Glioneuronal tumor with ATRX alteration, kinase fusion and anaplastic features (GTAKA): a molecularly distinct brain tumor type with recurrent NTRK gene fusions.

Glioneuronal tumors are a heterogenous group of CNS neoplasms that can be challenging to accurately diagnose. Molecular methods are highly useful in classifying these tumors-distinguishing precise classes from their histological mimics and identifying previously unrecognized types of tumors. Using an unsupervised visualization approach of DNA methylation data, we identified a novel group of tumors (n = 20) that formed a cluster separate from all established CNS tumor types. Molecular analyses revealed ATRX alterations (in 16/16 cases by DNA sequencing and/or immunohistochemistry) as well as potentially targetable gene fusions involving receptor tyrosine-kinases (RTK; mostly NTRK1-3) in all of these tumors (16/16; 100%). In addition, copy number profiling showed homozygous deletions of CDKN2A/B in 55% of cases. Histological and immunohistochemical investigations revealed glioneuronal tumors with isomorphic, round and often condensed nuclei, perinuclear clearing, high mitotic activity and microvascular proliferation. Tumors were mainly located supratentorially (84%) and occurred in patients with a median age of 19 years. Survival data were limited (n = 18) but point towards a more aggressive biology as compared to other glioneuronal tumors (median progression-free survival 12.5 months). Given their molecular characteristics in addition to anaplastic features, we suggest the term glioneuronal tumor with ATRX alteration, kinase fusion and anaplastic features (GTAKA) to describe these tumors. In summary, our findings highlight a novel type of glioneuronal tumor driven by different RTK fusions accompanied by recurrent alterations in ATRX and homozygous deletions of CDKN2A/B. Targeted approaches such as NTRK inhibition might represent a therapeutic option for patients suffering from these tumors.

The prognostic significance of clinicopathological features in meningiomas: Microscopic brain invasion can predict patient outcome in otherwise benign meningiomas.

AIMS: Brain invasion (BI) was firstly defined as a single criterion of atypia in otherwise benign meningiomas in the revised fourth edition of 2016 WHO classification of brain tumours after being previously inconsistently addressed. However, recent studies have raised doubts about the prognostic significance of BI in otherwise benign meningiomas. In our study, we investigate the reproducibility of such a prognostic effect. METHODS: We identified two cohorts one consisting of 483 patients with meningioma WHO grade I (M°I) or atypical meningioma WHO grade II (M°II) from Hannover Medical School and the other including atypical meningiomas defined according to the classical WHO criteria (M°IIb) from the University Hospital Heidelberg. Follow-up data with a median observation time of 38.2 months were available from 308 cases. These included 243 M°I and 65 M°II patients with the latter group consisting of 25 patients with otherwise benign meningiomas with BI (M°IIa) and 40 with M°IIb. RESULTS: A significant difference of progression-free interval (PFI) was found between patients with M°I and M°II, M°I and M°IIa and those with M°I and M°IIb of both cohorts and each separately. However, PFI of M°IIa and M°IIb patients showed no significant difference. In the multivariate regression analysis adjusted for M°I/M°IIa versus M°IIb, sex, age, extent of resection and tumour location, BI exhibited the strongest risk of relapse (Hazard ratio: 4.95) serving as an independent predictor of PFI (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results clearly support the definition of BI as a single criterion of atypia in WHO classification of 2016.

Rare germline variants in the E-cadherin gene CDH1 are associated with the risk of brain tumors of neuroepithelial and epithelial origin.

The genetic basis of brain tumor development is poorly understood. Here, leukocyte DNA of 21 patients from 15 families with ≥ 2 glioma cases each was analyzed by whole-genome or targeted sequencing. As a result, we identified two families with rare germline variants, p.(A592T) or p.(A817V), in the E-cadherin gene CDH1 that co-segregate with the tumor phenotype, consisting primarily of oligodendrogliomas, WHO grade II/III, IDH-mutant, 1p/19q-codeleted (ODs). Rare CDH1 variants, previously shown to predispose to gastric and breast cancer, were significantly overrepresented in these glioma families (13.3%) versus controls (1.7%). In 68 individuals from 28 gastric cancer families with pathogenic CDH1 germline variants, brain tumors, including a pituitary adenoma, were observed in three cases (4.4%), a significantly higher prevalence than in the general population (0.2%). Furthermore, rare CDH1 variants were identified in tumor DNA of 6/99 (6%) ODs. CDH1 expression was detected in undifferentiated and differentiating oligodendroglial cells isolated from rat brain. Functional studies using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in or stably transfected cell models demonstrated that the identified CDH1 germline variants affect cell membrane expression, cell migration and aggregation. E-cadherin ectodomain containing variant p.(A592T) had an increased intramolecular flexibility in a molecular dynamics simulation model. E-cadherin harboring intracellular variant p.(A817V) showed reduced ß-catenin binding resulting in increased cytosolic and nuclear ß-catenin levels reverted by treatment with the MAPK interacting serine/threonine kinase 1 inhibitor CGP 57380. Our data provide evidence for a role of deactivating CDH1 variants in the risk and tumorigenesis of neuroepithelial and epithelial brain tumors, particularly ODs, possibly via WNT/ß-catenin signaling.

Glioblastomas with primitive neuronal component harbor a distinct methylation and copy-number profile with inactivation of TP53, PTEN, and RB1.

Glioblastoma IDH-wildtype presents with a wide histological spectrum. Some features are so distinctive that they are considered as separate histological variants or patterns for the purpose of classification. However, these usually lack defined (epi-)genetic alterations or profiles correlating with this histology. Here, we describe a molecular subtype with overlap to the unique histological pattern of glioblastoma with primitive neuronal component. Our cohort consists of 63 IDH-wildtype glioblastomas that harbor a characteristic DNA methylation profile. Median age at diagnosis was 59.5 years. Copy-number variations and genetic sequencing revealed frequent alterations in TP53, RB1 and PTEN, with fewer gains of chromosome 7 and homozygous CDKN2A/B deletions than usually described for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. Gains of chromosome 1 were detected in more than half of the cases. A poorly differentiated phenotype with frequent absence of GFAP expression, high proliferation index and strong staining for p53 and TTF1 often caused misleading histological classification as carcinoma metastasis or primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Clinically, many patients presented with leptomeningeal dissemination and spinal metastasis. Outcome was poor with a median overall survival of only 12 months. Overall, we describe a new molecular subtype of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma with a distinct histological appearance and genetic signature.

Infratentorial IDH-mutant astrocytoma is a distinct subtype.

Diffuse IDH-mutant astrocytic tumors are rarely diagnosed in the cerebellum or brainstem. In this multi-institutional study, we characterized a series of primary infratentorial IDH-mutant astrocytic tumors with respect to clinical and molecular parameters. We report that about 80% of IDH mutations in these tumors are of non-IDH1-R132H variants which are rare in supratentorial astrocytomas. Most frequently, IDH1-R132C/G and IDH2-R172S/G mutations were present. Moreover, the frequencies of ATRX-loss and MGMT promoter methylation, which are typically associated with IDH mutations in supratentorial astrocytic tumors, were significantly lower in the infratentorial compartment. Gene panel sequencing revealed two samples with IDH1-R132C/H3F3A-K27M co-mutations. Genome-wide DNA methylation as well as chromosomal copy number profiling provided further evidence for a molecular distinctiveness of infratentorial IDH-mutant astrocytomas. Clinical outcome of patients with infratentorial IDH-mutant astrocytomas is significantly better than that of patients with diffuse midline gliomas, H3K27M-mutant (p < 0.005) and significantly worse than that of patients with supratentorial IDH-mutant astrocytomas (p = 0.028). The presented data highlight the very existence and distinctiveness of infratentorial IDH-mutant astrocytomas that have important implications for diagnostics and prognostication. They imply that molecular testing is critical for detection of these tumors, since many of these tumors cannot be identified by immunohistochemistry applied for the mutated IDH1-R132H protein or loss of ATRX.

Cerebellar glioblastoma: a clinical series with contemporary molecular analysis.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastomas (GBM) are localized in only less than 1% of patients in the cerebellum. Therefore, tumor characteristics, survival, and the efficacy of therapies are not yet well defined. The present study aims to characterize the molecular features of cerebellar GBM (GBMc) in 8 patients treated with contemporary modality in our institution. METHODS: Patients' treatment history, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. All histopathological specimens were re-investigated. EGFR amplification was determined by FISH, H3F3A, and HIST1H3B mutation status and MGMT promoter methylation after bisulfite treatment by pyrosequencing and BRAF V600E by pyrosequencing and immunohistochemistry. TERT promoter mutations were analyzed by Sanger sequencing, CDKN2A/B deletions by digital PCR. The expression of IDH1 R132H, ATRX, and p53 was determined through immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Six adults and two children (mean age 36 years) underwent tumor resection via medial or lateral suboccipital craniotomy. The median overall survival (mOS) of the adult patients was 7 months. GBMc from two children demonstrated a H3F3A K27M mutation. One of these also harbored a BRAF V600E mutation and has already had a PFS of 74 months. Mutated IDH1 R132H protein was expressed in 2 GBM from adult patients with previous supratentorial anaplastic astrocytoma. One patient carried a TERT promoter mutation. Another patient initially presented with a thalamic pilocytic astrocytoma. The cerebellar tumor revealed neither a BRAF V600E nor a H3F3A mutation but a homozygous CDKN2A/B deletion. CONCLUSIONS: GBM located in the cerebellum can be found in all age groups. We provide novel molecular genetic data on these rare tumors. Mutated IDH1 R132H protein and H3F3A K27M mutations indicate that a substantial number of GBMc are "metastatic" or "diaschismatic" lesions. Mutation of BRAF V600E may have a stronger biological significance than H3F3A K27M alterations. In a subset of patients, GBM may arise primarily as a distinct entity in the cerebellum.

Pediatric intracranial primary anaplastic ganglioglioma.

BACKGROUND: Primary intracranial anaplastic gangliogliomas are rare tumors in the pediatric patient group. Most of them present with symptoms of elevated pressure or symptomatic epilepsy. Extraaxial location is far more common than axial location. On MRI examination, they mimic pilocytic astrocytomas. The outcome after surgery depends mainly on the possible amount of surgical resection, and oncological therapy is necessary to prevent recurrence of the disease. CASE REPORT: An 11-year-old boy presented with headache and double vision due to obstructive hydrocephalus. MRI of the brain revealed an axial partially contrast enhancing lesion in the quadrigeminal plate extending from the cerebellum to the pineal gland and causing hydrocephalus. Subtotal removal of the lesion was performed, and the diagnosis of an anaplastic ganglioglioma was established and confirmed by the reference center. At the latest follow up (3 months), the boy is without any neurological symptoms and scheduled for radiation therapy as well as chemotherapy.

The new WHO 2016 classification of brain tumors-what neurosurgeons need to know.

BACKGROUND: The understanding of molecular alterations of tumors has severely changed the concept of classification in all fields of pathology. The availability of high-throughput technologies such as next-generation sequencing allows for a much more precise definition of tumor entities. Also in the field of brain tumors a dramatic increase of knowledge has occurred over the last years partially calling into question the purely morphologically based concepts that were used as exclusive defining criteria in the WHO 2007 classification. METHODS: Review of the WHO 2016 classification of brain tumors as well as a search and review of publications in the literature relevant for brain tumor classification from 2007 up to now. RESULTS: The idea of incorporating the molecular features in classifying tumors of the central nervous system led the authors of the new WHO 2016 classification to encounter inevitable conceptual problems, particularly with respect to linking morphology to molecular alterations. As a solution they introduced the concept of a "layered diagnosis" to the classification of brain tumors that still allows at a lower level a purely morphologically based diagnosis while partially forcing the incorporation of molecular characteristics for an "integrated diagnosis" at the highest diagnostic level. In this context the broad availability of molecular assays was debated. On the one hand molecular antibodies specifically targeting mutated proteins should be available in nearly all neuropathological laboratories. On the other hand, different high-throughput assays are accessible only in few first-world neuropathological institutions. As examples oligodendrogliomas are now primarily defined by molecular characteristics since the required assays are generally established, whereas molecular grouping of ependymomas, found to clearly outperform morphologically based tumor interpretation, was rejected from inclusion in the WHO 2016 classification because the required assays are currently only established in a small number of institutions. CONCLUSION: In summary, while neuropathologists have now encountered various challenges in the transitional phase from the previous WHO 2007 version to the new WHO 2016 classification of brain tumors, clinical neurooncologists now face many new diagnoses allowing a clearly improved understanding that could offer them more effective therapeutic opportunities in neurooncological treatment. The new WHO 2016 classification presumably presents the highest number of modifications since the initial WHO classification of 1979 and thereby forces all professionals in the field of neurooncology to intensively understand the new concepts. This review article aims to present the basic concepts of the new WHO 2016 brain tumor classification for neurosurgeons with a focus on neurooncology.

Cerebral Rosai-Dorfman disease.

BACKGROUND: Sinus histiocytosis (Rosai-Dorfman disease) with massive lymphadenopathy is a rare nonneoplastic and nonlangerhans cell proliferation disorder of the histiocytes. Extranodal location with or without lymphadenopathy occurs in about 40 % of the cases. Intracranial location is rare in children often mimicking meningiomas. The parasphenoidal region is more frequently involved though intraxial or intraventricular locations were described as well. Rarely, the surgical treatment allows the complete excision of the lesion; however, in symptomatic cases, partial resections of the tumor allow to counteract its mass effect. Long survivals are possible, even without radiotherapy or chemotherapy, due to the frequent spontaneous benign evolution of the lesions. CASE REPORT: A 2-year-10-month-old girl presented with high fever and vomiting. One year ago, she had a period of muscular weakness in both legs that recovered completely. MRI of the brain revealed an axial enhancing lesion with ventricular spreading mainly to the left occipital horn and bilateral frontal periventricular infiltration. After steroid therapy, all the symptoms recovered. Partial removal of the occipital intraventricular lesion was performed and the diagnosis of Rosai-Dorfman disease was established and confirmed by the reference center. At the latest follow-up (16 months), the girl is without any neurological symptoms and without any treatment.

Incorporating Supramaximal Resection into Survival Stratification of IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma: A Refined Multi-institutional Recursive Partitioning Analysis.

PURPOSE: To propose a novel recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification model in patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas that incorporates the recently expanded conception of the extent of resection (EOR) in terms of both supramaximal and total resections. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This multicenter cohort study included a developmental cohort of 622 patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas from a single institution (Severance Hospital) and validation cohorts of 536 patients from three institutions (Seoul National University Hospital, Asan Medical Center, and Heidelberg University Hospital). All patients completed standard treatment including concurrent chemoradiotherapy and underwent testing to determine their IDH mutation and MGMTp methylation status. EORs were categorized into either supramaximal, total, or non-total resections. A novel RPA model was then developed and compared to a previous RTOG RPA model. RESULTS: In the developmental cohort, the RPA model included age, MGMTp methylation status, KPS, and EOR. Younger patients with MGMTp methylation and supramaximal resections showed a more favorable prognosis (class I: median overall survival [OS] 57.3 months), while low-performing patients with non-total resections and without MGMTp methylation showed the worst prognosis (class IV: median OS 14.3 months). The prognostic significance of the RPA was subsequently confirmed in the validation cohorts, which revealed a greater separation between prognostic classes for all cohorts compared to the previous RTOG RPA model. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed RPA model highlights the impact of supramaximal versus total resections and incorporates clinical and molecular factors into survival stratification. The RPA model may improve the accuracy of assessing prognostic groups.

Proinflammatory Macrophage Activation by the Polysialic Acid-Siglec-16 Axis Is Linked to Increased Survival of Patients with Glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: Interactions with tumor-associated microglia and macrophages (TAM) are critical for glioblastoma progression. Polysialic acid (polySia) is a tumor-associated glycan, but its frequency of occurrence and its prognostic value in glioblastoma are disputed. Through interactions with the opposing immune receptors Siglec-11 and Siglec-16, polySia is implicated in the regulation of microglia and macrophage activity. However, due to a nonfunctional SIGLEC16P allele, SIGLEC16 penetrance is less than 40%. Here, we explored possible consequences of SIGLEC16 status and tumor cell-associated polySia on glioblastoma outcome. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens of two independent cohorts with 70 and 100 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were retrospectively analyzed for SIGLEC16 and polySia status in relation to overall survival. Inflammatory TAM activation was assessed in tumors, in heterotypic tumor spheroids consisting of polySia-positive glioblastoma cells and Siglec-16-positive or Siglec-16-negative macrophages, and by exposing Siglec-16-positive or Siglec-16-negative macrophages to glioblastoma cell-derived membrane fractions. RESULTS: Overall survival of SIGLEC16 carriers with polySia-positive tumors was increased. Consistent with proinflammatory Siglec-16 signaling, levels of TAM positive for the M2 marker CD163 were reduced, whereas the M1 marker CD74 and TNF expression were increased, and CD8+ T cells enhanced in SIGLEC16/polySia double-positive tumors. Correspondingly, TNF production was elevated in heterotypic spheroid cultures with Siglec-16-expressing macrophages. Furthermore, a higher, mainly M1-like cytokine release and activating immune signaling was observed in SIGLEC16-positive as compared with SIGLEC16-negative macrophages confronted with glioblastoma cell-derived membranes. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these results strongly suggest that proinflammatory TAM activation causes the better outcome in patients with glioblastoma with a functional polySia-Siglec-16 axis.

Differences in the MRI Signature and ADC Values of Diffuse Midline Gliomas with H3 K27M Mutation Compared to Midline Glioblastomas.

We conducted a two-center retrospective survey on standard MRI features including apparent diffusion coefficient mapping (ADC) of diffuse midline gliomas H3 K27M-mutant (DMG) compared to midline glioblastomas H3 K27M-wildtype (midGBM-H3wt). We identified 39 intracranial DMG and 18 midGBM-H3wt tumors. Samples were microscopically re-evaluated for microvascular proliferations and necrosis. Image analysis focused on location, peritumoral edema, degree of contrast enhancement and DWI features. Within DMG, MRI features between tumors with or without histomorphological GBM features were compared. DMG occurred in 15/39 samples from the thalamus (38%), in 23/39 samples from the brainstem (59%) and in 1/39 tumors involving primarily the cerebellum (2%). Edema was present in 3/39 DMG cases (8%) versus 78% in the control (midGBM-H3wt) group (p < 0.001). Contrast enhancement at the tumor rim was detected in 17/39 DMG (44%) versus 67% in control (p = 0.155), and necrosis in 24/39 (62%) versus 89% in control (p = 0.060). Strong contrast enhancement was observed in 15/39 DMG (38%) versus 56% in control (p = 0.262). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis showed significantly higher skewness and kurtosis values in the DMG group compared to the controls (p = 0.0016/p = 0.002). Minimum relative ADC (rADC) values, as well as the 10th and 25th rADC-percentiles, were lower in DMGs with GBM features within the DMG group (p < 0.001/p = 0.012/p = 0.027). In conclusion, DMG cases exhibited markedly less edema than midGBM-H3wt, even if histomorphological malignancy was present. Histologically malignant DMGs and midGBM-H3wt more often displayed strong enhancement, as well as rim enhancement, than DMGs without histomorphological malignancy. DMGs showed higher skewness and kurtosis values on ADC-histogram analysis compared to midGBM-H3wt. Lower minimum rADC values in DMGs indicated malignant histomorphological features, likely representing a more complex tissue microstructure.

Diffuse midline gliomas, H3 K27M-mutant are associated with less peritumoral edema and contrast enhancement in comparison to glioblastomas, H3 K27M-wildtype of midline structures.

PURPOSE: The entity 'diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant (DMG)' was introduced in the revised 4th edition of the 2016 WHO classification of brain tumors. However, there are only a few reports on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of these tumors. Thus, we conducted a retrospective survey focused on MRI features of DMG compared to midline glioblastomas H3 K27M-wildtype (mGBM-H3wt). METHODS: We identified 24 DMG cases and 19 mGBM-H3wt patients as controls. After being retrospectively evaluated for microscopic evidence of microvascular proliferations (MVP) and tumor necrosis by two experienced neuropathologists to identify the defining histological criteria of mGBM-H3wt, the samples were further analyzed by two experienced readers regarding imaging features such as shape, peritumoral edema and contrast enhancement. RESULTS: The DMG were found in the thalamus in 37.5% of cases (controls 63%), in the brainstem in 50% (vs. 32%) and spinal cord in 12.5% (vs. 5%). In MRI and considering MVP, DMG were found to be by far less likely to develop peritumoral edema (OR: 0.13; 95%-CL: 0.02-0.62) (p = 0.010). They, similarly, were associated with a significantly lower probability of developing strong contrast enhancement compared to mGBM-H3wt (OR: 0.10; 95%-CL: 0.02-0.47) (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Despite having highly variable imaging features, DMG exhibited markedly less edema and lower contrast enhancement in MRI compared to mGBM-H3wt. Of these features, the enhancement level was associated with evidence of MVP.

The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas.

The detection of IDH mutations in patients with diffusely infiltrating malignant astrocytomas resulted in substantial modifications in the concept of WHO classification of these tumors. An important underlying observation was that patients with anaplastic astrocytomas (AA) without IDH mutation had a clinical course similar to that of patients with glioblastomas (GBM). The underlying observations of the German Glioma Network and NOA-04, however, were based on mixed patient cohorts. While most GBM patients received combined radiochemotherapy, patients with AA usually had radiotherapy or chemotherapy only. This intrinsic shortcoming of the study raised the question of whether patients with AA, IDH wildtype, WHO grade III, might have better prognosis if treated with combined radiochemotherapy than patients with GBM receiving the same combination therapy. Thus, the question remains whether the established histopathological grading criteria for malignant astrocytomas in the absence of an IDH mutation are still important if neither vascular proliferation nor necrosis are detectable. All patients in the cohort investigated here with the diagnosis of AA or GBM were subjected to a combined radiochemotherapy according to the Stupp protocol independently of the histopathological diagnosis. Thus, the analysis of these patients allows to clarify whether patients with AA, IDH wildtype, WHO grade III have a prognosis similar to that of GBM, IDH wildtype, WHO grade IV, even under equivalent therapeutic conditions. We determined the IDH1 and IDH2 status by sequencing, the MGMT status by pyrosequencing after bisulfite treatment and the EGFR status of the patients by FISH. In fact, the patients with the histopathological diagnosis of an AA IDH wild-type under similar aggressive therapy showed a comparable and therefore no better prognosis (median overall survival (mOS) 16 months) than patients with a GBM (mOS 13 months). Instead, patients with an AA and an IDH mutation receiving the same therapy had a mOS of 54 months. Thus, it can be concluded that in the absence of an IDH mutation, the established histopathological grading criteria 'necrosis' and 'vascular proliferation' actually lose their prognostic significance. If, on the other hand, patients with malignant astrocytomas and an IDH mutation are examined, there is still a difference between patients with necrosis and/or vascular proliferation and those whose tumors do not show such characteristics. Accordingly, in patients with malignant astrocytomas with IDH mutation it can be concluded that a histological differentiation between AA IDH mutated and GBM IDH mutated remains beneficial from a prognostic perspective.