Snuffbox Versus Wrist Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistulas: 10 Years Experience.

Background The wrist radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) is the initial suggested procedure for establishing hemodialysis vascular access (HVA) in the most distal site of the upper limb. The anatomical snuffbox arteriovenous fistula (SBAVF) is barely utilised, despite its remote location. In this study, we aimed to analyse and compare the results of SBAVF and RCAVF in terms of their maturity, patency, and failure rates. Methodology This descriptive, retrospective study compared outcomes between SBAVF and RCAVF in terms of maturation, patency, and failure. All patients with chronic kidney disease who attended and underwent either procedure at Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board between 2013 and 2023 were studied. Results In a period of 10 years, 179 patients were included. Overall, 102 (57%) were male and 77 (43%) were female, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.3:1. Wrist radiocephalic fistula was the dominant type of surgery done in 76% (n = 136), while the snuffbox radiocephalic fistula was done in fewer than 24% (n = 43) of patients. Most patients underwent a successful arteriovenous (AV) fistula (n = 105, 58.7%), in contrast to 67 patients whose fistulas failed. There was a significant relationship between fistula failure and complications (p = 0.000). There was no significant effect of the fistula site, hypertension, diabetes, cardiac diseases, smoking, peripheral vascular disease, or central vein stenosis on the failure of the AV fistula (p = 0.127, 0.534, 0.510, 0.397, 0.017, 0.68, and 0.371, respectively). Conclusions The snuffbox AV fistula is a suitable and feasible first choice for patients on hemodynamic therapy.

Early Experience With the Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE) in Managing Iliac Aneurysms.

Aim The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of using iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) devices and to examine their short-term outcomes. Materials and methods This was a descriptive, retrospective observational study involving 15 patients diagnosed with either aortoiliac or isolated iliac artery aneurysms and treated with an IBE device. Data were collected for patients who received IBE devices at Glan Clwyd Hospital in Rhyl, United Kingdom, from February 2020 to May 2023. Results Most patients presented with asymptomatic aneurysms; 86.7% (n = 13) had bilateral common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysms. The mean diameter of the CIA was 38.7 ± 8.8 mm, and the mean diameter of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was 39.8 ± 23 mm. For the indications of IBE use, 60% (n = 9) of the patients had iliac aneurysms reaching the intervention threshold, 20% (n = 3) had AAA reaching the threshold, and 20% (n = 3) had aortoiliac aneurysms reaching the threshold. The majority of patients underwent bilateral femoral access (86.7%; n = 13), while 13.3% (n = 2) required both femoral and brachial access. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Aside from 20% (n = 3) of cases where the sac size remained static, the majority of patients (80%; n = 12) experienced sac regression. All patients were free from buttock claudication. A type II endoleak was observed in 33.3% (n = 5) of patients. No reinterventions were reported. The mean primary patency was 30.9 ± 0.7 months, and the follow-up period ranged from 12 to 36 months. Conclusions IBEs are an effective medical device, demonstrating a high rate of technical success, minimal need for additional procedures, and a low incidence of complications while maintaining a satisfactory rate of primary patency.

Breast metastasis from a melanoma.

Benign and primary malignant breast tumors are quite common, but secondary tumors in the breast from metastatic malignancies are rare. Nevertheless, metastasis to the breast must be considered in any patient with a known primary malignant tumor history who presents with a breast lump. We report a case of a premenopausal woman diagnosed with a metastatic melanoma in her breast.

Carotid axillary bypass in a patient with blocked subclavian stents: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment of symptomatic occlusive lesions of the proximal subclavian artery is infrequently necessary. Carotid subclavian bypass has gained popularity and is now considered standard treatment when stenting is not possible. Exposure of the subclavian artery and bypass grafting onto it is difficult, as the vessel is delicate, thin-walled and located deep in the supraclavicular fossa. The thoracic duct and brachial plexus are in close proximity to the left subclavian artery and are therefore susceptible to damage. Distal grafting to the axillary artery instead of the subclavian artery has the potential of avoiding some of these risks. Infraclavicular exposure of the axillary artery is more straightforward. The vessel wall is thicker and is easier to handle. In this case report, we describe a patient with a left proximal subclavian occlusion which was stented twice and blocked on both occasions. The patient underwent a carotid axillary bypass, as grafting onto the subclavian artery was impossible because of the two occluded metal stents. CASE PRESENTATION: A 56-year-old Caucasian woman, a heavy smoker, presented acutely with left arm numbness and pain and blood pressure discrepancies in both arms. A diagnosis of subclavian stenosis was confirmed on the basis of a computed tomographic scan and a magnetic resonance angiogram. The patient had undergone subclavian artery stenting twice, and unfortunately the stents blocked on both occasions. The patient underwent carotid axillary bypass surgery. She had an uneventful recovery and was able to return to a full, normal life. CONCLUSION: Carotid axillary bypass appears to be a good alternative to carotid subclavian bypass in the treatment of symptomatic proximal stenosis or occlusion of the subclavian artery.

The results of high-frequency duplex surveillance after iliac arterial stenting in a single center.

Frequent duplex surveillance after iliac arterial stenting is time-consuming and costly, so solid benefits of this approach must be available. Frequent duplex surveillance was performed at our center, this was reviewed retrospectively.A total of 117 stents were assessed. Duplex was done for 84 (71.8%) of 117 patients at 1 year and 25 (21.4%) of 117 at 5 years, mean follow-up 27.6 months. Totally, 456 scans were performed; 386 (84.6%) scans were normal, 43 (9.4%) showed an abnormality for which intervention was not necessary, 27 (5.9%) showed abnormalities which needed interventions. The maximum attendance of patients was 62%. In all, 18 patients had interventions unrelated to scheduled follow-up; 15 (83.3%) of 18 had no prior abnormalities on duplex, 3 (16.6%) of 18 had prior abnormalities which were not acted upon after clinical assessment. Our findings demonstrate a high nonattendance rate with frequent emergency presentations due to acute complications. We cannot, therefore, recommend frequent duplex surveillance program both in terms of results or resource allocation.