International perspective on military exposure data sources, applications, and opportunities for collaboration.

Military personnel may be exposed to a range of hazards. The assessment, documentation and reporting of military exposure information are important steps to guide health protection, services, and research to support actively serving members and veterans. In 2021, a Working Group of researchers from veteran and defense administrations across the Five Eyes countries (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States) was established to examine large military exposure data sources available in each country, their applications, and opportunities to leverage information across administrations and internationally. We provide a brief summary of this work here to highlight some successful examples of data applications and to elicit interest in this evolving area of exposure science.

Lessons Learned From Presumptive Condition Lists in Veteran Compensation Systems.

Presumptive condition lists formally accept connections between military factors and veteran health conditions. An environmental scan of such lists and their evidentiary basis was conducted across four veterans' administrations to inform other administrations considering the development of such lists. Information on included conditions, qualifying military factors, and scientific processes was obtained through targeted internet searches and correspondence with veterans' administrations. The content of presumptive condition lists across jurisdictions varied by conditions included, as well as military eligibility requirements (e.g., service in particular conflict, context, or time period). Scientific review processes to develop lists also varied across jurisdictions. Findings indicate that evidence and experience may be leveraged across compensation systems (veteran and civilian). Ongoing research to understand links between military exposures and veteran health is recommended.

Prevention of malaria in travellers.

BACKGROUND: Malaria remains endemic in over 100 countries worldwide. Travellers to these countries may be at risk of contracting disease. Assessing risk on an individual basis can be challenging. OBJECTIVE: This article identifies the traveller at high risk of contracting malaria, outlines preventive methods, including personal protection and chemoprophylaxis if indicated, and summarises the risks and benefits of the most commonly used chemoprophylactic agents. DISCUSSION: Appropriately assessing the risk of malaria in an individual traveller can be complex. A number of factors beyond the country being visited influence the level of risk. These should be identified and taken into account when discussing malaria prevention with individuals. The traveller should be actively involved in the decision making process in order to enhance compliance. High risk individuals should be identified. Personal protection methods should always be emphasised. If chemoprophylaxis is indicated, the contraindications, advantages and side effects should be discussed. If in doubt, referral to a specialised travel medicine clinic should be considered.

Travelers' diarrhea in Nepal: an update on the pathogens and antibiotic resistance.

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea is the most common illness among travelers and expatriates in Nepal. Published data on the etiology of travelers' diarrhea (TD) in Nepal are over 13 years old and no prior data exist on antibiotic susceptibility for currently used drugs. We investigated the etiology of diarrhea and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial pathogens and compared the results to previous work from the same clinical setting. METHODS: A total of 381 cases and 176 controls were enrolled between March 2001 and 2003 in a case-control study. Enrollees were over age 18 years from high socioeconomic countries visiting or living in Nepal. Stool samples were assessed by microbiologic, molecular identification, and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) methods, and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion. Risk factors were assessed by questionnaires. RESULTS: At least one enteropathogen was identified in 263 of 381 (69%) cases and 47 of 176 (27%) controls (p ≤ 0.001). Pathogens significantly detected among cases were Campylobacter (17%), enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) (15%), Shigella (13%), and Giardia (11%). Cyclospora was detected only in cases (8%) mainly during monsoon season. Although 71% of Campylobacter isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 80% of bacterial isolates overall were sensitive to either ciprofloxacin or azithromycin while 20% were intermediately sensitive or resistant. No bacterial isolates were resistant to both drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The most common pathogens causing TD in Nepal were Campylobacter, ETEC, and Shigella. Because resistance to fluoroquinolone or azithromycin was similar, one of these drugs could be used as empiric therapy for TD with the other reserved for treatment failures.