Do adolescents with extreme obesity differ according to previous treatment seeking behavior? The Youth with Extreme obesity Study (YES) cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Adolescent extreme obesity is associated with somatic and psychiatric comorbidity, low quality of life, and social dysfunction. Nevertheless, few adolescents seek obesity treatment, thus many may elope appropriate care. We examine whether previous treatment seeking relates to disease burden, and whether previously non-treatment seeking adolescents accept diagnostic and therapeutic offers. This information is important to inform intervention strategies. METHODS: The Youth with Extreme obesity Study (YES) is a prospective, multicenter cohort study. We developed a novel recruitment strategy to span medical and vocational ascertainment settings and directly compare previously treatment seeking and non-treatment seeking youth. Participants aged 14-24 years; BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 were enrolled at four medical- and one job centers. We present comorbidity and psycho-social baseline data by sex, obesity WHO grade I-III, and treatment-seeking status, defined as self-reported previous participation in a weight-loss program. RESULTS: Of 431 participants, 47% were male; mean age 16.6 (standard deviation 2.3) years, BMI 39.2 (7.5) kg/m2. Somatic comorbidity increased with obesity grade, p < 0.05: hypertension (42, 55, 64%), dyslipidemia (28, 24, 37%,), dysglycemia (9, 19, 20%,), elevated transaminases (15, 26, 30%). Quality of life (EQ5 D) decreased (74, 71, 70). Rates of psychiatric disorders were stable: depression 11%, attention deficit disorder 6%, substance use disorder 2%, self-injurious behavior 5%, suicide attempt 3%. Only 63% (56, 64, 69%) reported previous treatment seeking. Acceptance of the diagnostic (89%) or therapeutic (28%) program, medical or psychosocial situation did not differ by treatment seeking status. Acceptance of the therapeutic program was generally low, but high at the job center (92%). CONCLUSION: Irrespective of previous treatment seeking, adolescent extreme obesity was associated with high comorbidity and psychosocial burden. Acceptance of the diagnostic program overall and the therapeutic program at the job center were high. This underscores the need of innovative, accessible programs beyond the currently offered care.

A Structured, Manual-Based Low-Level Intervention vs. Treatment as Usual Evaluated in a Randomized Controlled Trial for Adolescents with Extreme Obesity - the STEREO Trial.

BACKGROUND: To compare efficacy and safety of a manual-based low-level psychological intervention with treatment as usual (weight loss treatment). METHODS: A two-armed randomized controlled trial without blinding and computer-based stratified block randomization included adolescents and young adults (14.0-24.9 years) with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 at five German university hospitals. Primary outcomes were adherence (participation rate ≥ 5/6 sessions) and quality of life (DISABKIDS-37) 6 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes included depression, self-esteem, and perceived stress scores. RESULTS: Of 397 screened adolescents, 119 (mean BMI 40.4 ± 7.0 kg/m2, 49.6% female) were randomized to the manual-based low-level intervention (n = 59) or treatment as usual (n = 60). We observed no group difference for adherence (absolute risk reduction 0.4%, 95% CI -14.7% to 15.5%; p = 1.0) or health-related quality of life (score difference 8.1, 95% CI -2.1 to 18.3; p = 0.11). Among all secondary outcomes, we detected explorative evidence for an effect on the DISABKIDS-37 'social exclusion' subscale (score difference 15.5; 95% CI 1.6-29.4; p = 0.03). 18/19 adverse events occurred in 26 participants, none were classified as serious. CONCLUSION: Adherence to a coping-oriented intervention was comparable to weight loss treatment, although it was weak in both interventions. Psychological interventions may help to overcome social isolation; further confirmation is required.

Heterodimerization of hypothalamic G-protein-coupled receptors involved in weight regulation.

BACKGROUND: Melanocortin 3 and 4 receptors (MC3R and MC4R) are known to play an essential role in hypothalamic weight regulation. In addition to these two G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), a huge number of other GPCRs are expressed in hypothalamic regions, and some of them are involved in weight regulation. So far, homodimerization was shown for a few of these receptors. Heterodimerization of unrelated receptors may have profound functional consequence but heterodimerization of GPCRs involved in weight regulation was not reported yet. METHODS: A selective number of hypothalamically expressed GPCRs were cloned into a eukaryotic expression vector. Cell surface expression was demonstrated by an ELISA approach. Subcellular distribution was investigated by confocal laser microscopy. A sandwich ELISA and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) were used to determine protein-protein interaction. RESULTS: Via sandwich ELISA and FRET approach we could demonstrate a robust interaction of the MC4R with GPR7, both of which are expressed in the hypothalamic nucleus paraventricularis. Moreover, we determined a strong interaction of MC3R with the growth hormone secretagogue receptor expressed in the nucleus arcuatus. CONCLUSION: Identification GPCR heterodimerization adds to the understanding of the complexity of weight regulation and may provide important information to develop therapeutic strategies to treat obesity.