RESUMO
Human African trypanosomiasis is a life-threatening parasitic infection transmitted by the tsetse fly in sub-Saharan Africa. The most common form is caused by Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, with humans as the main reservoir. Diagnosis in the field requires microscopic examination performed by specifically trained personnel. After over two decades of sustained efforts, the incidence of the disease is strongly declining, and some historically endemic countries are no longer detecting cases. The World Health Organization (WHO) has targeted the elimination of transmission of gambiense human African trypanosomiasis by 2030, defined as zero autochthonous cases for at least five consecutive years. Endemic countries reaching this goal must maintain dedicated surveillance to detect re-emergence or re-introduction. With this new agenda, new tools are needed for verification of the absence of transmission. WHO has therefore developed a target product profile calling for development of a method for population-level cross-cutting surveillance of T. b. gambiense transmission. The method needs to be performed in national or sub-national reference laboratories, and to test in parallel numerous samples shipped from remote rural areas. Among other characteristics the product profile specifies: (i) a simple specimen collection procedure; (ii) no cold-chain requirement to transfer specimens to reference laboratories; (iii) high sensitivity and specificity; (iv) high-throughput, substantially automatized; (v) low cost per specimen, when analysed in large batches; and (vi) applicable also in animals.
La trypanosomiase humaine africaine est une infection parasitaire potentiellement mortelle transmise par la mouche tsé-tsé en Afrique subsaharienne. La forme la plus répandue est causée par Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, les humains constituant son principal réservoir. Établir un diagnostic sur le terrain nécessite un examen microscopique réalisé par du personnel formé à cet effet. Après plus de deux décennies d'efforts soutenus, l'incidence de la maladie diminue fortement et quelques pays historiquement endémiques ne découvrent plus aucun cas. L'objectif de l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS) est d'éliminer la transmission de la trypanosomiase humaine africaine à T. b. gambiense d'ici 2030, ce qui correspond à zéro cas autochtone pendant au moins cinq années consécutives. Les pays endémiques qui atteignent cet objectif doivent maintenir une surveillance spécifique afin de détecter toute réémergence ou réintroduction. Ce nouveau programme doit s'accompagner de nouveaux outils servant à vérifier l'absence de transmission. L'OMS a donc élaboré un profil de produit cible pour le développement d'un procédé de surveillance transversale de la transmission de T. b. gambiense à l'échelle de la population. Ce procédé doit être effectué dans des laboratoires de référence nationaux ou infranationaux et tester simultanément de nombreux échantillons envoyés depuis des régions rurales isolées. Ce profil de produit comporte notamment les caractéristiques suivantes: (i) une procédure simple de collecte d'échantillons; (ii) aucune exigence concernant le respect de la chaîne du froid lors du transfert des échantillons vers les laboratoires de référence; (iii) un niveau élevé de sensibilité et de spécificité; (iv) un haut débit, en grande partie automatisé; (v) de faibles coûts par échantillon lors d'analyses en masse; et enfin, (vi) applicable aux animaux également.
La tripanosomiasis humana africana es una infección parasitaria potencialmente mortal transmitida por la mosca tsetsé en el África Subsahariana. El principal reservorio es el ser humano, y la forma más común está causada por Trypanosoma brucei gambiense. El diagnóstico práctico requiere un examen microscópico a cargo de personal con formación específica. Tras más de dos décadas de esfuerzos sostenidos, la incidencia de la enfermedad está disminuyendo considerablemente, y en algunos países históricamente endémicos ya no se detectan casos. La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) se ha fijado como objetivo la eliminación de la transmisión de la tripanosomiasis africana humana gambiense para 2030, es decir, cero casos autóctonos durante al menos cinco años consecutivos. Los países endémicos que alcancen este objetivo deben mantener una vigilancia permanente para detectar la reaparición o reintroducción de la enfermedad. Con esta agenda nueva, se necesitan herramientas nuevas para verificar la ausencia de transmisión. Por consiguiente, la OMS ha elaborado un perfil de producto objetivo en el que se pide el desarrollo de un método para la vigilancia transversal a nivel de población sobre la transmisión de T. b. gambiense. El método debe realizarse en laboratorios de referencia nacionales o subnacionales y analizar en paralelo numerosas muestras enviadas desde regiones rurales remotas. Entre otras características, el perfil del producto detalla: (i) un procedimiento sencillo de recogida de muestras; (ii) ningún requisito de cadena de frío para transferir las muestras a los laboratorios de referencia; (iii) alta sensibilidad y especificidad; (iv) alto rendimiento, sustancialmente automatizado; (v) bajo coste por muestra, cuando se analizan en grandes lotes; y (vi) aplicable también en animales.
Assuntos
Tripanossomíase Africana , Moscas Tsé-Tsé , Animais , Humanos , Trypanosoma brucei gambiense , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Tripanossomíase Africana/epidemiologia , Tripanossomíase Africana/parasitologia , Moscas Tsé-Tsé/parasitologia , África Subsaariana , IncidênciaRESUMO
Rhodesiense human African trypanosomiasis is a lethal parasitic infection caused by Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense and transmitted by tsetse flies in eastern and southern Africa. It accounts for around 5% of all cases of human African trypanosomiasis. Currently, there is no simple serological test for rhodesiense human African trypanosomiasis and diagnosis relies on microscopic confirmation of trypanosomes in samples of blood or other tissues. The availability of a simple and accurate diagnostic test would aid the control, surveillance and treatment of the disease. A subcommittee of the World Health Organization's Neglected Tropical Diseases Diagnostics Technical Advisory Group has developed a target product profile for a diagnostic tool to identify T. b. rhodesiense infection. The optimum tool would have a sensitivity and specificity above 99% for detecting T. b. rhodesiense, but be simple enough for use by minimally trained health-care workers in unsophisticated peripheral health facilities or mobile teams in villages. The test should yield a qualitative result that can be easily observed and can be used to determine treatment. An antigen test would be preferable, with blood collected by finger-prick. Ideally, there should be no need for a cold chain, instrumentation or precision liquid handling. The test should be usable between 10 °C and 40 °C and between 10% and 88% relative humidity. Basic training should take under 2 hours and the test should involve fewer than five steps. The unit cost should be less than 1 United States dollar.
La trypanosomiase humaine africaine à T. b. rhodesiense est une infection parasitaire mortelle causée par Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense et transmise par les mouches tsé-tsé en Afrique orientale et australe. Elle représente environ 5% de l'ensemble des cas de trypanosomiase humaine africaine. À l'heure actuelle, il n'existe aucun test sérologique simple pour l'infection à T. b. rhodesiense et le diagnostic repose sur la confirmation microscopique de la présence de trypanosomes dans des échantillons de sang ou d'autres tissus. Fournir un test de diagnostic simple et précis favoriserait la lutte, la surveillance et la prise en charge de la maladie. Un sous-comité du Groupe consultatif technique sur les produits de diagnostic des maladies tropicales négligées de l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé a donc élaboré un profil de produit cible pour un outil visant à détecter une infection par T. b. rhodesiense. L'outil le plus adapté présenterait un niveau de sensibilité et de spécificité supérieur à 99% pour la détection de T. b. rhodesiense, tout en étant à la portée de professionnels de la santé ayant reçu une formation sommaire, tant dans des structures de santé périphériques basiques qu'au sein d'équipes mobiles dans les villages. Cet outil doit fournir un résultat fiable, facile à interpréter, qui peut servir à établir un traitement. Un test antigénique serait préférable, avec prélèvement de l'échantillon sanguin par le biais d'une piqûre au bout du doigt. Idéalement, l'outil ne doit pas être thermosensible, ni nécessiter un équipement spécifique ou une manipulation de liquides délicate. Le test doit pouvoir être utilisé à une température comprise entre 10 °C et 40 °C, ainsi que dans une humidité relative de 10% à 88%. La formation requise pour son utilisation doit durer moins de deux heures et le test doit être effectué en moins de cinq étapes, Enfin, son coût unitaire doit être inférieur à un dollar américain.
La tripanosomiasis humana africana rhodesiense es una infección letal parasitaria causada por el Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense, y es transmitida por la mosca tse-tsé en África oriental y meridional. Representa aproximadamente el 5% de todos los casos de tripanosomiasis humana africana. Actualmente, no existe ninguna prueba serológica simple para la tripanosomiasis humana africana rhodesiense, y el diagnóstico se basa en la confirmación microscópica de tripanosomas existentes en muestras de sangre u otros tejidos. Una prueba diagnóstica sencilla y precisa ayudaría a controlar, vigilar y tratar la enfermedad. Un subcomité del Grupo Asesor Técnico de Diagnóstico de Enfermedades Tropicales Desatendidas de la Organización Mundial de la Salud ha creado un perfil de producto objetivo para una herramienta de diagnóstico que permita identificar la infección T. b. rhodesiense. La herramienta óptima tendría una sensibilidad y una especificidad superiores al 99% para detectar la T. b. rhodesiense y, al ser lo suficientemente sencilla, podrían utilizarla trabajadores sanitarios mínimamente formados, en centros sanitarios periféricos no sofisticados, o bien equipos móviles. La prueba debe arrojar un resultado cualitativo de fácil lectura y que pueda utilizarse para determinar el tratamiento. Sería preferible una prueba de antígenos, con sangre extraída mediante punción digital. Idealmente, no debería ser necesaria la cadena de frío, la instrumentación ni la manipulación de líquidos de precisión. La prueba debe poder utilizarse entre 10 °C y 40 °C, con una humedad relativa de entre el 10% y el 88%. La instrucción básica debe llevar menos de 2 horas y la prueba debe incluir menos de cinco pasos. El coste de la unidad debe ser inferior a 1 dólar estadounidense.
Assuntos
Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense , Tripanossomíase Africana , Animais , Humanos , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Tripanossomíase Africana/epidemiologia , Tripanossomíase Africana/parasitologia , África Austral , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Testes Diagnósticos de RotinaRESUMO
Having caused devastating epidemics during the 20th century, the incidence of life-threatening human African trypanosomiasis has fallen to historically low levels as a result of sustained and coordinated efforts over the past 20 years. Humans are the main reservoir of one of the two pathogenic trypanosome subspecies, Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, found in western and central Africa. The expected advent of a safe and easy-to-use treatment to be given to seropositive but microscopically unconfirmed individuals would lead to further depletion; in the meantime, the presence of T. b. gambiense infection in the community must be monitored to allow the control strategy to be adapted and the elimination status to be assessed. The World Health Organization has therefore developed a target product profile that describes the optimal and minimal characteristics of an individual laboratory-based test to assess T. b. gambiense infection in low-prevalence settings. Development of the target product profile involved the formation of a Neglected Tropical Diseases Diagnostics Technical Advisory Group and a subgroup on human African trypanosomiasis diagnostic innovation needs, and an analysis of the available products and development pipeline. According to the product profile, the test should ideally: (i) require a minimally invasive or non-invasive specimen, collectable at peripheral facilities by minimally trained health workers; (ii) demonstrate good sensitivity and high specificity; (iii) have a stability of samples allowing transfer to reference laboratories preferably without cold chain; (iv) be stable over a wide range of environmental conditions for more than 2 years; and (v) after marketing, be available at low cost for at least 7 years.
Après avoir causé des épidémies dévastatrices au cours du 20e siècle, la trypanosomiase humaine africaine, potentiellement mortelle, a vu son incidence chuter à un niveau historiquement bas grâce aux efforts conjoints et soutenus déployés ces deux dernières décennies. Les humains constituent le principal réservoir de l'une des deux sous-espèces pathogéniques de trypanosome, Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, que l'on retrouve en Afrique occidentale et centrale. L'arrivée d'un traitement sûr et simple d'utilisation, qui serait administré aux individus séropositifs mais sans confirmation microscopique, devrait entraîner une nouvelle diminution; dans l'intervalle, la présence d'une infection à T. b. gambiense au sein de la communauté doit être surveillée afin de pouvoir adapter la stratégie de lutte et évaluer le statut d'élimination. Par conséquent, l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé a élaboré un profil de produit cible qui détaille les caractéristiques minimales et optimales d'un test individuel en laboratoire visant à confirmer l'infection à T. b. gambiense dans les régions à faible prévalence. La mise au point de ce profil a entraîné la formation d'un Groupe consultatif technique sur le diagnostic des maladies tropicales négligées et d'un sous-groupe consacré aux besoins en matière d'innovation diagnostique pour la trypanosomiase humaine africaine, qui a conduit une analyse des produits existants et des projets de développement. Selon le profil de produit, le test devrait idéalement: (i) nécessiter un prélèvement d'échantillon peu ou non invasif, pouvant être effectué dans des structures périphériques par des professionnels de la santé ayant reçu une formation sommaire; (ii) faire preuve d'un bon niveau de sensibilité et d'un niveau élevé de spécificité; (iii) avoir une stabilité des échantillons permettant le transfert vers des laboratoires de référence, de préférence sans chaîne de froid; (iv) rester stable dans un large éventail de conditions environnementales pendant plus de deux ans; et enfin, (v) après commercialisation, être disponible à bas coût pendant au moins sept ans.
Tras haber causado epidemias devastadoras durante el siglo XX, la incidencia de la tripanosomiasis humana africana potencialmente mortal ha descendido a niveles históricamente bajos gracias a los esfuerzos sostenidos y coordinados de los últimos 20 años. El ser humano es el principal reservorio de una de las dos subespecies patógenas del tripanosoma, Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, presente en África Occidental y Central. La prevista disponibilidad de un tratamiento seguro y fácil de administrar a personas seropositivas, pero no confirmadas al microscopio, permitiría una mayor eliminación; mientras tanto, se debe vigilar la presencia de la infección por T. b. gambiense en la comunidad para poder adaptar la estrategia de control y evaluar el estado de eliminación. Por consiguiente, la Organización Mundial de la Salud ha elaborado un perfil de producto objetivo que describe las características óptimas y mínimas de una prueba de laboratorio individual para evaluar la infección por T. b. gambiense en regiones de baja prevalencia. El desarrollo del perfil de producto objetivo implicó la formación de un Grupo de Asesoramiento Técnico sobre Diagnóstico de Enfermedades Tropicales Desatendidas y un subgrupo sobre las necesidades de innovación en el diagnóstico de la tripanosomiasis humana africana, así como un análisis de los productos disponibles y en desarrollo. Según el perfil objetivo, lo ideal sería que la prueba: (i) requiriera una muestra mínimamente invasiva o no invasiva, que pudiera ser recogida en centros periféricos por personal sanitario con una capacitación mínima; (ii) demostrara una buena sensibilidad y alta especificidad; (iii) tuviera una estabilidad de las muestras que permita su transferencia a laboratorios de referencia, preferiblemente sin cadena de frío; (iv) fuera estable en un amplio rango de condiciones ambientales durante más de 2 años; y (v) tras su comercialización, estuviera disponible a bajo coste durante al menos 7 años.
Assuntos
Trypanosoma brucei gambiense , Tripanossomíase Africana , Animais , Humanos , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Tripanossomíase Africana/epidemiologia , Prevalência , IncidênciaRESUMO
Human African trypanosomiasis is a life-threatening parasitic infection endemic to sub-Saharan Africa. Around 95% of cases are due to Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, found in western and central Africa. Clinical signs and symptoms are nonspecific, current diagnostic tests are not sufficiently accurate, and parasitological confirmation of infection requires microscopic examination of body fluids and specialized techniques for concentrating parasites. Moreover, current treatment is not recommended on the basis of suspicion alone because it is not sufficiently safe. The availability of a simple and accurate diagnostic test to identify individuals harbouring parasites would widen treatment and help decrease disease prevalence. A subcommittee of the World Health Organization's Neglected Tropical Diseases Diagnostics Technical Advisory Group has developed a target product profile for a diagnostic tool to identify T. b. gambiense infection. This tool should have a high sensitivity for detecting T. b. gambiense but be simple enough to use in rural Africa. Ideally, the tool could be applied by any minimally trained individual in an unsophisticated peripheral health facility, or a mobile team in a village with little infrastructure. The test should be able to function under hot and humid conditions. Basic training should take under 2 hours and the test should involve fewer than five steps. There should be no need for instrumentation or precision liquid handling. The test should yield a qualitative result in under 20 minutes that can be easily observed, and one test should be sufficient for determining treatment. A unit cost below 1 United States dollar (US$) would enable mass screening.
La trypanosomiase humaine africaine est une infection parasitaire potentiellement mortelle endémique en Afrique subsaharienne. Dans près de 95% des cas, elle est causée par Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, que l'on trouve en Afrique occidentale et centrale. Les symptômes et signes cliniques sont aspécifiques, les tests de diagnostic existants ne sont pas assez précis et la confirmation parasitologique de l'infection nécessite un examen microscopique des liquides corporels ainsi que des techniques spécialisées pour concentrer les parasites. En outre, il n'est pas recommandé d'entamer le traitement actuel sur la base d'une simple suspicion car celui-ci n'est pas suffisamment sûr. Fournir un test de diagnostic simple et précis permettant d'identifier les individus porteurs de parasites contribuerait à élargir le traitement et à une diminution de la prévalence de la maladie. Un sous-comité du Groupe consultatif technique sur les produits de diagnostic des maladies tropicales négligées de l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé a élaboré un profil de produit cible pour un outil visant à détecter une infection par T. b. gambiense. Cet outil doit être suffisamment sensible pour déceler la présence de T. b. gambiense mais suffisamment simple pour être utilisé dans les régions rurales du continent. Idéalement, il doit pouvoir être employé par toute personne ayant reçu une formation sommaire, tant dans des structures de santé périphériques basiques qu'au sein d'une équipe mobile dans un village doté d'infrastructures restreintes. Par ailleurs, il doit fonctionner dans une atmosphère chaude et humide. La formation requise pour son utilisation doit durer moins de deux heures et le test doit être effectué en moins de cinq étapes, sans exiger d'équipement spécifique ni de manipulation délicate. Cet outil doit fournir un résultat fiable en moins de 20 minutes, facile à interpréter, et un seul test doit suffire à établir un traitement. Enfin, afin d'organiser un dépistage de masse, son coût unitaire ne doit pas dépasser un dollar américain.
La tripanosomiasis humana africana es una infección parasitaria potencialmente mortal endémica del África Subsahariana. Alrededor del 95% de los casos se deben al Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, presente en África Occidental y Central. Los signos y síntomas clínicos no son específicos, las pruebas diagnósticas actuales no son suficientemente precisas y la confirmación parasitológica de la infección requiere el examen microscópico de los fluidos corporales y técnicas especializadas de concentración de parásitos. Además, el tratamiento actual no se recomienda a partir de la sola sospecha porque no es suficientemente seguro. La disponibilidad de una prueba diagnóstica sencilla y precisa para identificar a las personas con parásitos ampliaría el tratamiento y ayudaría a disminuir la prevalencia de la enfermedad. Un subcomité del Grupo de Asesoramiento Técnico sobre Diagnóstico de Enfermedades Tropicales Desatendidas de la Organización Mundial de la Salud ha desarrollado un perfil de producto objetivo para una herramienta de diagnóstico destinada a identificar la infección por T. b. gambiense. Esta herramienta debe tener una alta sensibilidad para detectar T. b. gambiense, pero ser lo suficientemente sencilla para su uso en las regiones rurales de África. Lo ideal sería que la herramienta pudiera ser aplicada por cualquier persona mínimamente capacitada en un centro sanitario periférico poco sofisticado o por un equipo móvil en un pueblo con poca infraestructura. La prueba debería funcionar en condiciones de calor y humedad. La formación básica debe durar menos de 2 horas y la prueba debe constar de menos de cinco pasos. No debe necesitarse instrumentación ni manipulación precisa de líquidos. La prueba debe dar un resultado cualitativo en menos de 20 minutos que pueda observarse fácilmente y debe bastar una prueba para determinar el tratamiento. Su coste unitario, inferior a un dólar estadounidense, permitiría un cribado masivo.
Assuntos
Líquidos Corporais , Tripanossomíase Africana , Animais , Humanos , Trypanosoma brucei gambiense , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Tripanossomíase Africana/tratamento farmacológico , Tripanossomíase Africana/epidemiologia , África , Testes Diagnósticos de RotinaRESUMO
The Loopamp™ Trypanosoma brucei Detection Kit is the latest addition of molecular techniques for amplification of parasite DNA in biological materials. We have evaluated the kit on a number of preparations of crude templates from the blood of experimentally infected rodents, to provide the best option that can be extrapolated to resource-poor healthcare settings where human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) is endemic. We used rodent blood spiked with T. b. brucei at various serial dilutions to test whole blood, that was concentrated by differential lysis of red blood cells (RBCs) followed by centrifugation, or buffy coat samples recovered from whole blood after centrifugation. We also tested crude templates produced after lysis of blood with sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) or Triton X, and storage for up to 28 days at room temperature after spotting on filter paper or glass slides. Concentration by RBC lysis provided the highest analytical sensitivity (0.04 trypanosomes/ml), closely followed by the much cheaper SDS at 0.1 trypanosomes/ml sensitivity. We also monitored the persistence of DNA in lysed blood dried onto filter papers by testing them weekly with the LAMP kit and by PCR for the 177bp repeats characteristic of the T. brucei subspecies. At a concentration of 100 trypanosomes/ml, signals indicating presence of parasite DNA could be detected up to week 10, while at 10 trypanosomes/ml detection of signals was limited to week 4. Thus, an ordinary filter paper provides a convenient medium for preservation of trypanosome DNA at ambient conditions for use with the LAMP kit in the short run. Lysis of samples with SDS enhanced sensitivity by facilitating parasite DNA availability. This opens the avenue to incorporate LAMP in routine algorithms for HAT diagnosis and surveillance, as well as for monitoring elimination programs.
RESUMO
Strategies to detect Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) cases rely on serological screening of populations exposed to trypanosomes. In Guinea, mass medical screening surveys performed with the Card Agglutination Test for Trypanosomiasis have been progressively replaced by door-to-door approaches using Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) since 2016. However, RDTs availability represents a major concern and medical teams must often adapt, even in the absence of prior RDT performance evaluation. For the last 5 years, the Guinean HAT National Control Program had to combine three different RDTs according to their availability and price: the SD Bioline HAT (not available anymore), the HAT Sero-K-SeT (most expensive), and recently the Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 (limited field evaluation). Here, we assess the performance of these RDTs, alone or in different combinations, through the analysis of both prospective and retrospective data. A parallel assessment showed a higher positivity rate of Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 (6.0%, n = 2,250) as compared to HAT Sero-K-SeT (1.9%), with a combined positive predictive value (PPV) of 20.0%. However, an evaluation of Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 alone revealed a low PPV of 3.9% (n = 6,930) which was surpassed when using Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 in first line and HAT Sero-K-SeT as a secondary test before confirmation, with a combined PPV reaching 44.4%. A retrospective evaluation of all 3 RDTs was then conducted on 189 plasma samples from the HAT-NCP biobank, confirming the higher sensitivity (94.0% [85.6-97.7%]) and lower specificity (83.6% [76.0-89.1%]) of Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 as compared to SD Bioline HAT (Se 64.2% [52.2-74.6%]-Sp 98.4% [94.2-99.5%]) and HAT Sero-K-SeT (Se 88.1% [78.2-93.8%]-Sp 98.4% [94.2-99.5%]). A comparison of Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 and malaria-RDT positivity rates on 479 subjects living in HAT-free malaria-endemic areas further revealed that a significantly higher proportion of subjects positive in Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 were also positive in malaria-RDT, suggesting a possible cross-reaction of Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 with malaria-related biological factors in about 10% of malaria cases. This would explain, at least in part, the limited specificity of Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0. Overall, Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 seems suitable as first line RDT in combination with a second HAT RDT to prevent confirmatory lab overload and loss of suspects during referral for confirmation. A state-of-the-art prospective comparative study is further required for comparing all current and future HAT RDTs to propose an optimal combination of RDTs for door-to-door active screening.
Assuntos
Malária , Tripanossomíase Africana , Humanos , Animais , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Papua Nova Guiné , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Background - Rationale: Tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) are obligate bloodfeeders that occur exclusively in Sub-Saharan Africa, where they are the vectors of trypanosomes causing HAT (human African trypanosomiasis) and AAT (African animal trypanosomiasis). In Chad, tsetse flies occur only in the most southern part of the country because of its favorable bioclimatic conditions. However, despite the importance of HAT and AAT in this country, very little is known about the current tsetse distribution, in particular its northern limit, which is of key importance for the surveillance of these diseases. Material and methods - Results: A total of 217 biconical traps were deployed in 2021 and 2022 from the West to the East around the formerly known northern limit, resulting in 1,024 tsetse caught belonging to three different taxa: Glossina morsitans submorsitans (57%), G. tachinoides (39%) and G. fuscipes fuscipes (4%). In addition to the information gathered on the presence/absence of each tsetse taxon, we show a strong North-South shift of the northen tsetse distribution limit as compared to the previous works from 1966 to 1996, and a growing spatial fragmentation in more and more discrete pockets of tsetse presence. Discussion - Conclusion: This North-South shift of the northern tsetse distribution limit in Chad is the likely consequence of the combined effect of severe draughts that affected the country, and increasing human pressure on land. This update of the tsetse northern limit will be of help to the national programmes in charge of HAT and AAT.
Assuntos
Moscas Tsé-Tsé , Chade/epidemiologia , Animais , Distribuição Animal , Mudança Climática , Humanos , Insetos Vetores/parasitologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Serological screening tests play a crucial role to diagnose gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT). Presently, they preselect individuals for microscopic confirmation, but in future "screen and treat" strategies they will identify individuals for treatment. Variability in reported specificities, the development of new rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) and the hypothesis that malaria infection may decrease RDT specificity led us to evaluate the specificity of 5 gHAT screening tests. METHODS: During active screening, venous blood samples from 1095 individuals from Côte d'Ivoire and Guinea were tested consecutively with commercial (CATT, HAT Sero-K-SeT, Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0) and prototype (DCN HAT RDT, HAT Sero-K-SeT 2.0) gHAT screening tests and with a malaria RDT. Individuals with ≥ 1 positive gHAT screening test underwent microscopy and further immunological (trypanolysis with T.b. gambiense LiTat 1.3, 1.5 and 1.6; indirect ELISA/T.b. gambiense; T.b. gambiense inhibition ELISA with T.b. gambiense LiTat 1.3 and 1.5 VSG) and molecular reference laboratory tests (PCR TBRN3, 18S and TgsGP; SHERLOCK 18S Tids, 7SL Zoon, and TgsGP; Trypanozoon S2-RT-qPCR 18S2, 177T, GPI-PLC and TgsGP in multiplex; RT-qPCR DT8, DT9 and TgsGP in multiplex). Microscopic trypanosome detection confirmed gHAT, while other individuals were considered gHAT free. Differences in fractions between groups were assessed by Chi square and differences in specificity between 2 tests on the same individuals by McNemar. RESULTS: One gHAT case was diagnosed. Overall test specificities (n = 1094) were: CATT 98.9% (95% CI: 98.1-99.4%); HAT Sero-K-SeT 86.7% (95% CI: 84.5-88.5%); Bioline HAT 2.0 82.1% (95% CI: 79.7-84.2%); DCN HAT RDT 78.2% (95% CI: 75.7-80.6%); and HAT Sero-K-SeT 2.0 78.4% (95% CI: 75.9-80.8%). In malaria positives, gHAT screening tests appeared less specific, but the difference was significant only in Guinea for Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 (P = 0.03) and HAT Sero-K-Set 2.0 (P = 0.0006). The specificities of immunological and molecular laboratory tests in gHAT seropositives were 98.7-100% (n = 399) and 93.0-100% (n = 302), respectively. Among 44 reference laboratory test positives, only the confirmed gHAT patient and one screening test seropositive combined immunological and molecular reference laboratory test positivity. CONCLUSIONS: Although a minor effect of malaria cannot be excluded, gHAT RDT specificities are far below the 95% minimal specificity stipulated by the WHO target product profile for a simple diagnostic tool to identify individuals eligible for treatment. Unless specificity is improved, an RDT-based "screen and treat" strategy would result in massive overtreatment. In view of their inconsistent results, additional comparative evaluations of the diagnostic performance of reference laboratory tests are indicated for better identifying, among screening test positives, those at increased suspicion for gHAT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered under NCT05466630 in clinicaltrials.gov on July 15 2022.
Assuntos
Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Trypanosoma brucei gambiense , Tripanossomíase Africana , Humanos , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Tripanossomíase Africana/sangue , Côte d'Ivoire , Trypanosoma brucei gambiense/imunologia , Trypanosoma brucei gambiense/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Guiné , Estudos Prospectivos , Masculino , Adolescente , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Criança , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Idoso , Pré-Escolar , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/sangueRESUMO
Human African trypanosomiasis, caused by the gambiense subspecies of Trypanosoma brucei (gHAT), is a deadly parasitic disease transmitted by tsetse. Partners worldwide have stepped up efforts to eliminate the disease, and the Chadian government has focused on the previously high-prevalence setting of Mandoul. In this study, we evaluate the economic efficiency of the intensified strategy that was put in place in 2014 aimed at interrupting the transmission of gHAT, and we make recommendations on the best way forward based on both epidemiological projections and cost-effectiveness. In our analysis, we use a dynamic transmission model fit to epidemiological data from Mandoul to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of combinations of active screening, improved passive screening (defined as an expansion of the number of health posts capable of screening for gHAT), and vector control activities (the deployment of Tiny Targets to control the tsetse vector). For cost-effectiveness analyses, our primary outcome is disease burden, denominated in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and costs, denominated in 2020 US$. Although active and passive screening have enabled more rapid diagnosis and accessible treatment in Mandoul, the addition of vector control provided good value-for-money (at less than $750/DALY averted) which substantially increased the probability of reaching the 2030 elimination target for gHAT as set by the World Health Organization. Our transmission modelling and economic evaluation suggest that the gains that have been made could be maintained by passive screening. Our analysis speaks to comparative efficiency, and it does not take into account all possible considerations; for instance, any cessation of ongoing active screening should first consider that substantial surveillance activities will be critical to verify the elimination of transmission and to protect against the possible importation of infection from neighbouring endemic foci.
Assuntos
Trypanosoma brucei brucei , Tripanossomíase Africana , Animais , Humanos , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Tripanossomíase Africana/epidemiologia , Tripanossomíase Africana/prevenção & controle , Chade/epidemiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Trypanosoma brucei gambienseRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Activities to control human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) in Guinea were severely hampered by the Ebola epidemic that hit this country between 2014 and 2016. Active screening was completely interrupted and passive screening could only be maintained in a few health facilities. At the end of the epidemic, medical interventions were progressively intensified to mitigate the risk of HAT resurgence and progress towards disease elimination. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the medical activities that were implemented in the three most endemic prefectures of Guinea (Boffa, Dubreka and Forecariah) between January 2016 and December 2018. Passive screening using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) was progressively resumed in one hundred and one health facilities, and active screening was intensified by visiting individual households and performing RDTs, and by conducting mass screening in villages by mobile teams using the Card Agglutination Test for Trypanosomiasis. A total of 1885, 4897 and 8023 clinical suspects were tested in passive, while 5743, 14442 and 21093 people were actively screened in 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively. The number of HAT cases that were diagnosed first went up from 107 in 2016 to 140 in 2017, then subsequently decreased to only 73 in 2018. A progressive decrease in disease prevalence was observed in the populations that were tested in active and in passive between 2016 and 2018. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Intensified medical interventions in the post-Ebola context first resulted in an increase in the number of HAT cases, confirming the fear that the disease could resurge as a result of impaired control activities during the Ebola epidemic. On the other hand, the decrease in disease prevalence that was observed between 2016 and 2018 is encouraging, as it suggests that the current strategy combining enhanced diagnosis, treatment and vector control is appropriate to progress towards elimination of HAT in Guinea.
Assuntos
Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Tripanossomíase Africana/epidemiologia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Guiné/epidemiologia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola , Humanos , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trypanosoma brucei gambiense/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense Human African Trypanosomiasis (rHAT) is a zoonotic disease transmitted by tsetse flies from wild and domestic animals. It presents as an acute disease and advances rapidly into a neurological form that can only be treated with melarsoprol, which is associated with a high fatality rate. Bringing diagnostic services for rHAT closer to at-risk populations would increase chances of detecting cases in early stages of disease when treatment is safer and more effective. In Malawi, most of the rHAT cases occur around Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve. Until 2013, diagnosis of rHAT in the region was only available at the Rumphi District Hospital that is more than 60 km away from the reserve. In 2013, Malawi's Ministry of Health initiated a project to enhance the detection of rHAT in five health facilities around Vwaza Marsh by upgrading laboratories and training technicians. We report here a retrospective study that was carried out to evaluate the impact of improving access to diagnostic services on the disease stage at diagnosis and on mortality. Between August 2014 and July 2017, 2014 patients suspected of having the disease were tested by microscopy, including 1267 who were tested in the new facilities. This resulted in the identification of 78 new rHAT cases, of which six died. Compared with previous years, data obtained during this period indicate that access to diagnostic services closer to where people at the greatest risk of infection live promotes identification of cases in earlier stages of infection, and improves treatment outcomes.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense , Tripanossomíase Africana , Animais , Diagnóstico Precoce , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Malaui/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense/isolamento & purificação , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Tripanossomíase Africana/mortalidade , ZoonosesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Malaria is endemic in all regions where gambiense or rhodesiense human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) is reported, and both diseases have similarities in their symptomatology. A combined test could be useful for both diseases and would facilitate integration of the screening for gambiense HAT (gHAT) and malaria diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate a combined prototype rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for gHAT and malaria. METHODS: Blood samples were collected in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and in Uganda to evaluate the performance of a prototype HAT/Malaria Combined RDT in comparison to an individual malaria RDT based on Plasmodium falciparum (P.f.) Histidine Rich Protein II (HRP-II or HRP2) antigen (SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f. RDT) for malaria detection and an individual gHAT RDT based on recombinant antigens, the SD BIOLINE HAT 2.0 RDT for HAT screening. Due to the current low prevalence of gHAT in endemic regions, the set of blood samples that were collected was used to evaluate the specificity of the RDTs for gHAT, and additional archived plasma samples were used to complete the evaluation of the HAT/Malaria Combined RDT in comparison to the HAT 2.0 RDT. RESULTS: Frozen whole blood samples from a total of 486 malaria cases and 239 non-malaria controls, as well as archived plasma samples from 246 gHAT positive and 246 gHAT negative individuals were tested. For malaria, the sensitivity and specificity of the malaria band in the HAT/Malaria Combined RDT were 96.9% (95% CI: 95.0-98.3) and 97.1% (95% CI: 94.1-98.8) respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the SD BIOLINE malaria Ag P.f. RDT were 97.3% (95% CI: 95.5-98.6) and 97.1% (95% CI: 94.1-98.8) respectively. For gHAT, using archived plasma samples, the sensitivity and specificity were respectively 89% (95% CI: 84.4-92.6) and 93.5% (95% CI: 89.7-96.2) with the HAT/Malaria Combined RDT, and 88.2% (95% CI: 83.5-92) and 94.7% (95% CI: 91.1-97.2) with the HAT 2.0 RDT. Using the whole blood samples that were collected during the study, the specificity of the HAT/Malaria Combined RDT for gHAT was 95.8% (95% CI: 94.3-97.0). CONCLUSION: The HAT/Malaria Combined prototype RDT was as accurate as the individual malaria or gHAT RDTs. The HAT/Malaria Combined prototype RDT is therefore suitable for both malaria diagnosis and gHAT screening. However, there is a need to assess its accuracy using fresh samples in prospective clinical trials.
Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Malária/diagnóstico , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antígenos de Protozoários/sangue , Antígenos de Protozoários/imunologia , República Democrática do Congo , Feminino , Humanos , Malária/sangue , Masculino , Plasmodium falciparum , Estudos Prospectivos , Proteínas de Protozoários/sangue , Proteínas de Protozoários/imunologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Trypanosoma brucei gambiense , Tripanossomíase Africana/sangue , Uganda , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and treatment are central elements of strategies to control Trypanosoma brucei gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (HAT). Serological screening is a key entry point in diagnostic algorithms. The Card Agglutination Test for Trypanosomiasis (CATT) has been the most widely used screening test for decades, despite a number of practical limitations that were partially addressed by the introduction of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). However, current RDTs are manufactured using native antigens, which are challenging to produce. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new RDT developed using recombinant antigens (SD BIOLINE HAT 2.0), in comparison with an RDT produced using native antigens (SD BIOLINE HAT) and CATT. A total of 57,632 individuals were screened in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, either passively at 10 health centres, or actively by 5 mobile teams, and 260 HAT cases were confirmed by parasitology. The highest sensitivity was achieved with the SD BIOLINE HAT 2.0 (71.2%), followed by CATT (62.5%) and the SD BIOLINE HAT (59.0%). The most specific test was CATT (99.2%), while the specificity of the SD BIOLINE HAT and SD BIOLINE HAT 2.0 were 98.9% and 98.1%, respectively. Sensitivity of the tests was lower than previously reported, as they identified cases from partially overlapping sub-populations. All three tests were significantly more sensitive in passive than in active screening. Combining two or three tests resulted in a markedly increased sensitivity: When the SD BIOLINE HAT was combined with the SD BIOLINE HAT 2.0, sensitivity reached 98.4% in passive and 83.0% in active screening. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The recombinant antigen-based RDT was more sensitive than, and as specific as, the SD BIOLINE HAT. It was as sensitive as, but slightly less specific than CATT. While the practicality and cost-effectiveness of algorithms including several screening tests would need to be investigated, using two or more tests appears to enhance sensitivity of diagnostic algorithms, although some decrease in specificity is observed as well.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/sangue , Antígenos de Protozoários/genética , Trypanosoma brucei gambiense/imunologia , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Algoritmos , Antígenos de Protozoários/imunologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , República Democrática do Congo , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Trypanosoma brucei gambiense/química , Tripanossomíase Africana/imunologia , Tripanossomíase Africana/parasitologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have proven to be advantageous in the diagnosis of leishmaniases, allowing sensitive diagnosis of: (i) cutaneous leishmaniasis in long duration lesions and (ii) visceral leishmaniasis using a less-invasive sample like peripheral blood, in opposition to tissue aspiration required for parasite demonstration by microscopy. Despite their benefits, the implementation of NAATs for leishmaniasis diagnosis at the point-of-care has not been achieved yet, mostly due to the complexity and logistical issues associated with PCR-based methods. METHODS: In this work, we have evaluated the performance of a ready-to-use loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) kit using two real time fluorimeters to amplify leishmanial DNA obtained by silica column-based and Boil & Spin protocols. RESULTS: The different approaches used to run and interpret the LAMP reactions showed a performance equivalent to PCR and real-time PCR, using spiked and clinical samples. The time to positivity obtained with real-time fluorimetry showed an excellent correlation with both Ct values and parasite load from real-time quantitative PCR. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained open the possibility of using a highly stable, ready-to-use LAMP kit for the accurate diagnosis of leishmaniasis at the point-of-care. Furthermore, the feasibility of relating time to positivity, determined with a portable real-time fluorimeter, with the parasite burden could have a wider application in the management of leishmaniasis, such as in treatment efficacy monitoring or as a pharmacodynamics tool in clinical trials.
Assuntos
Fluorometria/métodos , Leishmania/isolamento & purificação , Leishmaniose/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Colorimetria/métodos , Humanos , Leishmania/genética , Testes ImediatosRESUMO
New rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for screening human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) have been introduced as alternatives to the card agglutination test for trypanosomiasis (CATT). One brand of RDT, the SD BIOLINE HAT RDT has been shown to have lower specificity but higher sensitivity than CATT, so to make a rational choice between screening strategies, a cost-effectiveness analysis is a key element. In this paper we estimate the relative cost-effectiveness of CATT and the RDT when implemented in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Data on the epidemiological parameters and costs were collected as part of a larger study. These data were used to model three different diagnostic algorithms in mobile teams and fixed health facilities, and the relative cost-effectiveness was measured as the average cost per case diagnosed. In both fixed facilities and mobile teams, screening of participants using the SD BIOLINE HAT RDT followed by parasitological confirmation had a lower cost-effectiveness ratio than in algorithms using CATT. Algorithms using the RDT were cheaper by 112.54 (33.2%) and 88.54 (32.92%) US dollars per case diagnosed in mobile teams and fixed health facilities respectively, when compared with algorithms using CATT. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that these conclusions were robust to a number of assumptions, and that the results can be scaled to smaller or larger facilities, and a range of prevalences. The RDT was the most cost-effective screening test in all realistic scenarios and detected more cases than CATT. Thus, on this basis, the SD BIOLINE HAT RDT could be considered as the most cost-effective option for use in routine screening for HAT in the DRC.
Assuntos
Testes de Aglutinação/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Algoritmos , República Democrática do Congo/epidemiologia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/economia , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tripanossomíase Africana/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A clear understanding of the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of a particular community is necessary in order to improve control of human African trypanosomiasis (HAT).New screening and diagnostic tools and strategies were introduced into South Sudan, as part of integrated delivery of primary healthcare. Knowledge and awareness on HAT, its new/improved screening and diagnostic tools, the places and processes of getting a confirmatory diagnosis and treatment are crucial to the success of this strategy. METHODOLOGY: A KAP survey was carried out in Yei County, South Sudan, to identify gaps in community KAP and determine the preferred channels and sources of information on the disease. The cross-sectional KAP survey utilized questionnaires, complemented with key informant interviews and a focus group discussion to elicit communal as well as individual KAP on HAT. FINDINGS: Most (90%) of the respondents had general knowledge on HAT. Lower levels of education, gender and geographic locations without a history of HAT interventions were associated with incorrect knowledge and/or negative perceptions about the treatability of HAT. Symptoms appearing in the late stage were best known. A majority (97.2%) would seek treatment for HAT only in a health centre. However, qualitative data indicates that existing myths circulating in the popular imagination could influence people's practices. Seventy-one percent of the respondents said they would offer social support to patients with HAT but qualitative data highlights that stigma still exists. Misconceptions and stigma can negatively influence the health seeking behaviour of HAT cases. In relation to communication, the top preferred and effective source of communication was radio (24%). CONCLUSION: Gaps in relation to KAP on HAT still exist in the community. Perceptions on HAT, specifically myths and stigma, were key gaps that need to be bridged through effective education and communication strategies for HAT control alongside other interventions.
Assuntos
Gerenciamento Clínico , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Tripanossomíase Africana/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sudão do Sul , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Tripanossomíase Africana/tratamento farmacológico , Tripanossomíase Africana/prevenção & controle , Adulto JovemRESUMO
We carried out a study to compare the performance, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, of the new SD BIOLINE® HAT rapid diagnostic test (RDT) with the card agglutination test for trypanosomiasis (CATT) for diagnosis of human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Participants were enrolled actively by four mobile teams, and passively at four health facilities in three provinces. Consenting participants were tested concurrently with the RDT and CATT on whole blood. Those found positive by either test were tested with CATT on serial dilutions of plasma, and with a parasitological composite reference standard (CRS). Cases were only the individuals found positive by the CRS, while controls were negative by both CATT and RDT, as well as those that were positive by CATT or RDT, but were negative by the CRS, and had no history of HAT. Over five months, 131 cases and 13,527 controls were enrolled. The sensitivity of the RDT was 92.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 86.1-95.5), which was significantly higher than CATT (sensitivity 69.1%; 95% CI = 60.7-76.4). The sensitivity of CATT on plasma at a dilution of 1:8 was 59.0% (95% CI = 50.2-67.2). The specificity of the RDT was 97.1% (95% CIs = 96.8-97.4) while that of CATT was 98.0% (95% CIs = 97.8, 98.2) and specificities of algorithms involving CATT at 1:8 dilution were 99.6% (95% CI = 99.5-99.7). Reproducibility of results was excellent. We concluded that an algorithm in which the SD BIOLINE® HAT RDT is used for screening is optimal for case detection in both passive and active screening settings. However, the lower specificity of the RDT compared to that of CATT would result in a larger number of false positive individuals undergoing confirmatory testing.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , República Democrática do Congo , Humanos , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) in Uganda has been declining, from 198 cases in 2008, to only 20 in 2012. Interruption of transmission of the disease by early diagnosis and treatment is core to the control and eventual elimination of gHAT. Until recently, the format of available screening tests had restricted screening and diagnosis to central health facilities (passive screening). We describe a novel strategy that is contributing to elimination of gHAT in Uganda through expansion of passive screening to the entire population at risk. METHODOLOGY / PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this strategy, patients who are clinically suspected of having gHAT at primary health facilities are screened using a rapid diagnostic test (RDT), followed by parasitological confirmation at strategically located microscopy centres. For patients who are positive with the RDT and negative by microscopy, blood samples undergo further testing using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), a molecular test that detects parasite DNA. LAMP positive patients are considered strong suspects, and are re-evaluated by microscopy. Location and upgrading of facilities to perform microscopy and LAMP was informed by results of georeferencing and characterization of all public healthcare facilities in the 7 gHAT endemic districts in Uganda. Three facilities were upgraded to perform RDTs, microscopy and LAMP, 9 to perform RDTs and microscopy, and 200 to screen patients with RDTs. This reduced the distance that a sick person must travel to be screened for gHAT to a median distance of 2.5km compared to 23km previously. In this strategy, 9 gHAT cases were diagnosed in 2014, and 4 in 2015. CONCLUSIONS: This enhanced passive screening strategy for gHAT has enabled full coverage of the population at risk, and is being replicated in other gHAT endemic countries. The improvement in case detection is making elimination of the disease in Uganda an imminent possibility.
Assuntos
Tripanossomíase Africana/diagnóstico , Buffy Coat/parasitologia , DNA de Protozoário/metabolismo , Instalações de Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Microscopia , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico , Trypanosoma brucei gambiense/isolamento & purificação , Tripanossomíase Africana/epidemiologia , Tripanossomíase Africana/parasitologia , Uganda/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Serological tests for gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) detect antibodies to antigens on the cell surface of bloodstream trypanosomes. As trypanosomes that cause animal African trypanosomiasis (AAT) also express related antigens, we have evaluated two rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) on cattle in trypanosomiasis endemic and non-endemic regions, to determine whether gHAT serological tests could also be used to screen for AAT. METHODS: Two RDTs, 1G RDT, made with native antigens, and p2G RDT, made with recombinant antigens, were tested on 121 cattle in a trypanosomiasis-free region, and on 312 cattle from a rhodesiense HAT and AAT endemic region. A subset of samples from the endemic region were also tested with two immune trypanolysis (TL) tests. The sensitivity of the tests was estimated by evaluating the result of the RDT on samples that were positive by both microscopy and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) PCR, whilst specificity was the result of the RDT on samples that were negative by ITS PCR and microscopy, and others from the non-endemic region. RESULTS: The specificity of the p2G RDT on cattle from the non-endemic region was 97.5% (95% CI: 93.0-99.2%), compared to only 57.9% (95% CI: 48.9-66.3%) for 1G RDT. The specificities of 1G RDT, p2G RDT and TL on endemic control cattle were 14.6% (95% CI: 9.7-21.5%), 22.6% (95% CI: 16.4-30.3%) and 68.3% (95% CI: 59.6-75.9%), respectively. The sensitivities of the tests on trypanosome positive samples were 85.1% (95% CI: 79.1-89.7%), 89.1% (95% CI: 83.7-93.0%) and 59.3% (95% CI: 51.8-66.4%), respectively. Among the same samples, 51.7% were positive by both TL and the 1G RDT. CONCLUSIONS: These serological tests detect cross-reacting antibodies in cattle. The p2G RDT based on recombinant antigens had a high specificity in a non-endemic region, while the 1G RDT had a lower specificity, suggesting cross-reactivity with other pathogens.