Surgical options for atrial fibrillation treatment during concomitant cardiac procedures.

Current guidelines recommend concomitant surgical ablation (SA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the context of mitral valve disease. A variety of energy sources have been tested for SA to perform effective transmural lesions reliably. To date, only radiofrequency and cryothermy energies are considered viable options. The gold standard for SA is the Cox-Maze ablation set, especially for non-paroxysmal AF (nPAF), with the aim of interrupting macro-reentrant drivers perpetuating AF, without hampering the sinus node activation of both atria, and to maintain the atrioventricular synchrony. Although the efficacy of SA in terms of early and late sinus rhythm restoration has been clearly demonstrated over the years, concomitant AF ablation is still underperformed in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery. From a surgical standpoint, concerns have been raised about whether a single (left) or double atriotomy would be justified in AF patients undergoing a "non-atriotomy" surgical procedure, such as aortic valve or revascularization surgery. Thus, an array of simplified lesion sets have been described in the last decade, which have unavoidably hampered procedural efficacy, somewhat jeopardizing the standardization process of ablation surgery. As a matter of fact, the term "Maze" has improperly become a generic term for SA. Surgical interventions that do not align with the principles of forming conduction-blocking lesions according to the Maze pattern, cannot be classified as Maze procedures. In this complex scenario, a tailored approach according to the different AF patterns has been proposed: for patients with concomitant nPAF, a biatrial Cox-Maze ablation is recommended. Conversely, it might be reasonable to limit lesions to the left atrium or the pulmonary veins in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) in some clinical scenarios. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current ablation strategies for patients with AF undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery.

Evaluation of the Nautilus Smart Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With Hemostatic Alteration: A Case Series.

The intricate management of hemostatic disorders in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) assisted patients poses challenges, particularly when procoagulant administration is necessary. We hereby report the performance of the Nautilus* Smart ECMO Module in three patients with hemostatic disorders. We collected data from ECMO procedures with Nautilus* Smart ECMO Module and analyzed the performance: the operating pressures and resistance of the device in addition to the coagulation status of the patients. During the three procedures, partial pressure oxygen post-oxygenator (paO2) stayed above 100 mm Hg and partial pressure carbon dioxide post-oxygenator (paCO2) did not exceed 45 mm Hg. Membrane FiO2 (fractional inspired O2) did not exceed 75% and air flow remained within a 1:1 ratio with blood flow in veno-arterial ECMO (V-A) and within 1:2 in veno-venous ECMO (V-V). There was no evidence of excessive operating pressure for the device, with a pressure drop consistently below 28 mm Hg and a maximum peak resistance of 7 Δmm Hg/L/min. The Nautilus* Smart ECMO Module showed good performance in patients with hemostatic disorders despite the implications associated with procoagulant administration.

Mitral valve surgery in acute infective endocarditis: long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair versus replacement.

AIMS: Timing and surgical strategies in acute infective endocarditis are still questionable. We sought to investigate clinical outcomes of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVR) compared with mitral valve replacement [mitral valve prosthesis (MVP)] for acute infective endocarditis. METHODS: From 2004 to 2019, 109 consecutive patients with acute mitral valve infective endocarditis were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical strategy: MVR 53/109 (48.6%) versus MVP 56/109 (51.4%). Primary end points were in-hospital mortality and overall survival at 10 years. Secondary end point was the freedom from infective endocarditis relapse. RESULTS: Our institutional surgical approach for infective endocarditis allowed us to achieve MVR in 48.6% of patients. Hospital mortality was comparable between the two groups [MVR: 1/53 (1.9%) versus MVP: 2/56 (3.6%), P  = 1.000]. Overall 10-year survival was 80.0 ±â€Š14.1 and 77.2 ±â€Š13.5% for MVR and MVP, respectively ( P  = 0.648). MVR showed a lower incidence of infective endocarditis relapse compared with MVP (MVR: 93.6 ±â€Š7.1 versus MVP: 80.9 ±â€Š10.8%, P  = 0.041). At Cox regression, infective endocarditis relapse was an independent risk factor for death (hazard ratio 4.03; 95% confidence interval 1.41-11.52; P  = 0.009). CONCLUSION: The tendency to postpone surgery in stable patients with mitral infective endocarditis allowed achievement of MVR in almost 50% of patients. Although repair remains the approach of choice in our institution, no differences between MVR and MVP were reported in terms of early/late survival. However, MVP had a higher incidence of infective endocarditis relapse that represents an independent risk of mortality.

Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus: Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes from a Multi-Institutional Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare hemodynamic performances and clinical outcomes of patients with small aortic annulus (SAA) who underwent aortic valve replacement by means of sutureless aortic valve replacement (SUAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: From 2015 to 2020, 622 consecutive patients with SAA underwent either SUAVR or TAVI. Through a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis, two homogeneous groups of 146 patients were formed. Primary endpoint: all cause-death at 36 months. Secondary endpoints: incidence of moderate to severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). RESULTS: All-cause death at three years was higher in the TAVI group (SUAVR 12.2% vs. TAVI 21.0%, P=0.058). Perioperatively, comparable hemodynamic performances were recorded in terms of indexed effective orifice area (SUAVR 1.12 ± 0.23 cm2/m2 vs. TAVI 1.17 ± 0.28 cm2/m2, P=0.265), mean transvalvular gradients (SUAVR 12.9 ± 5.3 mmHg vs. TAVI 12.2 ± 6.2 mmHg, P=0.332), and moderate-to-severe PPM (SUAVR 4.1% vs. TAVI 8.9%, P=0.096). TAVI group showed a higher cumulative incidence of MACCEs at 36 months (SUAVR 18.1% vs. TAVI 32.6%, P<0.001). Pacemaker implantation (PMI) and perivalvular leak ≥ 2 were significantly higher in TAVI group and identified as independent predictors of mortality (PMI: hazard ratio [HR] 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-6.94, P=0.008; PPM: HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.25-5.94, P=0.012). CONCLUSION: In patients with SAA, SUAVR and TAVI showed comparable hemodynamic performances. Moreover, all-cause death and incidence of MACCEs at follow-up were significantly higher in TAVI group.

Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Prevention of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Epicardial injection of botulinum toxin may suppress POAF. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the safety and efficacy of AGN-151607 for the prevention of POAF after cardiac surgery. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessed the safety and efficacy of AGN-151607, 125 U and 250 U vs placebo (1:1:1), for the prevention of POAF after cardiac surgery. Randomization was stratified by age (<65, ≥65 years) and type of surgery (nonvalvular/valve surgery). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of continuous AF ≥30 seconds. RESULTS: Among 312 modified intention-to-treat participants (placebo, n = 102; 125 U, n = 104; and 250 U, n = 106), the mean age was 66.9 ± 6.8 years; 17% were female; and 64% had coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) only, 12% had CABG + valve, and 24% had valve surgery. The primary endpoint occurred in 46.1% of the placebo group, 36.5% of the 125-U group (relative risk [RR] vs placebo: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.58-1.10; P = 0.16), and 47.2% of the 250-U group (RR vs placebo: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.79-1.37; P = 0.78). The primary endpoint was reduced in the 125-U group in those ≥65 years of age (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.43-0.94; P = 0.02) with a greater reduction in CABG-only participants ≥65 years of age (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.27-0.87; P = 0.01). Rehospitalization and rates of adverse events were similar across the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in the rate of POAF with either dose compared with placebo; however, there was a lower rate of POAF in participants ≥65 years undergoing CABG only and receiving 125 U of AGN-151607. These hypothesis-generating findings require investigation in a larger, adequately powered randomized clinical trial. (Botulinum Toxin Type A [AGN-151607] for the Prevention of Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation in Adult Participants Undergoing Open-chest Cardiac Surgery [NOVA]; NCT03779841); A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A [AGN 151607] Injections into the Epicardial Fat Pads to Prevent Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Open-Chest Cardiac Surgery; 2017-004399-68).