Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 68
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Fam Med ; 16(1): 6-13, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29311169

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In the current payment paradigm, reimbursement is partially based on patient satisfaction scores. We sought to understand the relationship between prescription opioid use and satisfaction with care among adults who have musculoskeletal conditions. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the 2008-2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We assessed whether prescription opioid use is associated with satisfaction with care among US adults who had musculoskeletal conditions. Specifically, using 5 key domains of satisfaction with care, we examined the association between opioid use (overall and according to the number of prescriptions received) and high satisfaction, defined as being in the top quartile of overall satisfaction ratings. RESULTS: Among 19,566 adults with musculoskeletal conditions, we identified 2,564 (13.1%) who were opioid users, defined as receiving 1 or more prescriptions in 2 six-month time periods. In analyses adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and health status, compared with nonusers, opioid users were more likely to report high satisfaction with care (odds ratio = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.18-1.49). According to the level of use, a stronger association was noted with moderate opioid use (odds ratio = 1.55) and heavy opioid use (odds ratio = 1.43) (P <.001 for trend). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with musculoskeletal conditions, those using prescription opioids are more likely to be highly satisfied with their care. Considering that emerging reimbursement models include patient satisfaction, future work is warranted to better understand this relationship.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/tratamento farmacológico , Satisfação Pessoal , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New Hampshire , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Pontuação de Propensão , Autorrelato
2.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 27(9): 880-884, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28504359

RESUMO

Increasingly complex pediatric patients and improvements in technology warrant reevaluation of the risk associated with anesthesia for diagnostic imaging. Although magnetic resonance imaging is the imaging modality of choice for children given the potentially harmful effects of computerized tomography-associated ionizing radiation, we dare to suggest that certain patients would benefit from the liberalization of our current standard. Incorporating the use of newer computerized tomography technology may improve safety for those that are already at higher risk for adverse events. Furthermore, magnetic resonance imaging is not risk-free-what is often overlooked is the need for controlled ventilation and breath-holding to minimize motion artifact. As physicians at the forefront of the development and sustainability of the perioperative surgical home, anesthesiologists must work to not only optimize patients preoperatively but should also act as gatekeepers for procedural safety.


Assuntos
Suspensão da Respiração , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Segurança do Paciente , Pediatria/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Artefatos , Criança , Humanos , Exposição à Radiação
3.
Anesthesiology ; 124(1): 80-8, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26551974

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies that have attempted to define the incidence of aspiration or pulmonary complications during sedation/anesthesia of children with respect to nil per os (NPO) status or other factors are difficult because of the relatively infrequent rate of these complications. METHODS: The Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium consists of 42 participating institutions with elective sedation services that submit consecutive patient encounter information to a central database. The authors evaluated aspiration episodes and a combined outcome of major adverse events (defined as aspiration, death, cardiac arrest, or unplanned hospital admission) with respect to NPO status, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, age, propofol use, procedure types, and urgency of the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 139,142 procedural sedation/anesthesia encounters were collected between September 2, 2007 and November 9, 2011. There were 0 deaths, 10 aspirations, and 75 major complications. NPO status was known for 107,947 patients, of whom 25,401 (23.5 %) were not NPO. Aspiration occurred in 8 of 82,546 (0.97 events per 10,000) versus 2 of 25,401 (0.79 events per 10,000) patients who were NPO and not NPO, respectively (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.08 to 4.08; P = 0.79). Major complications occurred in 46 of 82,546 (5.57 events per 10,000) versus 15 of 25,401 (5.91 events per 10,000) (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.93; P = 0.88). Multivariate adjustment did not appreciably impact the effect of NPO status. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis suggests that aspiration is uncommon. NPO status for liquids and solids is not an independent predictor of major complications or aspiration in this sedation/anesthesia data set.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Parada Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Aspiração Respiratória/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Anestesia/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia
4.
Anesth Analg ; 120(4): 837-43, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25383717

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health care worker compliance with hand hygiene guidelines is an important measure for health care-associated infection prevention, yet overall compliance across all health care arenas remains low. A correct answer to 4 of 4 structured questions pertaining to indications for hand decontamination (according to types of contact) has been associated with improved health care provider hand hygiene compliance when compared to those health care providers answering incorrectly for 1 or more questions. A better understanding of knowledge deficits among anesthesia providers may lead to hand hygiene improvement strategies. In this study, our primary aims were to characterize and identify predictors for hand hygiene knowledge deficits among anesthesia providers. METHODS: We modified this previously tested survey instrument to measure anesthesia provider hand hygiene knowledge regarding the 5 moments of hand hygiene across national and multicenter groups. Complete knowledge was defined by correct answers to 5 questions addressing the 5 moments for hand hygiene and received a score of 1. Incomplete knowledge was defined by an incorrect answer to 1 or more of the 5 questions and received a score of 0. We used a multilevel random-effects XTMELOGIT logistic model clustering at the respondent and geographic location for insufficient knowledge and forward/backward stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify predictors for incomplete knowledge. RESULTS: The survey response rates were 55.8% and 18.2% for the multicenter and national survey study groups, respectively. One or more knowledge deficits occurred with 81.6% of survey respondents, with the mean number of correct answers 2.89 (95% confidence interval, 2.78- 2.99). Failure of providers to recognize prior contact with the environment and prior contact with the patient as hand hygiene opportunities contributed to the low mean. Several cognitive factors were associated with a reduced risk of incomplete knowledge including providers responding positively to washing their hands after contact with the environment (odds ratio [OR] 0.23, 0.14-0.37, P < 0.001), disinfecting their environment during patient care (OR 0.54, 0.35-0.82, P = 0.004), believing that they can influence their colleagues (OR 0.43, 0.27-0.68, P < 0.001), and intending to adhere to guidelines (OR 0.56, 0.36-0.86, P = 0.008). These covariates were associated with an area under receiver operator characteristics curve of 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia provider knowledge deficits around to hand hygiene guidelines occur frequently and are often due to failure to recognize opportunities for hand hygiene after prior contact with contaminated patient and environmental reservoirs. Intraoperative hand hygiene improvement programs should address these knowledge deficits. Predictors for incomplete knowledge as identified in this study should be validated in future studies.


Assuntos
Anestesiologia/métodos , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Desinfecção das Mãos/métodos , Higiene das Mãos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Análise por Conglomerados , Feminino , Geografia , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Curva ROC , Risco , Sociedades Médicas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
5.
Anesth Analg ; 120(4): 819-26, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25790209

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gram-negative organisms are a major health care concern with increasing prevalence of infection and community spread. Our primary aim was to characterize the transmission dynamics of frequently encountered gram-negative bacteria in the anesthesia work area environment (AWE). Our secondary aim was to examine links between these transmission events and 30-day postoperative health care-associated infections (HCAIs). METHODS: Gram-negative isolates obtained from the AWE (patient nasopharynx and axilla, anesthesia provider hands, and the adjustable pressure-limiting valve and agent dial of the anesthesia machine) at 3 major academic medical centers were identified as possible intraoperative bacterial transmission events by class of pathogen, temporal association, and phenotypic analysis (analytical profile indexing). The top 5 frequently encountered genera were subjected to antibiotic disk diffusion sensitivity to identify epidemiologically related transmission events. Complete multivariable logistic regression analysis and binomial tests of proportion were then used to examine the relative contributions of reservoirs of origin and within- and between-case modes of transmission, respectively, to epidemiologically related transmission events. Analyses were conducted with and without the inclusion of duplicate transmission events of the same genera occurring in a given study unit (first and second case of the day in each operating room observed) to examine the potential effect of statistical dependency. Transmitted isolates were compared by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to disease-causing bacteria for 30-day postoperative HCAIs. RESULTS: The top 5 frequently encountered gram-negative genera included Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Brevundimonas, Enterobacter, and Moraxella that together accounted for 81% (767/945) of possible transmission events. For all isolates, 22% (167/767) of possible transmission events were identified by antibiotic susceptibility patterns as epidemiologically related and underwent further study of transmission dynamics. There were 20 duplicates involving within- and between-case transmission events. Thus, approximately 19% (147/767) of isolates excluding duplicates were considered epidemiologically related. Contaminated provider hand reservoirs were less likely (all isolates, odds ratio 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.50, P = 0.004; without duplicate events, odds ratio 0.05, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.49, P = 0.010) than contaminated patient or environmental sites to serve as the reservoir of origin for epidemiologically related transmission events. Within- and between-case modes of gram-negative bacilli transmission occurred at similar rates (all isolates, 7% between-case, 5.2% within-case, binomial P value 0.176; without duplicates, 6.3% between-case, 3.7% within-case, binomial P value 0.036). Overall, 4.0% (23/548) of patients suffered from HCAIs and had an intraoperative exposure to gram-negative isolates. In 8.0% (2/23) of those patients, gram-negative bacteria were linked by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to the causative organism of infection. Patient and provider hands were identified as the reservoirs of origin and the environment confirmed as a vehicle for between-case transmission events linked to HCAIs. CONCLUSIONS: Between- and within-case AWE gram-negative bacterial transmission occurs frequently and is linked by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to 30-day postoperative infections. Provider hands are less likely than contaminated environmental or patient skin surfaces to serve as the reservoir of origin for transmission events.


Assuntos
Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Anestesiologia/instrumentação , Anestesiologia/métodos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/transmissão , Acinetobacter , Adulto , Idoso , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Enterobacter , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Feminino , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Mãos/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Moraxella , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Salas Cirúrgicas , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Pseudomonas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
6.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 109(3): 417-26, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24394752

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Detection and removal of adenomas and clinically significant serrated polyps (CSSPs) is critical to the effectiveness of colonoscopy in preventing colorectal cancer. Although longer withdrawal time has been found to increase polyp detection, this association and the use of withdrawal time as a quality indicator remains controversial. Few studies have reported on withdrawal time and serrated polyp detection. Using data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry, we examined how an endoscopist's withdrawal time in normal colonoscopies affects adenoma and serrated polyp detection. METHODS: We analyzed 7,996 colonoscopies performed in 7,972 patients between 2009 and 2011 by 42 endoscopists at 14 hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, and community practices. CSSPs were defined as sessile serrated polyps and hyperplastic polyps proximal to the sigmoid. Adenoma and CSSP detection rates were calculated based on median endoscopist withdrawal time in normal exams. Regression models were used to estimate the association of increased normal withdrawal time and polyp, adenoma, and CSSP detection. RESULTS: Polyp and adenoma detection rates were highest among endoscopists with 9 min median normal withdrawal time, and detection of CSSPs reached its highest levels at 8-9 min. Incident rate ratios for adenoma and CSSP detection increased with each minute of normal withdrawal time above 6 min, with maximum benefit at 9 min for adenomas (1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.21, 1.85)) and CSSPs (1.77, 95% CI (1.15, 2.72)). When modeling was used to set the minimum withdrawal time at 9 min, we predicted that adenomas and CSSPs would be detected in 302 (3.8%) and 191 (2.4%) more patients. The increase in detection was most striking for the CSSPs, with nearly a 30% relative increase. CONCLUSIONS: A withdrawal time of 9 min resulted in a statistically significant increase in adenoma and serrated polyp detection. Colonoscopy quality may improve with a median normal withdrawal time benchmark of 9 min.


Assuntos
Pólipos Adenomatosos/diagnóstico , Pólipos do Colo/diagnóstico , Colonoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New Hampshire , Sistema de Registros , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Tempo
7.
Prev Med ; 69: 202-7, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25456807

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine whether school food attenuates household income-related disparities in adolescents' frequency of fruit and vegetable intake (FVI). METHOD: Telephone surveys were conducted between 2007 and 2008 with adolescent-parent dyads from Northern New England; participants were randomly assigned to be surveyed at different times throughout the year. The main analysis comprised 1542 adolescents who typically obtained breakfast/lunch at school at least once/week. FVI was measured using 7-day recall of the number of times adolescents consumed fruits and vegetables. Fully adjusted linear regression was used to compare FVI among adolescents who were surveyed while school was in session (currently exposed to school food) to those who were surveyed when school was not in session (currently unexposed to school food). RESULTS: Mean FVI was 8.0 (SD=5.9) times/week. Among adolescents unexposed to school food, household income and FVI were strongly, positively associated. In contrast, among adolescents exposed to school food, FVI was similar across all income categories. We found a significant cross-over interaction between school food and household income in which consuming food at school was associated with higher FVI among adolescents from low-income households versus lower FVI among adolescents from high-income households. CONCLUSION: School food may mitigate income disparities in adolescent FVI. The findings suggest that the school food environment positively influences FVI among low-income adolescents.


Assuntos
Serviços de Alimentação , Frutas/economia , Instituições Acadêmicas , Verduras/economia , Adolescente , Comportamento Alimentar , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Modelos Lineares , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Rememoração Mental , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
8.
Ann Fam Med ; 11(4): 335-43, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23835819

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Health Plans are uniquely positioned to deliver outreach to members. We explored whether telephone outreach, delivered by Medicaid managed care organization (MMCO) staff, could increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among publicly insured urban women, potentially reducing disparities. METHODS: We conducted an 18-month randomized clinical trial in 3 MMCOs in New York City in 2008-2010, randomizing 2,240 MMCO-insured women, aged 50 to 63 years, who received care at a participating practice and were overdue for CRC screening. MMCO outreach staff provided cancer screening telephone support, educating patients and helping overcome barriers. The primary outcome was the number of women screened for CRC during the 18-month intervention, assessed using claims. RESULTS: MMCO staff reached 60% of women in the intervention arm by telephone. Although significantly more women in the intervention (36.7%) than in the usual care (30.6%) arm received CRC screening (odds ratio [OR] = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.08-1.62), increases varied from 1.1% to 13.7% across the participating MMCOs, and the overall increase was driven by increases at 1 MMCO. In an as-treated comparison, 41.8% of women in the intervention arm who were reached by telephone received CRC screening compared with 26.8% of women in the usual care arm who were not contacted during the study (OR = 1.84; 95% CI, 1.38, 2.44); 7 women needed to be reached by telephone for 1 to become screened. CONCLUSIONS: The telephone outreach intervention delivered by MMCO staff increased CRC screening by 6% more than usual care among randomized women, and by 15.1% more than usual care among previously overdue women reached by the intervention. Our research-based intervention was successfully translated to the health plan arena, with variable effects in the participating MMCOs.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/organização & administração , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/organização & administração , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Intervalos de Confiança , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Saúde da Mulher
9.
Anesth Analg ; 115(6): 1315-23, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23144441

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bacterial contamination of intravascular devices has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in various hospital settings, including the perioperative environment. Catheter hub disinfection has been shown in an ex vivo model to attenuate intraoperative injection of bacterial organisms originating from the anesthesia provider's hands, providing the impetus for improvement in intraoperative disinfection techniques and compliance. In the current study, we investigated the clinical effectiveness of a new, passive catheter care station in reducing the incidence of bacterial contamination of open lumen patient IV stopcock sets. The secondary aim was to evaluate the impact of this novel intervention on the combined incidence of 30-day postoperative infections and IV catheter-associated phlebitis. METHODS: Five hundred ninety-four operating room environments were randomized by a computer-generated list to receive either a novel catheter care bundle (HubScrub and DOCit) or standard caps in conjunction with a sterile, conventional open lumen 3-way stopcock set (24 inch with 3-gang 4-way and T-Connector). Patients underwent general anesthesia according to usual practice and were followed prospectively for 30 postoperative days to identify the development of health care-associated infections (HCAIs) and/or phlebitis. The primary outcome was intraoperative bacterial contamination of the primary stopcock set used by the anesthesia provider(s). The secondary outcome was the combined incidence of 30-day postoperative infections and phlebitis. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-two operating rooms were included in the final analysis. Study groups were comparable with no significant differences in patient, provider, anesthetic, or procedural characteristics. The catheter care station reduced the incidence of primary stopcock lumen contamination compared with standard caps (odds ratio [OR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.98, P = 0.034) and was associated with a reduction in the combined incidence of HCAIs and IV catheter-associated phlebitis with and without adjustment for patient and procedural covariates (OR(adjusted) 0.589, 95% CI 0.353-0.984, P = 0.040). The risk-adjusted number needed to treat to eliminate 1 case of lumen contamination was 9 (95% CI 3.4-13.5) patients, whereas the risk-adjusted number needed to treat to eliminate 1 case of HCAI/catheter-associated phlebitis was 17 (95% CI 11.8-17.9) patients. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative use of a passive catheter care station significantly reduced open lumen bacterial contamination and the combined incidence of 30-day postoperative infections and phlebitis.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Injeções Intravenosas/efeitos adversos , Injeções Intravenosas/instrumentação , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Anestesia Geral , Anestesia Intravenosa , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Demografia , Desinfecção/métodos , Método Duplo-Cego , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Salas Cirúrgicas/organização & administração , Flebite/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Anesth Analg ; 114(6): 1236-48, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22467892

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative stopcock contamination is a frequent event associated with increased patient mortality. In the current study we examined the relative contributions of anesthesia provider hands, the patient, and the patient environment to stopcock contamination. Our secondary aims were to identify risk factors for stopcock contamination and to examine the prior association of stopcock contamination with 30-day postoperative infection and mortality. Additional microbiological analyses were completed to determine the prevalence of bacterial pathogens within intraoperative bacterial reservoirs. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to assess the contribution of reservoir bacterial pathogens to 30-day postoperative infections. METHODS: In a multicenter study, stopcock transmission events were observed in 274 operating rooms, with the first and second cases of the day in each operating room studied in series to identify within- and between-case transmission events. Reservoir bacterial cultures were obtained and compared with stopcock set isolates to determine the origin of stopcock contamination. Between-case transmission was defined by the isolation of 1 or more bacterial isolates from the stopcock set of a subsequent case (case 2) that were identical to reservoir isolates from the preceding case (case 1). Within-case transmission was defined by the isolation of 1 or more bacterial isolates from a stopcock set that were identical to bacterial reservoirs from the same case. Bacterial pathogens within these reservoirs were identified, and their potential contribution to postoperative infections was evaluated. All patients were followed for 30 days postoperatively for the development of infection and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Stopcock contamination was detected in 23% (126 out of 548) of cases with 14 between-case and 30 within-case transmission events confirmed. All 3 reservoirs contributed to between-case (64% environment, 14% patient, and 21% provider) and within-case (47% environment, 23% patient, and 30% provider) stopcock transmission. The environment was a more likely source of stopcock contamination than provider hands (relative risk [RR] 1.91, confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 3.35, P = 0.029) or patients (RR 2.56, CI 1.34 to 4.89, P = 0.002). Hospital site (odds ratio [OR] 5.09, CI 2.02 to 12.86, P = 0.001) and case 2 (OR 6.82, CI 4.03 to 11.5, P < 0.001) were significant predictors of stopcock contamination. Stopcock contamination was associated with increased mortality (OR 58.5, CI 2.32 to 1477, P = 0.014). Intraoperative bacterial contamination of patients and provider hands was linked to 30-day postoperative infections. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial contamination of patients, provider hands, and the environment contributes to stopcock transmission events, but the surrounding patient environment is the most likely source. Stopcock contamination is associated with increased patient mortality. Patient and provider bacterial reservoirs contribute to 30-day postoperative infections. Multimodal programs designed to target each of these reservoirs in parallel should be studied intensely as a comprehensive approach to reducing intraoperative bacterial transmission.


Assuntos
Anestesiologia/instrumentação , Infecções Bacterianas/transmissão , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Reservatórios de Doenças , Ambiente Controlado , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Salas Cirúrgicas , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Axila/microbiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/mortalidade , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Feminino , Luvas Cirúrgicas/microbiologia , Desinfecção das Mãos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Período Intraoperatório , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nasofaringe/microbiologia , Razão de Chances , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
11.
Anesthesiology ; 125(2): 425-6, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27433759
12.
Anesth Analg ; 112(1): 98-105, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20686007

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We have recently shown that intraoperative bacterial transmission to patient IV stopcock sets is associated with increased patient mortality. In this study, we hypothesized that bacterial contamination of anesthesia provider hands before patient contact is a risk factor for direct intraoperative bacterial transmission. METHODS: Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center is a tertiary care and level 1 trauma center with 400 inpatient beds and 28 operating suites. The first and second operative cases in each of 92 operating rooms were randomly selected for analysis. Eighty-two paired samples were analyzed. Ten pairs of cases were excluded because of broken or missing sampling protocol and lost samples. We identified cases of intraoperative bacterial transmission to the patient IV stopcock set and the anesthesia environment (adjustable pressure-limiting valve and agent dial) in each operating room pair by using a previously validated protocol. We then used biotype analysis to compare these transmitted organisms to those organisms isolated from the hands of anesthesia providers obtained before the start of each case. Provider-origin transmission was defined as potential pathogens isolated in the patient stopcock set or environment that had an identical biotype to the same organism isolated from hands of providers. We also assessed the efficacy of the current intraoperative cleaning protocol by evaluating isolated potential pathogens identified at the start of case 2. Poor intraoperative cleaning was defined as 1 or more potential pathogens found in the anesthesia environment at the start of case 2 that were not there at the beginning of case 1. We collected clinical and epidemiological data on all the cases to identify risk factors for contamination. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-four cases (82 case pairs) were studied. We identified intraoperative bacterial transmission to the IV stopcock set in 11.5 % (19/164) of cases, 47% (9/19) of which were of provider origin. We identified intraoperative bacterial transmission to the anesthesia environment in 89% (146/164) of cases, 12% (17/146) of which were of provider origin. The number of rooms that an attending anesthesiologist supervised simultaneously, the age of the patient, and patient discharge from the operating room to an intensive care unit were independent predictors of bacterial transmission events not directly linked to providers. CONCLUSION: The contaminated hands of anesthesia providers serve as a significant source of patient environmental and stopcock set contamination in the operating room. Additional sources of intraoperative bacterial transmission, including postoperative environmental cleaning practices, should be further studied.


Assuntos
Anestesia/normas , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Mãos/microbiologia , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Salas Cirúrgicas/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Desinfecção das Mãos/métodos , Desinfecção das Mãos/normas , Humanos , Período Intraoperatório , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
13.
J Natl Med Assoc ; 103(8): 746-53, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22046852

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess barriers to colorectal cancer screening among urban publicly insured women and to evaluate how barriers among underscreened urban women have changed between 2001 and 2007-2008. METHODS: Eligible women were selected using Medicaid Managed Care Organization (MMCO) administrative data. MMCO outreach staff interviewed women by phone between October 2007 and February 2008, and assessed their barriers to colorectal cancer screening. We compared the results of these interviews with interviews conducted in 2001 with women in community health center waiting rooms. RESULTS: Thirty percent of overdue women had never heard of either colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, and 55% had never heard of home fecal occult blood testing (FOBT). Among overdue women who had heard of colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, 33% reported misconceptions and 28% reported worry as a barrier. No clinician recommendation was the most commonly reported barrier to home FOBT (44%) and was also reported as a barrier to endoscopy by 22% of women. Between 2001 and 2007-2008, the proportion of women reporting that they had not received a clinician's recommendation for endoscopy or home FOBT increased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of information, no clinician recommendation, misconceptions, and worry persist as barriers to colon cancer screening among this underscreened urban population. An increased focus on clinician recommendation and patient education about stool-based as well as endoscopic screening methods could lead to greater screening compliance.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Colonoscopia , Aconselhamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/organização & administração , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sangue Oculto , Sigmoidoscopia , Estados Unidos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos
14.
Anesthesiology ; 113(3): 639-46, 2010 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20693876

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ketamine is an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist that has been shown to be useful in the reduction of acute postoperative pain and analgesic consumption in a variety of surgical interventions with variable routes of administration. Little is known regarding its efficacy in opiate-dependent patients with a history of chronic pain. We hypothesized that ketamine would reduce postoperative opiate consumption in this patient population. METHODS: This was a randomized, prospective, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled trial involving opiate-dependent patients undergoing major lumbar spine surgery. Fifty-two patients in the treatment group were administered 0.5 mg/kg intravenous ketamine on induction of anesthesia, and a continuous infusion at 10 microg kg(-1) min(-1) was begun on induction and terminated at wound closure. Fifty patients in the placebo group received saline of equivalent volume. Patients were observed for 48 h postoperatively and followed up at 6 weeks. The primary outcome was 48-h morphine consumption. RESULTS: Total morphine consumption (morphine equivalents) was significantly reduced in the treatment group 48 h after the procedure. It was also reduced at 24 h and at 6 weeks. The average reported pain intensity was significantly reduced in the postanesthesia care unit and at 6 weeks. The groups had no differences in known ketamine- or opiate-related side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative ketamine reduces opiate consumption in the 48-h postoperative period in opiate-dependent patients with chronic pain. Ketamine may also reduce opioid consumption and pain intensity throughout the postoperative period in this patient population. This benefit is without an increase in side effects.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Dor nas Costas/tratamento farmacológico , Dor nas Costas/cirurgia , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Método Duplo-Cego , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos
15.
Int J Health Geogr ; 9: 8, 2010 Feb 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20152044

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies involving the built environment have typically relied on US Census data to measure residential density. However, census geographic units are often unsuited to health-related research, especially in rural areas where development is clustered and discontinuous. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the accuracy of both standard census methods and alternative GIS-based methods to measure rural density. METHODS: We compared residential density (units/acre) in 335 Vermont school neighborhoods using conventional census geographic units (tract, block group and block) with two GIS buffer measures: a 1-kilometer (km) circle around the school and a 1-km circle intersected with a 100-meter (m) road-network buffer. The accuracy of each method was validated against the actual residential density for each neighborhood based on the Vermont e911 database, which provides an exact geo-location for all residential structures in the state. RESULTS: Standard census measures underestimate residential density in rural areas. In addition, the degree of error is inconsistent so even the relative rank of neighborhood densities varies across census measures. Census measures explain only 61% to 66% of the variation in actual residential density. In contrast, GIS buffer measures explain approximately 90% of the variation. Combining a 1-km circle with a road-network buffer provides the closest approximation of actual residential density. CONCLUSION: Residential density based on census units can mask clusters of development in rural areas and distort associations between residential density and health-related behaviors and outcomes. GIS-defined buffers, including a 1-km circle and a road-network buffer, can be used in conjunction with census data to obtain a more accurate measure of residential density.


Assuntos
Censos , Sistemas de Informação Geográfica , Densidade Demográfica , Características de Residência , População Rural , Viés , Análise por Conglomerados , Bases de Dados Factuais , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Instituições Acadêmicas , Vermont
16.
Crit Care Med ; 37(10): 2727-32, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19885996

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: There is continuing controversy regarding the effect of glucocorticoids on a systemic inflammatory process. Based ona model of glucocorticoid action that includes both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects, we used the human experimental endotoxemia model to test the hypothesis that a transient elevation of plasma cortisol to stress-associated levels would enhance a subsequent (delayed) systemic inflammatory response to bacterial endotoxin. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical investigation. SETTING: Academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Thirty-six healthy human volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to receive a 6-hr intravenous infusion of saline (control), an intermediate dose of cortisol (Cort80; 6.3 mg/hr/70 kg), or a high dose of cortisol (Cort160; 12.6 mg/hr/70 kg) on day 1. On day 2, participants received an intravenous injection of 2 ng/kg Escherichia coli endotoxin followed by serial measurements of plasma cytokine concentrations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline participant characteristics and cortisol and cytokine concentrations were similar in all three groups. The plasma cortisol response to endotoxemia on day 2 was similar in all three groups. The interleukin-6 response to endotoxemia was significantly increased in the Cort80 Group compared with the control Group (p = .004), whereas the interleukin-10 response was significantly suppressed (p = .034). Corresponding results for the Cort160 Group were not significantly different from control Group values. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, transient elevation of in vivo cortisol concentrations to levels that are observed during major systemic stress enhanced a subsequent, delayed in vivo inflammatory response to endotoxin. This appeared to be a dose-dependent effect that was more prominent at intermediate concentrations of cortisol than at higher concentrations of cortisol.


Assuntos
Hormônio Adrenocorticotrópico/sangue , Anti-Inflamatórios/farmacologia , Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Citocinas/sangue , Endotoxinas/sangue , Escherichia coli/imunologia , Hidrocortisona/análogos & derivados , Hidrocortisona/sangue , Contagem de Leucócitos , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/imunologia , Adulto , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/farmacologia , Infusões Intravenosas , Interleucina-10/sangue , Interleucina-6/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pré-Medicação
17.
Anesthesiology ; 110(5): 978-85, 2009 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19352154

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is a vital intervention to reduce health-care associated infections, but compliance remains low. The authors hypothesized that improvements in intraoperative hand hygiene compliance would reduce transmission of bacteria to surgical patients and reduce the incidence of postsurgical healthcare-associated infections. METHODS: The authors performed a controlled before-and-after study over 2 consecutive months. One hundred fourteen operative cases were enrolled. Two predesignated sites on the anesthesia machine were selected, decontaminated, and cultured via aseptic technique. These sites and the peripheral intravenous stopcock were cultured again after completion of the surgery. The treatment phase used a novel personal hand-decontamination device capable of recording hand-decontamination events. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient location, age, or case duration and procedure type between groups. Use of the Sprixx GJ device (Harbor Medical Inc., Santa Barbara, CA) increased hourly hand decontamination events by 27-fold as compared with baseline rates (P < 0.002; 95% confidence interval, 3.3-13.4). Use of the device was associated with a reduction in contamination in the anesthesia work area and peripheral intravenous tubing. Intravenous tubing contamination was identified in 32.8% of cases in the control group versus 7.5% in the treatment group (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.51; P < 0.01). Healthcare-associated infections rates were reduced in the device group (3.8%) as compared with the control group (17.2%) (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.81; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Improved hand hygiene compliance through the use of a novel hand sanitation strategy reduces the risk of intraoperative bacterial transmission. The intervention was associated with a reduction in healthcare-associated infections.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Desinfecção das Mãos/métodos , Controle de Infecções/instrumentação , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas/efeitos adversos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/microbiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
18.
Anesth Analg ; 108(3): 795-804, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19224786

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We used a large database of prospectively collected data on pediatric sedation/anesthesia outside the operating room provided by a wide range of pediatric specialists to delineate the nature and frequency of adverse events associated with propofol-based sedation/anesthesia care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected by the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium, a collaborative group of institutions dedicated to improving sedation/anesthesia care for children internationally. Members prospectively enrolled consecutive patients receiving sedation or sedation/anesthesia for procedures. The primary inclusion criterion was the need for some form of sedation/anesthesia to perform a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure outside the operating room. There were no exclusion criteria. Data on demographics, primary illness, coexisting illness, procedure performed, medications used, procedure and recovery times, medication doses outcomes of anesthesia, airway interventions and adverse events were collected and reported using web-based data collection tool. For this study, we evaluated all instances where propofol was used as the primary drug in the sedation/anesthesia technique. RESULTS: Thirty-seven locations submitted data on 49,836 propofol sedation/anesthesia encounters during the study period from July 1, 2004 until September 1, 2007. There were no deaths. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was required twice. Aspiration during sedation/anesthesia occurred four times. Less serious events were more common with O(2) desaturation below 90% for more than 30 s, occurring 154 times per 10,000 sedation/anesthesia administrations. Central apnea or airway obstruction occurred 575 times per 10,000 sedation/anesthesia administrations. Stridor, laryngospasm, excessive secretions, and vomiting had frequencies of 50, 96, 341, and 49 per 10,000 encounters, respectively. Unexpected admissions (increases in levels of care required) occurred at a rate of 7.1 per 10,000 encounters. In an unadjusted analysis, the rate of pulmonary adverse events was not different for anesthesiologists versus other providers. CONCLUSIONS: We report the largest series of pediatric propofol sedation/anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room. The data indicate that propofol sedation/anesthesia is unlikely to yield serious adverse outcomes in a collection of institutions with highly motivated and organized sedation/anesthesia services. However, the safety of this practice is dependent on a system's ability to manage less serious events. We propose that our data suggest variables for training and credentialing providers of propofol sedation/anesthesia and the system characteristics that promote safe use of this drug.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efeitos adversos , Sedação Consciente/efeitos adversos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Propofol/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Coleta de Dados , Bases de Dados Factuais , Ingestão de Alimentos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Aspiração Respiratória/epidemiologia
19.
J Health Commun ; 14(8): 756-67, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20029709

RESUMO

To evaluate the usefulness of Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) ratings for parental selection of appropriate films for children, the 100 top grossing movies each year from 1996 through 2004 (N = 900) were content analyzed to measure risk behaviors in each film. More restrictive MPAA ratings (R and PG-13) were associated with increased mean seconds of portrayals of tobacco use, alcohol use, and sexual content; increased frequency of violent content; and increased salience of drug use. MPAA ratings, however, did not clearly distinguish films based on tobacco or alcohol use. Fifty percent of R-rated movies contained 124 seconds or more of tobacco use, comparable with 26% of PG-13 and 17% of PG movies. Fifty percent of R-rated movies contained 162 seconds or more of alcohol use, comparable with 49% of PG-13 and 25% of PG movies. Because of the high degree of overlap in alcohol and tobacco content between rating categories, the MPAA rating system, as currently defined, is not adequate for parents who wish to limit their children's exposure to tobacco or alcohol content in movies.


Assuntos
Filmes Cinematográficos , Assunção de Riscos , Marketing Social , Adolescente , Comportamento do Adolescente , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas , Humanos , Comportamento Sexual , Fumar , Estados Unidos , Violência
20.
Anesthesiology ; 109(3): 399-407, 2008 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18719437

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The current prevalence of hospital-acquired infections and evolving amplification of bacterial resistance are major public health concerns. A heightened awareness of intraoperative transmission of potentially pathogenic bacterial organisms may lead to implementation of effective preventative measures. METHODS: Sixty-one operative suites were randomly selected for analysis. Sterile intravenous stopcock sets and two sites on the anesthesia machine were decontaminated and cultured aseptically at baseline and at case completion. The primary outcome was the presence of a positive culture on the previously sterile patient stopcock set. Secondary outcomes were the number of colonies per surface area sampled on the anesthesia machine, species identification, and antibiotic susceptibility of isolated organisms. RESULTS: Bacterial contamination of the anesthesia work area increased significantly at the case conclusion, with a mean difference of 115 colonies per surface area sampled (95% confidence interval [CI], 62-169; P < 0.001). Transmission of bacterial organisms, including vancomycin-resistant enterococcus, to intravenous stopcock sets occurred in 32% (95% CI, 20.6-44.9%) of cases. Highly contaminated work areas increased the odds of stopcock contamination by 4.7 (95% CI, 1.42-15.42; P = 0.011). Contaminated intravenous tubing was associated with a trend toward increased nosocomial infection rates (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% CI, 0.56-17.5; P = 0.11) and with an increase in mortality (95% CI odds ratio, 1.11-infinity; P = 0.0395). CONCLUSION: Potentially pathogenic, multidrug-resistant bacterial organisms are transmitted during the practice of general anesthesia to both the anesthesia work area and intravenous stopcock sets. Implementation of infection control measures in this area may help to reduce both the evolving problem of increasing bacterial resistance and the development of life-threatening infectious complications.


Assuntos
Anestesia Geral/instrumentação , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Bacterianas/transmissão , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Salas Cirúrgicas , Adulto , Idoso , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Intravenosa/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Intravenosa/instrumentação , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Contaminação de Equipamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Projetos Piloto , Medição de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA