The Impact of Antibiotic Use on Mortality in Patients Hospitalized in a COVID-19 Centre from Romania: A Retrospective Study.

Background and Objectives: Considering the significant number of patients worldwide that received empirical antibiotic therapy for COVID-19 infection due to their critical condition and the lack of therapeutical guidelines, we wanted to find out the consequences of antibiotic use in our study population. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including symptomatic patients older than 18 years, hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 between March and December 2020 in the Internal Medicine and Pneumology Departments of Colentina Clinical Hospital. The elected outcome was death, while independent variables were antibiotic therapy and literature-cited parameters associated with mortality in this disease. Results: Out of 198 included patients, 96 (48.48%) patients received antibiotic therapy during hospitalization. Female gender (OR = 2.61, p = 0.04), history of neoplasm (OR = 7.147, p = 0.01), heart failure (OR = 8.62, p = 0.002), and diabetes mellitus (OR = 3.05, p = 0.02) were significantly associated with death in multivariate analysis. Antibiotic treatment showed a higher probability of death both in bivariate (OR = 5.333, p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis adjusted for the aforementioned prognostic factors (OR = 3.55, p = 0.01). Conclusions: After adjusting for confounders, in-hospital antibiotic administration did not improve survival in COVID-19 patients.

Eosinophilic Pleural Effusion Secondary to Trichinella spiralis Infection in a Patient with Systemic Sclerosis: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND Scleroderma is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by angiopathy, autoimmunity, and fibrosis. One form of scleroderma, systemic sclerosis, is characterized by diffuse skin lesions and visceral involvement. Eosinophilic pleural effusion is a rare complication attributed to a large array of diseases. We present a case of a man with underlying systemic sclerosis who developed eosinophilic pleural effusion as a complication of associated Trichinella spiralis infection. CASE REPORT A 49-year-old man presented for bilateral inflammatory radio-ulnar-carpal joint pain, paresthesia of the hands and forearms and a 2-week history of right posterior aching thoracic pain and night sweats. The physical examination revealed sclerodermatous skin involvement of the hands, forearms, and forehead, sclerodactyly, Raynaud's phenomenon, and telangiectasias, together with muffled cardiac sounds and right basal abolishment of the vesicular breath sounds. Imagistic evaluation showed the presence of pleuro-pericardial fluid. A thoracocentesis highlighted the presence of an exudative eosinophilic pleural effusion. Laboratory findings showed leukocytosis, with elevated neutrophil and eosinophil counts. The patient was tested for a parasitic infection, but initially the results were negative. He started anti-inflammatory treatment, but no reduction of the pleural fluid was observed. Subsequent evaluation revealed specific anti-trichinella IgG antibodies. Albendazole and corticosteroid therapy were initiated, which resulted in remission of the symptoms. CONCLUSIONS This report highlights the possibility of developing rare or even not-until-now seen complications when 2 etiologically different diseases are associated. The physician should carefully assess the situation to find and resolve the underlying causes.

In-Hospital Antibiotic Use for COVID-19: Facts and Rationales Assessed through a Mixed-Methods Study.

It is well known that during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, antibiotics were overprescribed. However, less is known regarding the arguments that have led to this overuse. Our aim was to understand the factors associated with in-hospital antibiotic prescription for COVID-19, and the rationale behind it. We chose a convergent design for this mixed-methods study. Quantitative data was prospectively obtained from 533 adult patients admitted in six hospitals (services of internal medicine, infectious diseases and pneumology). Fifty-six percent of the patients received antibiotics. The qualitative data was obtained from interviewing 14 physicians active in the same departments in which the enrolled patients were hospitalized. Thematic analysis was used for the qualitative approach. Our study revealed that doctors based their decisions to prescribe antibiotics on a complex interplay of factors regarding the simultaneous appearance of consolidation on the chest computer tomography together with a worsening of clinical conditions suggestive of bacterial infection and/or an increase in inflammatory markers. Besides these features which might suggest bacterial co-/suprainfection, doctors also prescribed antibiotics in situations of uncertainty, in patients with severe disease, or with multiple associated comorbidities.

Antibiotic Prescription and In-Hospital Mortality in COVID-19: A Prospective Multicentre Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, empiric antibiotics (ATBs) have been prescribed on a large scale in both in- and outpatients. We aimed to assess the impact of antibiotic treatment on the outcomes of hospitalised patients with moderate and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicentre cohort study in six clinical hospitals, between January 2021 and May 2021. RESULTS: We included 553 hospitalised COVID-19 patients, of whom 58% (311/553) were prescribed antibiotics, while bacteriological tests were performed in 57% (178/311) of them. Death was the outcome in 48 patients-39 from the ATBs group and 9 from the non-ATBs group. The patients who received antibiotics during hospitalisation had a higher mortality (RR = 3.37, CI 95%: 1.7-6.8), and this association was stronger in the subgroup of patients without reasons for antimicrobial treatment (RR = 6.1, CI 95%: 1.9-19.1), while in the subgroup with reasons for antimicrobial therapy the association was not statistically significant (OR = 2.33, CI 95%: 0.76-7.17). After adjusting for the confounders, receiving antibiotics remained associated with a higher mortality only in the subgroup of patients without criteria for antibiotic prescription (OR = 10.3, CI 95%: 2-52). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, antibiotic treatment did not decrease the risk of death in the patients with mild and severe COVID-19, but was associated with a higher risk of death in the subgroup of patients without reasons for it.

COVID-19 Vaccine Does Not Increase the Risk of Disease Flare-Ups among Patients with Autoimmune and Immune-Mediated Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Reports describing post-vaccine autoimmune phenomena, in previously healthy individuals, increased the concerns regarding the risk of disease flare-ups in patients with immune diseases. We aimed to assess the potential risk of disease flare-up, after receiving the COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) vaccine, during a follow-up period of 6 months. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study, enrolling the patients with autoimmune- and immune-mediated diseases who voluntarily completed our questionnaire, both online and during hospital evaluations. Based on their decision to receive the vaccine, the patients were divided into two groups (vaccinated and non-vaccinated). Participants who chose not to receive the vaccine served as a control group in terms of flare-ups. RESULTS: A total of 623 patients, 416 vaccinated and 207 non-vaccinated, were included in the study during hospital evaluations (222/623) and after online (401/623) enrolment. There was no difference concerning the risk of flare-up between vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients (1.16, versus 1.72 flare-ups/100 patients-months, p = 0.245). The flare-ups were associated with having more than one immune disease, and with a previous flare-up during the past year. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find an increased risk of flare-up following COVID-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune-/immune-mediated diseases, after a median follow-up of 5.9 months. According to our results, there should not be an obvious reason for vaccine hesitancy among this category of patients.

COVID-19 Impact and Vaccination Willingness among Romanian Patients with Autoimmune/Immune-Mediated Diseases.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with immune diseases are a vulnerable population. We aimed to evaluate their access to medical care, as well as their awareness and willingness to obtain the vaccine after a year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted on a questionnaire basis, handled both online as well as in person. RESULTS: 651 patients with autoimmune or immune mediated diseases were enrolled. More than half (339/641 [53%]) reported difficulties in obtaining medical care throughout the pandemic and 135/651 ([21%]) of them were confirmed with COVID-19; 442/651, ([68%]) expressed their willingness to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. The factors associated with an increased probability of vaccination were the male gender (OR = 2.01, CI95% 1.2-3.7, p = 0.001), the patient's opinion that she/he was well informed (OR = 3.2, CI 95% 2.1-6.01, p < 0.001), physician's advice (OR = 2.1, CI 95% 1.3-3.5, p < 0.001), and flu vaccination in the past (OR = 1.5, CI 95% 1.1-2.3, p < 0.001), while those associated with a decreased probability of vaccination were COVID-19 disease in the past medical history (OR = 0.7, CI 95% 0.3-0.95, p = 0.02), and the opinion that patients with autoimmune diseases are at increased risk for adverse reactions (OR = 0.7, CI95% 0.53-0.89, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Given the fact that considering themselves informed regarding vaccination is the most important factor in order to be immunized against SARS-CoV-2, effective information campaigns would substantially increase willingness.

Hydroxychloroquine for prophylaxis of COVID-19 physicians survey: Despite lack of evidence, many would take or give to dear ones, and despite the perceived necessity of an RCT, few would participate.

INTRODUCTION: There was no evidence concerning the prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine, and only low-grade evidence regarding the use of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19 patients. We performed a survey among Romanian physicians in order to see how many of them would administer prophylactically hydroxychloroquine to themselves or to people close to them, and if they would participate to a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Between March 30 and April 02, 2020, a 16-item questionnaire was shared in a Romanian Facebook group of 2645 physicians dedicated to COVID-19 information, asking to be completed by physicians who could be directly involved in the care of these patients. RESULTS: A total of 785 answers were collected. Nine physicians (1.1%) thought that there was clear evidence on prescribing hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis, 375 (48%) considered the evidence acceptable, 348 (44.3%) considered it weak, whereas 53 (6.8%) answered there was no evidence. 59 (7.5%) respondents were determined to take it (of which 31 = 4% already took), 192 (24.5%) were inclined to take, 271 (34.5%) were not decided yet. 175 (22.3%) of respondents declared they (would) give the treatment to their close ones, and this decision was associated with a higher age (P = 0.003), and the opinion that there was evidence (P < 0.001). When asked about the source of the treatment regimen, 286 (36.4%) indicated a scientific paper, while no scientific paper about the prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine existed at that time. 718 (91.5%) considered a randomized clinical trial necessary (RCT), but only 333 (42.4%) answered they would enrol in such a trial. There was only a very weak correlation (Kendall's tau _b = 0.255, P < 0.001) between the belief that an RCT is necessary and the willingness to enrol in such an RCT. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of evidence, many physicians considered the evidence as existing, and were ready to take or to give hydroxychloroquine prophylactically to family. They considered an RCT necessary, but they were not willing to participate.

Anticoagulant protein S in COVID-19: low activity, and associated with outcome.

Introduction. COVID-19 disease was associated with both thrombo-embolic events and in-situ thrombi formation in small vessels. Antiphospholipidic antibodies were found in some studies.Aim. Assessment of protein S activity in patients with COVID-19 as a cause of this prothrombotic state, and of the association of protein S activity with worse outcome.Methods. All patients admitted for COVID-19 disease in a university hospital between 15th of May and 15th of July 2020 were prospectively enrolled into this cohort study. Patients treated with antivitamin K anticoagulants and with liver disease were excluded. All patients had protein S activity determined at admission. The main outcome was survival, while secondary outcomes were clinical severity and lung damage.Results. 91 patients were included, of which 21 (23.3%) died. Protein S activity was decreased in 65% of the patients. Death was associated with lower activity of protein S (median 42% vs. 58%, p < 0.001), and the association remained after adjustment for age, inflammation markers and ALAT. There was a dose-response relationship between protein S activity and clinical severity (Kendall_tau coefficient = -0.320, p < 0.001; Jonckheere-Terpstra for trend: p < 0.001) or pulmonary damage on CT scan (Kendall_tau coefficient = -0.290, p < 0.001; Jonckheere-Terpstra for trend: p < 0.001). High neutrophil count was also independently associated with death (p = 0.002).Conclusion. Protein S activity was lower in COVID-19 patients, and its level was associated with survival and disease severity, suggesting that it may have a role in the thrombotic manifestations of the disease.

Will imaging change the diagnosis and management of giant cell arteritis?

Giant cell arteritis is a common systemic vasculitis affecting the elderly, with maximum prevalence in the 7th decade of age, targeting aortic derived medium and large vessels of the neck and head. Diagnosis is established on a biopsy specimen of the temporal artery wall, through pathological confirmation of panarteritis, typically characterized by mononuclear cell infiltrate, with the 1990 ACR criteria often used in clinical practice. We present the case of a patient with a new onset headache and systemic inflammation, who did not fulfil the classical diagnostic criteria, nor did the temporal artery biopsy (TAB) provide a positive result. However, the ultrasonographical features, clinical evolution and response to corticosteroid therapy confirmed the diagnosis. This patient had bilateral presence of the halo sign on color duplex ultrasonography (CDUS), cited as a highly specific feature, when compared to the ACR criteria as a standard reference. We employed its positive likelihood-ratio (LR+) of 43 as previously estimated, while considering a low pre-test probability for a positive diagnosis (15%), to calculate a post-test probability of 88%, leading to our decision to treat him as having giant cell arteritis. Remission of the headache and rebound phenomena when tapered off steroid therapy substantially contributed to the positive diagnosis, underlining the importance of future studies needing to use clinical evolution as a reference standard.

The Romanian Society of Internal Medicine's Choosing Wisely Campaign.

Quality of care in medicine is not necessarily proportional to quantity of care and excess is often useless or even more, potentially detrimental to our patients. Adhering to the European Federation of Internal Medicine's initiative, the Romanian Society of Internal Medicine (SRMI) launched the Choosing Wisely in Internal Medicine Campaign, aiming to cut down diagnostic procedures or therapeutics overused in our country. A Working Group was formed and from 200 published recommendations from previous international campaigns, 36 were voted as most important. These were submitted for voting to the members of the SRMI and posted on a social media platform. After the two voting rounds, the top six recommendations were established. These were: 1. Stop medicines when no further benefit is achieved or the potential harms outweigh the potential benefits for the individual patient. 2. Don't use antibiotics in patients with recent C. difficile without convincing evidence of need. 3. Don't regularly prescribe bed rest and inactivity following injury and/or illness unless there is scientific evidence that harm will result from activity. Promote early mobilization. 4. Don't initiate an antibiotic without an identified indication and a predetermined length of treatment or review date. 5. Don't prescribe opioids for treatment of chronic or acute pain for sensitive jobs such as operating motor vehicles, forklifts, cranes or other heavy equipment. 6. Transfuse red cells for anemia only if the hemoglobin concentration is less than 7 g/dL or if the patient is hemodynamically unstable or has significant cardiovascular or respiratory comorbidity. Don't transfuse more units of blood than absolutely necessary.

Characteristics of shared decision making in Romania from the patient perspective: A cross-sectional multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is very important from patients' perspective. This process has not yet been evaluated in Romania. The study aims to evaluate SDM from the patients' perspective and to evaluate patients' characteristics that associate with SDM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional multicentric study comprising eight recruitment centres was performed. Inpatients and outpatients who referred to Hospital Units treating autoimmune diseases or atrial fibrillation were included. Another sample consisted of members of the Autoimmune Disease Patient Society, who completed an online anonymous questionnaire. All participants completed the Romanian translated version of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9), as these samples were used for the validation of this questionnaire, too. Patients had to refer to the visit in which the decision concerning the antithrombotic treatment was taken (atrial fibrillation patients), or the immunosuppressive treatment was last time changed (autoimmune disease patients). Ordinal regression having the total SDM score as dependent variable was used. RESULTS: A total of 665 questionnaires were filled in within the hospital setting (n = 324; 48.7%) and online (n = 341; 51.3%). The median score for SDM was 34 of 45, but it differed between hospital completion -39/45 and online completion (anonymous) -20/45 (P < .001). Patients with higher education were influenced most by the setting, giving the best marks in hospital and low marks online, while those with lower education gave lower marks in both settings. In ordinal regression with SDM score as dependent variable, hospital completion of the questionnaire (OR = 9.5, 95% confidence interval, 5.69-16), collagen disease diagnosis (OR = 2.4, 95% confidence interval, 1.39-4.14), and immunosuppressive treatment (OR = 2.16, 95% confidence interval, 1.43-3.26) were independent predictors. CONCLUSION: In our study, full anonymity was associated with significantly lower scores for the SDM process. The patients with higher education were most influenced by this condition, while those with the lowest education were the most critical.

Romanian version of SDM-Q-9 validation in Internal Medicine and Cardiology setting: a multicentric cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is becoming more and more important for the patient-physician interaction. There has not been a study in Romania evaluating patients' point of view in the SDM process yet. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the psychometric parameters of the translated Romanian version of SDM-Q-9. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicentric cross-sectional study was performed comprising eight recruitment centers. The sample consisted of in- and outpatients who referred to Hospital Units for treatment for atrial fibrillation or collagen diseases. Furthermore, patients who were members of Autoimmune Disease Patient Society were able to participate via an online survey. All participants completed the Romanian translated SDM-Q-9. RESULTS: Altogether, 665 questionnaires were filled in within the hospital setting (n = 324; 48.7%) and online (n = 341; 51.3%). The Romanian version had good internal consistency (Cronbach α coefficient of 0.96.) Corrected item correlations were good ranging from 0.64 to 0.89 with low corrected item correlations for item 1 and item 7. PCA found a one-factorial solution (similar with previous reports) but the first item had the lowest loading. CONCLUSION: SDM-Q-9 is a useful tool for evaluation and improvement in health care that was validated in Romania and can be used in clinical setting in this country.

IgG,kappa monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance with AL amyloidosis simulating giant cell arteritis.

Monoclonal gammopathies complicated by AL amyloidosis can mimic giant cell arteritis (GCA). We hereby present the case of a 63 year old woman in whom symptoms consistent with GCA were the first manifestations of a monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS) associated with amyloidosis. A 63 year old woman was admitted for temporal headache, maseterine claudication, neck and shoulder stiffness. She was recently diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome. On physical examination she had prominent temporal arteries, macroglosia and orthostatic hypotension. Muscular strength was normal. She had high ESR and CRP; in this clinical context, GCA was suspected. A gamma spike on serum protein electrophoresis raised the suspicion of monoclonal gammopathy (MG). Immunoelectrophoresis revealed monoclonal bands for IgG and kappa chains. Massive deposits of amyloid and no inflammation were found on temporal artery biopsy. Multiple myeloma and lymphoma were ruled out. A diagnosis of AL amyloidosis complicating MGUS was formulated. She did well on therapy with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. Cases published in medical literature reveal amyloidosis mimicking GCA in the setting of established MGUS. As far as we know, this is the first case of MGUS with IgG and kappa chains in which a GCA-like picture induced by amyloidosis was present from the very onset.

Extended Antiphospholipid Antibodies Screening in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients.

BACKGROUND: The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is one of the most encountered autoimmunity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and pathogenesis of these two seems to be intricate. AIM: To investigate the association of antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs) titer with the presence of secondary APS diagnosis in SLE patients. METHODS: 65 patients fulfilling the 2012 Systemic Lupus Collaborating International Clinics (SLICC) SLE's criteria were included. The APS diagnosis was sustained according to the 2006 Sydney APS's criteria. Three groups of patients were defined: SLE patients with secondary APS, SLE with history of positive "criteria" APLAs but without APS clinical features, respectively SLE patients without positive APLAs or clinical APS criteria. An extended APLAs panel was searched in all cases: both IgM and IgG of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), anti-P2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aß2GPI), antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies (aPE), antiphosphatidylserine antibodies (aPS), respectively antiprothrombin antibodies (aPT). Results. Only the aß2GPI, both IgM and IgG serotypes, had significantly higher titers in patients with SLE and secondary APS compared to no APS (with/ without positive APLAs): median (min; max) 7.0 (0.0-300.0) vs. 1.0 (0.0-28.0) vs. 1.0 (0.0-12.0), respectively 3.0 (0.0-79.0) vs. 1.0 (0.0-3.0) vs. 1.0 (0.0-12.0) (p<0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test)]. Also, in regression logistic models, only the aß2 GPI (IgG and IgM ) were identified as risk factors for secondary APS diagnosis in the SLE patients: OR(95%CI) 5.9 (2.2-15.7), respectively 1.3 (1.1-1.5). In regard with the SLE markers, the IgG serotypes of the "non-criteria" APLAs analyzed (aPS, aPT, aPE) were correlated with the antiDNA titers while the IgM serotypes inversely associated with the complement C3 levels. CONCLUSIONS: IgG aß2 GPI are accompanied by almost 6-fold increase risk of secondary APS when screening SLE patients. On the contrary, the "non-criteria" APLAs do not seem associated with the APS diagnosis in SLE patients. Some correlates of the "non-criteria" APLAs with the antiDNA and complement C3 levels were also observed.

Small bowel inflammatory involvement in Behçet's disease associated spondyloarthritis is different from other spondyloarthritides. A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Behçet's disease presents some similar clinical features with seronegative spondyloarthritides (SpA), raising the question whether a subgroup of patients with Behçet's disease belong in fact to the latter. As the already known inflammatory involvement at the level of the small bowel in SpA patients could not be extrapolated for patients with Behçet's disease associated SpA (BehSpA), the present study aims to investigate and compare it in these diseases. METHODS: 54 consecutive patients with a form of SpA, and 7 patients with BehSpA were enrolled and submitted to videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) examination. After reviewing the VCE findings, calculation of the score of small bowel mucosal inflammatory change (Lewis) was performed for each patient. The comparison was made with a control group, sex and age-matched to the patients in the study groups. RESULTS: The Lewis score differed in the groups considered for analysis (mean of 439, 179 and 81 in the SpA, BehSpA and the control group, respectively, with p = 0.04 for the comparison SpA vs. BehSpA and 0.05 for the comparison BehSpA vs. controls). C reactive protein (CRP) level was markedly reduced in the BehSpA group vs. the other SpA group (2.08 and 14.02 mg/L, respectively; p = 0.053). CONCLUSION: The significant difference in intestinal inflammatory involvement in BehSpA versus the other SpAs, as well as the significantly lower serum levels of CRP, as revealed by the present study, clearly draw a line between the two disease entities.

Immunohistochemical aspects of apoptosis in subcutaneous lupus erythematosus.

UNLABELLED: Lupus erythematosus (LE) has a broad clinical spectrum from exclusively skin damage (chronic discoid lupus-DLE or subacute lupus erythematosus-SCLE) to systemic, multiorgan disease (involving skin, joints, kidney, central nervous system). LE is characterized by an autoimmune component. SCLE is characterized by erythemato-squamous lesions mainly in photoexposed areas. Apoptosis (programmed cellular death) is essential for normal embryogenesis and for normal tissue homeostasis and control. Inefficient apoptotic cell clearance has been correlated with inflammatory diseases and autoimmunity outburst. This study evaluates histological and immunohistochemical expression ofpro-apoptotic markers in patients with SCLE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 patients with SCLE and 10 healthy controls were selected. Biopsies from skin lesions were performed. Biopsies were evaluated for immunohistochemical expression of caspase 3, CD25, CD35, CD21, CD36, CD68, CD31, IgM detection, T and B cell markers. RESULTS: In the inflammatory cells population we distinguished T lymphocytes, rare B lymphocytes, dendritic cells and macrophages. Within the lymphocyte population IL-2 receptor (CD25) expression was low but caspase 3 expression was intense in lymphocytes, epithelial cells and pericytes. Basal epithelial vacuolations were common. Phagocytic-cell and lymphocytic expression of CD35 (complement receptor 1-CR1) and CD21 (complement receptor 2-CR2) were lower when compared to healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: In SCLE patients we observed lymphocytic, epithelial and pericytal cell apoptosis and CR1 and CR2 expression are lower in professional phagocytes, suggesting a delay in the uptake of apoptotic bodies.

Anti C1q antibodies in cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

UNLABELLED: Autoantibodies against C1q are strongly linked to immune-complex disorders like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although anti-C1q antibodies have received much interest in the recent years, their biological functions remain unclear. Anti-C1q antibodies are strongly associated with lupus nephritis. Recent studies describe apoptosis as a key player in LE pathogenesis and C1q is an important opsonin, playing a central role in the uptake of apoptotic blebs. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum anti C1q antibodies, C1q with circulating immune complexes and correlation between serology and cutaneous apoptosis in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 79 subjects were recruited and divided into 4 groups-13 healthy controls, 26 with discoid chronic lupus (DLE), 23 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and 17 with subacute lupus erythematosus (SCLE). Blood samples and skin punched-biopsy specimens were performed. Serum anti-C1q antibodies and C1q associated to the immune complexes concentrations were determined by ELISA. Cutaneous caspase-3 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: SLE and SCLE patients had significantly higher levels of anti-C1q antibodies and serum C1q-CIC levels when compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05). Serum anti-C1q antibodies correlated with proteinuria in SLE patients (p < 0.05). Anti C1q antibodies levels also correlated with cutaneous caspase 3 expression in SLE and SCLE patients (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Anti C1q antibodies might play a pathogenic role in SCLE pathogenesis and being positively associated with cutaneous apoptosis markers might be associated with a negative prognosis and secondary SLE development.

Traditional and nontraditional risk factors for atherosclerosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Premature atherosclerosis (ATS) in SLE patients is an important clinical problem. It is explained not only by excess of traditional risk factors, but also by specific factors linked to disease activity and therapy. Such specific factors include the following: antioxLDL and anti CRP antibodies, immune complexes, mannose-binding lectin, disturbances of metabolism of annexin A5, antiphospholipid syndrome, immunologically determined dyslipidemia, influence of medication. As a conclusion,atherosclerosis in SLE patients results from an interplay between traditional and nontraditional risk factors. Therapeutic influences suggest antiatherogenic effects for hydroxychloroquine and immunosuppressants and a doubtful proatherogenic influence of cortisone.

Clinical particularities in a Romanian series of Behcet's disease patients.

Behcet's disease (BD) is characterized by a great geographic diversity of clinico-evolutive features. We identify the main clinical characteristics in our series as compared to other data in international literature. We studied 36 patients (16 women and 20 men) with BD fulfilling International Study Group for Behcet's Disease (ISGBD) criteria. We recorded the clinical features and compared the data with other recent statistics. The incidence of clinical manifestations in our group was the following: oral ulcerations -97.4%, genital ulcerations - 55.5%, vascular disease - 50%, antiphospholipid antibodies - 55%, digestive tract lesions - 28.5%, eye disease - 27.7%, pulmonary disease - 8.3%, arthritis - 5.4%, CNS lesions - 2.7%. The clinical course was generally mild. Our patients had a higher incidence of vasculo-thrombotic events, of APLAs and of oral aphthosis, as compared to other statistics. Eye disease, CNS, articular involvement and pathergy were encountered rarer than in other groups. Two cases had atypical onsets: one with a pyoderma gangrenosum-like lesion and the other with severe pulmonary hypertension. BD has protean clinical aspects, with important geographic particularities. Our patients ran a relatively mild course of the disease, more like the Western European than the Asian patients. Vasculothrombotic disease was an important feature, with a subsequent risk for mortality.