Tumor-derived cell-free DNA and circulating tumor cells: partners or rivals in metastasis formation?

The origin of metastases is a topic that has sparked controversy. Despite recent advancements, metastatic disease continues to pose challenges. The first admitted model of how metastases develop revolves around cells breaking away from the primary tumor, known as circulating tumor cells (CTCs). These cells survive while circulating through the bloodstream and subsequently establish themselves in secondary organs, a process often referred to as the "metastatic cascade". This intricate and dynamic process involves various steps, but all the mechanisms behind metastatic dissemination are not yet comprehensively elucidated. The "seed and soil" theory has shed light on the phenomenon of metastatic organotropism and the existence of pre-metastatic niches. It is now established that these niches can be primed by factors secreted by the primary tumor before the arrival of CTCs. In particular, exosomes have been identified as important contributors to this priming. Another concept then emerged, i.e. the "genometastasis" theory, which challenged all other postulates. It emphasizes the intriguing but promising role of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in metastasis formation through oncogenic formation of recipient cells. However, it cannot be ruled out that all these theories are intertwined. This review outlines the primary theories regarding the metastases formation that involve CTCs, and depicts cfDNA, a potential second player in the metastasis formation. We discuss the potential interrelationships between CTCs and cfDNA, and propose both in vitro and in vivo experimental strategies to explore all plausible theories.

ESR1 Gene Mutations and Liquid Biopsy in ER-Positive Breast Cancers: A Small Step Forward, a Giant Leap for Personalization of Endocrine Therapy?

The predominant forms of breast cancer (BC) are hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumors characterized by the expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) and/or progesterone receptors (PRs). Patients with HR+ tumors can benefit from endocrine therapy (ET). Three types of ET are approved for the treatment of HR+ BCs and include selective ER modulators, aromatase inhibitors, and selective ER downregulators. ET is the mainstay of adjuvant treatment in the early setting and the backbone of the first-line treatment in an advanced setting; however, the emergence of acquired resistance can lead to cancer recurrence or progression. The mechanisms of ET resistance are often related to the occurrence of mutations in the ESR1 gene, which encodes the ER-alpha protein. As ESR1 mutations are hardly detectable at diagnosis but are present in 30% to 40% of advanced BC (ABC) after treatment, the timeline of testing is crucial. To manage this resistance, ESR1 testing has recently been recommended; in ER+ HER2- ABC and circulating cell-free DNA, so-called liquid biopsy appears to be the most convenient way to detect the emergence of ESR1 mutations. Technically, several options exist, including Next Generation Sequencing and ultra-sensitive PCR-based techniques. In this context, personalization of ET through the surveillance of ESR1 mutations in the plasma of HR+ BC patients throughout the disease course represents an innovative way to improve the standard of care.

Validation of the Idylla GeneFusion assay to detect fusions and MET exon-skipping in non-small cell lung cancers.

Gene fusions and MET exon skipping drive oncogenesis in 8-9% and 3% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) respectively. Their detection are essential for the management of patients since they confer sensitivity to specific targeted therapies with significant clinical benefit over conventional chemotherapy. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) account for historical reference techniques however molecular-based technologies (RNA-based sequencing and RT-PCR) are emerging as alternative or complementary methods. Here, we evaluated the analytical performance of the fully-automated RT-PCR Idylla GeneFusion assay compared to reference methods using 35 fixed NSCLC samples. Idylla demonstrated overall agreement, sensitivity and specificity of 100% compared to RNASeq. Interestingly, it succeeded in retrieving 10 out of 11 samples with inconclusive results due to insufficient RNA quality for sequencing. Idylla showed an overall agreement, sensitivity and specificity of 90.32%, 91.67% and 89.47% compared to IHC/FISH respectively. Using commercial standards, the limit of detection of the Idylla system for the most frequent fusions and exon skipping ranges between 5 and 10 ng RNA input. These results support that the Idylla assay is a reliable and rapid option for the detection of these alterations, however a particular attention is needed for the interpretation of the expression imbalance.

DDB2 represses epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and sensitizes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells to chemotherapy.

Introduction: Damage specific DNA binding protein 2 (DDB2) is an UV-indiced DNA damage recognition factor and regulator of cancer development and progression. DDB2 has dual roles in several cancers, either as an oncogene or as a tumor suppressor gene, depending on cancer localization. Here, we investigated the unresolved role of DDB2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods: The expression level of DDB2 in pancreatic cancer tissues and its correlation with patient survival were evaluated using publicly available data. Two PDAC cell models with CRISPR-modified DDB2 expression were developed: DDB2 was repressed in DDB2-high T3M4 cells (T3M4 DDB2-low) while DDB2 was overexpressed in DDB2-low Capan-2 cells (Capan-2 DDB2-high). Immunofluorescence and qPCR assays were used to investigate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in these models. Migration and invasion properties of the cells were also determined using wound healing and transwell assays. Sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, irinotecan and gemcitabine were finally investigated by crystal violet assays. Results: DDB2 expression level was reduced in PDAC tissues compared to normal ones and DDB2-low levels were correlated to shorter disease-free survival in PDAC patients. DDB2 overexpression increased expression of E-cadherin epithelial marker, and decreased levels of N-cadherin mesenchymal marker. Conversely, we observed opposite effects in DDB2 repression and enhanced transcription of SNAIL, ZEB1, and TWIST EMT transcription factors (EMT-TFs). Study of migration and invasion revealed that these properties were negatively correlated with DDB2 expression in both cell models. DDB2 overexpression sensitized cells to 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and gemcitabine. Conclusion: Our study highlights the potential tumor suppressive effects of DDB2 on PDAC progression. DDB2 could thus represent a promising therapeutic target or biomarker for defining prognosis and predicting chemotherapy response in patients with PDAC.