Endoscopic submucosal dissection in a European setting. A multi-institutional report of a technique in development.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technique for "en bloc" resection of superficial tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. In France, experience with this technique is still limited. We wanted to assess the development of ESD in France, with special attention to short term outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Members of the Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive (SFED) who declared performing ESD reported their cases prospectively on a voluntary basis. Demographic, clinical, and technical data, and the results of immediate complications were collected. Case reports were completed prospectively by each investigator before pooled analysis. RESULTS: A total of 188 consecutive case reports were collected from 16 centers. The median case mix per center was 6 patients (range 1-43). The lesion sites treated by ESD were the stomach (n = 75), esophagus (n = 27), duodenum (n = 1), cecum (n = 2), right colon (n = 3), transverse colon (n = 5), sigmoid (n = 3), and rectum (n = 72). The median size of the lesions was 26 mm (range 2-150 mm). En bloc resection was achieved in 77.1% of cases, with complete R0 resection in 72.9%. Histopathology results showed high grade dysplasia or superficial cancer in 71.2%. The median duration of ESD was 105 minutes (range 20-450 minutes). The short term morbidity was 29.2% including 34 cases of perforation (18.1%), and 21 hemorrhages (11.2%) during the 24 hours following ESD, 89% of which were managed conservatively or endoscopically. CONCLUSION: In this early experience, the feasibility of ESD appeared to be good but R0 resection and complication rates did not match those reported by Japanese authors and must be improved by an extended practice.

Management of choroidal metastases.

BACKGROUND: Choroidal metastases (CM) are the most common malignant intraocular lesion observed in up to 4-12% of necropsy series of patients with solid cancer. The spectrum of presentations varies from prevalent CM in disseminated cancer to isolated CM. CM are responsible for visual deterioration. Depending on the primary cancer, estimated life expectancy, overall cancer presentation and ocular symptoms, the management of CM varies widely. We address the multidisciplinary management of CM and technical aspects of radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of literature was performed from 1974 to 2014. RESULTS: Choroidal metastases occur preferentially in breast and lung carcinomas but are reported in all cancer types. The standard treatment remains external beam radiotherapy, applying 30Gy in 10 fractions or 40Gy in 20 fractions. The reported complete response and improved visual acuity rates are 80% and 57% to 89%, respectively. Some chemotherapy or new targeted therapy regimens yield promising CM response rates. DISCUSSION: Radiation therapy consistently shows rapid symptom alleviation, yield excellent local control and functional outcomes. However, there are only few reports on late toxicities after 6months given the unfavorable prognostic of CM patients. Selected patients may live more than two years, underlying the need to better assess mean and long term outcomes. Some authors have favored exclusive systemic strategies with omission of irradiation. The current literature suffers from the scarcity of prospective trials. Duration of tumor response following systemic therapy is rarely reported but appears less favorable as compared to radiotherapy. Systemic treatments may be proposed for pauci-symptomatic CM in a polymetastatic context while radiation therapy remains necessary in symptomatic CM either upfront or as an alternating treatment. Focalized radiation like brachytherapy and proton therapy may be proposed for isolated CM with long disease-free interval between primary and CM, as these techniques have the potential to yield better tumor and functional outcomes in patients with long life expectancy.