The data project: a shared approach between stakeholders of the healthcare system in definition of a therapeutic algorithm for inflammatory arthritis.

Rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases or RMD [rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA)] are systemic inflammatory diseases for which there are no biomarkers capable of predicting treatments with a higher likelihood of response in naive patients. In addition, the expiration of the anti-TNF blocking drugs' patents has resulted in the availability of anti-TNF biosimilar drugs with the same efficacy and safety than originators but at significantly reduced prices. To guarantee a personalized therapeutic approach to RMD treatment, a board of rheumatologists and stakeholders from the Campania region, Italy, developed a clinically applicable arthritis therapeutic algorithm to guide rheumatologists (DATA project). The general methodology relied on a Delphi technique forecast to produce a set of statements that summarized the experts' consensus. Selected clinical scenarios were discussed in light of the available evidence, and there were two rounds of voting on the therapeutic approaches. Separate discussions were held regarding rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. The decision-making factors for each disease were clinical presentation, demographics, and comorbidities. In this paper, we describe a virtuous process between rheumatologists and healthcare system stakeholders that resulted in the development of a shared therapeutic algorithm for RMD patients naive to bDMARDs.

Subclinical atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica: a pilot study.

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate endothelial function in treatment-naïve polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) patients and its modification during steroid therapy, in relation to changes in clinical and laboratory parameters.Method: This prospective observational study involved patients with a new diagnosis of PMR according to provisional American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism 2012 criteria, who were naïve to steroid therapy, and control subjects matched for age, gender, and comorbidities. All participants underwent clinical and vascular ultrasound evaluations at baseline and after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of steroid therapy. For the study of endothelial function, we evaluated the brachial artery reactivity, which has emerged as the most well-established technique used in adults, by assessing flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), which measures the endothelium-dependent vasodilatation.Results: Sixteen newly diagnosed PMR patients were compared with a population of 16 matched controls. FMD values in all subjects showed an inverse correlation with the values of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein. At baseline, the FMD of PMR patients was significantly lower than controls and remained significantly lower with respect to controls until the sixth month of therapy, despite a clinical improvement already being evident after 1 month of therapy.Conclusions: PMR is characterized by an important chronic subclinical inflammatory component. This pilot study demonstrates that affected patients show endothelial dysfunction that slowly responds to steroid therapy. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical relevance of these observations and, in particular, to monitor the cardiovascular risk profile of PMR patients.

Biologics for psoriatic arthritis: network meta-analysis in review.

OBJECTIVE: A review of network meta-analysis to assess efficacy and safety of biologics for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on electronic databases to identify Bayesian meta-analysis reporting clinical parameters of efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of biologics that are approved for the treatment of PsA patients. RESULTS: We identified 19 studies and included them for review. There is insufficient statistical evidence to demonstrate clear differences in effectiveness between available biologic agents for PsA due to many differences in methods and clinical parameters reported in the studies. Old biologics are reported to be safe. CONCLUSIONS: New molecules approved for the treatment of PsA appear promising treatments but further comparative studies methodologically well-conducted are necessary. It is also necessary to follow strictly international recommendations to conduct NMA to better help physicians and decision-makers in making appropriate decisions.