Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Afr J Reprod Health ; 27(6): 70-76, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37715676

RESUMO

We investigated condom use at last sexual intercourse among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) to determine the prevalence and correlates of condom use pre- and post-COVID-19 lockdown. Condom use was compared pre- and post-COVID-19 lockdown using a single group interrupted time series analysis. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to determine the correlates of condom use at last sexual intercourse. We found a statistically significant decrease in prevalence of condom use at last sexual intercourse post-COVID-19 lockdown. Condom use at last sexual intercourse was associated with younger age, current contraceptive use, and higher education. AGYW in concurrent relationships were less likely to use condoms, as were owners of mobile phones. These findings suggest a disconnect between youth knowledge of HIV prevention and their actual condom use, particularly in concurrent sexual partnerships. Future research should explore how dynamic fertility intentions, mobile phone access, concurrent sexual partnerships and empowerment influence condom use among sub-Saharan AGYW.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Coito , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Preservativos , Prevalência , Quênia/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis
2.
Lancet HIV ; 11(8): e522-e530, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976993

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adherence challenges with oral tenofovir-based pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are common. We developed a point-of-care assay to objectively assess tenofovir in urine and conducted a pilot trial examining the impact of counselling informed by use of this urine assay on long-term PrEP adherence. METHODS: This randomised trial enrolled women not in serodiscordant partnerships 3 months after PrEP initiation at the Kenya Medical Research Institute to compare standard-of-care adherence counselling versus counselling informed by the urine assay (urine-test counselling group) every 3 months for 12 months. In the standard of care group, urine samples were stored and tested at study end without participant feedback. Here we report the adherence primary outcome of hair concentrations of tenofovir at 12 months as a long-term metric (undetectable levels defined long-term non-adherence), as well as urine concentrations of tenofovir at each visit as a short-term adherence metric and acceptability of the assay assessed by quantitative surveys. Data were analysed by randomisation group. This completed trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03935464). FINDINGS: From March 17, 2021 to Jan 18, 2022 we enrolled 49 women in the urine-test counselling group and 51 in the standard of care group; retention was 86 (86%) of 100. Nine (21%) of 42 in the urine-test counselling group had hair samples at 12 months with tenofovir concentrations below the limit of quantification compared with 15 (37%) of 41 in the standard of care group. The relative odds of long-term non-adherence in the standard of care group compared with urine-test counselling were 3·53 (95% CI 1·03-12·03; p=0·044). Pre-intervention, urine tenofovir was detectable in 65% in the urine-test counselling group and 71% in the standard of care group (p=0·68). At 12 months, 31 (72%) of 43 in the intervention group had detectable urine tenofovir compared with 19 (45%) of 42 in the standard of care group (p=0·0015). 40 (93%) of 43 participants liked the test very much and only one disliked the test. One participant in the standard of care group was withdrawn at the 6-month visit due to HIV seroconversion. INTERPRETATION: A low-cost urine tenofovir assay to inform PrEP counselling resulted in improvement in both short-term and long-term metrics of adherence. This urine tenofovir assay could help to improve long-term PrEP adherence. FUNDING: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and National Institutes of Health.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV , Infecções por HIV , Adesão à Medicação , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Tenofovir , Humanos , Feminino , Tenofovir/urina , Tenofovir/uso terapêutico , Tenofovir/administração & dosagem , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/métodos , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Quênia , Projetos Piloto , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Aconselhamento/métodos , Cabelo/química , Adulto Jovem , Testes Imediatos
3.
Nat Med ; 29(12): 3224-3232, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38049621

RESUMO

Cervical cancer burden is high where prophylactic vaccination and screening coverage are low. We demonstrated in a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled trial that single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination had high vaccine efficacy (VE) against persistent infection at 18 months in Kenyan women. Here, we report findings of this trial through 3 years of follow-up. Overall, 2,275 healthy women aged 15-20 years were recruited and randomly assigned to receive bivalent (n = 760), nonavalent (n = 758) or control (n = 757) vaccine. The primary outcome was incident-persistent vaccine type-specific cervical HPV infection. The primary evaluation was superiority analysis in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) HPV 16/18 and HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58 cohorts. The trial met its prespecified end points of vaccine type-specific persistent HPV infection. A total of 75 incident-persistent infections were detected in the HPV 16/18 mITT cohort: 2 in the bivalent group, 1 in the nonavalent group and 72 in the control group. Nonavalent VE was 98.8% (95% CI 91.3-99.8%, P < 0.0001) and bivalent VE was 97.5% (95% CI 90.0-99.4%, P < 0.0001). Overall, 89 persistent infections were detected in the HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58 mITT cohort: 5 in the nonavalent group and 84 in the control group; nonavalent VE was 95.5% (95% CI 89.0-98.2%, P < 0.0001). There were no vaccine-related severe adverse events. Three years after vaccination, single-dose HPV vaccination was highly efficacious, safe and conferred durable protection. ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT03675256 .


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Papillomavirus Humano 16 , Papillomavirus Humano 18 , Quênia/epidemiologia , Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Infecção Persistente , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/métodos , Método Duplo-Cego
4.
NEJM Evid ; 1(5): EVIDoa2100056, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35693874

RESUMO

Background: Single-dose HPV vaccination, if efficacious, would be tremendously advantageous; simplifying implementation and decreasing costs. Methods: We performed a randomized, multi-center, double-blind, controlled trial of single-dose nonavalent (HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58/6/11) or bivalent (HPV 16/18) HPV vaccination compared to meningococcal vaccination among Kenyan women aged 15-20 years. Enrollment and six monthly cervical swabs and a month three vaginal swab were tested for HPV DNA. Enrollment sera were tested for HPV antibodies. The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) cohort comprised participants who tested HPV antibody negative at enrollment and HPV DNA negative at enrollment and month three. The primary outcome was incident persistent vaccine-type HPV infection by month 18. Results: Between December 2018 and June 2021, 2,275 women were randomly assigned and followed; 758 received the nonavalent HPV vaccine, 760 the bivalent HPV vaccine, and 757 the meningococcal vaccine; retention was 98%. Thirty-eight incident persistent infections were detected in the HPV 16/18 mITT cohort: one each among participants assigned to the bivalent and nonavalent groups and 36 among those assigned to the meningococcal group; nonavalent Vaccine Efficacy (VE) was 97.5% (95%CI 81.7-99.7%, p=<0.0001), and bivalent VE was 97.5% (95%CI 81.6-99.7%, p=<0.0001). Thirty-three incident persistent infections were detected in the HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58 mITT cohort: four in the nonavalent group and 29 in the meningococcal group; nonavalent VE for HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58 was 88.9% (95%CI 68.5-96.1%, p<0.0001). The rate of SAEs was 4.5-5.2% by group. Conclusions: Over the 18 month time-frame we studied, single-dose bivalent and nonavalent HPV vaccines were each highly effective in preventing incident persistent oncogenic HPV infection, similar to multidose regimens.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA