Faculty Physician and Trainee Experiences with Micro- and Macroaggressions: a Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Micro- and macroaggressions are often stereotype threats that can have detrimental effects on the recipients. Survey data shows that these aggressions are happening. However, there are few qualitative studies on trainees and faculty physicians' experiences with such aggressions and their impact. OBJECTIVE: Explore how micro- and macroaggressions impact physician trainees and faculty. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Virtual, one-on-one, semi-structured interviews were conducted between February and September 2021, among 14 physicians and trainees (medical students, residents, fellows, and faculty) at a tertiary, urban, US academic medical center and its associated hospitals. Participants shared their experiences with micro- and macroaggressions in training and the workplace, as well as their thoughts on intervention and education. APPROACH: Qualitative interviews; grounded theory approach KEY RESULTS: A total of 14 physicians and trainees (5 faculty, 2 fellows, 5 residents, 2 students; 11 [79%] women) participated. Four themes with multiple subthemes surfaced: definition, the moment an aggression is experienced, aftereffect of an aggression, and education and training. While general definitions of micro- and macroaggressions were similar among participants, some may have overlooked the inclusion of a marginalized group as central to each term. Both types of aggressions had a range of effects on participants, with faculty noting a cumulative effect. Institutional diversity was identified as a key source of support. Ideas on how to combat such acts included mandatory educational programs and policies, with the acknowledgment that much effort and time are necessary to change mindset and culture. CONCLUSIONS: Faculty physicians and medical trainees shared their personal experiences with micro- and macroaggressions during work and training. Participants described various emotions in the moment but also noted that these aggressions often had lasting impacts. They recognized the challenges of finding a solution to micro- and macroaggressions. Institution-wide education was favored by many as a first step.

Utilization of Health Care Services and Ambulatory Resources Associated with Chronic Noncancer Pain.

OBJECTIVE: Examine traditional and uncompensated health care utilization associated with chronic noncancer pain. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Internal medicine patients on long-term opioids for chronic noncancer pain with or without a pain agreement between April 1, 2014, and April 1, 2015 (N = 834). Patients without pain served as controls (N = 782). METHODS: Univariate statistics were used to compare health care utilization by the presence of chronic pain, pain agreement status, opioid dose, and schedule. Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of health care utilization, with emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and after-hour calls as binary outcomes and office visits and phone/e-mail contacts as ordinal outcomes. RESULTS: Patients with chronic pain used significantly more health care resources compared with patients without pain (all P < 0.001). Patients on a pain agreement had more telephone and secure messages than patients without an agreement ( P = 0.002). Controlling for demographics and other factors, patients with chronic pain had 2.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.1-3.4) times the odds of an emergency room visit, 5.0 (95% CI = 3.6-7.0) times the odds of a hospitalization, and 2.3 (95% CI = 1.7-3.0) times the odds of an after hour call, compared with nonpain controls. Ordinal logistic regression yield adjusted common odds ratios of 3.4 (95% CI = 2.7-4.2) and 2.9 (95% CI = 2.3-3.6) for total clinic visits and telephone or secure messages, respectively, indicating higher utilization for chronic pain patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic noncancer pain utilized more traditional and uncompensated health care resources compared with patients without chronic pain.

Risk Factors for Climate-Related Health Effects in an Ambulatory Population.

BACKGROUND: Climate change is a global health crisis. In most regions, heat waves are expected to become longer and more frequent and air quality is expected to worsen. Few physicians discuss climate and health with patients, and related guidelines are lacking. Our objective was to quantify the prevalence of risk factors for illness related to climate change in the U.S. ambulatory setting. METHODS: From the 2018 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a national probability sample of nonfederal, ambulatory encounters, we identified adults with risk factors for illness related to heat or air pollution exposure. RESULTS: We found 91.4% of encounters involved a patient with at least 1 risk factor, while 46.7% had 2 or more. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of patients with climate-related health risk factors exists in the ambulatory setting, representing a significant opportunity for evidence-based climate and health patient education and preventative care.

Depression in Primary Care, 2010-2018.

BACKGROUND: Depression is common in primary care and significantly reduces quality of life. Our study aimed to examine the prevalence of depression in primary care visits, examine patterns of depression treatment and referral, and determine how often depression screening occurred over an 8-year timespan. METHODS: From the 2010-2018 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a national probability sample of non-federal, ambulatory encounters, we identified adults being seen in a primary care clinic. We assessed the prevalence of depression screening, diagnosis, and treatment. RESULTS: During these 8 years, 13.1% of primary care encounters involved a patient with a diagnosis of depression. The prevalence of depression did not change over time. Patients were screened for depression 4.1% of the time, with screening increasing over time. Depression was more likely to be diagnosed when screening occurred (odds ratio 9.9; 95% confidence interval, 6.8-14.5%). Most patients were treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. CONCLUSION: Depression is common in primary care, though screening was infrequent. Practices should consider instituting universal screening.

Leadership Views on the Barriers and Incentives to Clinical Preceptorship.

BACKGROUND: Clinical education often relies on a one-to-one student-preceptor model. Recruiting and retaining quality preceptors to sustain this model has become increasingly difficult at academic institutions across the nation. While ample literature describes preceptor barriers and incentives as viewed by physician educators, few studies explore the issue from institutional leadership perspectives. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe leadership perceptions across an academic institution to better understand knowledge gaps, system barriers, and proposed solutions to help institutions take action and address preceptor shortages. METHODS: Between February and July 2019, the researchers conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with sampled representation of Medical College of Wisconsin leadership. The researchers reviewed transcriptions of each interview verbatim and used a qualitative grounded theory approach to generate content codes and themes. Researchers iteratively refined codes using the constant comparison method until all interviews were analyzed and final themes and subthemes were defined. RESULTS: Twelve institutional leaders participated, of whom 5 were clinical executives, 1 was an academic executive, 4 were academic deans, and 2 were educational directors. Analysis yielded 4 major themes: student impact, recognition, physician well-being, and leadership. CONCLUSION: Each content theme highlighted areas to consider when addressing preceptor issues within an institution: (1) leadership knowledge gaps regarding the scope of preceptor challenges, particularly time commitments and the number of preceptors required; (2) improving career advancement or promotion criteria to recognize teaching efforts; (3) enhanced physician well-being from teaching, while important, may no longer be sufficient for participation, especially without financial compensation; (4) distributed leadership may be needed to address issues at the course, clinic, and system levels.

Health care utilization by veterans prescribed chronic opioids.

PURPOSE: Ambulatory resources such as telephone calls, secure messages, nurse visits, and telephone triage are vital to the management of patients on chronic opioid therapy (COT). They are also often overlooked as health care services and yet to be broadly studied. The aim of the present study was to describe the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care utilization by patients based on COT, type, and amount of opioids prescribed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was done on 617 patients on COT at a VA primary care clinic. Instances of health care utilization (emergency department visits [EDVs], hospitalizations, clinic visits, telephone triage calls, telephone calls/secure messages/nurse visits) were obtained. RESULTS: Patients were likely to have more telephone calls, secure messages, or nurse visits if they were prescribed a schedule II opioid or if they were on more than one opioid. Model-based results found that patients on COT were more likely to have EDVs, telephone triage calls, and clinic contact compared to patients who were not on chronic opioids. CONCLUSION: The results are despite having a Patient Aligned Care Team, which is the VA's patient-centered medical home. This suggests that reducing health care utilization for patients on COT may not be possible with just a primary care involvement.

Opioid-related Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations Among Commercially Insured Individuals, 2009-2015.

OBJECTIVES: Overall opioid prescribing rates have decreased since 2012, but opioid-involved deaths have not. This study describes the regional and overall trends of opioid-related emergency department visits (EDVs) and hospitalizations of commercially insured patients on chronic opioids and those on concurrent opioids and benzodiazepines. METHODS: Secondary data analysis from Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters (MarketScan) database from 2009 to 2015 was used. Outcomes were geographic rates of opioid-related EDVs and hospitalizations and rates of concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use. RESULTS: Rates of opioid-related EDVs and hospitalizations for patients on chronic opioids have decreased since 2009. Two thirds of those with opioid-related EDVs and nearly 3-quarters of those with an opioid-related hospitalization were coprescribed benzodiazepines. The North Central region had the highest proportion of individuals on chronic opioid therapy (2.7%) in 2015. However, the South had not only the highest rates of opioid-related EDVs (23/100,000 in 2015) and opioid-related hospitalizations (39/100,000 in 2015) but also the largest percentage of individuals on concurrent opioids and benzodiazepines (41%). DISCUSSION: Rates of opioid-related EDVs and hospitalizations, as well as concurrent opioid and benzodiazepine use, vary geographically. More research is needed to examine factors that impact regional variation and what influences the concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines.

Pain Agreements and Healthcare Utilization in a Veterans Affairs Primary Care Population: A Retrospective Chart Review.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of chronic pain is enormous. In America, the management of chronic pain and opioids remains a critical focus. Guidelines recommend pain agreements as part of the management of chronic pain and opioids; however, evidence of improvement in patient outcomes is lacking. An aspect of patient outcome includes utilization of healthcare resources, such as emergency department visits and hospitalizations. It remains uncertain whether the use of pain agreements lessens healthcare utilization. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of a Midwest Veterans Affairs primary care clinic. Subjects were veterans on chronic opioids between 1 April 2014 and 1 April 2015. Outcome measures included emergency department visits, hospitalizations, clinic visits, telephone triage, telephone/secure messages, and nurse visits. RESULTS: The charts of 635 veterans on chronic opioids were reviewed. Of these, 295 were on a pain agreement. There were no significant differences in demographics, medical, or psychiatric diagnoses between patients with and without pain agreements. There were significant differences in opioid schedule and number of opioids based on pain agreement (p < 0.01). Patients on pain agreements did not utilize healthcare resources less than patients without a pain agreement. In fact, patients on pain agreements were likely to have more telephone calls, secure messages, and nurse visits compared with patients not on an agreement (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Pain agreements are becoming standard of care for chronic pain management. However, there continues to be a lack of evidence demonstrating improvement in healthcare outcomes with their use, despite guideline recommendations. Further studies are needed to examine specific patient outcomes, such as overdose and death, in regard to pain agreements. FUNDING: Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Program.

Adherence to chronic opioid therapy prescribing guidelines in a primary care clinic.

OBJECTIVE: Characterize primary care patients prescribed opioids for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP), explore guideline-recommended opioid-monitoring practices, and investigate predictors of pain agreements. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Primary care clinic at a tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adults prescribed chronic opioids (three or more monthly prescriptions within a year) for CNCP between April 1, 2014 and April 1, 2015. Patients without CNCP served as controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient demographics, medical diagnoses, tobacco status, provider status, documentation of guideline-recommended opioid-monitoring practices, pain agreement status, and opioid prescription. Univariate statistics were used to explore differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, and guideline-recommended opioid-monitoring practices by chronic pain and pain agreement status. Logistic regression was used to investigate predictors of agreement status. RESULTS: The clinic had 834 (9 percent) patients on chronic opioids, with 335 on a pain agreement. Documentation of opioid-monitoring practices was lacking. Logistic regression indicated that patients were significantly more likely to be on an agreement if they were Caucasian (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.17 [95% CI 1.41, 3.39]), had a baseline urine drug screen (adjusted OR 10.72 [95% CI 6.16, 19.41]), were prescribed a schedule II controlled medication (adjusted OR 11.92 [95% CI 6.93, 21.62]), and had risk assessed to some degree (adjusted OR 3.06 [95% CI 1.90, 4.96]). CONCLUSIONS: Aside from race, most patient characteristics were not predictive of pain agreement implementation. However, controlled medication of higher schedules and the use of certain guideline-recommended practices were associated with an agreement. Studies are needed to examine whether pain agreement or guideline-adherence influence clinical outcomes.

Hiring and screening practices of agencies supplying paid caregivers to older adults.

OBJECTIVES: To assess what screening practices agencies use in hiring caregivers and how caregiver competency is measured before assigning responsibilities in caring for older adults. DESIGN: One-to-one phone interviews in which interviewers posed as prospective clients seeking a caregiver for an older adult relative. SETTING: Cross-sectional cohort of agencies supplying paid caregivers to older adults in Illinois, California, Florida, Colorado, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Indiana. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred sixty-two home care agencies were contacted, of which 84 were no longer in service, 165 offered only nursing care, and 33 were excluded; 180 agencies completed interviews. MEASUREMENTS: Agencies were surveyed about their hiring methods, screening measures, training practices, skill competencies assessments, and supervision. Two coders qualitatively analyzed open-ended responses. RESULTS: To recruit caregivers, agencies primarily used print and Internet (e.g., Craigslist.com) advertising (n = 69, 39.2%) and word-of-mouth referrals (n = 49, 27.8%). In hiring, agencies required prior "life experiences" (n = 121, 68.8%) few of which (n = 33, 27.2%) were specific to caregiving. Screening measures included federal criminal background checks (n = 96, 55.8%) and drug testing (n = 56, 31.8%). Agencies stated that the paid caregiver could perform skills, such as medication reminding (n = 169, 96.0%). Skill competency was assessed according to caregiver self-report (n = 103, 58.5%), testing (n = 62, 35.2%), and client feedback (n = 62, 35.2%). General caregiver training length ranged from 0 to 7 days. Supervision ranged from none to weekly and included home visits, telephone calls, and caregivers visiting the central office. CONCLUSION: Using an agency to hire paid caregivers may give older adults and their families a false sense of security regarding the background and skill set of the caregiver.