The prognosis of pre-frail chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients for hospitalizations and mortality depends on their level of functional physical performance.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if pre-frail Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with poor and non-poor performance in the five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5-STS) had a worse prognosis for hospitalization and mortality at 2 years and for mortality at 5 years than non-frail patients. METHODS: We prospectively included patients with stable COPD, between 40 and 80 years, from a hospital in Spain. Patients were classified according their performance on the 5-STS test and level of frailty. Timing, number of hospitalizations, length of stay, and timing and rate of mortality were outcome measures. Patients were followed for 2 years for exacerbations and for 5 years for mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazard analyses, ANOVA tests and univariate and multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: Of the 125 patients included, 25.6% were pre-frail with poor performance, 57% pre-frail with non-poor performance, and 17.4% non-frail with non-poor performance. Pre-frail patients with poor performance had a higher number of hospitalizations (adjusted beta: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.01-0.96), mortality rates (odds ratio: 11.33; 95% CI: 1.15-110.81), and risk at 5 years (adjusted hazard ratio: 8.77; 95% CI: 1.02-75.51) than non-frail patients. Pre-frail patients with poor performance also had worse prognoses than non-frail patients with respect to length of hospital stays (increased by 4.16 days) and timing to first hospitalization (HR: 6.01) in unadjusted models, but not when adjusted. CONCLUSION: The COPD prognosis of pre-frail patients with respect to the number of exacerbations with hospitalization and the timing and rate of mortality is dependent of functional performance.

Physical frailty characteristics have a differential impact on symptoms as measured by the CAT score: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: The physical frailty status affects the health status of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The objective was to determine if the individual physical frailty characteristics have a differential impact on the CAT score. METHODS: This observational study included 137 patients with stable COPD. Physical frailty was measured with unintentional weight loss, low physical activity, exhaustion, slow walking speed and low grip strength and health status assessed with the COPD Assessment test (CAT). The following variables were evaluated as potential determinants of CAT: sex, age, body mass index, smoking, dyspnea, exacerbations, comorbidities, %FEV1, %FVC, anxiety and depression. RESULTS: The prevalence of characteristics for individual frailty was as follows: low grip strength, 60.6%; low physical activity, 27.0%; exhaustion, 19.7%; slow walking speed, 9.5%; and unintentional weight loss, 7.3%. A total of 17.5% of the patients were non-frail, 73.7% were pre-frail and only 8.7% were frail. One of the five frailty characteristics, exhaustion (adjusted ß coefficient 5.12 [standard error = 1.27], p = 0.001) was an independent determinant of CAT score in the final regression model which was adjusted by other independent determinants of CAT (dyspnea, exacerbations and anxiety). CONCLUSIONS: Due to the fact that exhaustion is a frequent and relevant psychological symptom on CAT score of patients with COPD, interventions should reduce that stress. Future research should explore how exhaustion persists or remits over time.

Patterns and predictors of exhaustion episodes in patients with stable COPD: A longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Exhaustion is the perception of low energy. Little is known about how exhaustion persists, remits or reappears over time in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or how to predict these events. We determined the likelihood of transitions between states of exhaustion and no exhaustion among patients with stable COPD followed up for 2 years. We investigated combinations of potential factors for their abilities to predict new-onset exhaustion episodes. METHODS: We prospectively included 137 patients with stable COPD (mean age, 66.9 years ± 8.3). Exhaustion states were measured at baseline and 1 and 2 years later. Exhaustion was defined as an answer of "most of the time" or "a moderate amount of time" to 1 of 2 questions: "How often have you found it hard to get going?" and "How often does everything seem to require effort?" We evaluated demographic, non-respiratory and respiratory variables as potential predictors. The likelihoods of new episodes and recovery were calculated. Predictors were evaluated with generalised estimating equations. RESULTS: At baseline, 27 patients (19.7%) displayed exhaustion. Of the 110 patients without exhaustion at baseline, 17 (15.5%) displayed exhaustion at least once during the follow-up period. During the study period, a total of 204 annual transitions displaying no exhaustion at the beginning were identified. Of them, 10.3% transitioned to exhaustion in the next year. The likelihood of recovery after exhaustion was 50%. Independent predictors of new-onset exhaustion episodes within the following year were: the COPD assessment test score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.21), depression (OR = 6.89; 95% CI: 1.00-47.41) and female gender (OR = 6.88; 95% CI: 1.83-25.73). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in stable COPD with high CAT scores and depression were most likely to experience new-onset exhaustion episodes Thus, exhaustion might be predicted by a combination of psychological factors and respiratory health status. Nevertheless, exhaustion is dynamic in COPD; half of patients recover from exhaustion.

Interobserver Reliability of Peripheral Muscle Strength Tests and Short Physical Performance Battery in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interobserver reliability of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and hand dynamometry when measuring isometric muscle strength in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). DESIGN: Reliability study. Each patient was assessed by a pulmonology physician and a physical therapist in 2 separate sessions 7 to 14 days apart (mean, 9.8±0.8d). Each rater was blinded to the other's results. SETTING: Pneumology unit of a public hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of outpatients with stable COPD (N=30). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SPPB and muscle strength (kg) using electronic handgrip and handheld dynamometers. Reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement values, and Bland-Altman plots. ICCs were calculated for the SPPB summary score and for its 3 subscales. RESULTS: The ICCs for the overall reliability of the SPPB summary score and for grip and quadriceps strength were .82 (95% confidence interval [CI], .62-.91), .97 (95% CI, .93-.98), and .76 (95% CI, .49-.88), respectively. The standard error of measurement values were .55 points, 1.30kg, and 1.22kg, respectively. The mean differences between the rater's scores were near zero for grip strength and SPPB summary score measures. The ICCs for the SPPB subscales were .84 (95% CI, .66-.92) for the chair subscale, .75 (95% CI, .48-.88) for gait, and .33 (95% CI, -.42 to .68) for balance. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver reliability was good for quadriceps and handgrip dynamometry and for the SPPB summary score and its chair stand and gait speed subscales. Both pulmonary physicians and physical therapists can obtain and exchange the scores. Because the reliability of the balance subscale was questionable, it is better to use the SPPB summary score.

Identifying COPD patients with poor health status and low exercise tolerance through the five-repetition sit-to-stand test and modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Score.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine whether the concomitant presence of poor health status (COPD Assessment Test, CAT ≥ 10 points) and low exercise tolerance (6-Minute Walking Test, 6MWT < 350 m) is associated with worse clinical characteristics in patients with COPD. In addition, we aimed to develop a readily applicable diagnostic model to discriminate COPD patients with these conditions. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicenter study involving 208 stable COPD patients (FEV1/FVC < 0.7, smoking history of at least 10 pack-years, and chronic respiratory symptoms) was carried out. The outcome measures were the 6MWT, CAT score, 5-repetition sit-to-stand test (5STS) and modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC). Patients were categorized into three groups: no condition (6MWT ≥ 350 m and CAT < 10 points), one condition (6MWT < 350 m or CAT ≥ 10 points), and both conditions (6MWT < 350 m and CAT ≥ 10 points). RESULTS: A total of 26 patients (12,5%) presented both conditions. These patients experienced a higher degree of dyspnea (p = 0.001), smoking pack-years (p = 0.011), severe obstruction (p = 0.006), and time on 5STS (p = 0.001). The probability of having both conditions directly increased with the time spent on the 5STS (ß=0.188; p = 0.010) and the degree of dyspnea (ß=1.920; p < 0.001) (R2=0.413). The scoring system, using the 5STS and dyspnea as surrogate measures, demonstrated adequate calibration between the predicted and observed risk (linear R2=0.852). CONCLUSIONS: COPD patients with concurrent conditions have worse clinical status. The diagnostic model developed to discriminate these patients shows good internal validation.

Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test as Predictor of Mortality in High Risk COPD Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if adding performance on the five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5-STS) to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) high-risk criteria, proposed by the Spanish COPD guidelines (GesEPOC), affects mortality prognosis. METHODS: Observational study of COPD outpatients involved prospective follow-up for 5 years. Patients were classified based on 5-STS performance and risk criteria proposed by GesEPOC version 2021. Outcome measures were 5-year mortality timing and rate. Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazard analyses, analysis of variance, and univariate and multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-seven patients were included. Mean age was 66±8.3 years, and 87.6% were men. Of them, 115 (83.9%) were classified as high risk, 43 (34.4%) of whom had poor performance on the 5-STS. Overall mortality at 5 years was 27% and was significantly higher in the high-risk (29.6%) compared with the low-risk (13.6%) group. Among high-risk patients, mortality at 5 years was significantly worse with poor 5-STS performance (60.5%) compared with non-poor performance (11.1%). Poor performance on the 5-STS was independently associated with increased 5-year mortality risk (HR 4.70; 95% CI: 1.96-11.27) in a model adjusted for history of heart disease and dyspnea. CONCLUSION: Among high-risk COPD patients, those with poor performance on the 5-STS have a significantly higher mortality at 5 years than those with non-poor 5-STS performance.

Diffuse pulmonary meningotheliomatosis diagnosed by transbronchial lung biopsy.

Minute pulmonary meningothelial-like nodules (MPMNs) are usually unique lesions in the lung parenchyma. Diffuse pulmonary meningotheliomatosis, which is presented as multiple MPMNs, has been less frequently described. MPMNs are mainly asymptomatic and are diagnosed after lung surgery or during autopsy. We report on a patient with multiple and bilateral pulmonary nodules, some of which were cavitated, diagnosed with diffuse pulmonary meningotheliomatosis by transbronchial lung biopsy. Diffuse pulmonary meningotheliomatosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of bilateral lung nodules.

Development of the ESEx index: a tool for predicting risk of recurrent severe COPD exacerbations.

Background: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), multiple recurrent severe exacerbations that require hospitalization can occur. These events are strongly associated with death and other clinical complications. Objectives: We aimed to develop a prognostic model that could identify patients with COPD that are at risk of multiple recurrent severe exacerbations within 3 years. Design: Prospective cohort. Methods: The derivation cohort comprised patients with stable, moderate-to-severe COPD. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to develop the final model. Based on regression coefficients, a simplified index (ESEx) was established. Both, model and index, were assessed for predictive performance by measuring discrimination and calibration. Results: Over 3 years, 16.4% of patients with COPD experienced at least three severe recurrent exacerbations. The prognostic model showed good discrimination of high-risk patients, based on three characteristics: the number of severe exacerbations in the previous year, performance in the five-repetition sit-to-stand test, and in the 6-minute-walk test. The ESEx index provided good level of discrimination [areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs): 0.913]. Conclusions: The ESEx index showed good internal validation for the identification of patients at risk of three recurrent severe COPD exacerbations within 3 years. These tools could be used to identify patients who require early interventions and motivate patients to improve physical performance to prevent recurrent exacerbations.

Improving the Reliability Between the BODE Index and the BODS Index in Which the 6-Min Walk Test Was Replaced with the Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test.

Purpose: The BODS index has been confirmed to have predictive properties similar to the original BODE index for mortality in COPD. We evaluated the agreement between the BODS index and the BODE and explored with an updated BODS how this agreement could be improved and its ability to correctly discriminate individual participants' mortality in a prospective cohort study. Patients and Methods: We included prospectively a consecutive sample of 137 patients with COPD, between 40 and 80 years, during 2014 and followed for 5 years (2014-2019) in the Pneumology section of a public university hospital in Spain. They participated in the baseline data collection, which included BODE- and BODS-related measurements and prognostic factors, and were followed up for 5-year mortality. We used Bland-Altman plots and the kappa coefficient to analyze the agreement between both the original and updated BODS and the BODE index, and we used the areas under ROC curves (AUC) to compare their discriminative abilities for 5-year all-cause mortality. Results: The original BODS index scores and quartiles had weak agreement with the BODE index, and our updated BODS strengthened these agreements (a small, statistically nonsignificant mean bias [<0.03] with LoAs<2 points, and a substantial Kappa coefficient [k =0.63; IC 95%: 0.53-0.73]). In addition, the updated BODS index scores had better summarized ability than the BODS index in discriminating participants' mortality during the following 5 years (AUC: 0.768 versus 0.736; p=0.04). Conclusion: The updated BODS index scores and quartiles may provide prognostic information similar to that provided by the BODE index in COPD. Future research should focus on index improvement through external validation, as well as the assessment of safety and effectiveness in clinical practice by means of impact studies.

Prognostic value of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test for mortality in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic studies suggest that some musculoskeletal and functional capacity tests are independently associated with mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but comparing their prognostic value is difficult because of differences in the selected covariates for regression modelling in those studies. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prognostic value of five musculoskeletal and functional capacity tests in predicting mortality risk in patients with COPD after adjusting for existing and confounding prognostic factors and to compare their ability to correctly discriminate the mortality of individual participants using the 6-min walk test (6MWT). We hypothesized that the examined tests have different prognostic value. METHODS: Prospective and longitudinal study. A total of 137 patients with stable COPD (mean [SD] age 67 [8.33] years; 87% male) were recruited from a hospital in Spain during 2014 and followed for 5 years (2014-2019). No one refused and only one was lost to follow-up. The outcome measure was 5 year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients died within 5 years. All musculoskeletal tests were associated with 5 year all-cause mortality in Cox proportional-hazards regression models. However, only the five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5-STS) score was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio 1.04 per sec, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.08) after adjusting for history of heart disease, number of previous severe exacerbations, and dyspnoea. This model explained 50.7% of the variance in mortality. This test exhibited similar discriminative ability as the 6MWT for 5 year mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.741vs 0.722; p = 0.92), and a highly prognostic cut-off for discriminating (15.98 s). This cut-off had higher likelihood ratios (LRs) than the 6MWT cut-off (∼350 m), especially for negative LRs (1/LR-: 7.69vs 2.00). CONCLUSIONS: The 5-STS is an objective measure for predicting mortality in patients with COPD and has good discriminative ability, with a cut-off for discriminating survival slight better than the 6MWT. The prognostic value of the other tests remains to be confirmed.