Validating the Reliability and Clinical Relevance of a Nasolabial Fold Photonumeric Scale.

BACKGROUND: The use of tissue fillers to treat age-related deepening of the nasolabial fold (NLF) has increased and become the standard clinical approach, creating a need for evidence-based, objective evaluation for pre- and post-procedure assessment of the NLF. METHODS: A 5-point rating scale was developed to assess the NLF, specifically the presence of depression and shadowing. Live validation of the scale was performed with a total of 73 participants representing the full range of NLF severities. Physicians board-certified in a core aesthetic specialty (3 trained raters) performed the scale validation over 2 rounds, 2 weeks apart. Training was carried out, and test-retest reliability was quantitated through the determination of intra- and inter-rater reliability by percentage of agreement, weighted kappa statistic with 95% confidence interval (CI), and intraclass correlation coefficient with 95% CI. To evaluate the clinical relevance of a 1-grade difference, rater assessments of 90 photo pairs were compared with previous designations of clinically different or not clinically different. RESULTS: The NLF scale achieved near-perfect intra- and inter-rater reliability when utilized by trained raters to assess a diverse group of live participants. Furthermore, clinically relevant differences between grades were established, and a 1-point difference was detectable by trained evaluators using the NLF scale. CONCLUSION: The clinically relevant and highly reliable validated NLF scale provides a standardized grading system with a user-friendly design for objectively assessing NLF in clinical practice and as a research tool for clinical approval studies of new aesthetic products and technologies. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(1):1284-1291.   doi:10.36849/JDD.7316.

Safe and Effective Chin Augmentation With the Hyaluronic Acid Injectable Filler, VYC-20L.

BACKGROUND: VYC-20L is a hyaluronic acid soft tissue filler with lidocaine designed to restore facial volume. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VYC-20L in patients with chin retrusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults with chin retrusion were randomized (3:1) to receive VYC-20L in the chin at study onset (treatment group) or 6 months later (control group). The primary effectiveness end point was ≥1-point improvement on the Allergan Chin Retrusion Scale (ACRS) from baseline at Month 6. Safety assessments included injection site responses (ISRs) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: VYC-20L was administered to 192 participants (treatment group, n = 144; control group, n = 48). At Month 6, significantly more participants had an ACRS response in the treatment versus control group (56.3% vs 27.5%; p = .0019). Effectiveness was also demonstrated by the proportion of participants with improved/much improved Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores and responses on the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Chin questionnaire and FACE-Q Psychological Wellbeing module. Treatment benefit remained evident at Month 12. Most common ISRs were tenderness (81.1%) and firmness (75.1%). One participant (0.5%) discontinued the study due to 2 treatment-related serious AEs of facial cellulitis and injection site inflammation, both resolved without sequelae. CONCLUSION: VYC-20L significantly improved an ACRS response and was generally safe and well tolerated.

A Randomized, Comparator-Controlled Study of HARC for Cheek Augmentation and Correction of Midface Contour Deficiencies.

BACKGROUND: HARC is a soft and flexible hyaluronic acid filler containing lidocaine, manufactured using XpresHAn® technology, restoring natural-looking volume and soft contours. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of HARC for cheek augmentation and correction of midface contour deficiencies compared to a control product HAJV (hereafter referred to as Control). Primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of HARC compared to the Control, by blinded evaluation of change from baseline in midface fullness 12 weeks after last injection, using a 4 grade midface volume scale (MMVS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects over the age of 21 with loss of fullness in the midface area (MMVS score 2, 3, or 4) were randomized 2:1 to treatment with HARC(n=142) or Control (n=68). Optional touch-up was allowed after 4 weeks. Study assessments included MMVS, aesthetic improvement, subject satisfaction, and safety. Subjects were followed for 48 weeks. RESULTS: Overall, most subjects were female (89%) and mean age was 53 years (range 24-80). Total mean volume injected was 4.3 mL for HARC and 4.9 mL for Control. Primary objective was met; mean change from baseline in MMVS score at week 12: -1.4 (HARC), -1.3 (Control), 95% CI: -0.22, 0.06. HARC effectiveness was supported by a high degree of aesthetic improvement and subject satisfaction throughout 48 weeks. Related adverse events were generally mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS:  HARC was well tolerated and non-inferior to Control for correction of midface fullness at 12 weeks after last injection. Aesthetic improvement and subject satisfaction were high and lasted through week 48.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(9):949-956. doi:10.36849/JDD.6191.

Hyaluronic Acid Gel With (HARRL) and Without Lidocaine (HAJU) for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Nasolabial Folds: A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Phase III Study.

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers are frequently used to correct or smooth facial wrinkles and folds such as nasolabial folds. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 2 HA gels, formulated by 2 different manufacturing processes: XpresHAn Technology (HARRL [with lidocaine]) and Hylacross technology (HAJU-a comparator product without lidocaine). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy subjects with bilateral nasolabial folds rated as moderate or severe, according to the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), received injections of HARRL in the nasolabial folds on one side of the face and HAJU on the other side. Investigator- and subject-assessed wrinkle severity was measured up to 48 weeks after final injection. RESULTS: HARRL exhibited a similar safety and efficacy profile compared with HAJU. Noninferiority of HARRL was demonstrated at 24 weeks (WSRS mean change from baseline mean difference -0.1 [95% confidence interval: -0.15, 0.01], p = .090). Incidence of adverse events was 40% for both treatments. CONCLUSION: HARRL exhibited a similar safety and efficacy profile compared with HAJU.

Safety and Effectiveness of VYC-15L, a Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Lip and Perioral Enhancement: One-Year Results From a Randomized, Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: VYC-15L (Juvéderm Volbella XC) is a nonanimal crosslinked hyaluronic acid (HA) gel with lidocaine. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VYC-15L for lip and perioral enhancement versus a nonanimal stabilized HA with lidocaine (Restylane-L; NASHA). METHODS: This prospective multicenter study randomized 225 adults with minimal, mild, or moderate lip fullness on the validated 5-point Allergan Lip Fullness Scale (LFS) to treatment with VYC-15L or NASHA; optional touch-up was administered 30 days later. Subjects were followed for 1 year. The primary effectiveness end point was noninferiority of VYC-15L versus NASHA by mean change in LFS score from baseline to Month 3. RESULTS: The primary end point was met. At Month 3, LFS responder rates were 80.3% for VYC-15L versus 70.8% for NASHA. LFS responder rates exceeded 60% through 1 year with VYC-15L. Perioral lines severity improved for 65.4% and 66.2% of VYC-15L subjects at Month 3 and Year 1, respectively. At Month 3, 96.1% and 88.2% of subjects reported improvement in FACE-Q Satisfaction With Lips and Satisfaction With Lip Lines, respectively. Severe injection site responses were reported less frequently with VYC-15L than NASHA. CONCLUSION: VYC-15L was safe and effective for lip and perioral enhancement, with treatment effects lasting through 1 year.

Effectiveness and Safety of Large Gel Particle Hyaluronic Acid With Lidocaine for Correction of Midface Volume Deficit or Contour Deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Aging effects, such as facial flatness, increased tissue laxity, and soft tissue descent and deflation, contribute to midface deficiency. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether large gel particle hyaluronic acid with lidocaine (LGP-HAL) is more effective in the treatment of midface deficiencies than no treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects with mild to substantial loss of midface fullness were randomized 3:1 to LGP-HAL (Restylane Lyft; Galderma Laboratories, L.P., Fort Worth, TX) or no treatment. Treatment success was defined as at least 1-grade improvement in Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS) on each side of the face at 8 weeks as assessed by a blinded evaluator. Secondary efficacy end points included MMVS score, global aesthetic improvement, and subject satisfaction. RESULTS: Significantly greater percent of subjects achieved treatment success in the LGP-HAL group compared to no treatment at all time points through Month 12 (p < .001). One year after initial treatment, 85% of subjects still had a global aesthetic improvement assessed by the treating investigator. Subject satisfaction demonstrated that LGP-HAL improved the aesthetic appearance of the midface. Most reported adverse events (80%) were mild in severity. CONCLUSION: The LGP-HAL treatment is well tolerated and provides significant improvement up to 12 months for the correction of midface deficiencies.

Development and Validation of a Composite Skin Quality Scale.

Background: The increasing demand for skin quality interventions in aesthetic medicine underscores the necessity for objective, evidence-based assessment tools that may be used to evaluate novel interventions or devices. Objectives: To develop and validate a 5-point photonumeric rating scale for assessing overall skin quality, including radiance, color evenness, and smoothness. Methods: The IBSA (Institut Biochimique SA) Composite Skin Quality Scale was developed and underwent live validation with 88 real-world patients, chosen to encompass a broad spectrum of skin qualities and Fitzpatrick skin types. Scale validation was performed by board-certified plastic surgeons and dermatologists over 2 rounds, 2 weeks apart. Reliability was assessed through intrarater and interrater agreements, utilizing weighted kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The scale's ability to discern a clinically relevant 1-grade difference was evaluated with 72 photo pairs. Results: Combined intrarater reliability results showed weighted kappa values of 0.812 (right side) and 0.815 (left side) and an ICC of 0.903 for both sides, indicating an almost perfect agreement. Interrater reliability ranged from substantial to almost perfect, with kappa coefficients between 0.654 and 0.853 and ICCs between 0.657 and 0.855 across all rater pairs in both rounds. The ability to detect a clinically relevant 1-point difference using the scale was established. Conclusions: Integrating various key aspects of skin quality, the IBSA Composite Skin Quality Scale is a clinically relevant and highly reliable tool, suitable for skin assessment in clinical studies of new aesthetic technologies and products.

Validating the Reliability and Clinical Relevance of an Infraorbital Hollow Photonumeric Scale.

Background: Infraorbital hollowing is a facial aesthetic issue for which a broad age range of patients seek treatment. Expanding treatment options for this region warrants the development of validated tools to objectively assess infraorbital hollow (IOH) severity before and after treatment. Objectives: To validate a 4-point rating scale to assess depression of IOH, depression relative to the mid-pupillary line, and visibility of the lateral orbital rim. Methods: The IOH scale described herein was developed and subjected to live validation with a total of 73 patients representing the full range of IOH severities. Scale validation was performed by board-certified plastic surgeons and dermatologists (3 raters) over 2 rounds, 2 weeks apart. Intrarater and interrater reliabilities were used to demonstrate test-retest reliability as quantitated with percentage of agreement, weighted kappa statistic with 95% confidence interval (CI), and intraclass correlation coefficient with 95% CI. The clinical relevance of a 1-grade difference was evaluated by comparing rater assessments of 77 photo pairs with their previously determined designation as "clinically different" or "not clinically different." Results: The IOH scale demonstrated substantial to near-perfect intrarater and interrater reliabilities when utilized by trained raters to assess a diverse group of live patients. Furthermore, clinically relevant differences between grades were established, and detection of a 1-point difference could be achieved by trained evaluators using the IOH scale. Conclusions: This highly reliable, clinically relevant, and validated IOH scale provides a user-friendly, standardized grading system to objectively evaluate and track changes in infraorbital hollowing in clinical practice and research.

A randomized, evaluator-blinded, controlled study of the effectiveness and safety of small gel particle hyaluronic acid for lip augmentation.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of small gel particle hyaluronic acid (SGP-HA) for lip augmentation. METHODS: Adults (n = 180; aged 18-65) scoring 1 (very thin) to 2 (thin) on the 5-point validated Medicis Lip Fullness Scale (MLFS) for the upper or lower lip were randomized (3:1) to SGP-HA (≤1.5 mL/lip) or no treatment. Co-primary effectiveness end points were blinded-evaluator MLFS score for upper or lower lip at week 8. Secondary end points (MLFS score, independent photographic review, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale [GAIS], safety assessments) were measured throughout the study. RESULTS: Statistically significantly more MLFS responders (≥1 grades of MLFS improvement at week 8) received SGP-HA (93% combined upper and lower lip responders [95% upper lip; 94% lower lip]) than no treatment (29% combined; p < .001). SGP-HA improved self-assessed combined lip GAIS (97% week 8; 74% week 24) significantly more than no treatment (0% throughout; p < .001). The SGP-HA group reported anticipated swelling (58%) and bruising (44%), 88% mild or 11% moderate severity, without unanticipated device adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: SGP-HA is highly effective and well tolerated for lip augmentation. Statistically significant improvement was evident based on the MLFS at 8 weeks, with visible results reported in the majority of participants 6 months after treatment.

A lidocaine-containing formulation of large-gel particle hyaluronic acid alleviates pain.

BACKGROUND: Effective pain management is an important component of aesthetic procedures. OBJECTIVE: To compare the pain relief and safety of large-gel particle hyaluronic acid (HA) plus 0.3% lidocaine (LGP-HA+L) with that of LGP-HA without lidocaine during correction of nasolabial folds (NLFs) and to assess filler safety in different skin types. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty subjects were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, split-face study of LGP-HA and LGP-HA+L for NLF correction. Subjects assessed pain on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). The primary objective was to demonstrate that more than 50% of subjects experienced pain relief with LGP-HA+L, defined as a within-subject VAS difference of at least 10 mm at the end of injection. RESULTS: LGP-HA+L resulted in pain relief in 57 (95.0%, 95% confidence interval=86.1-99.0) subjects at the end of injection. The mean within-subject VAS difference was 34.4 mm. Injection-related adverse events occurred at similar frequencies with both products. Slightly higher adverse event rates were observed with Fitzpatrick skin type IV for both compounds. The safety profiles of LGP-HA and LGP-HA+L were similar to each other in all skin types. CONCLUSION: The addition of lidocaine substantially reduces the pain of LGP-HA injection without altering safety. LGP-HA and LGP-HA+L were generally well tolerated in all Fitzpatrick skin types.

The Effects of Session Standardization and Template Optimization on Improving Access to High-Demand Pediatric Subspecialty Care.

A major focus of US health care systems is ensuring timely patient access to subspecialty care. This article describes the experiences of a large children's hospital after implementation of clinic session standardization and template optimization. Outpatient specialty clinic sessions were standardized to 4-hour periods, and all unfilled complex appointment slots were made available for any appointment type within 72 hours of the clinic date. Three high-demand outpatient clinical services achieved increased aggregate potential and completed outpatient appointments over a 2-year period. These improvements were mostly due to an increase in providers and were not always coupled to shorter patient lag times.

A novel approach to treatment of the aging hand with Radiesse.

The ideal dermal filler for treatment of the aging had needs to have inherent bulk and longevity of effect. The filler calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) provides a texture that lends itself to injection and then to subsequent massage, without losing control of where the product is placed. In the recent past, delivery of CaHA to the hands has been accomplished by mixing lidocaine with the dermal filler prior to injection into the dorsum of the hand. The author suggests that an alternative way to deliver CaHA is to administer a large bolus of lidocaine immediately prior to injection of the dermal filler itself, followed by firm massage to disseminate the CaHA microspheres and carrier gel into the areas around and above the tendons and veins of the hand.

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Split-Hand Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Large-Gel-Particle Hyaluronic Acid with Lidocaine for the Correction of Volume Deficits in the Dorsal Hand.

BACKGROUND: Hand rejuvenation has become increasingly popular, but there are few reports published on the use of hyaluronic acid gels for correction of volume deficits in the dorsal hand. METHODS: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of large-gel-particle hyaluronic acid with lidocaine, a 20-mg/ml hyaluronic acid gel with 0.3% lidocaine, compared to no treatment for the correction of volume deficits in the dorsal hand. This was a prospective, multicenter, split-hand study in 90 subjects who received treatment with product in one hand. The primary efficacy endpoint was based on a 1 point of improvement with treatment versus no treatment according to the Merz Hand Grading Scale at week 12. Other assessments included Central Independent Photographic Reviewers evaluations of hand photographs, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, subject satisfaction, and safety. RESULTS: The mean injection volume was 2.1 ml at the first treatment. Subjects demonstrated significantly higher response rates with treatment compared to no treatment at week 12 (85.9 percent versus 21.2 percent) and at weeks 16, 20, and 24 (p < 0.0001). Photographic Reviewers assessments showed consistently greater improvements in the treated hands compared with the untreated hands from week 12 to week 24. Most subjects and investigators (≥92.8 percent) reported improvements in Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale score across all time points with treatment. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in seven subjects (7.9 percent). Most of these were mild, and none were serious. CONCLUSION: Hyaluronic acid with lidocaine is safe, effective, and well tolerated for the correction of volume deficits in the dorsal hand. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

The use of photodynamic therapy in dermatology: results of a consensus conference.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has significant promise in improving outcomes of patients with a variety of cutaneous conditions. A group of experts met to review the principles, indications, and clinical benefits of PDT with 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA). They also reviewed PDT with methyl aminolevulinate. The experts established consensus statements for pretreatment, posttreatment, ALA contact time, light sources, and numbers of sessions associated with ALA PDT for actinic keratosis and superficial basal cell carcinoma, photorejuvenation and cosmetic enhancement, acne, sebaceous skin, rosacea, and rhinophyma. They based consensus recommendations on their clinical experience and the medical literature. They also suggested future applications of ALA PDT. Experts concluded that ALA PDT is a safe and effective modality for the treatment of conditions commonly encountered in dermatology. Since downtime is minimal, the technique is suitable for patients of all ages and lifestyles. Appropriate light sources are available in many dermatology offices. The expanding clinical and financial benefits of PDT justify the purchase of an appropriate light source.

High-dose rectal midazolam for pediatric procedures: a randomized trial of sedative efficacy and agitation.

OBJECTIVES: To compare 2 doses of rectal midazolam, used for pediatric emergency department sedation, with regard to sedative efficacy and frequency of paradoxical agitation. METHODS: Children

Tongue entrapment in an aluminum juice can.

Tongue entrapment in bottles and cans is rare, but occurs. The following is a case report of a 10-year-old female who got her tongue entrapped in an aluminum juice can. The anatomy of the tongue, complications from injury, and a proposed removal procedure are described.

Validation of a four-point photographic scale for the assessment of midface volume loss and/or contour deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Soft-tissue augmentation with injectable fillers is commonly performed in the malar area. A four-point scale, the Medicis Midface Volume Scale, was developed and validated as an objective measure of the severity of midface volume loss. METHODS: Using a separate photographic guide, four investigators rated photographs (front and right and left sides, to provide a full view of the face) of 60 untreated subjects in random order during two sessions 2 or more weeks apart. Both sides of the midface were scored separately as follows: 1, fairly full; 2, mild loss of fullness; 3, moderate loss, slight hollowing; and 4, substantial loss, clearly apparent hollowing. RESULTS: Most subjects (mean age, 45.7 years; range, 23 to 80 years) were women (72 percent) and white (87 percent). Intraobserver agreement between sessions was "almost perfect" (weighted kappa scores) for the right (0.918; 95 percent CI, 0.887 to 0.949) and left (0.911; 95 percent CI, 0.878 to 0.943) sides. Intraobserver exact agreement between sessions was 87.1 percent (range, 76.7 to 95.0 percent) for the right side and 86.3 percent (range, 76.7 to 95.0 percent) for the left. Interobserver agreement was "substantial" to "almost perfect" (weighted kappa scores) for the right (0.759 to 0.893) and left (0.758 to 0.888) sides. Interobserver exact agreement was 72.5 to 87.5 percent for the right side and 72.5 to 86.7 percent for the left. Overall, results were similar in nonwhite and white subjects. CONCLUSION: Consistent agreement by different evaluators and the same evaluator at different times validates the four-point Medicis Midface Volume Scale as suitable to objectively measure the severity of midface volume loss. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic IV.

A multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled study of the safety and effectiveness of Juvéderm injectable gel with and without lidocaine.

INTRODUCTION: Pain is a common patient complaint during dermal filler injections. The primary objective of this study was to compare a new formulation of Juvéderm((R)) injectable gel with lidocaine (denoted as JUV + L) to commercially-available Juvéderm((R)) injectable gel without lidocaine (denoted as JUV) with respect to procedural pain scores in subjects desiring nasolabial fold (NLF) correction. METHODS: Subjects received randomized treatment with the lidocaine filler in one NLF and the filler without lidocaine in the other NLF. Investigators determined the appropriate formulation (Ultra or Ultra Plus) and volume of material to inject but were blinded as to which syringe contained lidocaine. Subjects rated procedural pain (pain during injection) using an 11-point scale within 30 min after receiving treatment in both NLFs and compared procedural pain between right and left NLFs using a 5-point scale. NLF severity was rated by both subjects and investigators before and 2 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: The mean difference on the procedural pain scale was 3.4 (P < 0.0001), and 93% of subjects found JUV + L to be less or slightly less painful than JUV. Improvement in NLF severity was comparable for both products. Common treatment site reactions (CTRs) of pain and tenderness were considerably less frequent for JUV + L than JUV while all other CTRs showed no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: The dermal filler formulated with lidocaine is effective in reducing procedural pain during correction of facial wrinkles and folds while maintaining a similar safety and effectiveness profile to the filler without lidocaine.

Clinical and demographic factors associated with urinary tract infection in young febrile infants.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research has identified clinical predictors for urinary tract infection (UTI) to guide urine screening in febrile children <24 months of age. These studies have been limited to single centers, and few have focused on young infants who may be most at risk for complications if a UTI is missed. The objective of this study was to identify clinical and demographic factors associated with UTI in febrile infants who are < or =60 days of age using a prospective multicenter cohort. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study during consecutive bronchiolitis seasons. All febrile (> or =38 degrees C) infants who were < or =60 days of age and seen at any of 8 pediatric emergency departments from October through March 1999-2001 were eligible. Clinical appearance was evaluated using the Yale Observation Scale. UTI was defined as growth of a known bacterial pathogen from a catheterized specimen at a level of (1) > or =50000 cfu/mL or (2) > or =10000 cfu/mL in association with a positive dipstick test or urinalysis. We used bivariate tests and multiple logistic regression to identify demographic and clinical factors that were associated with the likelihood of UTI. RESULTS: A total of 1025 (67%) of 1513 eligible patients were enrolled; 9.0% of enrolled infants received a diagnosis of UTI. Uncircumcised male infants had a higher rate of UTI (21.3%) compared with female (5.0%) and circumcised male (2.3%) infants. Infants with maximum recorded temperature of > or =39 degrees C had a higher rate of UTI (16.3%) than other infants (7.2%). After multivariable adjustment, UTI was associated with being uncircumcised (odds ratio: 10.4; bias-corrected 95% confidence interval: 4.7-31.4) and maximum temperature (odds ratio: 2.4 per degrees C; 95% confidence interval: 1.5-3.6). Factors that were reported previously to be associated with risk for UTI in infants and toddlers, such as white race and ill appearance, were not significantly associated with risk for UTI in this cohort of young infants. CONCLUSIONS: Being uncircumcised and height of fever were associated with UTI in febrile infants who were < or =60 days of age. Uncircumcised male infants were at particularly high risk and may warrant a different approach to screening and management.