A Rare Case of Page Kidney in a Young Man with Flank Pain.

BACKGROUND: Page kidney is a rare condition in which an external compression of the kidney as a result of a hematoma or mass causes renal ischemia and hypertension. In a patient with flank pain, elevated blood pressure, and recent trauma, this condition should be considered. Since this condition was first described in 1939, more than 100 case reports have surfaced. CASE REPORT: We describe the case of a 26-year-old man who presented to the Emergency Department with flank pain, vomiting, and elevated blood pressure. A computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis confirmed the presence of a perinephric hematoma, and the interventional radiology team was consulted to resolve the Page kidney. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Symptoms seen in Page kidney may be similar to other more common diagnoses encountered in the emergency department. It is important to maintain a high suspicion and order imaging studies as needed, especially in the setting of trauma, or a recent procedure in the vicinity of the renal parenchyma.

Analysis of Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization Outcomes in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience.

PURPOSE: To analyze outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of survival, recurrence, and complications was performed in 82 patients with HCC undergoing preoperative PVE and surgical treatment with curative intention from June 2006 to December 2014. RESULTS: Rate of major adverse events after PVE was 11% with no mortality. Twenty-eight (34.1%) patients showed radiologic progression of HCC after PVE; 72 patients (87.8%) eventually were accepted as surgical candidates. Median interval between PVE and surgery was 37 days, and 69 patients (84.1%) ultimately underwent surgical resection. At 1 and 3 years, disease-free survival rates were 81.3% and 53.1%, respectively, and overall patient survival rates were 77.5% and 63.1%. Compared with patients accepted as surgical candidates, patients who did not undergo surgery had a higher median number of HCC tumors (1 [range, 1-5] vs 2 [range, 1-4], P = .031). At 1 and 3 years, patients with disease progression after PVE but who still underwent surgical resection showed similar recurrence-free (90% vs 79.6% and 75% vs 48.6%) and overall (72.2% vs 78.4% and 57.8% vs 64%) survival rates as the rest of the patients who underwent resection. CONCLUSIONS: PVE is a safe technique with good outcomes that potentially increases the number of patients with initially unresectable HCC who can be offered resection. Radiologic progression after PVE should not be seen as a contraindication to offer resection if it is still deemed possible.

Prophylactic uterine artery embolization in first-trimester cervical pregnancy termination with placenta accreta: A case report.

The current standard treatment for placenta accreta is a hysterectomy, which carries a significant risk of hemorrhage. Although prophylactic uterine artery embolization (UAE) is established as an effective means of minimizing perioperative bleeding, there are few reports of its use early in pregnancy with invasive placenta. A 45-year-old woman, gravida 6, para 1, at 11 weeks of gestation presented with heavy, painless uterine bleeding and was diagnosed with a spontaneous abortion complicated by cervical pregnancy and placenta accreta. The patient underwent bilateral UAE followed by gravid hysterectomy. This case report encourages prophylactic UAE prior to abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early gestational cervical pregnancy and placenta accreta to minimize blood loss during surgery.

May-Thurner Syndrome-a Rare Cause of Extensive Pelvic DVT, but Is there More to Know?

May-Thurner Syndrome (MTS) is a rare anatomical variant characterized by the compression of the left common iliac artery by the right common iliac artery against the fifth lumbar vertebrae. It can present as acute or chronic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), leg pain, varicosities, skin ulceration, and hyperpigmentation. In this case report, we present an interesting case of a young male with no obvious risk factors, who presented with back and left lower extremity pain later diagnosed with MTS on computed tomography angiography (CTA) and venogram. The patient was treated with venoplasty and pharmacomechanical thrombolysis and was discharged on apixaban.

Patients Want to Meet With Imaging Experts.

PURPOSE: The evolving health care landscape demands a multidisciplinary approach to care and increased emphasis on patient engagement. Radiologists may play an important role in this respect, by improving patient agency and understanding through direct patient interaction. The purpose of this study is to assess patient preferences and perceptions regarding direct communication with radiologists, focusing on a medically underserved demographic. METHODS: Our institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study. English- and/or Spanish-speaking adults undergoing imaging studies across two tertiary-care hospitals and a busy outpatient center were surveyed over a consecutive two-month period, to assess knowledge of the role of a radiologist, interest in, and perceived benefits of reviewing examination results with imaging experts. RESULTS: A total of 628 surveys were completed: 20% of total respondents accurately identified the role of radiologists; 28% identified radiologists as doctors. A total of 68% of respondents expressed an interest in receiving imaging results immediately, or whenever results became available, regardless of when referring physicians received results. An interest in reviewing imaging results with an expert was indicated by 81% of respondents; 88% anticipated that reviewing imaging results with an expert would be beneficial. Although 58% of respondents indicated that they might be willing to pay out of pocket for such a service, 50% selected $0 when asked to indicate an amount. CONCLUSIONS: Although most patients do not know the role of radiologists, they want immediate results, and perceive value in consulting directly with imaging experts.