Assembly of functional diversity in an oceanic island flora.

Oceanic island floras are well known for their morphological peculiarities and exhibit striking examples of trait evolution1-3. These morphological shifts are commonly attributed to insularity and are thought to be shaped by the biogeographical processes and evolutionary histories of oceanic islands2,4. However, the mechanisms through which biogeography and evolution have shaped the distribution and diversity of plant functional traits remain unclear5. Here we describe the functional trait space of the native flora of an oceanic island (Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain) using extensive field and laboratory measurements, and relate it to global trade-offs in ecological strategies. We find that the island trait space exhibits a remarkable functional richness but that most plants are concentrated around a functional hotspot dominated by shrubs with a conservative life-history strategy. By dividing the island flora into species groups associated with distinct biogeographical distributions and diversification histories, our results also suggest that colonization via long-distance dispersal and the interplay between inter-island dispersal and archipelago-level speciation processes drive functional divergence and trait space expansion. Contrary to our expectations, speciation via cladogenesis has led to functional convergence, and therefore only contributes marginally to functional diversity by densely packing trait space around shrubs. By combining biogeography, ecology and evolution, our approach opens new avenues for trait-based insights into how dispersal, speciation and persistence shape the assembly of entire native island floras.

Strategies for advancing inclusive biodiversity research through equitable practices and collective responsibility.

Biodiversity research is essential for addressing the global biodiversity crisis, necessitating diverse participation and perspectives of researchers from a wide range of backgrounds. However, conservation faces a significant inclusivity problem because local expertise from biodiversity-rich but economically disadvantaged regions is often underrepresented. This underrepresentation is driven by linguistic bias, undervalued contributions, parachute science practices, and capacity constraints. Although fragmented solutions exist, a unified multistakeholder approach is needed to address the interconnected and systemic conservation issues. We devised a holistic framework of collective responsibility across all research participants and tailored strategies that embrace diversity and dismantle systemic barriers to equitable collaboration. This framework delineates the diverse actors and practices required for promoting inclusivity in biodiversity research, assigning clear responsibilities to researchers, publishers, institutions, and funding bodies. Strategies for researchers include cultivating self-awareness, expanding literature searches, fostering partnerships with local experts, and promoting knowledge exchange. For institutions, we recommend establishing specialized liaison roles, implementing equitable policies, allocating resources for diversity initiatives, and enhancing support for international researchers. Publishers can facilitate multilingual dissemination, remove financial barriers, establish inclusivity standards, and ensure equitable representation in peer review. Funders must remove systemic barriers, strengthen research networks, and prioritize equitable resource allocation. Implementing these stakeholder-specific strategies can help dismantle deep-rooted biases and structural inequities in biodiversity research, catalyzing a shift toward a more inclusive and representative model that amplifies diverse perspectives and maximizes collective knowledge for effective global conservation.

Estrategias para las prácticas equitativas y la responsabilidad colectiva en la investigación de la biodiversidad Resumen La investigación sobre biodiversidad es esencial para hacer frente a la crisis mundial de la biodiversidad, por lo que requiere la participación y la variedad de perspectivas de investigadores de diferente procedencia. Sin embargo, la conservación se enfrenta a un importante problema de inclusión, ya que los expertos locales de regiones ricas en biodiversidad, pero con economías desfavorecidas suelen estar infrarrepresentados. Esta infrarrepresentación se debe a prejuicios lingüísticos, contribuciones infravaloradas, prácticas científicas paracaidistas y limitaciones de capacidad. Aunque existen soluciones fragmentadas, se necesita un enfoque unificado de los múltiples actores para abordar los problemas de conservación interconectados y sistémicos. Ideamos un marco holístico de responsabilidad colectiva de todos los participantes en la investigación y estrategias a medida que abarcan la diversidad y desmantelan las barreras sistémicas a la colaboración equitativa. Se necesitan diversos actores y estrategias para promover la inclusión en la investigación sobre biodiversidad, y deben asignarse claramente las responsabilidades de investigadores, editores, instituciones y organismos de financiación. Las estrategias para los investigadores incluyen fomentar la autoconciencia, ampliar las búsquedas bibliográficas, fomentar las asociaciones con expertos locales y promover el intercambio de conocimientos. Para las instituciones, recomendamos establecer funciones de enlace especializadas, aplicar políticas equitativas, asignar recursos a iniciativas de diversidad y mejorar el apoyo a los investigadores internacionales. Las editoriales pueden facilitar la difusión multilingüe, eliminar barreras financieras, establecer normas de inclusión y garantizar una representación equitativa en la revisión por pares. Los financiadores deben eliminar las barreras sistémicas, reforzar las redes de investigación y dar prioridad a la asignación equitativa de recursos. La aplicación de estas estrategias específicas puede ayudar a desmantelar prejuicios profundamente arraigados y desigualdades estructurales en la investigación de la biodiversidad, catalizando un cambio hacia un modelo más inclusivo y representativo que amplifique las diversas perspectivas y maximice el conocimiento colectivo para una conservación global eficaz.

Links to rare climates do not translate into distinct traits for island endemics.

Current models of island biogeography treat endemic and non-endemic species as if they were functionally equivalent, focussing primarily on species richness. Thus, the functional composition of island biotas in relation to island biogeographical variables remains largely unknown. Using plant trait data (plant height, leaf area and flower length) for 895 native species in the Canary Islands, we related functional trait distinctiveness and climate rarity for endemic and non-endemic species and island ages. Endemics showed a link to climatically rare conditions that is consistent with island geological change through time. However, functional trait distinctiveness did not differ between endemics and non-endemics and remained constant with island age. Thus, there is no obvious link between trait distinctiveness and occupancy of rare climates, at least for the traits measured here, suggesting that treating endemic and non-endemic species as functionally equivalent in island biogeography is not fundamentally wrong.

Ecosistemas estratégicos y disponibilidad de hábitat de la avifauna del piedemonte llanero (Colombia), como posible peligro aviar / Strategic ecossttems and avifana habitat availability in the plains piedmont (Colombia) as possible avian danger

Dada la diversidad y oferta de áreas naturales o artificiales en el piedemonte Llanero y cuenca del Orinoco para la avifauna, se hace necesario llevar a cabo inspecciones y monitoreos de focos de concentración de aves como posible peligro para la aeronavegación. Para este propósito se tomó como referencia al municipio de Villavicencio (Meta, Colombia) estableciendo dos niveles diferentes de evaluación, incluyendo las áreas de aeropuertos y el Parque Ecológico Reciclante. En cada nivel identificado se realizaron visitas de inducción, ajuste de categorías de hábitats, caracterización de la cobertura y uso del suelo y la identificación de los ecosistemas estratégicos partiendo del concepto de servicios ambientales prestados, especialmente la oferta de hábitat. Las observaciones permitieron la categorización de hábitats de influencia de los niveles 1 y 2, en ecosistemas boscosos, pastizales, ecosistemas acuáticos, agroecosistemas y la presencia de infraestructura urbana y productiva, focos importantes para aves de importancia potencial en el peligro aviario.

Given the diversity and range of natural or artificial areas for avifauna in the Plains piedmont and the Orinoco river basin, it is necessary to carry out inspections and monitoring of concentration of bird outbreaks as a potential hazard to air navigation. For this purpose, the municipality of Villavicencio (Meta, Colombia) was made reference to establish two different levels of evaluation, including the areas of airports and the Reciclante Ecological Park. At each level identified induction visits, adjustment of habitat categories, coverage characterization and land use, and identification of strategic ecosystems based on the concept of environmental services, especially habitat supply were performed. The observations allowed the categorization of level 1 and 2, habitats influence in forest ecosystems, grasslands, aquatic ecosystems, agro ecosystems and the presence of urban and productive infrastructure, central focus for birds of potential importance in aviary hazard.