Dipping Status, Ambulatory Blood Pressure Control, Cardiovascular Disease, and Kidney Disease Progression: A Multicenter Cohort Study of CKD.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring allows concurrent evaluation of BP control and nocturnal BP dipping status, both related to adverse outcomes. However, few studies have assessed the prognostic role of combining information on dipping status and achieved ambulatory BP in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 906 patients with hypertension and CKD attending 1 of 3 Italian nephrology clinics. EXPOSURE: Four groups were defined by simultaneously classifying systolic ambulatory BP levels as being at goal (daytime SBP <135 and nighttime SBP <120 mm Hg) or above goal, and the presence or absence of nocturnal dipping (nighttime to daytime SBP ratio of <0.9 versus ≥0.9). OUTCOME: The composite of time to initiation of maintenance dialysis or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline ≥50%, and the composite of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate risks of kidney disease progression and cardiovascular disease in the 4 exposure groups where nocturnal dipping with systolic ambulatory BP at goal was the reference group. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 63.8 years, 61% were male, and 26.4% had diabetes; eGFR was 41.1 ± 20.8 mL/min/1.73 m2. The dipping prevalence in each of the 4 groups was as follows: nocturnal dipping with ambulatory BP at goal, 18.6%; no nocturnal dipping with ambulatory BP at goal, 20.5%; nocturnal dipping with ambulatory BP above goal, 11.8%; and no nocturnal dipping with ambulatory BP above goal, 49.1%. Among patients with ambulatory BP above goal, the risk of cardiovascular events was greater in the absence (HR, 2.79 [95% CI, 1.64-4.75]) and presence (HR, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.10-3.84]) of nocturnal dipping. The same held true for risk of kidney disease progression (HRs of 2.40 [95% CI, 1.58-3.65] and 2.11 [95% CI, 1.28-3.48] in the absence and presence of nocturnal dipping, respectively). Patients at the ambulatory BP goal but who did not experience nocturnal dipping had an increased risk of the cardiovascular end point (HR, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.15-3.68]) and the kidney disease progression outcome (HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.17-2.82]). LIMITATIONS: Lack of a diverse cohort (all those enrolled were White). Residual uncontrolled confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Systolic ambulatory BP above goal or the absence of nocturnal dipping, regardless of ambulatory BP, is associated with higher risks of cardiovascular disease and kidney disease progression among patients with CKD. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring improves the identification of individuals at high risk of clinical disease outcomes. Those with uncontrolled ambulatory BP are known to have a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease and kidney disease progression, particularly when their ambulatory BP does not decline by at least 10% at night. Whether this is also true for patients with presence of optimal ambulatory BP levels but a BP pattern of no nighttime decline is largely unknown. We measured ambulatory BP in 900 Italian patients with CKD and followed them for several years. We found that, independent of ambulatory BP level, the absence of nighttime reductions in BP was associated with worsening of CKD and more frequent cardiovascular events. The absence of nighttime declines in BP is an independent risk factor for adverse events among patients with CKD. Future studies are needed to examine whether treating the absence of nighttime declines in BP improves clinical outcomes.

Risk of end-stage kidney disease in kidney transplant recipients versus patients with native chronic kidney disease: multicentre unmatched and propensity-score matched analyses.

BACKGROUND: In kidney transplant recipients (KTR), the end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) risk dependent on the risk factors acting in native chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains undefined. METHODS: We compared risk and determinants of ESKD between 757 adult KTR and 1940 patients with native CKD before and after propensity-score (PS) analysis matched for unmodifiable risk factors [(age, sex, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)]. RESULTS: In unmatched cohorts, eGFR was lower in CKD versus KTR (45.9 ± 11.3 versus 59.2 ± 13.4 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 5.4 years, the unadjusted cumulative incidence of ESKD was consistently lower in unmatched KTR versus CKD. Conversely, in PS-matched analysis, the risk of ESKD in KTR was 78% lower versus CKD at 1 year of follow-up while progressively increased over time resulting similar to that of native CKD patients after 5 years and 2.3-fold higher than that observed in CKD at 10 years. R2 analysis in unmatched patients showed that the proportion of the outcome variance explained by traditional ESKD determinants was smaller in KTR versus native CKD (31% versus 70%). After PS matching, the risk of ESKD [hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (95% CI)] was significantly associated with systolic blood pressure (1.02, 1.01-1.02), phosphorus (1.31, 1.05-1.64), 24-h proteinuria (1.11, 1.05-1.17) and haemoglobin (0.85, 0.78-0.93) irrespective of KTR status. Similar data were obtained after matching also for modifiable risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In KTR, when compared with matched native CKD patients, the risk of ESKD is lower in the first 5 years and higher later on. Traditional determinants of ESKD account for one-third of the variability of time-to-graft failure.

Caring for Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: Dietary Options and Conservative Care Instead of Maintenance Dialysis.

An expert advisory board discussed the prevention and treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD), with a focus on dietary options. This is timely, given the uptake of value based models for kidney care in the United States. Timing of dialysis start is influenced by patients' clinical status and complex patient-clinician interactions. Patients value personal freedom and quality of life and may want to delay dialysis, whilst physicians are sometimes more concerned with clinical outcomes. Kidney-preserving therapy can prolong the dialysis-free period and preserve residual kidney function, thus patients are asked to adjust their lifestyle and diet, to follow a low- or very low-protein diet, with or without ketoacid analogues. Multi-modal approaches include pharmacotherapies, management of symptoms, and a gradual, individualized dialysis transition. Patient empowerment is vital, including CKD education and involvement in decision making. These ideas may help patients, their families, and clinical teams to improve the management of CKD.

Sex difference in ambulatory blood pressure control associates with risk of ESKD and death in CKD patients receiving stable nephrology care.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether faster progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in men than in women relates to differences in ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) levels. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 906 hypertensive CKD patients (553 men) regularly followed in renal clinics to compare men versus women in terms of ABP control [daytime <135/85 and nighttime blood pressure (BP) <120/70 mmHg] and risk of all-cause mortality and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). RESULTS: Age, estimated glomerular filtration rate and use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors were similar in men and women, while proteinuria was lower in women [0.30 g/24 h interquartile range (IQR) 0.10-1.00 versus 0.42 g/24 h, IQR 0.10-1.28, P = 0.025]. No sex-difference was detected in office BP levels; conversely, daytime and nighttime BP were higher in men (134 ± 17/78 ± 11 and 127 ± 19/70 ± 11 mmHg) than in women (131 ± 16/75 ± 11, P = 0.005/P < 0.001 and 123 ± 20/67 ± 12, P = 0.006/P < 0.001), with ABP goal achieved more frequently in women (39.1% versus 25.1%, P < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 10.7 years, 275 patients reached ESKD (60.7% men) and 245 died (62.4% men). Risks of ESKD and mortality (hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval), adjusted for demographic and clinical variables, were higher in men (1.34, 1.02-1.76 and 1.36, 1.02-1.83, respectively). Adjustment for office BP at goal did not modify this association. In contrast, adjustment for ABP at goal attenuated the increased risk in men for ESKD (1.29, 0.98-1.70) and death (1.31, 0.98-1.77). In the fully adjusted model, ABP at goal was associated with reduced risk of ESKD (0.49, 0.34-0.70) and death (0.59, 0.43-0.80). No interaction between sex and ABP at goal on the risk of ESKD and death was found, suggesting that ABP-driven risks are consistent in males and females. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights that higher ABP significantly contributes to higher risks of ESKD and mortality in men.

Sex Differences in the Progression of CKD Among Older Patients: Pooled Analysis of 4 Cohort Studies.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Data for the association of sex with chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression are conflicting, a relationship this study sought to examine. STUDY DESIGN: Pooled analysis of 4 Italian observational cohort studies. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 1,311 older men and 1,024 older women with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<45mL/min/1.73m2 followed up in renal clinics. PREDICTOR: Sex. OUTCOMES: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD), defined as maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation, as the primary outcome; all-cause mortality and eGFR decline as secondary outcomes. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Cox proportional hazard analysis to estimate the relative risk for ESKD and mortality and linear mixed models to estimate the rate of eGFR decline. RESULTS: Age, systolic blood pressure, and use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors were similar in men and women. Baseline eGFRs were 27.6±10.2 in men and 26.0±10.6mL/min/1.73m2 in women (P<0.001), while median proteinuria was lower in women (protein excretion, 0.45 [IQR, 0.14-1.10] g/d) compared with men (0.69 [IQR 0.19-1.60] g/d; P<0.001). During a median follow-up of 4.2 years, 757 developed ESKD (59.4% men) and 471 died (58.4% men). The adjusted risks for ESKD and mortality were higher in men (HRs of 1.50 [95% CI, 1.28-1.77] and 1.30 [95% CI, 1.06-1.60], respectively). This finding was consistent across CKD stages. We observed a significant interaction between sex and proteinuria, with the risk for ESKD in men being significantly greater than for women at a level of proteinuria of ∼0.5g/d or greater. The slope of decline in eGFR was steeper in men (-2.09; 95% CI, -2.21 to-1.97mL/min/1.73m2 per year) than in women (-1.79; 95% CI, -1.92 to-1.66mL/min/1.73m2 per year; P<0.001). Although sex differences in eGFR decline were not different across CKD stages (P=0.3), the difference in slopes between men and women was progressively larger with proteinuria >0.5g/d (P = 0.04). LIMITATIONS: Residual confounding; only whites were included. CONCLUSIONS: Excess renal risk in men may, at least in part, be related to higher levels of proteinuria in men compared with women.

Reclassification of chronic kidney disease patients for end-stage renal disease risk by proteinuria indexed to estimated glomerular filtration rate: multicentre prospective study in nephrology clinics.

BACKGROUND: In non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD), absolute proteinuria (Uprot) depends on the extent of kidney damage and residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We therefore evaluated, as compared with Uprot, the strength of association of proteinuria indexed to estimated GFR (eGFR) with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) risk. METHODS: In a multi-cohort prospective study in 3957 CKD patients of Stages G3-G5 referred to nephrology clinics, we tested two multivariable Cox models for ESRD risk, with either Uprot (g/24 h) or filtration-adjusted proteinuria (F-Uprot) calculated as Uprot/eGFR ×100. RESULTS: Mean ± SD age was 67 ± 14 years, males 60%, diabetics 29%, cardiovascular disease (CVD) 34%, eGFR 32 ± 13 mL/min/1.73 m2, median (interquartile range) Uprot 0.41 (0.12-1.29) g/24 h and F-Uprot 1.41 (0.36-4.93) g/24 h per 100 mL/min/1.73 m2 eGFR. Over a median follow-up of 44 months, 862 patients reached ESRD. At competing risk analysis, ESRD risk progressively increased when F-Uprot was 1.0-4.9 and ≥5.0 versus <1.0 g/24 h per 100 mL/min/1.73 m2 eGFR in Stages G3a-G4 (P < 0.001) and Stage G5 (P = 0.002). Multivariable Cox analysis showed that Uprot predicts ESRD in Stages G3a-G4 while in G5 the effect was not significant; conversely, F-Uprot significantly predicted ESRD at all stages. The F-Uprot model allowed a significantly better prediction versus the Uprot model according to Akaike information criterion. Net reclassification improvement was 12.2% (95% confidence interval 4.2-21.1), with higher reclassification in elderly, diabetes and CVD, as well as in diabetic nephropathy and glomerulonephritis, and in CKD Stages G4 and G5. CONCLUSIONS: In patients referred to nephrology clinics, F-Uprot predicts ESRD at all stages of overt CKD and improves, as compared with Uprot, reclassification of patients for renal risk, especially in more advanced and complicated disease.

Cardiorenal prognosis by residual proteinuria level in diabetic chronic kidney disease: pooled analysis of four cohort studies.

Background: No study has assessed whether the prognosis of coexisting diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease (DM-CKD) is dictated by DM per se or by the extent of proteinuria. Methods: In this pooled analysis of four prospective studies in CKD patients treated with drugs inhibiting the renin-angiotensin system, we compared the risk of all-cause mortality, fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular (CV) events and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) between patients with (n = 693) and without diabetes (n = 1481) stratified by proteinuria level (<0.15, 0.15-0.49, 0.5-1 and >1 g/day). Results: The group with DM-CKD was older (69 ± 11 versus 65 ± 15 years), had a higher body mass index (29.6 ± 5.4 versus 27.5 ± 4.8 kg/m2) and systolic blood pressure (143 ± 19 versus 136 ± 18 mmHg), prevalent CV disease (48% versus 29%) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (34.5 ± 17.9 versus 36.6 ± 19.0 mL/min/1.73 m2). During 4.07 years of follow-up, there were 466 patients with ESRD, 334 deaths and 401 CV events occurred. In the subgroup with urine protein <0.15 g/day (N = 662), the risks of ESRD, CV events and mortality were similar in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Conversely, in DM-CKD patients, the mortality risk was higher in proteinuric patients {hazard ratio 1.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.95); 1.99 (1.26-3.15) and 1.98 (1.28-3.06) for proteinuria 0.15-0.49, 0.5-1 and >1 g/day, respectively}, whereas in non-diabetics the mortality risk increased only for proteinuria 0.5-1 g/day [HR 1.60 (95% CI 1.07-2.40)] and >1 g/day [HR 1.69 (95% CI1.20-2.55)]. In both groups, CV risk had a trend similar to that of mortality. ESRD risk increased progressively across strata >0.5 g/day independent of diabetic status. Conclusions: We provide evidence that patients with non-proteinuric DM-CKD are not exposed to higher cardiorenal risk. In contrast, in the presence of moderate proteinuria and diabetes per se is associated with a higher risk of mortality and CV events, whereas the entity of abnormal proteinuria modulates ESRD risk independent of diabetes.

Mediterranean diet as the diet of choice for patients with chronic kidney disease.

Traditional dietary management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) focuses on the quantity within the diet of energy and protein, and the restriction of single micronutrients, with little mention of dietary quality. Dietary patterns that are more plant-based, lower in meat (including processed meat), sodium and refined sugar, and have a higher content of grains and fibres are now included in multiple clinical guidelines for chronic disease prevention. The Mediterranean diet (MD) has been associated with reduced cardiovascular disease incidence in both observational and interventional studies. A wealth of evidence links MD with other beneficial effects on chronic diseases such as diabetes, obesity or cognitive health. This review examines each constituent of the classical MD and evaluates their suitability for the management of patients with CKD. We also evaluate the potential hyperkalaemia risk of increasing fruit and vegetable intake. Overall, a decrease in net endogenous acid production and increase in fibre may lead to a better control of metabolic acidosis. This, together with other putative favourable effects of MD on endothelial function, inflammation, lipid profile and blood pressure, provide mechanistic pathways to explain the observed reduced renal function decline and improved survival in CKD patients adhering to an MD.

Safety and effectiveness of low-protein diet supplemented with ketoacids in diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the low-protein diet on nutrition in CKD diabetics is uncertain. METHODS: The metabolic and nutritional effects of a low-protein (0.5-0.6 g/kg/d), normal-high energy (30-35 kcal/kg/d) diet supplemented with ketoacids (LPD-KA) were prospectively evaluated in CKD patients with (DM) and without (non-DM) diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: 197 patients on CKD stages 3-5 were enrolled. DM (n = 81) and non-DM (n = 116) were comparable for gender (Male 58 vs 55%), age (66 ± 9 vs 63 ± 18 years), renal function (eGFR 23 ± 13 vs 24 ± 13 mL/min). After 6-month, serum urea (DM: 131 ± 58 to 105 ± 49 mg/dl, p < 0.05; non-DM: 115 ± 52 to 88 ± 36, p < 0.05) and phosphate (DM: 4.5 ± 1.3 to 4.1 ± 1.2 mg/dl, p = 0.06; non-DM: 4.3 ± 1.0 to 3.7 ± 0.8, p < 0.05) declined. Fasting glucose decreased in DM (126 ± 52 to 103 ± 29 mg/dl, p < 0.05) without insulin dose increase. These effects were preserved after 3-year. Serum albumin did not change after 6 months (DM: 3.7 ± 0.6 to 3.8 ± 0.4 mg/dl; non-DM: 4.0 ± 0.6 to 4.0 ± 0.4) and in the long-term. Body weight (BW) declined after the diet start (DM: 68.9 ± 14.3 to 65.1 ± 12.1 kg, p < 0.05; non-DM: 66.6 ± 15.1 to 64.1 ± 15.1, p < 0.05) and was stable at 6 months and 3 years. Muscle strength at baseline was reduced in all patients and remained stable during the diet period. Changes of nutritional markers during the study were similar among groups and diabetes was not associated to any nutritional change at the multivariate analysis. As attain wasting, lower BMI (< 23 kg/m2) and albumin (< 3.8 g/dl) levels were present in 1/3 patients at start and along 3 years, cholesterol never dropped below the lower threshold (< 100 mg/dl) and poorer FM (< 10%) was less than 10% during the study in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic CKD patients a low-protein diet supplemented with ketoacids improves uremia and diabetes, causes sudden decline of body weight which remains stable over time and has not a negative effect on wasting and muscle mass and fitness. In diabetic CKD patients the LPD-KA is safe and the nutritional impact is the same as in non-diabetics CKD.

As we grow old: nutritional considerations for older patients on dialysis.

The number of older people on dialysis is increasing, along with a need to develop specialized health care to manage their needs. Aging-related changes occur in physiological, psychosocial and medical aspects, all of which present nutritional risk factors ranging from a decline in metabolic rate to assistance with feeding-related activities. In dialysis, these are compounded by the metabolic derangements of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and of dialysis treatment per se, leading to possible aggravation of protein-energy wasting syndrome. This review discusses the nutritional derangements of the older patient on dialysis, debates the need for specific renal nutrition guidelines and summarizes potential interventions to meet their nutritional needs. Interdisciplinary collaborations between renal and geriatric clinicians should be encouraged to ensure better quality of life and outcomes for this growing segment of the dialysis population.

Pregnancy outcomes after kidney graft in Italy: are the changes over time the result of different therapies or of different policies? A nationwide survey (1978-2013).

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice to restore fertility to women on renal replacement therapy. Over time, immunosuppressive, support therapies and approaches towards high-risk pregnancies have changed. The aim of this study was to analyse maternal-foetal outcomes in two cohorts of transplanted women who delivered a live-born baby in Italy in 1978-2013, dichotomized into delivery before and after January 2000. METHODS: A survey involving all the Italian transplant centres was carried out, gathering data on all pregnancies recorded since the start of activity at each centre; the estimated nationwide coverage was 75%. Data on cause of ESRD, dialysis, living/cadaveric transplantation, drug therapy, comorbidity, and the main maternal-foetal outcomes were recorded and reviewed. Data were compared with a low-risk cohort of pregnancies from two large Italian centres (2000-14; Torino and Cagliari Observational Study cohort). RESULTS: The database consists of 222 pregnancies with live-born babies after transplantation (83 before 2000 and 139 in 2000-13; 68 and 121 with baseline and birth data, respectively), and 1418 low-risk controls. The age of the patients significantly increased over time (1978-99: age 30.7 ± 3.7 versus 34.1 ± 3.7 in 2000-13; P < 0.001). Azathioprine, steroids and cyclosporine A were the main drugs employed in the first time period, while tacrolimus emerged in the second. The prevalence of early preterm babies increased from 13.4% in the first to 27.1% in the second period (P = 0.049), while late-preterm babies non-significantly decreased (38.8 versus 33.1%), thus leaving the prevalence of all preterm babies almost unchanged (52.2 and 60.2%; P = 0.372). Babies below the 5th percentile decreased over time (22.2 versus 9.6%; P = 0.036). In spite of high prematurity rates, no neonatal deaths occurred after 2000. The results in kidney transplant patients are significantly different from controls both considering all cases [preterm delivery: 57.3 versus 6.3%; early preterm: 22.2 versus 0.9%; small for gestational age (SGA): 14 versus 4.5%; P < 0.001] and considering only transplant patients with normal kidney function [preterm delivery: 35 versus 6.3%; early preterm: 10 versus 0.9%; SGA: 23.7 versus 4.5% (P < 0.001); risks increase across CKD stages]. Kidney function remained stable in most of the patients up to 6 months after delivery. Multiple regression analysis performed on the transplant cohort highlights a higher risk of preterm delivery in later CKD stages, an increase in preterm delivery and a decrease in SGA across periods. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy after transplantation has a higher risk of adverse outcomes compared with the general population. Over time, the incidence of SGA babies decreased while the incidence of 'early preterm' babies increased. Although acknowledging the differences in therapy (cyclosporine versus tacrolimus) and in maternal age (significantly increased), the decrease in SGA and the increase in prematurity may be explained by an obstetric policy favouring earlier delivery against the risk of foetal growth restriction.

6-tips diet: a simplified dietary approach in patients with chronic renal disease. A clinical randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of dietary restriction of proteins in chronic kidney disease are widely recognized; however, poor compliance to prescribed low-protein diets (LPD) may limit their effectiveness. To help patients to adhere to the dietary prescriptions, interventions as education programmes and dietary counselling are critical, but it is also important to develop simple and attractive approaches to the LPD, especially when dietitians are not available. Therefore, we elaborated a simplified and easy to manage dietary approach consisting of 6 tips (6-tip diet, 6-TD) which could replace the standard, non-individualized LPD in Nephrology Units where dietary counselling is not available; hence, our working hypothesis was to evaluate the effects of such diet vs a standard moderately protein-restricted diet on metabolic parameters and patients' adherence. METHODS: In this randomized trial, 57 CKD patients stage 3b-5 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive the 6-TD (Group 6-TD) or a LPD containing 0.8 g/kg/day of proteins (Group LPD) for 6 months. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the effects of the two different diets on the main "metabolic" parameters and on patients' adherence (registration number NCT01865526). RESULTS: Both dietary regimens were associated with a progressive reduction in protein intake and urinary urea excretion compared to baseline, although the decrease was more pronounced in Group 6-TD. Effects on serum levels of urea nitrogen and urinary phosphate excretion were greater in Group 6-TD. Plasma levels of phosphate, bicarbonate and PTH, and urinary NaCl excretion remained stable in both groups throughout the study. 44 % of LPD patients were adherent to the dietary prescription vs 70 % of Group 6-TD. CONCLUSIONS: A simplified diet, consisting of 6 clear points easily managed by CKD patients, produced beneficial effects either on the metabolic profile of renal disease and on patients' adherence to the dietary plan, when compared to a standard LPD.

"Dietaly": practical issues for the nutritional management of CKD patients in Italy.

Evidence exists that nutritional therapy induces favorable metabolic changes, prevents signs and symptoms of renal insufficiency, and is able to delay the need of dialysis. Currently, the main concern of the renal diets has turned from the efficacy to the feasibility in the daily clinical practice.Herewith we describe some different dietary approaches, developed in Italy in the last decades and applied in the actual clinical practice for the nutritional management of CKD patients.A step-wise approach or simplified dietary regimens are usually prescribed while taking into account not only the residual renal function and progression rate but also socio-economic, psychological and functional aspects.The application of the principles of the Mediterranean diet that covers the recommended daily allowances for nutrients and protein (0.8 g/Kg/day) exert a favorable effect at least in the early stages of CKD. Low protein (0.6 g/kg/day) regimens that include vegan diet and very low-protein (0.3-0.4 g/Kg/day) diet supplemented with essential amino acids and ketoacids, represent more opportunities that should be tailored on the single patient's needs.Rather than a structured dietary plan, a list of basic recommendations to improve compliance with a low-sodium diet in CKD may allow patients to reach the desired salt target in the daily eating.Another approach consists of low protein diets as part of an integrated menu, in which patients can choose the "diet" that best suits their preferences and clinical needs.Lastly, in order to allow efficacy and safety, the importance of monitoring and follow up of a proper nutritional treatment in CKD patients is emphasized.

Low-protein diets for chronic kidney disease patients: the Italian experience.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional treatment has always represented a major feature of CKD management. Over the decades, the use of nutritional treatment in CKD patients has been marked by several goals. The first of these include the attainment of metabolic and fluid control together with the prevention and correction of signs, symptoms and complications of advanced CKD. The aim of this first stage is the prevention of malnutrition and a delay in the commencement of dialysis. Subsequently, nutritional manipulations have also been applied in association with other therapeutic interventions in an attempt to control several cardiovascular risk factors associated with CKD and to improve the patient's overall outcome. Over time and in reference to multiple aims, the modalities of nutritional treatment have been focused not only on protein intake but also on other nutrients. DISCUSSION: This paper describes the pathophysiological basis and rationale of nutritional treatment in CKD and also provides a report on extensive experience in the field of renal diets in Italy, with special attention given to approaches in clinical practice and management. Italian nephrologists have a longstanding tradition in implementing low protein diets in the treatment of CKD patients, with the principle objective of alleviating uremic symptoms, improving nutritional status and also a possibility of slowing down the progression of CKD or delaying the start of dialysis. A renewed interest in this field is based on the aim of implementing a wider nutritional therapy other than only reducing the protein intake, paying careful attention to factors such as energy intake, the quality of proteins and phosphate and sodium intakes, making today's low-protein diet program much more ambitious than previous. The motivation was the reduction in progression of renal insufficiency through reduction of proteinuria, a better control of blood pressure values and also through correction of metabolic acidosis. One major goal of the flexible and innovative Italian approach to the low-protein diet in CKD patients is the improvement of patient adherence, a crucial factor in the successful implementation of a low-protein diet program.

Very low-protein diet plus ketoacids in chronic kidney disease and risk of death during end-stage renal disease: a historical cohort controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Very low-protein intake during chronic kidney disease (CKD) improves metabolic disorders and may delay dialysis start without compromising nutritional status, but concerns have been raised on a possible negative effect on survival during dialysis. This study aimed at evaluating whether a very low-protein diet during CKD is associated with a greater risk of death while on dialysis treatment. METHODS: This is an historical, cohort, controlled study, enrolling patients at dialysis start previously treated in a tertiary nephrology clinic with a very low-protein diet supplemented with amino acids and ketoacids (s-VLPD group, n = 184) or without s-VLPD [tertiary nephrology care (TNC) group, n = 334] and unselected patients [control (CON) group, n = 9.092]. The major outcome was survival rate during end-stage renal disease associated to s-VLPD treatment during CKD. The propensity score methods and Cox regression model were used to match groups at the start of dialysis to perform survival analysis and estimate adjusted hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS: In s-VLPD, TNC and CON groups, average age was 67.5, 66.0 and 66.3 years, respectively (P = 0.521) and male prevalence was 55, 55 and 62%, respectively (P = 0.004). Diabetes prevalence differed in the three groups (P < 0.001), being 18, 17 and 31% in s-VLPD, CON and TNC, respectively. A different prevalence of cardiovascular (CV) disease was found (P < 0.001), being similar in TNC and CON (31 and 25%) and higher in s-VLPD (41%). Median follow-up during renal replacement therapy (RRT) was 36, 32 and 36 months in the three groups. Adjusted HR estimated on matched propensity patients was 0.59 (0.45-0.78) for s-VLPD versus CON. Subgroup analysis showed a lower mortality risk in s-VLPD versus matched-CON in younger patients (<70 years) and those without CV disease. No significant difference in HRs was found between s-VLPD and TNC. CONCLUSION: s-VLPD during CKD does not increase mortality in the subsequent RRT period.

Assessment of achieved clinic and ambulatory blood pressure recordings and outcomes during treatment in hypertensive patients with CKD: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the effect of having clinic and/or ambulatory blood pressures (BPs) not at goal on cardiorenal risk in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD). STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter prospective study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 489 consecutive hypertensive patients with CKD (stages 1-5) with concomitant assessment of ambulatory and clinic BPs followed up in tertiary nephrology clinics. PREDICTORS: Achievement of goal for ambulatory (day- and night-time BPs <135/85 and <120/70mmHg, respectively) and clinic (<140/90mmHg) BPs was used to create 4 BP groups: clinic and ambulatory BPs at goal (group 1), clinic BP above goal and ambulatory BP at goal (group 2), clinic BP at goal and ambulatory BP above goal (group 3), and clinic and ambulatory BPs above goal (group 4). OUTCOMES: Composite cardiovascular event outcome (fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, stroke, revascularization, peripheral vascular disease, and nontraumatic amputation) and a composite renal outcome (maintenance dialysis therapy or death). MEASUREMENTS: Clinic and 24-hour ambulatory BPs. RESULTS: Mean age was 64.4±14.2 (SD) years; 41% were women, and diabetes and previous cardiovascular disease were present in 36% and 30%, respectively. Groups 1-4 contained 16.8%, 22.1%, 14.5%, and 46.6%, respectively, of the overall number of participants. Median follow-up was 5.2 years. Compared to group 1, the adjusted risk of the composite cardiovascular outcome was higher in groups 3 (HR, 3.17; 95%CI, 1.50-6.69) and 4 (HR, 2.83; 95%CI, 1.50-5.34), but not in group 2 (HR, 1.55; 95%CI, 0.75-3.19). Similarly, the risk of the composite renal outcome was higher in groups 3 (HR, 3.59; 95%CI, 2.05-6.27) and 4 (HR, 2.96; 95%CI, 1.83-4.78), but not group 2 (HR, 1.24; 95%CI, 0.67-2.27). Sensitivity analyses confirmed that these results were independent from the thresholds used for defining groups. LIMITATIONS: Only white patients were enrolled. Observational design does not allow for causality to be established. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with treated CKD, clinic BP above goal and ambulatory BP at goal identify a low-risk condition, whereas clinic BP at goal and ambulatory BP above goal are associated with higher cardiorenal risk, similar to that observed in patients with both clinic and ambulatory BPs above goal.

Physical activity and renal transplantation.

Renal transplantation is burdened by high cardiovascular risk because of increased prevalence of traditional and disease-specific cardiovascular risk factors and, consequently, patients are affected by greater morbidity and mortality. In renal transplanted patients, healthy lifestyle and physical activity are recommended to improve overall morbidity and cardiovascular outcomes. According to METs (Metabolic Equivalent Task; i.e. the amount of energy consumed while sitting at rest), physical activities are classified as sedentary (<3.0 METs), of moderate-(3.0 to 5.9 METs) or vigorous-intensity (≥ 6.0 METs). Guidelines suggest for patients with chronic kidney disease an amount of physical activity of at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity activity five times per week (min 450 MET-minutes/week). Data on physical activity in renal transplanted patients, however, are limited and have been mainly obtained by mean of non-objective methods. Available data suggest that physical activity is low either at the start or during renal transplantation and this may be associated with poor patient and graft outcomes. Therefore, in renal transplanted patients more data on physical activity obtained with objective, accelerometer-based methods are needed. In the meanwhile, physical activity have to be considered as an essential part of the medical care for renal transplanted recipients.

Physical activity and exercise programs for kidney patients: an Italian survey of nephrology centres.

BACKGROUND: Data on exercise activities in place, and on the interest for developing them in Nephrology Services in Italy is limited. To address this gap, we carried out this cross-sectional study to investigate the status of physical activity and exercise programs available in Italian Nephrology Centres. Additionally, research priorities on this topic were examined. METHODS: We developed a 14-item electronic survey, which consisted of multiple-choice questions covering exercise training programs, physical assessment, barriers to exercise practice and to exercise programs, exercise and physical activity counselling practices, perceived exercise benefits, literature evidence, and research priorities. Data on the characteristics of the centres were also collected. RESULTS: Sixty-two responses from Italian nephrology centres were collected. Ninety-three percent of the respondents were aware of the scientific evidence supporting the benefits of regular exercise programs for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Additionally, in 75% of centres the nephrologists believed that physical activity counselling should be performed by the nephrologists. However, only 26% of centres provided exercise programs, mainly for dialysis patients, and 63% never or infrequently assessed physical activity in the context of patient management. Eighty-nine percent of centres reported barriers to implementing exercise programs, including lack of funding, institutional disinterest, patient refusal, and negative attitudes of the healthcare personnel. Forty-six research priorities related to exercise in CKD patients were suggested, with the majority focusing on impact of exercise programs and physical activity on cardiovascular, nutritional, and psychosocial outcomes. CONCLUSION: This survey highlights the limited availability of exercise programs and physical activity evaluation in clinical practice in Italian Nephrology Centres. However, the survey also revealed a strong interest for counselling CKD patients on physical activity and implementing exercise prescriptions and interventions.

Sevelamer versus calcium carbonate in incident hemodialysis patients: results of an open-label 24-month randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether the use of sevelamer rather than a calcium-containing phosphate binder improves cardiovascular (CV) survival in patients receiving dialysis remains to be elucidated. STUDY DESIGN: Open-label randomized controlled trial with parallel groups. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: 466 incident hemodialysis patients recruited from 18 centers in Italy. INTERVENTION: Study participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to receive either sevelamer or a calcium-containing phosphate binder (although not required by the protocol, all patients in this group received calcium carbonate) for 24 months. OUTCOMES: All individuals were followed up until completion of 36 months of follow-up or censoring. CV death due to cardiac arrhythmias was regarded as the primary end point. MEASUREMENTS: Blind event adjudication. RESULTS: At baseline, patients allocated to sevelamer had higher serum phosphorus (mean, 5.6 ± 1.7 [SD] vs 4.8 ± 1.4 mg/dL) and C-reactive protein levels (mean, 8.8 ± 13.4 vs 5.9 ± 6.8 mg/dL) and lower coronary artery calcification scores (median, 19 [IQR, 0-30] vs 30 [IQR, 7-180]). At study completion, serum phosphate levels were lower in the sevelamer arm (median dosages, 4,800 and 2,000 mg/d for sevelamer and calcium carbonate, respectively). After a mean follow-up of 28 ± 10 months, 128 deaths were recorded (29 and 88 due to cardiac arrhythmias and all-cause CV death). Sevelamer-treated patients experienced lower CV mortality due to cardiac arrhythmias compared with patients treated with calcium carbonate (HR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.25; P < 0.001). Similar results were noted for all-cause CV mortality and all-cause mortality, but not for non-CV mortality. Adjustments for potential confounders did not affect results. LIMITATIONS: Open-label design, higher baseline coronary artery calcification burden in calcium carbonate-treated patients, different mineral metabolism control in sevelamer-treated patients, overall lower than expected mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that sevelamer compared to a calcium-containing phosphate binder improves survival in a cohort of incident hemodialysis patients. However, the better outcomes in the sevelamer group may be due to better phosphate control rather than reduction in calcium load.