L-type prostaglandin D synthase regulates the trafficking of the PGD2 DP1 receptor by interacting with the GTPase Rab4.

Accumulating evidence indicates that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) interact with Rab GTPases during their intracellular trafficking. How GPCRs recruit and activate the Rabs is unclear. Here, we report that depletion of endogenous L-type prostaglandin D synthase (L-PGDS) in HeLa cells inhibited recycling of the prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) DP1 receptor (DP1) to the cell surface after agonist-induced internalization and that L-PGDS overexpression had the opposite effect. Depletion of endogenous Rab4 prevented l-PGDS-mediated recycling of DP1, and l-PGDS depletion inhibited Rab4-dependent recycling of DP1, indicating that both proteins are mutually involved in this pathway. DP1 stimulation promoted its interaction through its intracellular C terminus with Rab4, which was increased by l-PGDS. Confocal microscopy revealed that DP1 activation induces l-PGDS/Rab4 co-localization. l-PGDS/Rab4 and DP1/Rab4 co-immunoprecipitation levels were increased by DP1 agonist treatment. Pulldown assays with purified GST-l-PGDS and His6-Rab4 indicated that both proteins interact directly. l-PGDS interacted preferentially with the inactive, GDP-locked Rab4S22N variant rather than with WT Rab4 or with constitutively active Rab4Q67L proteins. Overexpression and depletion experiments disclosed that l-PGDS partakes in Rab4 activation following DP1 stimulation. Experiments with deletion mutants and synthetic peptides revealed that amino acids 85-92 in l-PGDS are involved in its interaction with Rab4 and in its effect on DP1 recycling. Of note, GTPγS loading and time-resolved FRET assays with purified proteins suggested that l-PGDS enhances GDP-GTP exchange on Rab4. Our results reveal how l-PGDS, which produces the agonist for DP1, regulates DP1 recycling by participating in Rab4 recruitment and activation.

Identification of the interactome of the DP1 receptor for Prostaglandin D2: Regulation of DP1 receptor signaling and trafficking by IQGAP1.

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms governing localization, trafficking and signaling of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are critical in cell function. Protein-protein interactions are determinant in these processes. However, there are very little interacting proteins known to date for the DP1 receptor for prostaglandin D2. METHODS: We performed LC-MS/MS analyses of the DP1 receptor interactome in HEK293 cells. To functionally validate our LC-MS/MS data, we studied the implications of the interaction with the IQGAP1 scaffold protein in the trafficking and signaling of DP1. RESULTS: In addition to expected interacting proteins such as heterotrimeric G protein subunits, we identified proteins involved in signaling, trafficking, and folding localized in various cell compartments. Endogenous DP1-IQGAP1 co-immunoprecipitation was observed in colon cancer HT-29 cells. The interaction was augmented by DP1 agonist activation in HEK293 cells and GST-pulldown assays showed that IQGAP1 binds to intracellular loops 2 and 3 of DP1. Co-localization of the two proteins was observed by confocal microscopy at the cell periphery and in intracellular vesicles in the basal state. PGD2 treatment resulted in the redistribution of the DP1-IQGAP1 co-localization in the perinuclear vicinity. DP1 receptor internalization was promoted by overexpression of IQGAP1, while it was diminished by IQGAP1 knockdown with DsiRNAs. DP1-mediated ERK1/2 activation was augmented and sustained overtime by overexpression of IQGAP1 when compared to DP1 expressed alone. IQGAP1 knockdown decreased ERK1/2 activation by DP1 stimulation. Interestingly, ERK1/2 signaling by DP1 was increased when IQGAP2 was silenced, while it was impaired by IQGAP3 knockdown. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings define the putative DP1 interactome, a patho-physiologically important receptor, and validated the interaction with IQGAP1 in DP1 function. Our data also reveal that IQGAP proteins may differentially regulate GPCR signaling. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: The identified putative DP1-interacting proteins open multiple lines of research in DP1 and GPCR biology in various cell compartments.

GGA3 interacts with L-type prostaglandin D synthase and regulates the recycling and signaling of the DP1 receptor for prostaglandin D2 in a Rab4-dependent mechanism.

Mechanisms controlling the recycling of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remain largely unclear. We report that GGA3 (Golgi-associated, γ adaptin ear containing, ADP-ribosylation factor-binding protein 3) regulates the recycling and signaling of the PGD2 receptor DP1 through a new mechanism. An endogenous interaction between DP1 and GGA3 was detected by co-immunoprecipitation in HeLa cells. The interaction was promoted by DP1 agonist stimulation, which was supported by increased DP1-GGA3 colocalization in confocal microscopy. Pulldown assays showed that GGA3 interacts with the intracellular loop 2 and C-terminus of DP1, whereas the receptor interacts with the VHS domain of GGA3. The Arf-binding deficient GGA3 N194A mutant had the same effect as wild-type GGA3 on DP1 trafficking, suggesting a new mechanism for GGA3 in recycling. Depletion of Rab4 inhibited the GGA3 effect on DP1 recycling, revealing a Rab4-dependent mechanism. Interestingly, depletion of L-PGDS (L-type prostaglandin synthase, the enzyme that produces the agonist for DP1) impaired the ability of GGA3 to mediate DP1 recycling, while GGA3 knockdown prevented L-PGDS from promoting DP1 recycling, indicating that both proteins function interdependently. A novel interaction was observed between co-immunoprecipitated endogenous L-PGDS and GGA3 proteins in HeLa cells, and in vitro using purified recombinant proteins. Redistribution of L-PGDS towards GGA3- and Rab4-positive vesicles was induced by DP1 activation. Silencing of GGA3 inhibited ERK1/2 activation following DP1 stimulation. Altogether, our data reveal a novel function for GGA3, in a newly described association with L-PGDS, in the recycling and signaling of a GPCR, namely DP1.

Characterization of the interaction between the prostaglandin D2 DP1 receptor and the intracellular L-prostaglandin D synthase.

Identification of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-interacting proteins is an intense subject of current research. However, confirmation and characterization of identified interactions can be difficult with GPCRs, especially at the endogenous level. Here, we describe how we characterized the interaction between the prostaglandin D2 DP1 receptor and the intracellular L-type prostaglandin D synthase by in vitro pull-down assays using purified recombinant GST- and His-tagged proteins, by co-immunoprecipitation of overexpressed Flag- and HA-tagged proteins, and by co-immunoprecipitation of endogenous proteins.

A G protein-coupled receptor and the intracellular synthase of its agonist functionally cooperate.

Export of newly synthesized G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remains poorly characterized. We show in this paper that lipocalin-type prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) synthase (L-PGDS) interacts intracellularly with the GPCR DP1 in an agonist-independent manner. L-PGDS promotes cell surface expression of DP1, but not of other GPCRs, in HEK293 and HeLa cells, independent of L-PGDS enzyme activity. In addition, formation of a DP1-Hsp90 complex necessary for DP1 export to the cell surface is dependent on the interaction between L-PGDS and the C-terminal MEEVD residues of Hsp90. Surprisingly, PGD2 synthesis by L-PGDS is promoted by coexpression of DP1, suggesting a possible intracrine/autocrine signaling mechanism. In this regard, L-PGDS increases the formation of a DP1-ERK1/2 complex and increases DP1-mediated ERK1/2 signaling. Our findings define a novel cooperative mechanism in which a GPCR (DP1) promotes the activity of the enzyme (L-PGDS) that produces its agonist (PGD2) and in which this enzyme in turn acts as a cofactor (of Hsp90) to promote export and agonist-dependent activity of the receptor.

Novel, gel-free proteomics approach identifies RNF5 and JAMP as modulators of GPCR stability.

The maturation and folding of G protein-coupled receptors are governed by mechanisms that remain poorly understood. In an effort to characterize these biological events, we optimized a novel, gel-free proteomic approach to identify partners of the ß2-adrenergic receptor (ß2AR). In addition to a number of known interacting proteins such as heterotrimeric G protein subunits, this allowed us to identify proteins involved in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) QC of the receptor. Among ß2AR-associated proteins is Ring finger protein 5 (RNF5), an E3 ubiquitin ligase anchored to the outer membrane of the ER. Coimmunoprecipitation assays confirmed, in a cellular context, the interaction between RNF5 and the ß2AR as well as the prostaglandin D2 receptor (DP). Confocal microscopy revealed that DP colocalized with RNF5 at the ER. Coexpression of RNF5 with either receptor increased levels of their expression, whereas small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of endogenous RNF5 promoted the opposite. RNF5 did not modulate the ubiquitination state of ß2AR or DP. Instead, RNF5 ubiquitinated JNK-associated membrane protein (JAMP), a protein that recruits the proteasome to the ER membrane and that is negatively regulated by RNF5-mediated ubiquitination. JAMP coimmunoprecipitated with both ß2AR and DP and decreased total receptor protein levels through proteasomal degradation. Expression of DP, a receptor largely retained in the ER, promoted proteasome recruitment by JAMP. Degradation of both receptors via JAMP was increased when RNF5 was depleted. Our data suggest that RNF5 regulates the turnover of specific G protein-coupled receptors by ubiquitinating JAMP and preventing proteasome recruitment.