What is the real impact of bone pain on survival in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer treated with docetaxel?

OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefit of starting early chemotherapy with docetaxel (the recommended first-line treatment) for patients with asymptomatic metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were analysed from 145 patients with HRPC treated with chemotherapy between February 2000 and June 2002 in one French centre. Eligible patients were categorized into three groups according to the bone pain at baseline, i.e. minimal/no pain, mild, and moderate/severe pain. The primary endpoint was the effect of bone pain on overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Docetaxel was administered to 67% of patients. The risk of death was 1.56 and 2.11 times higher for patients with mild or moderate/severe pain than for those with minimal/no pain (P = 0.027). The median (95% confidence interval (CI)) OS was 23.1 (18.5-27.6) and 14.1 (8.9-19.2) months (P = 0.001, log-rank-test) for patients with minimal pain or no pain treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy compared with mitoxantrone, respectively. The prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSA-DT) had a significant effect on OS in patients with minimal/no pain, with a median of 32.4 and 16.5 months for a PSA-DT of >or=45 and <45 days, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients with HRPC and minimal or no bone pain could have better survival than those with mild pain or moderate to severe pain, independent of the treatment administered. In addition, patients with HRPC and minimal or no bone pain treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy have a significantly better OS than those treated with mitoxantrone. The PSA-DT can be useful to identify asymptomatic patients who are candidates for early treatment.

Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing gemcitabine-based doublets versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on overall survival at 6, 12 and 18 months of gemcitabine-based doublets compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data on the use of gemcitabine-based doublets compared with gemcitabine alone in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer treated in randomised controlled phase II-III trials with overall survival as the principal or secondary endpoint. To this end, a literature search was performed using Cochrane methodology. The relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were estimated based on adjusted number of deaths and patients at risk according to the extent of follow-up and censoring. Twenty-three randomised clinical trials including 5886 patients met the inclusion criteria. In these trials, 2932 patients were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine-based doublets and 2954 patients to receive gemcitabine alone. RESULTS: Gemcitabine-based doublets were associated with small but significant reductions in the risk of death at 6, 12 and 18 months of 8% (95% CI 3, 13), 4% (95% CI 2, 7) and 3% (95% CI 1, 5), respectively (p<0.005 for all timepoints). No heterogeneity between studies was observed. Subgroup analyses showed an overall survival benefit for gemcitabine-based doublets in clinical trials testing the same planned dose intensity of gemcitabine in comparative arms, using platinum salt-based protocols and with survival as the primary endpoint. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis of data obtained from randomised controlled phase II-III trials of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer showed a small but significant improvement in overall survival for patients receiving gemcitabine-based doublets compared with gemcitabine alone.

Multicenter randomized phase II study of two schedules of docetaxel, estramustine, and prednisone versus mitoxantrone plus prednisone in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Mitoxantrone-corticosteroid is currently the standard palliative treatment in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. Recent clinical trials documented the high activity of the docetaxel-estramustine combination. We conducted a randomized phase II study to evaluate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (primary end point) and safety of two docetaxel-estramustine-prednisone (DEP) regimens and mitoxantrone-prednisone (MP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty metastatic HRPC patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel (70 mg/m2 on day 2 or 35 mg/m2 on days 2 and 9 of each 21-day cycle) and estramustine (280 mg p.o. tid on days 1 through 5 and 8 through 12) or mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 every 3 weeks; all patients received prednisone (10 mg daily). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients were assessable for PSA response and safety. A > or = 50% PSA decline was found in a greater percentage of patients in the docetaxel arms (67% and 63%) compared with MP (18%; P = .0001). Median time to PSA progression was five times longer with DEP than with MP (8.8 and 9.3 v 1.7 months, respectively; P = .000001). Overall survival was better in the docetaxel arms (18.6 and 18.4 months) compared with the MP arm (13.4 months), but not significantly so (P = .3). Crossover rates differed significantly among treatment arms (16%, 10%, and 48% in arms A, B, and C, respectively; P = .00001). Treatment-related toxicities were mild and mainly hematologic. CONCLUSION: The results of this randomized phase II study showed significantly higher PSA decline < or = 50% and longer times to progression in HRPC patients receiving DEP-based chemotherapy than MP, and that DEP could be proposed in this setting.

Platelet microparticles: a potential predictive factor of survival in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Several studies suggest a causal relationship between platelet activation and cancer metastasis. Activated platelet microparticles (PMPs) release vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), which play a major role in angiogenesis. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a prospective, nonrandomised, single-centre study in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients to determine the impact of PMPs on the outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eligible chemonaive and metastatic HRPC patients received docetaxel-based chemotherapy and a low dose of prednisone. INTERVENTION: PMPs in whole blood were quantified before the start of chemotherapy through flow cytometry using an anti-CD41a monoclonal antibody, and plasma VEGF and bFGF were determined with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was to evaluate the impact of the PMPs on overall survival (OS). We also studied the statistical interaction between PMPs and platelets and their relationship with OS. The median PMP value was used to sort patients into two groups. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Data of 43 consecutive HRPC patients treated in a single French centre were analysed. Significant correlations were observed between Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), platelets, and PMP level. The median OS was significantly shorter for patients with >6867 PMPs per microl of whole blood than for those with lower values (16.7 vs 26.4 mo, p=0.013). A significant relationship was found between OS and PMPs, whereas a statistical interaction term between PMPs and platelets was significantly associated with OS (p=0.019). No association was found between OS and plasma VEGF and bFGF. In the multivariate analysis, only baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and ECOG PS remained significantly predictive of risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: In HRPC patients, PMPs and their interaction with platelets were predictive of outcome. A biologic association between PMPs and the OS of HRPC patients, independent of chemotherapy regimen, should be demonstrated by confirmatory prospective studies.

Matched case-control phase 2 study to evaluate the use of a frozen sock to prevent docetaxel-induced onycholysis and cutaneous toxicity of the foot.

BACKGROUND: Onycholysis occurs in approximately 30% of patients treated with docetaxel. The efficacy and safety of an Elasto-Gel frozen sock (FS) was investigated for the prevention of docetaxel-induced nail and skin toxicity of the feet. METHODS: Patients receiving docetaxel at a dose of 70 to 100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks were eligible for this matched case-control study. Each patient wore an FS for 90 minutes on the right foot. The unprotected left foot acted as control. Nail and skin toxicities were assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 3) and compared using a 2-sample Wilcoxon matched-pairs rank test adjusted for tied values. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients were included between April 2005 and January 2007. Nail toxicity was significantly lower in the FS-protected foot compared with the control foot (grade 0: 100% versus 79%; and grade 1 and 2: 0% versus 21%, respectively) (P= .002). Skin toxicity was grade 0: 98% versus 94%; and grade 1 and 2: 2% versus 6% in the FS-protected and the control feet, respectively. The median times until toxicity occurrence were not found to differ significantly between the groups. One patient experienced discomfort because of cold intolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Cold therapy using FS significantly reduced the incidence of docetaxel-induced foot nail toxicity, as previously demonstrated using frozen gloves for the hands.

Serum PSA half-life as a predictor of survival for hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients: modelization using a standardized set of response criteria.

OBJECTIVE: Changes of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) during chemotherapy have been validated as a marker of response for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. We retrospectively established new response criteria to assess the risk of death. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-six chemonaive HRPC patients treated with chemotherapy were included in the analysis. According to PSA half-life (HL) dynamics, three response categories were defined: responders (R), late-progressors (LP) and initial-progressors (IP), that were compared with Working Group (WG) criteria. PSA HL time to failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were estimated and compared between HT categories. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to isolate the impact on OS of these response categories. A new predictor of survival, delta-time PSA interval (DeltaT) was described. RESULTS: PSA HL categories were strongly related with WG criteria (P = 0.0001). PSA HL TTF differed among PSA HL categories: 4.2, 2.3, and 0.9 months for R, LP, and IP patients, respectively, and their respective median OS were 27, 19.7, and 12.3 months (P = 0.0001). For DeltaT > or = 3 versus <3 months, median OS significantly differed: 24.9 months versus 13.2 months (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PSA HL dynamics during chemotherapy were able to accurately predict survival, earlier than WG-defined progression criteria. This criterion should be prospectively evaluated in randomized trials for HRPC patients in order to better estimate the risk of death.

Prospective multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine plus platinum salt for metastatic collecting duct carcinoma: results of a GETUG (Groupe d'Etudes des Tumeurs Uro-Génitales) study.

PURPOSE: Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney is a rare and aggressive neoplasm of the distal collecting tubules for which there is no established treatment. Since the histology of collecting duct carcinoma is similar to that of urothelial carcinoma, the standard chemotherapy regimen defined by a gemcitabine and platinum salts combination was prospectively investigated in patients with metastatic collecting duct carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 23 patients with metastatic collecting duct carcinoma with no prior systemic chemotherapy were treated with 1,250 mg/m(2) gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 plus 70 mg/m(2) cisplatin or carboplatin (AUC 5) in patients with renal insufficiency on day 1. The drugs were repeated every 21 days for 6 cycles according to toxicity and efficacy. The objective response rate was the primary end point. RESULTS: There were 1 complete and 5 partial responses for an objective response rate of 26% (95% CI 8 to 44). Median progression-free and overall survival was 7.1 (95% CI 3 to 11.3) and 10.5 months (95% CI 3.8 to 17.1), respectively. Toxicity was mainly hematological with grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 52% and 43% of patients, respectively. The severity of granulocytopenia and the number of metastatic sites were associated with overall survival on univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first prospective, multicenter, phase II study showing that the platinum salts combination is an active and safe regimen as first line treatment in patients with metastatic collecting duct carcinoma. This platinum based chemotherapy should be considered the standard regimen in these patients.