Regulation of Peritoneal Inflammatory Response to Implant Material Using an Ex Vivo Model System.

BACKGROUND: Implants used in abdominal wall reconstruction are associated with intra-abdominal inflammation that can cause complications such as adhesions, fistulae, or failure of the implant. This study analyzed the inflammatory response of human peritoneum explants when exposed to different implant materials including synthetic and biological (cross-linked and non-cross-linked). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human peritoneum explants (parietal and visceral) were incubated in culture with implants used for abdominal wall reconstruction. Implants included Permacol (biological implant with chemical cross-linking); Biodesign and Strattice (biological implants without chemical cross-linking); Prolene (synthetic nonabsorbable); and Vicryl (synthetic absorbable). Control peritoneum samples were incubated without implant. Cytokine concentrations and corresponding gene expression were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, respectively. Further evaluation included assessment of tissue viability and implant-cytokine adsorption. RESULTS: Incubation of human peritoneal explants with Biodesign or Strattice was associated with a significant reduction in interleukin-6, interleukin-1ß, and tumour necrosis factor alpha protein and gene expression compared with control. These could not be explained by reduced cell viability or implant-cytokine adsorption. Incubation of explants in Biodesign-conditioned media displayed a similar effect to incubation of explants with Biodesign itself. CONCLUSIONS: Human peritoneal explants cultured with different mesh implant materials show an altered inflammatory cytokine response suggesting a tissue-specific response. Downregulation of key inflammatory cytokines by the peritoneum exposed to non-cross-linked biological implants may be mediated by the release of soluble factors from these implants inhibiting cytokine gene expression. This ex vivo human peritoneal system provides a novel preclinical model to investigate peritoneum-implant interactions.

LAP-VEGaS Practice Guidelines for Reporting of Educational Videos in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Joint Trainers and Trainees Consensus Statement.

OBJECTIVE: Consensus statement by an international multispecialty trainers and trainees expert committee on guidelines for reporting of educational videos in laparoscopic surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Instructive laparoscopy videos with appropriate exposition could be ideal for initial training in laparoscopic surgery, but there are no guidelines for video annotation or procedural educational and safety evaluation. METHODS: Delphi questionnaire of 45 statements prepared by a steering group and voted on over 2 rounds by committee members using an electronic survey tool. Committee selection design included representative surgical training experts worldwide across different laparoscopic specialties, including general surgery, lower and upper gastrointestinal surgery, gynecology and urology, and a proportion of aligned surgical trainees. RESULTS: All 33 committee members completed both the first and the second round of the Delphi questionnaire related to 7 major domains: Video Introduction/Authors' information; Patient Details; Procedure Description; Procedure Outcome; Associated Educational Content; Peer Review; and Use in Educational Curriculae. The 17 statements that did not reach at least 80% agreement after the first round were revised and returned into the second round. The committee consensus approved 37 statements to at least an 82% agreement. CONCLUSION: Consensus guidelines on how to report laparoscopic surgery videos for educational purposes have been developed. We anticipate that following our guidelines could help to improve video quality.These reporting guidelines may be useful as a standard for reviewing videos submitted for publication or conference presentation.