Comparison of the effects of parecoxib and diclofenac in preemptive analgesia: A prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, single-dose, parallel-group study in patients undergoing elective general surgery.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative administration of analgesics may prevent or reducehyperalgesia, inhibit inflammation, and reduce pain by reducing the synthesis of prostaglandins in response to tissue damage caused by surgery. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a potent, widely used class of analgesic agents; however, they may not be as effective as selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerabilityof the COX-2 inhibitor parecoxib sodium and the NSAID diclofenac sodium as preemptive analgesics in patients undergoing elective general surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, single-dose,parallel-group, comparative trial. Patients aged 18 to 65 years undergoing elective general surgery were enrolled. A single IM injection of parecoxib 40 mg or diclofenac 75 mg was administered 30 to 45 minutes before the induction of anesthesia. Surgery was performed as per standard protocol. The primary measures of efficacy were pain intensity score (measured on a visual analog scale [VAS]), pain relief score, duration of analgesia, and platelet aggregation response to adenosine diphosphate. Tolerability assessment included monitoring of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), physical examination, laboratory analysis, electrocardiography, and chest radiography. RESULTS: Eighty patients (56 men, 24 women; mean [SD] age, 45.96 [12.83] years) were enrolled in the study (40 patients per treatment group). All patients completed the trial. No pain was reported by any patient in the parecoxib group up to 12 hours; in the diclofenac group, no pain was reported up to 6 hours. At 12 hours, the mean (SD) VAS score was 2.33 (1.39) (moderate pain) in the diclofenac group and 0 (no pain) in the parecoxib group (P < 0.05). At 12 hours, total pain relief was reported by all 40 patients (100.0%) in the parecoxib group but by none (0.0%) in the diclofenac group, and 2 patients in the diclofenac group (5.0%) reported good pain relief (between-group difference for total + good pain relief, P < 0.05). Mean (SD) duration of analgesia was significantly longer in the parecoxib group than in the diclofenac group (19.48 [5.61] hours vs 8.32 [4.11 ] hours; P < 0.05). Platelet aggregation was significantly inhibited in the diclofenac group (change from baseline, 64.0%) but not in the parecoxib group (change from baseline, 12.0%) (P < 0.05). Both regimens were well tolerated, and no AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients undergoing elective general surgery,patients treated with the COX-2 specific inhibitor parecoxib experienced no pain at 12 hours, and the treatment was well tolerated. The results of this study suggest that good postoperative analgesia and minimal interference with platelet function may make parecoxib an alternative to the nonselective NSAID diclofenac in providing preemptive analgesia in patients undergoing general surgery.

Efficacy and safety of a combination of metformin and rosiglitaone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus--a postmarketing study.

The efficacy and safety of combined metformin and rosiglitazone therapy in type 2 diabetes has been evaluated in an open-label, phase IV, prospective, multicentre study conducted in India over a period of 3 months in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. The superiority of the combination therapy in its effects on glycaemic parameters and lipid profile has been observed. A discussion of the same with brief review of literature has been presented here.

Comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of telmisartan with losartan in Indian patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a pilot study.

A prospective, randomised, double-blind, parallel group study was carried out to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of telmisartan 40 mg once daily with losartan 50 mg once daily in Indian patients with mild to moderate hypertension. It had a placebo run-in period of 2 weeks followed by drug treatment (telmisartan 40 mg, once daily or losartan 50 mg once daily) for 8 weeks. Supine BP was assessed at the end of every 2 weeks. Tolerability and safety was assessed by physical examination, laboratory parameters and evaluation of adverse events. Treatment with telmisartan resulted in a significant reduction of SBP of 10.3% and 13.7% as compared to 6.6% and 10.6% in losartan group at the end of 6th and 8th weeks respectively. At the end of 6th and 8th weeks, the reduction was 14.3% and 18.1% among telmisartan which was significantly more as compared to 8.8% and 14.3% in losartan group respectively. The laboratory values were within normal limits. Both drugs were well tolerated. Telmisartan monotherapy in a dose of 40 mg once daily has a clinically better therapeutic effect as compared to losartan 50 mg and a good tolerability profile in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Evaluation of efficacy, safety and tolerability of valdecoxib in osteo-arthritis patients--an Indian study.

Valdecoxib, a COX-2 inhibitor, has been introduced as a new treatment for osteo-arthritis (OA). The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of valdecoxib, in OA patients in an Indian setting. The present 4-week study was a prospective, non-comparative, assessor blind, single group, multicentric trial with OA patients treated with valdecoxib, 10 mg once a day. Efficacy was assessed by analysing the changes in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue scale (VAS), patient's and physician's global assessment of arthritis. The incidence of adverse events was monitored throughout the study. There was a clinical and statistical significant improvement in the mean pain score, stiffness score, physical function, composite WOMAC index score and VAS (p<0.05). Patient's and physician's global evaluation of valdecoxib treatment was very good to good in 84.1% and 83.6% of cases respectively. The present study has shown that valdecoxib, in a dose of 10 mg/day given over 4 weeks, is an effective and safe treatment for the signs and symptoms of OA of hip and knee joints.

Efficacy and safety of cilostazol, a novel phosphodiesterase inhibitor in patients with intermittent claudication.

Pharmacotherapy is limited for the relief of intermittent claudication (IC), a common manifestation of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Pentoxyfylline, the only current pharmacological therapy for IC, has been shown to have similar efficacy as placebo. Cilostazol, a new phosphodiesterase III (PDE III) inhibitor, is a potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation with vasodilatory, antithrombotic, antiproliferative and positive lipid-altering effects. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cilostazol for the treatment of IC in Indian patients, 123 patients were selected from 6 centres in India. The patients, aged 58-73 years, with the diagnosis of stable moderate-to-severe IC received cilostazol 100/50 mg twice daily for a period of 12 weeks. Primary efficacy measures included initial claudication distance (ICD) and absolute walking distance (ACD) by treadmill testing and ankle-brachial index (ABI) using Doppler ultrasonography-measured systolic pressures. Secondary efficacy outcomes included subjective assessment of symptom improvement by patient and investigator and estimation of lipid values. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Laboratory investigations were carried out at baseline and end of study. At the end of week 12 of cilostazol therapy, there was a significant improvement in the raw walking distances (ICD and ACD). Percentage change in ICD and ACD was 46.77% and 64.5%, respectively, at the end of study. There was a significant increase (32.7%) in the ABI by the end of study period. According to patient and investigator assessment of symptoms, 58-60% of the subjects showed significant improvement to complete resolution of claudication symptoms by the end of 12 weeks of therapy. In addition, there was a significant increase of 20.24% in the mean plasma HDL-cholesterol levels and a decrease of 29.55% in the mean plasma triglyceride concentrations by the end of study period. Headache, diarrhoea, palpitation and dizziness were the commonly reported adverse effects during the study. No adverse effect led to discontinuation of therapy. The present study suggests that cilostazol is an effective therapeutic option with an acceptable tolerability profile for the treatment of IC in patients with PAD.

Efficacy and safety of the first parenteral selective COX-2 inhibitor, parecoxib sodium, in adult patients with postoperative pain.

Parecoxib, a prodrug of valdecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, has been recently introduced for the treatment of moderate to severe postoperative pain. This prospective, open, multicentric study enrolled 260 patients undergoing orthopaedic, gynaecological, dental and general surgery. Postoperatively, patients were treated with parecoxib, 40 mg IM/IV. There was a statistically significant decrease in the mean pain intensity score (p<0.05). At the end of 24 hours, 89.6% of total cases had a very good to total relief of pain. The mean duration of analgesia was 19.26 hours and mean time of onset of analgesia was 16.25 minutes ranging from 11-20 minutes. The laboratory values were within normal limits. The drug was well tolerated. There was no report of any hypersensitivity reaction. This study suggests that parecoxib, in a dose of 40 mg IM/IV, is an effective and safe option for the management of postoperative pain.