Podcast-Based Medical Education and Content Alignment with National Education Bodies.

Introduction: Despite the rapid expansion of medical education podcasts in the past decade, there are few efforts to characterize the landscape of available content for specific medical specialties. We trialed a method of rigorous characterization for the field of neurology. Materials and Methods: Using a censoring date of July 25, 2022, we queried the top three podcast platforms for neurology education podcasts: Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Google Podcasts. We characterized podcasts based on total number of episodes, episode release frequency, target audience, and affiliation type. We characterized individual episodes by length and primary content area as defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN). We compared content availability with content recommendations from these education bodies. Results: We identified 30 podcasts sharing 1772 episodes and totaling 46,287 min. The ACGME subspecialties most frequently covered were vascular neurology (5082 total min, 11%), neuroimmunology (4,406, 10%), and neuromuscular diseases (3,771, 8%). Subjects that were underrepresented included palliative neurology (89 min, 0.2%), neuropathology (95 min, 0.2%), and bioethics (171 min, 0.4%). The coverage of ABPN examination topics varied substantially from the content distribution for the examination. Discussion: The current landscape of neurology education podcasts features heterogeneous coverage of topics and varies considerably from recommended distribution of content by national education bodies. As podcasts have tremendous potential in supplementing neurology education, characterizing available content may help various stakeholders in the neurology education pipeline optimize the use of this e-learning modality. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01971-0.

COVID-19 and the brain.

Entering the third year into the pandemic, overwhelming evidence demonstrates that Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is a systemic illness, often with involvement of the central nervous system. Multiple mechanisms may underlie the development of neurologic manifestations of illness, including hypoxia, systemic illness, hypercoagulability, endothelial dysfunction, general critical illness, inflammatory response, and neurotropism of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Co-V2) virus. COVID-19 infection is associated with neurologic involvement in all stages; acute infection, subacute/post-infection, and growing evidence also suggests during a chronic phase, the post-acute sequalae of COVID-19 (PASC). With over 20,000 published articles on COVID and the brain at the time of writing, it is virtually impossible to present an unbiased comprehensive review of how SARS-Co-V2 impacts the nervous system. In this review, we will present an overview of common neurologic manifestations, in particular focusing on the cerebrovascular complications, and proposed pathophysiology.

Disparate healthcare access and telehealth-based hybrid consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic led to rapid expansion of telehealth services. This was speculated to improve healthcare access among underserved populations, including individuals unable to take time off work or arrange transportation. OBJECTIVE: We completed a quality improvement project to evaluate the feasibility of hybrid consultations that combined televisits and abbreviated in-person visits for neuromuscular referrals. METHODS: Using a censoring date of August 5, 2021, we reviewed all outpatient neuromuscular consultations from August 5, 2020 to February 5, 2021. For both hybrid and traditional in-person consultations, we reviewed no-show rates, completion rates of ordered diagnostic workup, and billing codes. For hybrid consultations only, we also reviewed intervals between initial televisit and subsequent examination and rates of video-enhanced versus audio-only televisits. RESULTS: During the study period, we completed 153 hybrid and 59 in-person new-patient consultations (no-show rates 9% and 27% respectively.) For hybrid consultations, 77% and 73% of laboratory and imaging studies were completed respectively, compared to 89% and 91% for in-person consultations. For hybrid visits, average RVUs (a marker for reimbursement) per consultation depended on whether audio-only televisits were billed as telephone calls or E/M visits per insurance payer rules, while video-enhanced televisits were uniformly billed as E/M visits. This resulted in average RVUs between 2.09 and 2.26, compared to 2.30 for in-person consultations. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth-based hybrid neuromuscular consultations are feasible with minor caveats. However, the future of telehealth may be restricted by decreasing reimbursement rates particularly for audio-only televisits, limiting its potential to improve healthcare access.

Neurological manifestations of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis: a focus on diagnostic delays.

BACKGROUND: The recent availability of disease-modifying therapies for hereditary transthyretin amyloid (ATTRv) amyloidosis warrants urgency for earlier diagnosis and timely identification of active disease state among genetic carriers. METHODS: We reviewed clinical neurological data of all patients with ATTRv amyloidosis with initial visits at our amyloidosis centre between January 2016 and December 2018. We abstracted the signs and symptoms of neurological manifestations, as well as rates and patterns of diagnostic testing. RESULTS: Of 92 patients with 19 different transthyretin (TTR) mutations, 66 and 36% had symptoms attributed to large-fibre and small-fibre neuropathy, respectively, compared to 75 and 66% with corresponding examination findings. Thirty-six patients with V122I ATTR mutation had asymptomatic polyneuropathy identified on neurological examination, eight without concurrent cardiac disease. Seventy-three percent of patients had symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), while 26% had dysautonomia. The average delays between the onset of symptoms of large fibre neuropathy (LFN) or CTS to ATTRv amyloidosis diagnosis were 2.9 and 6.7 years, respectively. DISCUSSION: Our study found higher rates of polyneuropathy by examination than patient-reported symptoms, especially among those with V122I TTR amyloidosis, signalling asymptomatic polyneuropathy. Our findings suggest the need for routine neurological examinations and other testing for genetic carriers to achieve earlier identification of active disease state.