Distribution of atrial low voltage induced by vein of Marshall ethanol infusion.

INTRODUCTION: Systematic and quantitative descriptions of vein of Marshall (VOM)-induced tissue ablation are lacking. We sought to characterize the distribution of low voltage observed in the left atrium (LA) after VOM ethanol infusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: The distribution of ethanol-induced low voltage was evaluated by comparing high-density maps performed before and after VOM ethanol infusion in 114 patients referred for atrial fibrillation ablation. The two most frequently impacted segments were the inferior portion of the ridge (82.5%) and the first half of the mitral isthmus (pulmonary vein side) (92.1%). Low-voltage absence in these typical areas resulted from inadvertent ethanol infusion in the left atrial appendage vein (n = 3), initial VOM dissection (n = 3), or a "no branches" VOM morphology (n = 1). Visible anastomosis of the VOM with roof or posterior veins more frequently resulted in low-voltage extension beyond typical areas, toward the entire left antrum (19.0% vs. 1.9%, p = .0045) or the posterior LA (39.7% vs. 3.8%, p < .001) but with a limited positive predictive value ranging from 29.4% to 43.5%. Ethanol-induced low voltage covered a median LA surface of 3.6% (1.9%-5.0%) and did not exceed 8% of the LA surface in 90% of patients. CONCLUSION: VOM ethanol infusion typically locates at the inferior ridge and the adjacent half of the mitral isthmus. Low-voltage extensions can be anticipated but not guaranteed by the presence of visible anastomosis of the VOM with roof or posterior veins.

Comparative study of strategies to prevent esophageal and periesophageal injury during atrial fibrillation ablation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of esophageal and periesophageal thermal injury in patients undergoing radiofrequency (RF) atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using 8 mm tip catheters during three different esophageal protection strategies. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF underwent first ablation procedure, besides esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) combined with radial endosonography (EUS) performed before and after the pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Before the procedure, patients were randomly assigned to one of three esophageal lesion protection strategies: group I-without any protective or monitoring dispositive and limiting RF applications to 30 W for 20 seconds, in left atrium posterior wall (LAPW); group II-power and time of RF delivery, up to 50 W for 20 seconds at LAPW, limited by esophageal temperature monitoring; group III-applications of RF in LAPW with fixed power application of 50 W for 20 seconds during continuous esophageal cooling. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients were similar in all groups. The four PVs were isolated in 14 (93.3%), 13 (86.7%), and 15 (100%) patients, respectively in groups I, II, and III. The mean RF power was significantly higher (P < .001) in the posterior side of PVs in group III. Post-AF ablation EGD and EUS revealed two esophageal wall ulcerations and two periesophageal mediastinal edemas only in the esophageal cooling group (P = .008). CONCLUSION: Esophageal cooling balloon strategy resulted in a higher RF power energy delivery when ablating at the LA posterior wall, using 8 mm nonirrigated tip catheters under temperature mode control. Despite that, patients presented a relatively low incidence of esophageal and periesophaeal injuries.

Gaps after linear ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (Marshall-PLAN): Clinical implication.

BACKGROUND: Beyond pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, anatomic isthmus transection is an adjunctive strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation. Data on the durability of multiple lines of block remain scarce. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of gaps within such a lesion set. METHODS: We followed 291 consecutive patients who underwent (1) vein of Marshall ethanol infusion, (2) PV isolation, and (3) mitral, cavotricuspid, and dome isthmus transection. Dome transection relied on 2 distinct strategies over time: a single roof line with touch-ups applied in case of gap demonstrated by conventional maneuvers (first leg), and an alternative floor line if the roof line exhibited a gap during high-density mapping with careful electrogram reannotation (second leg). RESULTS: Twelve-month sinus rhythm maintenance was 70% after 1 procedure and 94% after 1 or 2 procedures. Event-free survival after the first procedure was lower in case of residual gaps within the lesion set (log-rank, P = .004). Delayed gaps were found in 94% of a second procedure performed in the 69 patients relapsing despite a complete lesion set with PV gaps increasing the risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation (67% vs 34%; P = .02) and anatomic isthmus gaps supporting a majority of atrial tachycardias (60%). Between the first leg and the second leg, a significant decrease was found in roof lines considered blocked during the first procedure (99% vs 78%; P < .001) and in delayed dome gaps observed during a second procedure (68% vs 43%; P = .05). CONCLUSION: Gaps are arrhythmogenic and can be reduced by optimized ablation and assessment of lines of block. Closing these gaps improves sinus rhythm maintenance.

Sinus node exit, crista terminalis conduction, interatrial connection, and wavefront collision: Key features of human atrial activation in sinus rhythm.

BACKGROUND: An understanding of normal atrial activation during sinus rhythm can inform catheter ablation strategies to avoid deleterious impacts of ablation lesions on atrial conduction and mechanics. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe how the sinus node impulse originates, propagates, and collides in right and left atria with normal voltage. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with endocardial atrial voltage >0.5 mV during high-density 3-dimensional mapping were studied. RESULTS: Sinus node exits varied among patients along a lateral oblique arc extending from the anterior aspect of the superior vena cava (SVC) to the mid-posterior wall of the right atrium (RA). Conduction slowing or block at one of the smooth components that faces the crista terminalis was observed in 54% of cases, including complete block at the SVC musculature and systemic venous sinus in 6% of cases. Depending on these 2 key features of RA activation, interatrial conduction was mediated by the Bachmann bundle (64%) and posterior bundles (54%), with an overlap of the resulting left atrial breakthrough location. Wavefront collision was consistently observed at 3 sites: the septal aspect of the cavotricuspid isthmus, and the lower aspects of the dome and of the mitral isthmus. CONCLUSION: During sinus rhythm, atrial activation occurs via distinct sequences mediated by a complex interaction of anatomic factors.