Polypharmacy and the management of the older cancer patient.

Aging is associated with polymorbidity and polypharmacy. In the absence of a consensual definition, polypharmacy has been defined according to the number of drugs that an individual takes or to the presence of the risk of at least one severe drug interaction. In older cancer patients, polypharmacy is at least as common as it is in individuals of the same age without cancer. The management of cancer itself may result in the addition of more medications to counteract the adverse effects of antineoplastic treatment. Polypharmacy may be necessary to control the multiple health conditions of the older person, but it may represent a risk factor for more complications from antineoplastic therapy, and it may affect the outcome of cancer treatment. Polypharmacy is also associated with increased cost. The criteria proposed for the management of polypharmacy include the assessment that all medical conditions are properly treated, the avoidance of drug interactions, and of drugs that may compromise the outcome of antineoplastic treatment and the choice of drugs with the lowest risk of complications in older individuals.

Prevalence of aging population in the Middle East and its implications on cancer incidence and care.

The Middle Eastern population is aging rapidly, and as aging is the main risk factor for cancer, the incidence and prevalence of that disease are increasing among all the populations in the region. These developments represent huge challenges to national and community-based health services. At the current state of affairs, most Middle Eastern countries require the cooperation of international agencies in order to cope with such new challenges to their health systems. The focus and emphasis in facing these changing circumstances lie in the education and training of professionals, mainly physicians and nurses, at the primary, secondary and tertiary levels of health services. It is imperative that these training initiatives include clinical practice, with priority given to the creation of multidisciplinary teams both at the cancer centers and for home-based services.

Promoting new approaches for cancer care in the Middle East.

Cancer is now the fastest growing killing disease in the Middle East. Accordingly, there is an urgent need to train local health professionals: oncologists, palliative care experts, oncology nurses, psychologists, along with social workers, physiotherapists and spiritual counselors on strategies for early detection, curative therapies and palliation. Professionals in the region, along with the public, need to convince medical administrators, regulators and policymakers about investing in education and training of YOUNG professionals, as well as those with already proven experience in cancer care. Training is the basis for any future cancer care program, which aims at the integration of palliative care practices into standard oncology care across the trajectory of the illness.

Improvement of a rapid screening test for chronic granulomatous disease.

Diagnosis of CGD is made by demonstrating absent or markedly reduced oxidase activity in stimulated neutrophils. The screening test proposed is based upon the naked eye evaluation of the reduction of NBT on a solid surface. It seems to be a useful tool for rapid and inexpensive detection of CGD patients, especially for large-scale screening purposes. The test was carried out on forty-five subjects: two males affected by CGD, three female carriers and forty healthy donors. The test confirmed the results obtained with flow cytometric and NBT assays.

Death and dying: what the patient wants.

A good death and a death with dignity may be achieved when death is congruent with the personal values of the patient. It behooves the practitioner to recognize these values and to cater to them. This paper describes effective communication with the dying person, and the partnership of treatment team, patient and family in face of the patient death. To identify and define the patient wishes it is necessary to learn how to interpret the patient's non verbal as often patients are unable to formulate the questions they wish to ask concerning their passing. These difficulties stem from several cultural factors including concern about disturbing the practitioner. It is the treatment team's responsibility to facilitate this discussion. A good death is achieved when symptoms are controlled and when patients and family recognize death as a unique living experience to be treasured as any other living experience. A death with dignity brings healing, that is always possible even when cure is out of reach. Patient's and practitioner's values may be at odd in face of controversial issues including euthanasia, assisted suicide and terminal sedation. Though he/she should not be compelled to execute these requests, the practitioner should be able to entertain an open discussion with the patient concerning these issues. Open communication and reflective listening even in presence of disagreements are the venue of healing. The study of death and dying requires novel approaches including personal narrative and qualitative research to complement traditional research instrument, such as questionnaire that cannot embrace the whole human dimension.

Anemia in the elderly-clinical findings and impact on health.

Anemia is common in older people and it becomes more so with advancing decades. Because the older population is increasing, the prevalence of anemia and consequently its impact on health and healthcare expenditure is expected to rise. Although the causes and consequences of anemia have not been fully elucidated and its etiology is occasionally elusive, clinical evidence has indicated that anemia itself is a cause of morbidity and it can complicate other health conditions. The clinical approach to anemia is evolving. In the past, anemia was mainly seen as a sign of underlying disease; today, anemia is considered to be a cause of severe deterioration of quality of life, morbidity, and decline in physical function, and a risk factor for death. A better understanding of anemia in the elderly will lead to improved treatment strategies, including the more judicious use of transfusion and appropriate use of erythropoietic agents.

Early hematopoietic events during tumor growth in mice.

Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) of C57BL/6 mice, a transplantable tumor widely metastatic by 6-7 days post implant (PI), caused hematopoietic alterations such as progressive anemia (hemoglobin: day 1 PI, 11.0 g/dl; day 19 PI, 7.8 g/dl), neutrophilia (neutrophils: day 1 PI, 2 X 10(3)/microliter; day 19 PI, 22 X 10(3)/microliter), and marrow and splenic myeloid hyperplasia (marrow myeloid-to-erythroid ratio: day 1 PI, 1:1; day 7 PI, 3:1). Accompanying these changes were an increased concentration of marrow granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (culture) (GM-CFUC) (day 3 PI, LLC 185 +/- 27% of control; day 19 PI, LLC 265 +/- 10% of control) and accelerated cycling of these myeloid progenitors [day 3 PI, LLC 45.3 +/- 6.5% GM-CFUC in cycle vs. sham (media) injected 17.5 +/- 10.5%; day 7 PI, LLC 52.2 +/- 2.5% vs. sham (media) injected 29.8 +/- 9.8%; day 11 PI, LLC 56.2 +/- 4.4% vs. sham (media) injected 22.2 +/- 14%]. This study questioned whether enhanced hematopoiesis was a result of progressive tumor growth or whether the injection of tumor cells could evoke the response. By use of groups of C57BL/6 mice given an injection of live LLC cells, x-irradiated killed LLC cells, or media, the hematopoietic response to live LLC cells versus dead LLC cells could be dissected. A biphasic colony-stimulating activity (CSA) response in the sera of tumor bearers was found to account for the myelopoietic changes. The first wave of CSA from days 1 to 3 PI stimulated 168 +/- 3.7% more GM-CFUC than control sera and was likely released by dead cells of the tumor inoculum; the second wave from day 7 onward stimulated 220 +/- 7.6% more colonies and was a result of the enlarging tumor mass. Tumor growth was necessary for GM-CFUC proliferation, and the declining growth fraction at day 19 in LLC-bearing mice suggested that hematopoietic exhaustion was a consequence of tumor growth.

Decision analysis of hematopoietic growth factor use in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) have been shown to reduce the incidence of neutropenia and fever in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. PURPOSE: This cost analysis was designed to determine the conditions in which use of HGFs in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy is cost-effective. METHODS: We used a standard model based on decision theory; the model assumes that all patients experiencing neutropenia and fever will be hospitalized and treated with intravenous antibiotics. Data from a prospective, randomized clinical trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in small-cell lung cancer treated with combination chemotherapy were used to determine baseline probabilities for control hospitalization risk and survival; proportional hospitalization risk with prophylactic HGF; and median durations of hospitalization and prophylactic HGF use. The model was analyzed by one-way and multivariate sensitivity analyses, with estimation of threshold values at which the expected cost is the same for either of two treatment options. One or more of the specific costs and durations and the probability for each group of threshold curves were varied in a sensitivity analysis that generated variable thresholds. Use of Monte Carlo analysis based on the available distributions of the main variables provided 90% confidence limits and an inference method for comparing decision options. RESULTS: The expected excess cost per treatment cycle, based on hospitalization for neutropenic fever and/or HGF administration, was $5500 for no HGF, $4750 for prophylactic HGF, and $6875 for therapeutic HGF. Sensitivity analysis provided the following thresholds for no HGF versus prophylactic HGF: control risk of hospitalization, 0.40; risk of hospitalization with HGF as a proportion of control, 0.64; total daily cost of hospitalization, $727; total daily cost of HGF, $344; duration of hospitalization, 7.3 days; and duration of HGF use, 11.0 days. Multivariate analysis revealed that conditions favoring the use of HGF on a cost basis become greater (a) as risk of hospitalization, total daily hospital cost, and duration of hospitalization increase and (b) as the proportional risk of hospitalization with HGF, daily cost of HGF, and duration of HGF treatment decrease. CONCLUSIONS: The major determinants of total excess cost were the control risk of hospitalization, the proportional reduction in risk with HGF, and the average daily hospital cost. IMPLICATIONS: Use of HGFs should be based on the risk of hospitalization for neutropenic fever and consideration of the patient population and institutional costs.

Breast cancer care in old age: what we know, don't know, and do.

In this review of current pertinent literature from the fields of cancer epidemiology, oncology, health services research, and geriatrics, we describe the epidemiology and unique features of breast cancer and its victims in old age. In addition, we review the current evidence regarding treatment efficacy (i.e., beneficial under ideal circumstances) and effectiveness (i.e., beneficial under usual circumstances) in relation to primary tumor management and the use of adjuvant therapy in early stage disease and outline the challenges associated with studying breast cancer care in older women (> or = 65 years of age). Comorbidity, impaired functional status, lack of social support, and differences in host physiology are among the many factors that influence treatment efficacy and effectiveness, making extrapolation of study findings from younger to older women questionable. Indeed, with the exception of studies of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, none of the clinical trials supporting the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer guidelines have included women over the age of 70 years. Because (a) breast cancer is becoming increasingly common in old age and (b) health-related quality of life is frequently more important to older women than is risk of recurrence or death, all three aspects (surgical management of the primary tumor, postoperative irradiation, and axillary lymph node dissection) of recommended primary treatment deserve fresh scrutiny. The value of adjuvant chemotherapy has yet to be defined. Substantial variations in breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and care exist, and these differences become greater with increasing age of the patient. However, evidence regarding the reasons for these variations and their relationships with subsequent outcomes is lacking. Challenges for investigators in studies of older women include recruitment into studies, collection of reliable data from interviews or surveys, measurement of disease severity and comorbidity, and selection of relevant outcomes. Given current uncertainty about optimal treatment, clinicians can best serve older patients with early stage breast cancer by involving them in decision-making, taking into account available efficacy data, and individualizing care on the basis of such factors as comorbidity, social support, functional status, and patient preferences for outcomes. Future studies of treatment efficacy in older women should examine the roles of radiation therapy and axillary lymph node dissection that follow breast-conserving therapy and should focus on quality of life in addition to recurrence and mortality. Less aggressive treatments, tamoxifen therapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy should also be evaluated.

High proliferation of granulocyte-macrophage progenitors in tumor-bearing mice.

Cancer may affect hemopoiesis by altering the proliferative status of hemopoietic progenitor cells. In Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC), the proliferative rate of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit (culture) (GM-CFUc) was studied using in vivo hydroxyurea techniques. The disposal of mature elements to the periphery was also monitored during tumor growth. Neutrophilia, anemia, and splenic hypertrophy developed during the course of the disease. By Day 6 post-tumor implant, myeloid hyperplasia of the marrow was evident, but the content of GM-CFUc in LLC mice was similar to that of control. However, by Day 11, the marrow of LLC mice displayed an increased concentration of GM-CFUc, which tripled by Day 19. There was an increased percentage of proliferating GM-CFUc in LLC mice by Day 6 which was highest by Day 11 and thereafter declined. The level of colony-stimulating activity was higher in the serum of tumor bearers than in that of controls. The early increase in proliferative rate of these early hemopoietic precursors can account for the later accumulation of GM-CFUc and myeloid elements in the marrow. Increased cycling of hemopoietic stem cells raises questions concerning the potential for early exhaustion of hemopoietic progenitor cells in these animals.

What threshold for adjuvant therapy in older breast cancer patients?

PURPOSE: To consider the question of when to prescribe adjuvant treatment for elderly breast cancer patients, particularly when comorbidities are present. Knowledge of the threshold relapse risks above which adjuvant treatment is worth prescribing would enhance decision making. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Markov analysis of data from the medical literature was conducted. Patients aged 65 to 85 years were considered, along with three levels of comorbidity. The threshold risk of relapse at 10 years (RR10), at which time treatment provides absolute reduction or reduction of an absolute 1% in relapse or mortality, was evaluated. RESULTS: The threshold RR10 for an absolute reduction in mortality risk by adjuvant treatment was low through the age of 85 years. However, for an absolute 1% reduction, the effect of treatment on relapse and the effect of treatment on mortality increasingly diverged. The threshold RR10 for an absolute 1% reduction in relapse risk remained fairly low (5% to 6% for tamoxifen, 12% to 19% for chemotherapy). The threshold RR10 for an absolute 1% reduction in mortality risk, although starting close to the RR10 for an absolute 1% reduction in relapse risk, rose sharply. For tamoxifen, the difference between the two was 4% for an average 65-year-old, 6% at the age of 75 years, and 15% at the age of 85 years. For chemotherapy, the differences were 6%, 12%, and 30%, respectively. Similarly, thresholds increased with increasing comorbidity. In older and sicker patients, the maximum benefit was reached after 5 years rather than 10 years. CONCLUSION: Older breast cancer patients can expect a reduction in relapse that is fairly similar to that of younger patients. However, the effect on mortality diverges markedly, and attention should be paid to this difference in clinical decision making. Comorbidity should be considered in recommendations for adjuvant treatment, including clinical practice guidelines.

Comorbidity and functional status are independent in older cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Comorbidity is a frequent and often therapeutically limiting problem in older cancer patients. However, to date, there is no standard measure of the comorbidity burden available for these patients. We tested the performance of two comorbidity scales and their relationship with functional status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric (CIRS-G) was compared with the Charlson scale in 203 patients who received a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in our Senior Adult Oncology Program (SAOP). Study end points were variability, reliability, correlation with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL). The relative weight of comorbidity versus tumor stage in the correlations with functional status was assessed. RESULTS: Median age was 75 years (range, 63 to 91). Sixty-four percent of patients scored 0 on the Charlson scale versus 6% on the CIRS-G. The correlation between the Charlson and CIRS-G was fair (p = 0.25 to 0.39). CIRS-G grade 3/4 had a fair correlation with ADL (p = 0.27). Otherwise, there was low or no correlation between comorbidity and functional status across the measures. Tumor stage was not correlated with functional status either. Correlation of ECOG PS with ADL (p = 0.51)c and IADL (p = 0.61) was moderate. Interrater and test-retest correlations were good or very good for both the Charlson and CIRS-G. CONCLUSION: Comorbidity needs to be assessed independently from functional status. Both the Charlson and CIRS-G scales are reliable tools for use in trials of older cancer patients. Both can be tested in further studies as predictors of outcomes such as toxicity of treatment, changes in functional status, or survival.

Characteristics and correlates of fatigue after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Clinical reports suggest that many breast cancer patients experience persistent fatigue as a long-term side effect of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. To investigate this issue further, we examined the characteristics and correlates of fatigue in women who had completed adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer and in a comparison group of women with no history of cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants were 61 women with breast cancer who had completed chemotherapy an average of 471 days previously and 59 women with no history of cancer. All participants completed standardized self-report measures of fatigue, sleep quality, menopausal symptoms, and coping and were administered a structured clinical interview to identify current and past psychiatric disorder. RESULTS: Compared with women with no history of cancer, former adjuvant chemotherapy patients reported more severe fatigue (P < .01) and worse quality of life because of fatigue (P < .05). More severe fatigue among patients was significantly (P < .05) related to poorer sleep quality, more menopausal symptoms, greater use of catastrophizing as a coping strategy, and current presence of a psychiatric disorder. CONCLUSION: These findings support the view that many breast cancer patients experienced heightened fatigue after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. Results yield a profile of women who are at increased risk for heightened fatigue after chemotherapy and suggest ways to intervene clinically to prevent or reduce fatigue in this patient population.

Acute megakaryocytic leukemia. Description of a case initially seen as preleukemia syndrome.

A 52-year-old man had aregenerative anemia unresponsive to pyridoxine hydrochloride. Acute leukemia developed, and he died four months after diagnosis. At autopsy he had acute megakaryocytic leukemia with involvement of bone marrow, liver, spleen, adrenals, kidneys, and thyroid. Chromosomal analysis revealed absence of both diploid and Ph1 chromosomes. A mode of 45 chromosomes and aneuploidy were present. This is similar to the only other case with chromosomal studies. Of the 15 acceptable documented cases, eight were men and seven were women. Their age varied from 28 to 76 (mean, 55) years. Only two were less than 40 years of age. Most had pancytopenia, and all were dead within six months of diagnosis.

Treating cancer and no-cancer pain in older and oldest old patients.

Pain is one of the most frequent reasons for consultations in general practice, presenting either alone or associated with some comorbidity. In all care settings for older and oldest old patients, a gap exists between best-practice recommendations and current clinical practice. Clinical manifestations of persistent pain are often complex and multifactorial in the frail population, so the approach to pain management in older persons differs from that for younger people. The purpose of this review is to describe the best approach to assess and manage persistent cancer and no-cancer pain in the elderly, to explain the principles of pain treatment in this so often frail and complex population and compare the different drugs that should be used or avoided in older and oldest old patients considering the agerelated physiologic changes. Considerable emphasis is placed on conditions more common in the elderly such as neuropathic pain or typical subsets of the aging population such as the assessment of pain in people with dementia.

Treating cancer in older and oldest old patients.

The so-called "silver tsunami" is a metaphor that the individuals 65 and older represent the most rapidly growing segment of the Western world population. Aging is an ongoing process that leads to the loss of functional reserve of multiple organ systems, increased susceptibility to stress, it is associated with increased prevalence of chronic disease, and functional dependence. Determined by a combination of genetic and environmental factors, this process is highly individualized and poorly reflected in chronologic age. The heterogeneity and the complexity of the older old population represent the main challenge to the treatment of cancer in those patients. We should discern "fit" elderly in whom standard cancer treatment appears to be comparable to a younger population and "unfit" or "frail" elderly, in which the risks of the treatment may overwhelm potential benefits. There are many aspects that have to be assessed before treating an elderly patient, or before to choose the treatment itself. In our review we will try to explain and describe the meaning and the most important aspects related to the oldest old complex patients, and how to manage those patients.

The application of the principles of geriatrics to the management of the older person with cancer.

Is the patient going to die of cancer or with cancer? Is the patient going to suffer pain and disability due to cancer? Is the patient able to tolerate aggressive life-prolonging treatment? This paper tries to reply to the fundamentals of these questions by introducing the multidimensional assessment that evaluates areas where age-related changes are more likely. Chronologic age cannot be used to predict the degree of comorbidity and of functional deterioration of the single individual up to age 85 at least. Assessment of aging includes health, functional status, nutrition, cognition, socio-economic and emotion evaluations. This multidisciplinary assessment is referred to as comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). The risk of comorbid conditions increases with age and may result in underdiagnosis: in older patients, new symptoms may not be clearly recognized by the patient and may be dismissed by practitioners as manifestations of preexisting conditions. A meaningful assessment of comorbidity may be obtained with a comorbidity index. The Charlson scale and the Chronic Illness Rating Scale - Geriatric (CIRS-G), have enjoyed the widest acceptance. The Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) are the most sensitive assessment of function in older individuals. IADLs include shopping, managing finances, housekeeping, laundry, meal preparation, ability to use transportation and telephone and ability to take medications: in simple words, the IADLs are those skills a person needs to live independently. ADLs include feeding, grooming, transferring, toileting and are the skills necessary for basic living. Though a correlation exists among comorbidity, performance status, ADL and IADL, this correlation is not strong enough to be reflected in a single parameter. The Folstein Mini Mental Status (MMS), is the instrument of most frequent use to screen older individuals for dementia. The main problem with the MMS is lack of sensitivity to early stages of dementia. The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), a simple tool that can be completed by most patients at home, doubles the rate of detection of depression. The Mini Nutritional assessment is very sensitive to screen older persons for malnutrition. The risk of polypharmacy increases with age and partly results from the fact that older patients visit different practitioners. A CGA should also include evaluation of the so called Geriatric Syndromes like delirium, incontinence, osteoporosis, all of which represent a hallmark of frailty. The CGA may help the management of older individuals with cancer in at least three areas: detection of frailty, treatment of unsuspected conditions, removal of social barrier to treatment.

Management of the frail person with advanced cancer.

The frail population is increasing: currently, approximately 400,000 frail persons have cancer in the USA. Although the frail person is not a candidate for aggressive life-prolonging antineoplastic treatment, he/she is a candidate for aggressive symptom palliation. Most common symptoms include pain, especially bone pain, anemia, and fatigue. Destruction of cancer with antineoplastic treatment is pivotal to symptom palliation. A number of cytotoxic agents including gemcitabine, taxanes in low doses, vinorelbine, oral fluorinated pyrimidine, appear suitable for the management of metastatic cancer in the frail patient and should be tested in clinical trials.

Cancer and age in the USA.

Cancer in the older person has become an increasingly common problem with the aging of the population. The goal of this paper is to review the influence of age on cancer biology and cancer management. Specific interactions of cancer and aging include: Increased incidence of cancer with the age: This association may be reported to three factors: duration of carcinogenesis; increased susceptibility of older tissues to late stage carcinogens, and systemic effects of aging, including immune-senescence and enhanced cytokine production. Biological behavior of cancer: With aging, the prognosis of certain neoplasms, including acute myelogenous leukemia and large-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma worsens, whereas the behavior of other tumors becomes more indolent. In these biologic variations one may recognize both a 'seed" effect (different tumor cells) and a "soil" effect (different ways in which the older tumor host handles tumor growth. Goals of prevention and treatment: Given the limited life-expectancy of older individuals and reduced tolerance of clinical intervention, the main goal is compression of morbidity, rather than prolongation of survival. Cancer prevention in the older person: In virtue of increased susceptibility to environmental carcinogens, the older person appears an ideal candidate for primary prevention of cancer, including chemoprevention; though randomized controlled studies have not been performed, the older person may benefit from secondary prevention (screening), when the average life-expectancy is 3 years or longer. Cancer treatment: The risk of surgical complications increases only slightly with age for elective surgery, but increases dramatically for emergency surgery. Radiation therapy appears a valuable method of cancer treatment in patients of all ages. Chemotherapy can be made safer by the following provisions: use of hemopoietic growth factors for patients aged 70 and older receiving moderately toxic chemotherapy (CHOP and CHOP-like); maintenance of hemoglobin levels at 12 g/dl with erythropoietin; adjustment of the dose of renally excreted agents to the glomerular filtration rate; selection of the best candidates for chemotherapy based on comprehensive geriatric assessment.

Geriatric oncology: challenges for the new century.

The management of cancer in the older aged person represents one of the major immediate challenges of medicine. The response to this challenge involves answers to the following questions: I. Who is old? Currently. 70 years of age may he considered the lower limit of senescence because the majority of age-related changes occur after this age. Individual estimates of life expectancy and functional reserve may be obtained by a comprehensive and time-consuming multidimensional geriatric assessment. The current instrument may be fine-tuned and new instruments, including laboratory tests of ageing. may be developed. 2. Why do older persons develop more cancer? It is clear that ageing tissues are more susceptible to late-stage carcinogen. Older persons may represent a natural monitor system for new environmental carcinogens, and may also represent a fruitful ground to study the late stages of carcinogenesis. 3. Is cancer different in younger and older persons? Clearly. the behaviour of some tumors. including acute myeloid leukaemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and breast cancer change with the age of the patient. The mechanisms of these changes that may involve both the tumour cell and the tumour host are poorly understood. 4. Can cancer he prevented in older individuals? Chemoprevention offers a new horizon of possibilities for cancer prevention: older persons may benefit most from chemoprevention due to increased susceptibility to environmental carcinogens. Screening tests may become more accurate in older individuals due to increased prevalence of cancer. hut may he less beneficial due to more limited patient life expectancy. 5. Do older persons benefit from cytotoxic treatment? The answer to this question partly stands on proper patient selection. partly on the development of safer forms of cancer treatment and prudent use of antidotes to chemotherapy toxicity. 6. What is the cost of treating older cancer patients? The treatment of older patients is generally more costly. This cost should be assessed against the cost of not treating cancer and promoting functional dependence. which by itself is extremely costly. 7. What are the endpoints of clinical trials in older cancer patients? With more limited life expectancy. the effect of treatment on quality of life is paramount. Reliable assessment of quality of life is essential for interpreting clinical trials in older individuals. 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.