Quality of goal setting in pediatric rehabilitation-A SMART approach.

BACKGROUND: Setting goals for treatment is often the core of the rehabilitation process. The quality of the set goals has however rarely been evaluated. The aims of this study were therefore to assess the quality of goals set in clinical practice of pediatric rehabilitation using SMART criteria (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Timed) and to assess if the goals were considered relevant from both a client perspective and expertise perspective. METHODS: In a retrospective multicase study, a total of 161 goals from 42 children with disabilities (cerebral palsy, n = 22; Down syndrome, n = 16; and developmental disability, n = 4) were assessed. The children were 1.5-5.5 years and had previously participated in goal-directed, activity-focused therapy at four pediatric rehabilitation centers. Collaborative goal setting had been used to define the desired treatment outcome. The quality of the goals was assessed using defined SMART criteria. RESULTS: Specific: All goals could be reliably linked to International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Children and Youth version chapters within the Activity/Participation domain. Measurable: A total of 75% of the goals were rated as having a well-defined scaling; in 20%, the scaling was less clear, and in 5%, a scaling could not be determined. Achievable: A total of 80% of the goals were attained. Relevant: All goals were set in collaboration with the family and could therefore be considered relevant from a client perspective. Relevancy judged from a professional perspective was strengthened by the fact that age, baseline status, and diagnosis had an influence on the choice of goals. Timed: All goals were set within a specific time frame. CONCLUSIONS: The goals set in clinical practice showed high quality with respect to the SMART criteria. The most difficult part was the construction of the goal attainment scale. The goals settled in clinical practice were considered relevant from both a client perspective and expertise perspective.

Goal-directed functional therapy: a longitudinal study on gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE: To investigate gross motor function and goal attainment in children with cerebral palsy before, during and after goal-directed functional therapy (GDT), to evaluate body functions, and explore relationships. METHOD: Prospective longitudinal intervention study. Twenty-two children, uni- or bilateral CP, 1-6 years (mean: 46 months SD: 16 months), classified in GMFCS and MACS level I-IV participated. Outcome measures were Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66), performed at seven occasions, Goal Attainment Scale, assessments of passive range of motion, spasticity and selective motor control (SMC). Baseline, the GDT-intervention and the follow-up period were 12 weeks each. RESULTS: Improvements were demonstrated in GMFM-66 during the intervention (mean difference: 5.07, CI: 3.8-6.4, p < 0.001). The baseline and follow-up assessments were stable. Evaluations of ankle dorsiflexion displayed small improvement (mean difference: 9 degrees , CI: 5-13, p < 0.001). Estimations of spasticity and SMC did not demonstrate significant changes. Goal attainment to the expected level or higher was achieved in 93/110 goals and further improved at the long-term follow-up (103/110). CONCLUSION: Gross motor function improved during GDT, and was maintained 12 weeks later. The goals were reached to a high extent, and the children gradually progressed towards their goals after the end of the intervention. The therapy did not induce any deterioration of body functions.

Exploring the relationship of family goals and scores on standardized measures in children with cerebral palsy, using the ICF-CY.

AIM: To explore the relationships of family selected goals and scores on standardized measures using the ICF-CY as a classification system. METHODS: Goal attainment scaling (GAS)-goals (n = 110) of 22 children, 11 girls, 1-6 years, bilateral or unilateral cerebral palsy, GMFCS I-IV and MACS I-IV were linked to the ICF-CY. The children had participated in goal-directed therapy during 12 weeks. GAS-goals, baseline assessments and change scores from PEDI and GMFM-66 were used to explore the relationships. RESULTS: All GAS-goals were classified in the Activity and Participation domain within ICF-CY. The number of GAS-goals correlated to baseline scores in PEDI and GMFM-66. The change scores in PEDI and GMFM-66 correlated to goal attainment in the Mobility and the Self-Care chapter. CONCLUSIONS: The family goals were reflected in standardized measures. The combined use of standardized and individual measures offers a possibility to explore the focus in therapy and the impact in children with cerebral palsy.