RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Finding the balance between the reduction in ischemic events and bleeding complications is crucial for the success of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The activated clotting time (ACT) is used routinely worldwide to monitor and titrate anticoagulation therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) during the procedure. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to test the accuracy of ACT measurements from the guiding catheter compared to the arterial access sheath. METHODS: Patients undergoing PCI with UFH therapy were prospectively enrolled. Blood samples were drawn from the coronary guide catheter and the arterial access sheath. ACT values were determined in the same ACT machine, and potential interactions with clinical variables were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 331 patients with post PCI ACT measurements. The mean ACT value of the catheter samples was statistically higher than the arterial access sample [294 ± 77 s Vs. 250 ± 60 s, p < 0.001]. The mean difference between the guiding catheter and the arterial line sheath samples was 43 ± 27 s (P < 0.001). We found that in 101/331 [30 %] patients the ACT from the guiding catheter was above 250 s, while from the access sheath it was below 250 s. Notably, in 40/331 [12 %] the ACT from the guiding catheter was above 200 s, while from the access sheath it was below 200 s. CONCLUSIONS: Large proportion of patient may be considered to have therapeutic ACT if measured from guide catheter during PCI, while the corresponding ACT from arterial sheath is subtherapeutic. This difference may have clinical and safety significance.
RESUMO
Patients with acute myocardial infarctions (AMIs) present as persistent ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or as non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). In some patients with STEMI, ST elevations are transient and resolve before coronary intervention (transient ST-elevation myocardial infarction [TSTEMI]). We analyzed our registry comprising all consecutive patients with AMI admitted during 2009 to 2014, and compared the characteristics, management, and outcome of patients with TSTEMI with those of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. Of 1,847 patients with AMI included in the registry, 1,073 patients sustained a STEMI (58%), 649 had a NSTEMI (35%), and 126 presented with TSTEMI (6.9%). Patients with TSTEMI were younger than patients with NSTEMI and STEMI (56.5 vs 62.8, p <0.001, and 59.5 years, p <0.02, respectively), smoked more (77.8 vs 54.0, p <0.001, and 62.1%, p <0.0005), and fewer were hypertensive (52.4 vs 74.2% and 58.8%, both p <0.001) and diabetic (26.2% vs 47.7%, p <0.0001, and 36.9%, p <0.02). The extent of coronary artery disease in patients with TSTEMI was similar to that of patients with STEMI except for less involvement of the left anterior descending artery (p <0.001), but less extensive than in NSTEMI patients. TSTEMI involved less myocardial damage by troponin-T level (p <0.005) with better cardiac function (LVEF 61% vs 55% and 49%, both p <0.0001). Mortality was lower among TSTEMI both in-hospital (0 vs 2.3% [p = NS] and 4.2% [p <0.01]) and long-term (4.8% vs 14.7% and 14.2%, both p <0.003) at a median of 36 months. In conclusion, TSTEMI is an acute coronary syndrome distinct from NSTEMI and STEMI, characterized by fewer risk factors, a similar extent of coronary artery disease to STEMI, but is associated with less myocardial damage and portends a better outcome.