Performance of an ultra-fast deep-learning accelerated MRI screening protocol for prostate cancer compared to a standard multiparametric protocol.

OBJECTIVES: To establish and evaluate an ultra-fast MRI screening protocol for prostate cancer (PCa) in comparison to the standard multiparametric (mp) protocol, reducing scan time and maintaining adequate diagnostic performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective single-center study included consecutive biopsy-naïve patients with suspected PCa between December 2022 and March 2023. A PI-RADSv2.1 conform mpMRI protocol was acquired in a 3 T scanner (scan time: 25 min 45 sec). In addition, two deep-learning (DL) accelerated sequences (T2- and diffusion-weighted) were acquired, serving as a screening protocol (scan time: 3 min 28 sec). Two readers evaluated image quality and the probability of PCa regarding PI-RADSv2.1 scores in two sessions. The diagnostic performance of the screening protocol with mpMRI serving as the reference standard was derived. Inter- and intra-reader agreements were evaluated using weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: We included 77 patients with 97 lesions (mean age: 66 years; SD: 7.7). Diagnostic performance of the screening protocol was excellent with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%/100% and 89%/98% (cut-off ≥ PI-RADS 4) for reader 1 (R1) and reader 2 (R2), respectively. Mean image quality was 3.96 (R1) and 4.35 (R2) for the standard protocol vs. 4.74 and 4.57 for the screening protocol (p < 0.05). Inter-reader agreement was moderate (κ: 0.55) for the screening protocol and substantial (κ: 0.61) for the multiparametric protocol. CONCLUSION: The ultra-fast screening protocol showed similar diagnostic performance and better imaging quality compared to the mpMRI in under 15% of scan time, improving efficacy and enabling the implementation of screening protocols in clinical routine. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The ultra-fast protocol enables examinations without contrast administration, drastically reducing scan time to 3.5 min with similar diagnostic performance and better imaging quality. This facilitates patient-friendly, efficient examinations and addresses the conflict of increasing demand for examinations at currently exhausted capacities. KEY POINTS: Time-consuming MRI protocols are in conflict with an expected increase in examinations required for prostate cancer screening. An ultra-fast MRI protocol shows similar performance and better image quality compared to the standard protocol. Deep-learning acceleration facilitates efficient and patient-friendly examinations, thus improving prostate cancer screening capacity.

Reproducibility of non-contrast enhanced multi breath-hold ultrashort echo time functional lung MRI.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraindividual reproducibility of functional lung imaging using non-contrast enhanced multi breath-hold 3D-UTE MRI. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers underwent non-contrast enhanced 3D-UTE MRI at three time points for same-day and different-day measurements employing a stack-of-spirals trajectory at 3 T. At each time point, inspiratory and expiratory breathing states were acquired for tidal and deep breathing, each within a single breath-hold. For functional image analysis, fractional ventilation (FV) was calculated pixelwise after image registration from the MR signal change. To decouple FV from breathing depth, the individual lung volume was used for volume adjustment (rFV). Reproducibility evaluation was performed in eight lung segments. Statistical analyses included two way mixed intraclass correlation (ICC), sign-test, Friedman-test and modified Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: FV from tidal breathing showed an ICC of 0.81, a bias of 1.3% and an interval of confidence (CI) ranging from -67.1 to 69.6%. FV from deep breathing was higher reproducible with an ICC of 0.92 (bias, -0.2%; CI, -34.2 to 33.7%). Following volume adjustment, reproducibility of rFV for tidal breathing improved (ICC, 0,86; bias, 2.0%; CI, -34.3 to 38.3%), whereas it did not bear significant benefits for deep breathing (ICC, 0.89; bias, 2.8%; CI, -24.9 to 30.5%). Reproducibility was independent from the examination day. CONCLUSION: Non-contrast-enhanced multi breath-hold 3D-UTE MRI allows for highly reproducible ventilation imaging.

Improved diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: Comparison of readout-segmented and zoomed single-shot imaging.

OBJECTIVES: Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is the most important sequence for detection and grading prostate cancer (PCa), but it is considerably prone to artifacts. New approaches like zoomed single-shot imaging (z-EPI) with advanced image processing or multi-shot readout segmentation (rs-EPI) try to improve DWI quality. This study evaluates objective and subjective image quality (IQ) of rs-EPI and z-EPI with and without advanced processing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six consecutive patients (67 ± 8 years; median PSA 8.3 ng/ml) with mp-MRI performed at 3 Tesla between February and October 2019 and subsequently verified PCa by targeted plus systematic MRI/US-fusion biopsy were included in this retrospective single center cohort study. Rs-EPI and z-EPI were prospectively acquired in every patient. Signal intensities (SI) of PCa and benign tissue in ADC, b1000, and calculated high b-value images were analyzed. Endpoints were signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), PCa contrast intensity (CI), and subjective IQ on a 5-point scale evaluated by three blinded readers. Wilcoxon signed rank test, Friedman test and Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated. RESULTS: SNR, CNR, and PCa CI of z-EPI with and without advanced processing was superior to rs-EPI (p < 0.01), whereas no significant differences were observed between z-EPI with and without advanced processing. Subjective IQ was significantly higher for z-EPI with advanced processing compared rs-EPI for ADC, b1000, and calculated high b-values (p < 0.01). Compared to z-EPI without advanced processing, z-EPI with advanced processing was superior for ADC and calculated high b-values (p < 0.01), but no significant differences were shown for b1000 images. CONCLUSIONS: Z-EPI with and without advanced processing was superior to rs-EPI regarding objective imaging parameters and z-EPI with advanced processing was superior to rs-EPI regarding subjective imaging parameters for the detection of PCa.