conclusion, ERT-induced IAR can be safely and effectively managed with a modified regimen or desensitization protocol in LOPD patients.

Preparations of exploration of immediate hypersensitivity to antineoplastic agents: An oncology pharmacy perspective.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are being exposed to antineoplastic drugs more frequently and for longer periods, resulting in a higher risk of hypersensitivity reactions. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmaceutical time and direct cost of drug allergy explorations following immediate hypersensitivity reactions to antineoplastic agents. METHODS: A micro-costing method was used to collect data on consumption of human and material resources for allergy exploration preparations. The monetisation was carried out on the basis of prices and hourly wage costs applied in 2018. The number and type of allergy explorations prepared by the pharmacy as well as nature of antineoplastic drugs tested, and the number of culprit drugs reintroductions were collected. RESULTS: Almost 1.5 h is required to realise allergy tests for one patient including pharmacist time for prescription analysis and pharmacy technician's time for tests preparation. The mean manufacturing cost of these tests is estimated at €62.87 (€57.82-65.49) per culprit drug for one patient. Programming patients according to culprit drugs tested allows rationalising healthcare provider time and increasing efficiency. From January 2010 to December 2018, 277 patients were tested and 490 allergy explorations were performed, corresponding to more than 5000 preparations. Mostly, the culprit drug could be reintroduced (n = 383, 78.2%) allowing patients to receive the best possible treatment. CONCLUSION: Management of hypersensitivity reactions is constantly progressing, as it contributes to improving patient care in oncology. This activity is time-consuming for the pharmacy team but allows patients with previous hypersensitivity reaction to continue effective treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Infliximab Tolerance Induction in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases who Experienced Acute Infusion Reactions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: One of the reasons for the failure of infliximab (IFX) is immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHR). We aimed to report the efficacy and safety of a tolerance induction protocol in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients who had previously experienced IHR during IFX infusions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reported all cases of IBD patients who had previously experienced IHR due to IFX and who were submitted to a standardized protocol of tolerance induction to IFX from 2010 to 2015. RESULTS: IHR occurred in a majority of patients (69%) during the first 3 infusions and for half of them after a period of IFX withdrawn. Skin prick tests were negative and only 2 intradermal tests were positive. Basophil activation tests and antidrug antibody measurements were performed in 8 out of 16 patients and were positive in 3 and 4 patients respectively. Induction of tolerance was successful in 69% of patients and IFX was pursued with clinical efficacy > 1 year in 7 patients (44%). Allergologic investigations were not predictive of tolerance induction success. CONCLUSION: A majority of IHR to IFX infusions occurred during the beginning or restarting of treatment and was related to a nonallergic hypersensitivity. Induction of tolerance to IFX is feasible and effective and may safely allow retreatment of IFX in almost 70% of IBD patients.

The basophil activation test: a sensitive test in the diagnosis of allergic immediate hypersensitivity to pristinamycin.

Immediate hypersensitivity (IHS) reactions to macrolides and to macrolide-derived antibiotics like pristinamycin are uncommon. In this context, there is little data available to appreciate the true value of biological tools regarding the diagnosis of immediate allergy to pristinamycin. Here we assess the clinical usefulness of the basophil activation test (BAT) to differentiate allergic from nonallergic IHS to pristinamycin. Thirty-six patients were tested with skin tests as the gold standard and BAT. The BAT achieved a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 100%, implying an absence of false positive results. Multicenter studies remain to be performed to better define the sensitivity, specificity and interlaboratory variation of BAT in the diagnosis of allergy to pristinamycin and macrolides.

[DRUGS DESENSITIZATION]. / Induction de tolérance aux médicaments. D'excellents résultats quand le médicament est indispensable.

We now have the means to give a patient the drug he absolutely needs even if these have been responsible for immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reactions. We use so-called "desensitization protocols" which rely on strong experimental pathophysiological bases. We take as examples immediate hypersensitivity to aspirin/NSAID and chemotherapy and non-severe delayed hypersensitivity to antibiotic for which tolerance induction gives excellent results.

Atopic Dermatitis and Self-Image Design: A Real-Life Study in Children Using Drawings.

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) induces alterations of external appearance and self-esteem, with impact on the personal development of the children. However, tools for estimating such suffering are lacking. We aimed to assess how children with AD represent themselves through their drawings. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included children (<18 years) suffering from AD who followed the instruction "draw yourself with and without eczema" at the end of a routine follow-up consultation. Drawings were interpreted with the child and then classified in different analysis groups by 5 independent evaluators. Results: A total of 64 children (41 [64.1%] girls and 23 [35.9%] boys, median [range] age 8 [3-7] years) made 64 drawings. Five groups of drawing were identified: "amputee" (n = 8, 12.5%), "identical" (n = 18, 28.1%), "sad" (n = 19, 29.7%), "complex" (n = 11, 17.2%), and "other" (n = 8, 12.5%). Univariate analysis found that age was differently distributed among the different drawing groups (P = 0.0047), as was the predominance of light colors (P = 0.038). The distribution of the other variables (gender, investigator global assessment score, active AD, and duration of activity) was not different among drawing groups. Conclusions: The drawing allows a majority of the AD children to express their self-image with and without eczema, as well as their feelings and their interactions with the environment and with their entourage. The visual tool proposed herein could be used during consultations, to (a) become aware of the need to treat AD, (b) better evaluate the impact of AD burden in childhood, and (c) adjust appropriately AD treatment.

Case Report: Mast cell anergy: absence of symptoms after accidental re-exposure to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 3 days after anaphylaxis.

Empty mast cell syndrome, also named post anaphylaxis mast cell anergy (PAMA), is a temporary state of loss of mast cell responsiveness after a severe immediate hypersensitivity reaction. In this study, we describe a case of PAMA after accidental re-exposure to amoxicillin in a patient who developed severe anaphylaxis to this drug three days earlier in the operating room. To our knowledge, this report is the second to document this phenomenon.

Allergic and hypersensitivity condition in the International Patients' Summary (IPS) standard: The need of updates through the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11.

In 2010, the United States Human and Health Services (US HHS) and the European Union's (EU) Directorate General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology signed a memorandum of understanding to stimulate cooperation surrounding health-related information communications technology. The key project that emerged from this agreement is the International Patient Summary (IPS), intended to provide succinct clinically relevant patient summaries, which are generalizable and condition-independent, that can be readily used by all clinicians for the care of patients. Although allergies are included in the main information required by the IPS library and framework, it is misrepresented which leads to underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis of patients suffering from allergic and hypersensitivity conditions (A/H). The French and Montpellier World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centres have provided arguments for supporting representation of A/H in the IPS. These are based on the relevance of the new classification of A/H in the WHO International Classification of Diseases 11th version (ICD-11), and the need for alignment of eHealth tools with harmonized health information. We first present the A/H in the IPS initiative with the mission of producing an international information system that can be used globally in electronic health records to standardize clinical diagnoses and facilitate communication between clinicians caring for patients with A/H diseases. It is believed this initiative will provide a strong voice for the allergy community and an effective process for improving the quality of health data that will optimize medical care for our patients worldwide.

A quick access to information on influenza burden and prevention in Lyon university hospital: A prospective QR code-based information campaign in 2022-2023.

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccines are effective in decreasing hospitalizations and mortality related to influenza and its complications. However, the Vaccine Coverage Rate of influenza remains low and multifaceted efforts are required to improve it. The aim of this study was to assess the impact on influenza vaccine perception using a digital tool among outpatients and health care workers (HCWs). METHODS: A study was performed among outpatients and the HCWs of 23 hospital departments from 4 hospitals affiliated to Lyon university Hospitals (France), between October 2022 and February 2023. By scanning QR (Quick Response) codes, displayed on posters for patients, their companions, as well as in the letters sent to HCWs, users accessed anonymously to a web-application (ELEFIGHT®), which provided information on influenza and invited them to initiate a discussion on influenza prevention with their physicians during the consultation. Patients were also invited to complete a questionnaire regarding their perception of influenza vaccination before and after reading the information on ELEFIGHT®. The retention rate (RR = proportion of people who remain on the page for >2 s), the conversion rate (CR = proportion of people who click on the "Call-To-Action" button) and the absolute variation (difference in the perception before/after) and relative variation (absolute change as a percentage of the initial perception) in perception regarding influenza vaccination before and after consulting the application were calculated. RESULTS: 3791 scans were performed by 3298 patients and/or their companions with a RR of 52% and a CR of 55.1% and 253 scans by 221 HCWs with a RR of 71.2% and a CR of 115.3%. Participants spent an average of 47 s on the application. The questionnaire on influenza vaccination perception was completed by 1533 participants (46.5%); 1390 (90.7%) maintained the same position (neutral, favorable or unfavorable) on this vaccination before and after consulting the application. The relative variations in favor of vaccination were + 7.2% (unfavorable then favorable) and + 19.8% (neutral then favorable). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a facilitated direct access to medical information through QR codes disseminated in health settings can help nudge people to foster their awareness of influenza and its prevention. Future deployments in a similar context or to other populations could be envisaged. Other vaccine-preventable and/or chronic diseases could also be the target of similar projects as part of public health programs.

Prevention of nonsteroidal inflammatory drug-induced urticaria and/or angioedema.

BACKGROUND: Urticaria and/or angioedema (U/AE) are the most frequent and less severe forms of nonallergic hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Management of NSAID-induced U/AE includes (1) the avoidance of the culprit drug and of cyclooxygenase (COX) 1 inhibitors, (2) the use of weak COX-2 inhibitors, and/or (3) desensitization to aspirin. Because these possibilities may have drawbacks, we tested the possibility of preventing NSAID-induced U/AE by the administration of antihistamines and/or a combination of antihistamines and leukotriene antagonists. OBJECTIVE: To test the preventive effect of antihistamines and/or leukotriene antagonists on the development of U/AE in patients with a history of NSAID hypersensitivity confirmed by a positive challenge result. METHODS: A single, placebo-controlled, oral challenge using the culprit NSAID was applied to 65 patients with a history of NSAID-induced U/AE. In the case of recurrence of the symptoms, another oral challenge was performed under premedication with antihistamines alone or combined antihistamines and leukotriene antagonists. RESULTS: A total of 59 of 65 patients (90%) tolerated a normal dose of NSAID, confirming previous data on the poor reproducibility of nonallergic hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs on challenge. Of the 6 patients who experienced recurrence of the U/AE on NSAID challenge, antihistamines and combined antihistamines and leukotriene antagonists prevented the hypersensitivity reactions in 2 and 3 of them, respectively. Only 1 patient still developed a moderate NSAID-induced urticaria despite the double premedication. CONCLUSION: Treatment with NSAIDs at normal doses is possible and well tolerated in patients who have experienced NSAID-induced U/AE, which could be prevented by the concomitant use of antihistamines and leukotriene antagonists.

The efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange in COVID-19 patients on endothelial tightness in vitro is hindered by platelet activation.

Coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 is characterised in particular by vascular inflammation with platelet activation and endothelial dysfunction. During the pandemic, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was used to reduce the cytokine storm in the circulation and delay or prevent ICU admissions. This procedure consists in replacing the inflammatory plasma by fresh frozen plasma from healthy donors and is often used to remove pathogenic molecules from plasma (autoantibodies, immune complexes, toxins, etc.). This study uses an in vitro model of platelet-endothelial cell interactions to assess changes in these interactions by plasma from COVID-19 patients and to determine the extent to which TPE reduces such changes. We noted that exposure of an endothelial monolayer to plasmas from COVID-19 patients post-TPE induced less endothelial permeability compared to COVID-19 control plasmas. Yet, when endothelial cells were co-cultured with healthy platelets and exposed to the plasma, the beneficial effect of TPE on endothelial permeability was somewhat reduced. This was linked to platelet and endothelial phenotypical activation but not with inflammatory molecule secretion. Our work shows that, in parallel to the beneficial removal of inflammatory factors from the circulation, TPE triggers cellular activation which may partly explain the reduction in efficacy in terms of endothelial dysfunction. These findings provide new insights for improving the efficacy of TPE using supporting treatments targeting platelet activation, for instance.

Negativity of the basophil activation test in quinolone hypersensitivity: a breakthrough for provocation test decision-making.

BACKGROUND: Quinolone hypersensitivity reactions are being more frequently reported. Skin tests in investigations of patients are known to not be fully reliable. The provocation test thus remains the gold standard in the definitive diagnosis of allergy, despite the risks involved. The aim of this study was to evaluate basophil activation tests (BATs) in the diagnosis of immediate-type reactions to quinolones. METHODS: Thirty-four patients who presented an immediate-type hypersensivity reaction less than an hour after quinolone administration were studied. The allergologic workup of these patients consisted of a careful clinical history, a skin test and a BAT with the culprit quinolone. If not contraindicated, and in the case of high probability of a nonallergic reaction, provocation tests were performed to assess the nonimmunologic nature of the hypersensitivity. RESULTS: Among the 34 patients studied, 17 (50%) presented a negative BAT to the suspected quinolone, while the other 17 (50%) patients presented a positive BAT for quinolone at the time of their reaction. Among the 17 patients with negative BATs, 15 (2 of whom had had positive skin tests) had quinolone successfully reintroduced. CONCLUSIONS: Our report suggests that the BAT, if negative for the culprit quinolone, is a valuable tool in the decision whether or not to perform provocation tests in patients with a history of immediate-type reaction to quinolones, in order to exclude an allergic reaction.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria is not an allergic disease.

The links between chronic urticaria, IgE sensitization and allergy have been much discussed but little studied. We investigated IgE sensitization and allergy in 128 adult chronic urticaria patients during 2006-2008. During a one-day hospitalisation, the patients answered a standardized questionnaire and underwent blood serum analysis, physical tests and skin prick-tests. IgE sensitization to environmental allergens was defined by the positivity of at least one skin prick test and/or elevated levels of serum IgE ≥ 300 Kui/L. The chronic urticaria was considered allergic if: i) a high correlation between positive skin prick tests to a clinically relevant allergen and the case history was found; ii) complete remission of urticaria occurred within two months of allergen withdrawal. Of 105 patients with interpretable skin prick tests, 46.7% were IgE sensitized. Two patients had clinically relevant positive skin prick tests but their chronic urticaria had many other triggering factors and neither was in complete remission after withdrawal of these allergens. IgE sensitization is higher in chronic urticaria patients than in the global adult population, suggesting that it is one important etiopathogenic factor in chronic urticaria. However, it cannot be considered as the expression of an IgE-mediated allergy but as a chronic inflammatory disease, more frequent in IgE sensitized people and favoured by multiple factors, among which IgE-mediated allergy is exceptional.